logo
To conceal secret projects, US military has misled officers on UFOs: Report

To conceal secret projects, US military has misled officers on UFOs: Report

First Post09-06-2025
For decades, the US military misled the public and even its own officers with myths of alien UFOs to hide the truth about top-secret military programmes, such as the development of stealth fighters, according to an investigation. read more
In what makes separating facts from fiction difficult, it has now emerged that the US military misled the public and even its own personnel about unidentified flying objects (UFOs) for decades.
The revelation has come at a time when the issue of UFOs, now formally called unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), has generated great interest in recent years, including of lawmakers who have held hearings on the subjects.
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) of the US Department of Defense (DoD) has found that the US military misled the public and its own personnel, including officers, with myths of UFOs to hide actual top-secret projects, according to Wall Street Journal.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In recent years, several stories about UFOs have gained widespread attention, such as stories about Area 51 military base, the story of orb-like UFOs that US military pilots have spotted, and mysterious sightings around military bases. The issue has also become politicised as far-right Republicans have accused the purported 'deep state' of hiding UFO-related truth from public and even the government.
Aliens? No, just government disinformation!
The truth, it has emerged, has been much banal.
The Journal has reported that many popular stories about UFOs, that grew into a whole lore over decades, were planted by the US military to keep top-secret military programmes under wraps.
For example, in 1980s, a US Air Force colonel gave photos of what were dubbed as flying saucers to a pub-owner near the Area 51 base who then put those up in the pub. That led to the development of the lore about alien UFOs at Area 51. In reality, the doctored photographs were intentionally planted to create the myth of alien UFOs to hide the fact that the US government was developing top-secret fighter planes Area 51.
The alien UFO lore meant that whenever someone saw a strange aircraft in the area, it was believed to be an alien aircraft and dismissed as a rumour. In reality, those alien UFOs were stealth fighters under development!
The report said that a host of soldiers and officers were told that they were part of projects involving aliens and were made to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). This meant that even many people within the government thought they were working in alien-related programmes when they were not!
On another occasion, the US government conducted a secret test involving electromagnetic pulse to test the security of one of its nuclear missile installations. But the senior leadership never told personnel stationed at the base about the test. This meant that personnel stationed at the base came under the false impression that their base came under an alien attack. Their impression and distrust of the government has lasted to this day.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jay Leno slams partisan late-night comedy amid Stephen Colbert fallout: ‘Why alienate half the audience?'
Jay Leno slams partisan late-night comedy amid Stephen Colbert fallout: ‘Why alienate half the audience?'

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Jay Leno slams partisan late-night comedy amid Stephen Colbert fallout: ‘Why alienate half the audience?'

