
Denmark To Push For Stricter EU Migration Policies
Denmark's strict migration policies have slowly spread across Europe and the country will now push for harsher EU-wide regulations during its upcoming EU presidency, including on asylum handling and legal appeals.
Migration policy "is linked to security, that is to say that we need a Europe that is safer, more stable and robust, and that isn't really the case if we don't control the flows to Europe," Denmark's European Affairs Minister Marie Bjerre said as she presented the country's priorities for its EU presidency, which it takes over from Poland on July 1.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen hopes to build EU consensus on externalising asylum procedures outside Europe, and restricting the scope of rulings from the European Court of Human Rights.
She set the tone during a recent visit to Berlin.
"We need new solutions to reduce the influx to Europe and to effectively send back those who don't have the right to stay in our countries," she said at a press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who applauded the Danish "model".
Denmark, where the number of inhabitants of foreign origin has soared from 3.3 percent in 1985 to 16.3 percent in 2025, says it needs to limit the number of immigrants in order to safeguard its generous cradle-to-grave welfare system.
At the same time, the need for foreign labour has surged, with the number of work permits doubling in less than a decade, though these can be swiftly revoked.
Refugees in Denmark are entitled to a one-year renewable residency permit, and they are encouraged to return home as soon as authorities deem there is no longer a need for a safe haven.
"Refugees are expected to integrate while also being prepared to leave at anytime... a kind of contradictory or schizophrenic situation," researcher Marie Sandberg, the head of the Centre for Advanced Migration Studies at the University of Copenhagen, told AFP.
"As recent research shows, the increased focus on return policies and temporary protection, along with high demands for getting permanent residency, create a very, very difficult integration landscape for newcomers into Danish society," she added.
Denmark made headlines in 2020 when it revoked residency permits for 200 Syrians, deeming the situation in Damascus no longer justified a Danish residence permit.
Since her election to the head of the centre-left Social Democrats 10 years ago, Mette Frederiksen has shifted her party's migration policy far to the right, in line with that of preceding right-wing governments backed by the far right.
She has repeatedly called non-Western immigration Denmark's "biggest challenge".
In 2024, she expressed support for an MP who alleged that some well-integrated immigrants were "undermining" Danish society.
"We are a sociable and relaxed country culturally, but for some reason Muslims have been seen as a kind of threat to this liberal culture," lamented Michala Bendixen, head of the Refugees Welcome organisation.
Championing a "zero refugee" policy, Denmark is keen to externalise the asylum process to a country outside Europe.
In 2024, the country accepted 860 refugees, 13 times fewer than in 2015.
Two years ago, the government halted its plans to process asylum requests abroad -- possibly in Rwanda -- and keep refugees there if their applications were approved, in order to try to find a joint solution with the European Union.
While all similar efforts in European countries have so far failed, "there will be a European attempt to do something on the subject" during the Danish EU presidency, Bendixen said.
Denmark also recently joined Italy and seven other countries to seek a reinterpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights to allow for changes to migration policy, arguing that the text sometimes protects "the wrong people."
"We used to be proud of being one of the first countries to sign the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, and we've also been part of the UNHCR resettlement scheme since the late 1980s. However ... Denmark seems to be ready to test the (limits of the) conventions," Sandberg said.
