Mathews: California to Uncle Sam — shut up and do your job
Zócalo Public Square
Shut up, Uncle Sam. Or put up.
Yes, I'm talking to you, my federal government. I don't care if you don't like my tone.
Because, while falsely blaming California and its politicians for devastating fires, you never acknowledge your own culpability:
You are the arsonist, and not just politically.
Because half of California is yours.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
In fact, more than 47% of the land in this state belongs to the federal government. Just 3% is managed by the state.
The flames that leveled Pacific Palisades and Malibu are believed to have started in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (italics mine), managed by the National Park Service. (That's you!).
The blaze that turned Altadena to ash burned through the Angeles National Forest, managed by the U.S. Forest Service, which is part of the United States (you again!) Department of Agriculture.
Let's be clear: Our firelands are actually your firelands. And you've managed your California land so poorly for so long — suppressing fire instead of managing it, letting fuels accumulate, providing insufficient personnel to handle our national parks, forests, wilderness, and recreation areas — that you've helped turn California into a tinderbox.
When President Trump, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and Republicans blame California's land management for our fires, you aren't just lying. You're trying to shift blame.
Now, if you had any honor — which you don't, but let's just say you did for argument's sake — you wouldn't just provide us with all the disaster aid we need. You'd announce major new investments in federal land management in California and elsewhere. After all, you own a quarter of all the land in the United States.
Instead, you are shamelessly working to make your land management even worse.
Project 2025, the governing blueprint for the new administration, outlines deep cuts to the already-diminished number of federal workers, which would exacerbate understaffing and poor management on federal lands. The cuts are now starting, with federal hiring and funding freezes leaving positions open and stopping wildlands projects.
You propose to do all this, while your administration, run by climate deniers, rolls back green investment, and encourages burning more fossil fuels.
Your current regime better hope hell isn't hotter than our mega-fires.
Even saying that, I want to make clear that I'm not like you. I don't want to shift blame. I want to solve problems.
Our state and its leaders must press you — for disaster aid and massive investments in public lands. If you won't make those investments, then we must insist that you surrender ownership of all federal lands in California to state and local governments and institutions, immediately.
That surrender should come with money to cover all the deferred maintenance from the last century. I'm thinking $500 billion, but let's negotiate.
If you refuse these terms, California's elected leaders should use every trick in the Congressional toolbox to force you to fork over. That should include attaching this transfer of public lands to every must-pass piece of Congressional legislation, including the debt limit.
California's state and local governments can apply pressure by y ceasing the collection of federal withholding tax dollars from their employees. If you're going to stiff us on funding, we shouldn't collect taxes for you.
If you won't manage or turn over your land, you and California could be headed toward divorce. A new YouGov poll commissioned by the think tank Independent California Institute found 61% support among Californians for peaceful secession from the United States.
Or maybe you can trade us to Denmark in exchange for Greenland, which you actually seem to care about. I don't know why the Danes would trust you to manage one of the world's wildest places, but I guess that would be Greenland's problem.
Like I said, Uncle Sam, the choice is yours. Either do your job, or turn over your land so we can.
But, either way, shut up.