Jay Leno, former host of NBC's The Tonight Show, is speaking out about what he sees as a concerning shift in late-night comedy: one where partisanship has replaced universal humor, and political alignment threatens to divide audiences, according to Variety. Jay Leno said late-night hosts are 'alienating' half the audience by taking sides politically.(AP) In a recent interview with David Trulio, president of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute, Jay Leno lamented how modern late-night comedians 'cozy up to one side' and alienate half their viewership. He emphasized the importance of comedy as a unifying escape. He was quoted in the Variety report saying, 'People come to a comedy show to get away from things. Why shoot for just half an audience all the time?' Also read: David Letterman blasts CBS and Paramount for canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert: 'Pure cowardice' Jay Leno on keeping it balanced Leno, who hosted The Tonight Show from 1992 to 2009, and again from 2010 to 2014, was known for keeping his political jokes balanced. Referencing a 2009 George Mason University study, Trulio noted Leno's jokes were nearly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans. Leno quipped that he got hate mail from both sides over the same joke and added, 'That's how you know you're doing it right.' He further recalled that he never discussed politics with longtime friend Rodney Dangerfield, reinforcing his belief that 'funny is funny' no matter which side one is on. When asked what advice he would give to today's comedians, Leno warned them against becoming mouthpieces for any political group. Jay added that the audience does not want to hear a lecture and said, 'Just do what is funny. Get to the joke as quickly as possible.' Leno stressed that building an inclusive audience matters more than appeasing a political base, and added, 'Why alienate one particular group? I like to bring people into the big picture.' Also read: Trey Parker humorously apologizes to Trump after WH anger over South Park's controversial episode; 'We're terribly…' Stephen Colbert-CBS controversy and fallout Leno's remarks come just as CBS announced the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert has stirred up a controversy. While CBS insists the decision was purely financial, critics, including David Letterman, slammed the move as politically motivated. Tensions escalated after the network settled a $16 million lawsuit with Donald Trump, who openly celebrated Colbert's ouster, the Variety report added. Stephen Colbert responded to Trump with an expletive-laced rebuke on air. Meanwhile, several top comedians and other late-night show anchors like Jon Stewart, John Oliver, Jimmy Fallon, and Seth Meyers rallied behind Colbert. Stewart and Oliver, former Daily Show colleagues, joined his recent taping as well. FAQs Why does Jay Leno think late-night comedy has become too political? Leno believes modern late-night shows often take sides politically, which alienates half the audience and undermines the universal appeal of comedy. Was Jay Leno politically neutral on The Tonight Show? Yes. A study showed he made fun of both Democrats and Republicans nearly equally, and he prided himself on receiving complaints from both sides. Did Leno comment on Stephen Colbert's show cancellation? Leno did not directly address Colbert's exit, but his comments come amid controversy surrounding CBS's decision, which many believe is politically charged. What did Colbert say after Trump celebrated his show's cancellation? Colbert responded on-air, telling Trump to 'Go f--- yourself,' escalating tensions around the show's ending.

Centre procures 1L tonnes of onions so far for buffer stock
Centre procures 1L tonnes of onions so far for buffer stock

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Centre procures 1L tonnes of onions so far for buffer stock

Nashik: Central govt has procured around 1.07 lakh tonnes of onions so far through its two central agencies: the National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd (Nafed) and the National Cooperative Consumers' Federation of India Limited (NCCF). This was to create a buffer stock under the price stability funds. As many as 1.06 lakh tonnes of summer onions were procured in Maharashtra alone, stated the minister of state for agriculture and farmers welfare, Ram Nath Thakur, in a written reply to questions raised by the MP from Dindori parliamentary constituency, Bhaskar Bhagare, and other MPs during the ongoing parliamentary session. Thakur said, "The ministry of consumer affairs are procuring onions, which has set the total procurement target of 3 lakh tonnes of summer onions through the Nafed and NCCF. Each agency will procure 1.5 lakh tonnes." As per the Second Advance Estimates for 2024-25, area estimates of onion in the state of Maharashtra are 9.78 lakh hectares, compared to 6.67 lakh hectares in 2023-24, This was an increase of 46%. The All-India Wholesale Price Index (WPI) for onion was reported as 279.2 for June 2024 and 185.7 for June 2025, registering a rate of inflation of 33.49%, stated the minister in a written reply. The central govt undertakes onion procurement annually to create a buffer stock. This measure aims to manage the supply of the onions, particularly during potential scarcity periods that typically occur around Aug-Sept each year.

A new front in Trump's clash with the judiciary: Appointing prosecutors
A new front in Trump's clash with the judiciary: Appointing prosecutors