Bendixen said those efforts were now "undermining the whole mindset of Europe".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
CSU chief supports German ‘Iron Dome' missile defense system – DW – 06/29/2025
CSU leader Markus Söder is calling for the procurement of 2,000 interceptor missiles for the German version of the "Iron Dome" missile defense system. DW has more. During an unexpected visit to Tel Aviv on Sunday, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt offered unqualified support for Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear weapons program. "Iran has been destabilizing this region for years, for decades, one has to say, with its support for terrorist groups to the north, to the south, to the east of Israel," he said. Dobrindt added that the Iranian nuclear program is "a real threat to Israel's right to exist and a threat to Europe as well." The German minster said that Tehran had received a clear message that Israel, the United States, and other allies like Germany could not tolerate research on or construction of nuclear weapons. Tehran insists that its nuclear program is for purely civilian purposes. Dobrindt made these comments while visiting the site of a deadly Iranian missile attack in Holon with Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar. He described the attack as an assault on the civilian population and expressed his belief that Iran would use any nuclear bomb it developed against Israel. Dobrindt said that Germany would continue to do all it could to secure Israel's existence. Markus Söder, Bavaria's state premier and head of the Christian Social Union (CSU), called for the acquisition of thousands of drones, new missile systems, and a German version of the "Iron Dome" consisting of 2,000 Patriot systems to protect against potential attacks. "Germany needs a protective shield with precision weapons," Söder told newspaper, adding that this would include a modern drone army of 100,000 drones and a defense shield similar to Israel's "Iron Dome." "We should cooperate with Ukraine and Israel and use their experience," CSU leader said. In addition to drones, Söder called for 300 new battle tanks, 500 infantry fighting vehicles, 35 additional Eurofighter warplanes, and 1,000 more Taurus cruise missiles. He also called for the Bundeswehr to have its own satellites. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video , and welcome to DW's coverage of developments in Germany on Sunday, June 29. The center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) concludes its party congress in Berlin. On Friday, Lars Klingbeil was re-elected as co-leader of the party, receiving 65% support, a significant decrease from the 85.6% he garnered in 2023. For all of the latest news from Germany, stay tuned here.


DW
19 hours ago
- DW
Germany and COVID-19: What went wrong? – DW – 06/28/2025
The German parliament is seeking to assess the political impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Former Health Minister Jens Spahn is under attack over the possible misuse of public funds. Jens Spahn, the former German health minister, faced scrutiny this week over the possible misuse of public funds in the large-scale procurement of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. He had to answer to questions from the budget committee over why he ordered masks at a very high price and then failed to accept or pay for them. Germany's government could face payments of some €2.3 billion ($2.7 billion) to health-product manufacturers if courts rule against it in the dozens of lawsuits that have been filed over the issue. Spahn has defended his actions, though he admitted last year that he should have done things differently. The heavily redacted version of a report commissioned by Spahn's successor, Karl Lauterbach, was presented to the budget committee of the Bundestag this week. It stated that Spahn's procurement decision was made "against the advice of his specialized departments." The socialist Left Party has called for Spahn to step down from his current role as parliamentary leader of the ruling conservative bloc of Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU), one of the most powerful positions in the Bundestag. "Anyone who throws our tax money out of the window so carelessly should no longer be allowed to hold an important political office," said Left Party co-leader Ines Schwerdtner. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany's governing parties — the CDU/CSU and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) — have sought to establish an inquiry commission to investigate actions taken by the government during the pandemic, including lockdowns that had a major impact on the country's economy. The Left Party had already suggested such a commission last year. "Firstly, lost trust should be regained through a serious review," read the party's motion put to the parliament. "Secondly, to gain insights and recommendations for action that will help us to deal with the pandemic in a more forward-looking, intelligent and effective way before and during a recurring pandemic situation." Among the supporters of such a commission is Hendrik Streeck, who became known as one of Germany's leading virologists during the pandemic. He went on to win a Bundestag seat for the center-right CDU in Bonn in February this year. The 47-year-old now sits on the parliamentary health committee and is also the federal commissioner for addiction and drug issues. Streeck considers it "absolutely necessary" to re-examine how the pandemic was handled, since it was the biggest health crisis since World War Two, he told DW. Streeck is hoping to get answers to the question of how scientific advice reaches the government in a crisis like the coronavirus pandemic. "This is an area of tension between science, politics and the public," the virologist said. He also wants the new commission to take a critical look at the coordination between the federal and state levels of government. During the pandemic, the leaders of Germany's 16 states convened with the federal