Six private healthcare groups warn 8pc rental SST may cripple clinics, pharmacies
In a joint statement, the coalition urged the government to exempt healthcare providers from the tax, saying it disproportionately affects small and independent practices already struggling with controlled consultation fees and rising overheads.
"Rental is among the largest fixed costs for clinics, pharmacies and health facilities. The imposition of the 8 per cent SST on commercial rent continues to place a significant and disproportionate financial burden on private healthcare providers," the statement read.
The signatories to the statement were the Malaysian Medical Association, Pertubuhan Doktor-Doktor Islam Malaysia, Medical Practitioners Coalition Association of Malaysia, Malaysian Association for Advancement of Functional & Interdisciplinary Medicine, Private Physiotherapy Clinics Owners Association of Malaysia, and the Malaysian Community Pharmacy Guild.
The groups also raised the alarm over the looming increase in electricity tariffs, set to take effect tomorrow, saying it would further erode the financial viability of practices already grappling with controlled fees and rising overheads.
"Consultation fees for general practitioners have been regulated and unchanged for the past 30 years under the Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act. Providers have little room to absorb or pass on rising costs," they said.
The coalition criticised the assumption that exceeding the RM1 million annual revenue threshold automatically indicates high profitability.
"Providers often surpass this figure because of the essential and continuous nature of services, not because of large profit margins."
They warned that without intervention, the combination of rental SST and increased utility costs could trigger a wave of downsizing, job losses, or outright closures, especially among small healthcare practices.
"These closures would not only limit access to care in the private sector but also put pressure on the already overstretched public health system."
The statement added that such cost pressures were contrary to the goals of the National Medicines Policy, which aims to ensure all Malaysians have access to affordable, quality care.
The coalition also took issue with the 6 per cent SST on private healthcare services provided to foreign patients, particularly low-income migrant workers in 3D (dirty, dangerous, and difficult) jobs.
"These patients rely on GP clinics for affordable, essential care. Taxing these services raises serious humanitarian and public health concerns."
They said while they welcomed efforts to revise the SST framework, the reforms did not go far enough to protect both healthcare providers and the communities they served.
"We urge the government to exempt healthcare providers from the 8 per cent SST on rental and reconsider the application of SST on services in the primary care sector," it added.
On June 27, the government announced a revision to the SST framework, following extensive feedback from the public and engagement with industry stakeholders on the proposed expansion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
10 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Taxing fruits while fighting obesity feels like a bitter pill to swallow
AS Malaysia rolls out its revised Sales and Service Tax (SST) on imported fruits starting today, the irony is hard to miss. While the nation battles rising obesity rates and a diabetes crisis, the price of one of the easiest and healthiest solutions just went up. You really have to pause and wonder: what exactly are we doing? The Malaysian government officially implemented the revised five per cent SST on imported goods and yes, that includes imported fruits. However, apples and oranges were eventually excluded after public response, despite initially being on the list. They were described as 'the people's fruit,' which led the government to reconsider and grant an exemption. Meanwhile, local fruits like bananas, pineapples, rambutans, longan and jackfruit are exempted, a move that supposedly encourages people to support local agriculture and raise national revenue. As Malaysia enforces its revised SST on imported fruits today, the irony is clear—fruit prices are rising just as the nation faces growing obesity and diabetes crises. Photo: Edited via Canva Fair enough, on the surface. But dig a little deeper and it is hard not to be sceptical. Because the more urgent crisis Malaysia is facing is not a lack of love for local pineapples, it is obesity. A growing one. According to the World Obesity Atlas, nearly 20 per cent of Malaysians were already obese and projections show that number ballooning to 41 per cent by 2035. The Health Ministry has also highlighted that Malaysia has one of the highest diabetes rates in the world, with 3.6 million people diagnosed as of 2019, a number expected to double by this year. Alarmingly, many are walking around without even realising they have the disease: 40 per cent of adults and 84 per cent of young adults aged 18–29 do not even know they are diabetic. Data from the CIA World Factbook shows Malaysia ranks second in Southeast Asia for obesity, with 19.7 per cent of the population affected. Photo: Screenshot via Sea Asia Stats Instagram account When you factor in the infamous "Three Highs" - high blood sugar, high blood pressure and high cholesterol - the situation only grows bleeker. Over 500,000 Malaysians are now living with all four conditions. So why, of all things, are we making fruits more expensive? Fruits, after all, are the simplest, most accessible health solutions out there. Unlike fitness programmes, gym memberships or fancy diets, fruits are straightforward. You eat them, they are nutritious and they help. You do not need an app to track them or a trainer to tell you how to bite into a cherry. And I do not know