Joe Mathews writes the Connecting California column for Zócalo Public Square.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NE Wisconsin reacts to no third term for Evers announcement
MADISON, Wis. (WFRV) – Governor Tony Evers announced that he will not run for a third term, prompting a flood of reaction from both sides of the aisle. Some Republicans tell Local 5 News that they feel like they have a better chance of winning back the governor's office with Evers out of the race. 'Well, to be honest Tony Evers is tough to beat and he'd be tough to beat again,' said Republican state representative David Steffen. 'He was very good at finding the middle and had kind of a folksy way about himself that connected with people.' Steffen said it's now anybody's guess who will emerge as the frontrunners in the gubernatorial race for both parties. 'It is now a jump ball there is now an opportunity for just about anyone to take this race and that's exciting for us as Republicans who are looking to take that seat back,' he said. While Steffen said he believes Evers bowing out of the race helps Republicans, others in his party think that the governor would have been a terrible candidate. A recent Marquette Law School poll found that 55 percent of Wisconsinites didn't want to see Evers run again. 'Tony Evers saw the writing on the wall: Wisconsinites are fed up with far-left policies,' said Wisconsin GOP chairperson Brian Schimming. 'While Wisconsin Democrats continue to lose the approval of voters, Republicans are already working on winning up and down the ballot.' Appleton continues Children's Week with Parks and Recreation Department's Playground Fair Washington County executive Josh Schoemann and business owner and Navy Seal Bill Berrien have launched their campaigns for governor on the GOP ticket. 'Well we need a great candidate and certainly we have the policies,' Steffen said when asked what it is going to take for Republicans to win the gubernatorial race this time around. 'We're going to be looking to cut taxes, limit government, and make everything work a little smarter for the people.' Lawrence University history professor Jerald Podair said he thinks if Evers ran again he would have won by a thin margin. He said attorney general Josh Kaul is the likely frontrunner with Evers out of the race. He said lieutenant governor Sara Rodriguez and Milwaukee mayor Cavalier Johnson are other people to keep an eye on in what could be a very crowded primary field for the Democrats. On Thursday afternoon after Evers announcement, many Democrats here in Northeast Wisconsin wanted to thank Evers for his efforts throughout his time as the state's governor. 'I think that Governor Evers was a respectable and kind leader who was really steadfast in his priorities but also knew he needed to work in a bipartisan way,' said Democratic Party of Outagamie County chairperson Emily Tseffos. 'Champion our public schools, make life more affordable for everyday Wisconsinites while dealing with a Republican controlled legislature.' Community gathers to celebrate Wautoma woman's 110th birthday 'Green Bay loves Governor Evers,' said state representative Amaad Rivera-Wagner. 'One thing he's been instrumental in is moving the coal piles, a once in a generation project, he also helped us secure funding for the NFL draft and the public safety costs afterwards.' Local Democrats said they're sad to see Governor Evers step away from politics, but that they're confident that strong candidates will emerge. 'We on the Democratic side are trying to do what's right for our neighbors, our community, state, and nation and we just need to remind the electorate of that,' Emily Tseffos said. 'I was surprised Governor Evers (didn't run for a third term), he is one of the most popular political figures in the state, popular among independents, even some Republicans,' Rivera-Wagner added. 'I think that is a testament to the work he's done.' As far as his legacy, professor Podair said that he thinks that people will remember Evers much more for his politics than his policy. 'He certainly is leaving the Democratic party better than when he found it in 2019,' Podair said. 'Tony Evers may be remembered most among Democrats as the man who slew the Scott Walker dragon. I think his legacy will be more political than policy although we will have school funding for the next 400 years thanks to him and that is policy.' The Wisconsin gubernatorial primary is in August 2026. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump travels to Scotland for golf and bilateral talks amid Epstein furor
By Andrea Shalal and Andrew MacAskill EDINBURGH/LONDON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump, dogged by questions about his ties to disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, heads to Scotland on Friday for a trip that will mix golf with politics mostly out of the public view. Trump plans to visit his golf resort in Turnberry on Scotland's east coast, where he will meet on Monday with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, before heading to his sprawling golf property 200 miles away near Aberdeen on the west coast. As part of the visit, he will open a second 18-hole course on the Aberdeen property named in honor of his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, who was born and raised on a Scottish island before emigrating to America. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt this week said the trip was intended as a "working visit that will include a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the historic U.S.