government to agree measures such as imposing complete lockdowns. Streeck doubts that this was the best framework, as it meant that the parliament was often relegated to a limited control function. Trained nurse and Left Party Bundestag member Stella Merendino, also a member of the health committee, also wants a review as the basis for lessons to learned for the future. "I experienced the pandemic in a hospital emergency room," she told DW. "I saw people die alone, while we were not allowed to let them see their relatives." The 31-year-old also saw hospital staff collapse from exhaustion and grief. "We worked through shifts without knowing whether we would stay healthy ourselves," she said. "There was no adequate protective equipment, no psychological support, hardly any recognition and, to this day, no systematic evaluation of what this meant for our staff." Merendino also believes that many people were left alone during the pandemic to cope with their economic worries, childcare, and loneliness. "This has fueled anger and mistrust that continues to this day," she said. "We don't have to convince everyone, but we have to listen. And as politicians, we must have the courage to admit mistakes." Above all, Merendino expects to ensure more support for people who are still suffering from the consequences of COVID-19. "I know nursing staff who are no longer able to work because of Long Covid. Many are fighting for recognition, for medical care, for financial security. And all this in a healthcare system that is already overburdened." Meanwhile, Streeck believes that the commission should look beyond Germany's borders for its reappraisal. "More data, more analysis would help us to get a more accurate picture," he said. He is convinced that this would help mitigate the divisions he still sees in society. Streeck says that three groups have formed: "Some who don't want to deal with it. The others who say: We were too lax, we did too little. And the third, who say: We went far too far." Everyone has to be taken seriously, says Streeck. "The best thing that can happen is to talk about it." The review commission could be set up to start its work after the summer break, in September you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Budapest Pride To Challenge Orban's Ban In Hungary
A record number of people are expected to attend Saturday's Pride march in the Hungarian capital Budapest, defying a ban that marks an unprecedented regression of LGBTQ rights in the European Union. Prime Minister Viktor Orban's ruling coalition amended laws and the constitution earlier this year to prohibit the annual celebration, justifying his years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights on "child protection" grounds. While Orban has been emboldened by the anti-diversity offensive of US President Donald Trump, his own initiatives have drawn protests at home and condemnation from the EU and rights groups. The nationalist leader on Friday said that while police would not "break up" the 30th edition of the Pride march, those who took part should be aware of "legal consequences". Despite the risk of a fine, more than 35,000 people are expected to gather at 2:00 pm (1200 GMT) near Budapest's city hall, an hour before the march begins. Ministers from several EU countries, and dozens of European lawmakers are expected to attend in defiance of the ban, reminiscent of that in Moscow in 2006 and Istanbul in 2015. "We're not just standing up for ourselves... If this law isn't overturned, eastern Europe could face a wave of similar measures," Pride organiser Viktoria Radvanyi said. Earlier this week, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen called on the Hungarian authorities to reverse the ban. Thirty-three countries have also spoken up in support of the march. While parade organisers risk up to a year in prison, attendees can face fines up to 500 euros ($580). The latest legal changes empower the authorities to use facial-recognition technology to identify those who take part. Freshly installed cameras have appeared on lamp posts along the planned route of the march. However, opposition Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony has insisted that no attendee can face any reprisals as the march -- co-organised by the city hall this time -- is a municipal event and does not require police approval. "The police have only one task tomorrow, and it is a serious one: to ensure the safety of Hungarian and European citizens attending the event," Karacsony said during a briefing with visiting EU equalities commissioner Hadja Lahbib. Far-right groups have announced multiple counterprotests along the planned route of the procession. Justice Minister Bence Tuzson this week sent a letter to EU embassies cautioning diplomats and staff against participating because of the police ban. Several EU countries have informed their citizens of the potential of fines through travel advisories. Since Orban's return to power in 2010, the country of 9.6 million people has been steadily rolling back LGBTQ rights. Legal changes have effectively barred same-sex couples from adopting children, prevented transgender people from changing their name or gender in official documents, and a 2021 law forbade the "display and promotion" of homosexuality to under-18s. This March, lawmakers passed a bill targeting the annual Pride march, amending the 2021 law to prohibit any gathering violating its provisions. A month later, parliament also adopted a constitutional change to strengthen the legal foundations for the ban. "Orban is employing a tried-and-tested recipe ahead of next year's election by generating a conflict," political analyst Daniel Mikecz told AFP. Orban was "polarising society", he added. Voter opinion polls suggest Orban's Fidesz party has been losing ground to the opposition. The first Pride march was held in 1970 in New York to mark the anniversary of the city's Stonewall riots in June 1969, which sparked the gay rights movement. Freshly installed cameras have appeared on lamp posts along the planned route of the march AFP