anyone - really, anyone - who does not eat at least one fruit. Sure, some people are not into vegetables, but fruits? Everyone has a favourite. Now, we are making it less attractive to choose them, just as we are trying to convince people to take better care of their health. That is the contradiction that makes this new SST expansion so frustrating. It is like raising the price of bottled water during a heatwave and calling it a strategy to encourage people to use public fountains. Will this tax stop people from buying imported fruits? Probably not. Will people even realise what has been taxed and what has not? Doubtful. Malaysians are already overwhelmed with economic concerns. And let us be real, no one is memorising the government's updated tax catalogue before heading to the supermarket. If the goal was to redirect people toward local produce, there are better ways to do it. One could subsidise local fruits or launch awareness campaigns, alternatives that are more encouraging. Instead, we have just made a basic health necessity more expensive, hoping people will 'get the message'. As Malaysia enforces its revised SST on imported fruits today, the irony is clear—fruit prices are rising just as the nation faces growing obesity and diabetes crises. Photo: Edited via Canva But it is not just about pricing. Malaysia's battle with obesity goes deeper - into infrastructure, culture and lifestyle. This is a country where walking is not easy. It is hot, humid and not exactly pedestrian-friendly. Public transportation is not the most dependable and when people are tired, busy and stressed, grabbing a quick meal at the nearest 'mamak' becomes the default choice. 'Lepak' culture is a big part of who we are, but let us be honest, Roti Canai at 11pm while watching football is not exactly a nutritionist's dream. We are proud of our food heritage and rightfully so. But that pride should also come with some responsibility. If we want Malaysians to be healthier, we have to make healthy options easier and more appealing; not pricier. Fruits and vegetables should be the last things we make harder to access. They are neutral, universal and do not come with the socioeconomic stigma of gym memberships. They are just food, good food. So while we are all trying to eat better, live longer and manage this nationwide health concern, let us hope future policy decisions reflect a bit more thought on the actual barriers people face. Because this five per cent tax may seem small on paper, but in the broader fight against obesity, it is sending the wrong message entirely.
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
SST, tax hikes putting country's healthcare sector at risk, says MCA
The recent wave of price increases introduced by the government is significantly impacting the provision of private healthcare services. As of July 1, 2025, the government has expanded the scope of the Sales and Service Tax (SST), now including an 8% tax on commercial rent and a 6% tax on private healthcare services for foreign or non-Malaysian patients. Adding to the rise in electricity costs, these changes come at a time when healthcare providers are already struggling. In support of the Malaysian Medical Association's (MMA) recent call and five other leading medical organisations, MCA urges the government to exempt commercial rent and SST from primary and private healthcare services. We must urgently protect Malaysia's access to healthcare.
Daily Express
13 hours ago
- Daily Express
Use EPF as collection tool for national health insurance, says think tank
Published on: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 Published on: Tue, Jul 01, 2025 By: FMT Reporters Text Size: The funds would supplement existing allocations in the annual health budget, Galen Centre said in proposing a national insurance scheme via EPF contributions. PETALING JAYA: A health policy think tank has proposed the introduction of a national health and social insurance scheme funded through increased contributions to the EPF, without drawing from contributors' existing retirement savings. Azrul Khalib, CEO of Galen Centre for Health and Social Policy, said the scheme could be modelled after Singapore's Central Provident Fund in the early 1980s, where contributors allocated 8% to 10.5% of their income to the MediSave account. 'This proposal would not use people's existing retirement savings. Instead, it proposes an increase in the level of contributions by both worker and employer, which would then be earmarked for national health and social insurance. 'These funds would complement and not replace the existing annual allocation under the federal budget, potentially bringing in new and sustainable funding,' he said in a statement today. Azrul said the proposed scheme would provide access to both public and private healthcare, with no exclusions for pre-existing conditions, no costly deductibles, and only minimal co-payments where necessary. He added that the fund could be used to upgrade public hospital services and improve access to lifesaving medication and treatment currently out of reach for many Malaysians. Health minister Dzulkefly Ahmad previously proposed that EPF allow contributors to use funds in their Account 2 to pay for medical insurance premiums. EPF members are currently able to access their Account 2 funds to meet some of their education, healthcare, and housing needs. They are also allowed to make a partial withdrawal at the age of 50. Noting that only 18% of EPF members currently have sufficient savings, Azrul said diverting savings to pay insurance premiums risked making the situation worse. 'Implying that they won't notice the withdrawal as it is automatic and coming from the Sejahtera account is dangerous, encourages financial illiteracy, and is disconnected from the rakyat's everyday realities,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