Mint

time11 hours ago

  • Mint

A new front in Trump's clash with the judiciary: Appointing prosecutors

President Trump's administration has opened a new front in its widening battle with the judiciary, sparring with federal courts over his picks to lead U.S. attorney's offices around the country. Trump has submitted more than 30 U.S. attorney nominations to the Senate. Because of a rift between Republicans and Democrats, lawmakers haven't confirmed any of them. That has put federal judges in the hot seat because the law requires them to appoint lead district prosecutors if Congress doesn't. The president's picks can serve for 120 days in an interim capacity. Once the clock ticks down, the courts must decide if his nominees can stay. Twice already, the answer has been no, prompting the administration to circumvent those decisions. The biggest flashpoint has been Trump's former personal lawyer, Alina Habba, who was nominated to be U.S. attorney in New Jersey. She had been serving in an interim capacity since late March, but the state's federal district judges last week declined to install her, appointing her top assistant—a career prosecutor, Desiree Grace—instead. Hours later, Grace was fired by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. The White House has since withdrawn Habba's nomination and reinstated her in a new acting capacity, to reset the time limits. 'I am now the Acting United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey," Habba wrote on X. 'I don't cower to pressure. I don't answer to politics." Her office has been thrown into disarray, with some prosecutors fearing grand-jury indictments and plea deals could be challenged by defense attorneys over questions about Habba's status, said people familiar with the matter. It couldn't be determined whether Grace would go quietly. 'I'm prepared to follow that Order and begin to serve in accordance with the law," she wrote in a LinkedIn message after she was fired. She didn't respond to a request for comment. Bill Essayli, interim U.S. attorney, speaking in June on the Palm Springs, Calif., fertility-clinic bombing. Other fights are brewing. In Los Angeles, Bill Essayli, interim U.S. attorney, said his soon-to-expire appointment is unlikely to be extended by judges. Essayli is an outspoken Trump supporter who made waves trying to prosecute people who violently protested against immigration enforcement. Several prosecutors in Essayli's office resigned in May after he proposed a misdemeanor plea deal to a sheriff's deputy who had been convicted by a jury of a felony charge of using excessive force. Essayli said last week on Glenn Beck's radio program that he was 'up against very hostile judges" in Southern California and didn't expect to get their support. The Trump administration has 'tricks up our sleeves" to help the president get 'his prosecutors in place," he said. Legal scholars and former federal judges said the recent clashes tie into Trump's push to assert executive power over another branch of government by disparaging judicial decisions and slow-walking compliance with court orders. 'I think that's part of his war on the judiciary," said Shira Scheindlin, a former federal judge. 'Who is ultimately in charge? Me, not you." Each district has its own practices and culture for voting on whether to ratify an interim U.S. attorney. Typically judges examine a candidate's qualifications such as previous service as a prosecutor. They also consider whether the U.S. attorney's office is running well, including whether assistant U.S. attorneys are exiting the office in high numbers. 'They want somebody that they can trust who wouldn't use the position as a political bullhorn or for carrying out the administration's broader political agenda," said Jeremy Fogel, a former federal judge and the executive director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute. The votes can lead to spirited conversations between judges, with some working behind the scenes to whip up support. The Justice Department declined to comment about the clashes. In a social-media post last week after the New Jersey judges voted against Habba, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said, 'Alina is President Trump's choice to lead—and no partisan bench can override that." Senate Democrats have blocked the nominees from easily clearing the chamber, saying Republicans did something similar during the Biden administration. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) has put a hold on Justice Department nominees in protest of Trump's acceptance of a luxury airplane from the Qatari government. A dozen of Trump's U.S. attorney picks have passed through the first stage of confirmation by clearing the Senate Judiciary Committee. On Thursday, one of them was Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host picked after an earlier nominee, Ed Martin, lacked support among Republicans to win confirmation. Republican and Democratic staff members on the Judiciary Committee are now engaged in talks to break the logjam, according to people familiar with the matter. Among others facing potential votes from judges in the coming weeks is Jay Clayton, the interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York who took office about two months after an acting U.S. attorney resigned in protest over the Justice Department's order to dismiss the bribery case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. More recently, the department's firing of career prosecutor Maurene Comey angered her colleagues and Southern District office alums, leading some to question whether Clayton had made efforts to stop it. Clayton has made an effort to talk to judges, and some have asked him tough questions, including about the Adams case, said people familiar with the matter. Such meetings are typical. An office spokesman declined to comment. In northern New York, federal judges declined to appoint John Sarcone, Trump's interim pick for the job there—but didn't choose an alternative to take his place. In an unusual workaround, Bondi essentially gave Sarcone his job back through a series of maneuvers, including naming him as 'special attorney to the attorney general." Stephen Saltzburg, a George Washington University law professor and former Justice Department official, said the selection process has worked smoothly in the past because previous presidents moved on to a new candidate when their picks weren't approved by a court or confirmed by the Senate. The law doesn't address the scenario playing out with Habba, he said. 'We are dealing with issues we never dealt with before," he said. Write to James Fanelli at Dave Michaels at and Corinne Ramey at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store