-U.K. trade deal." The overseas travel comes as Trump faces the biggest domestic political crisis of his second term in office. Allies and opponents alike have criticized his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and the circumstances of his 2019 death in prison. The issue has caused a rare breach with some of Trump's most loyal Make America Great Again supporters, and majorities of Americans and Trump's Republicans say they believe the government is hiding details on the case, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling. White House officials, frustrated by the ongoing focus on the Epstein saga, are hoping the controversy dies down while Trump is abroad, one person familiar with the matter said. DEEPEN TIES The trip, initially billed as a private visit, gives Trump and Starmer a chance to deepen their already warm relationship, with key issues on the agenda to include ending Russia's war in Ukraine, UK and U.S. sources said. British officials have been heartened by what they see as a clear shift in Trump's rhetoric on Ukraine and Russia in recent weeks, a UK source said. Since being elected last year, Starmer has prioritized good relations with Trump, stressing the importance of Britain's defense and security alliance with the U.S. and being careful to avoid openly criticizing Trump's tariff policies. That approach helped Britain seal the first tariff-reduction deal with the U.S. in May, which reaffirmed quotas and tariff rates on British automobiles and eliminated tariffs on the U.K. aerospace sector, but left steel tariffs in place. Tariffs will likely come up, but sources close to the matter said it was unclear if any breakthrough could be achieved. Trump also is expected to meet with Scottish leader John Swinney, who publicly backed Democratic candidate Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, but no details have been released by either side. Trump has described Scotland as a 'very special place" and made a similar trip there in 2016 during his first run for the presidency, but he won't necessarily receive a warm welcome. About 70% of Scots have an unfavorable opinion of Trump, while 18% have a favorable opinion of him, an Ipsos poll in March found. Scottish police are girding for protests on Saturday in both Aberdeen and in Edinburgh, the country's capital. Trump will return to Britain from September 17-19 for a state visit hosted by King Charles. It will make Trump the first world leader in modern times to undertake two state visits to Britain. The late Queen Elizabeth hosted him at Buckingham Palace for a three-day state visit in June 2019.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We've already done that': Missouri lawmakers show little enthusiasm for new congressional maps
Members of the Missouri House review a proposed Congressional map during redistricting debate on Jan. 18, 2022 (photo courtesy of Tim Bommel/Missouri House Communications). As Texas embarks on a special legislative session that includes revising that state's congressional districts to help Republicans, President Donald Trump is reportedly asking for Missouri to do the same. The reaction among legislative leaders, however, is decidedly negative. Asked by text about a report from Punchbowl News on a new redistricting effort, state Senate President Pro Tem Cindy O'Laughlin responded with a horror emoji. 'I know this is a topic being talked about in Washington,' she added, 'but no one has asked us to do anything about redistricting.' Punchbowl reported that U.S. Rep. Bob Onder of Lake St. Louis was at the White House on Tuesday and came away convinced Trump's advisors want Missouri to act. 'The president's team is serious about it,' Onder said to Punchbowl. Missouri has eight seats in the U.S. House, six held by Republicans and two held by Democrats — the same total and partisan division it has had since a seat was lost after the 2010 census. Missouri Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck of Affton said Democrats would fight any effort to change district lines that were just redrawn three years ago. 'This originated out of the White House,' Beck said. 'This is a blatant power grab by an administration desperate to deflect from their cover up of the Epstein files and other things going on.' We've already done that. To do it again would be out of character with the way Missouri operates. – Chad Perkins, speaker pro tem of the Missouri House The 435 seats in the U.S. House are allotted to the states every 10 years based on census results. When Missouri receives its allotment, the state Constitution mandates that lawmakers revise district lines. The last time lines were redrawn between censuses was in the 1960s, following the 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that districts had to be drawn as closely as possible in population to preserve equal representation, known as the one person, one vote decision. In 2022, when the current districts were drawn, Republican leaders in the Missouri Senate had to resort to little-used maneuvers to outwit opponents within their caucus who wanted to break up the 5th District and push the partisan split to 7-1. The 5th District, which includes Kansas City and sections of Jackson and Clay counties, has been Democratic for decades. U.S. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, who has held the seat since 2005, was re-elected in November with 60% of the vote. Splitting those votes into adjacent districts, while bringing in enough Republican votes to carry the district, isn't as certain as it may seem to aid the GOP, said state Sen. Mike Cierpiot, a Republican from Lee's Summit. 'There's a lot of Democrats in Jackson County,' Cierpiot said, 'and if it's a map that they promote that, once again, puts two or three of our Republican seats in play in a bad year, I would have trouble supporting that.' The 2022 fight over redistricting came during a four-year period where hard-right conservatives in the state Senate fought almost daily with GOP leadership and its backers. This year, Republicans finally forged a truce that helped make their supermajority, holding two-thirds of the seats, far more effective in moving priority legislation. The fight over redistricting was colored as much by personalities as policy, said U.S. Rep. Eric Burlison, a Republican from Springfield who won the 7th District seat in 2022. Then-state Sen. Bill Eigel of St. Charles, leader of the insurgents, couldn't convince anyone that a 7-1 map was possible and safe for Republicans because of his personal conflicts with the leadership, Burlison said in an interview on Thursday with The Independent. 'It was more about people's personalities than what were the facts,' said Burlison, a state senator at the time. 'What was achievable in that session was marked by that.' Tempers fray as Missouri Senate Republicans fight over Congressional map The conflict was so bad that Eigel and Cierpiot nearly came to blows during a lunch break. It wasn't the only moment where violence was possible, Burlison said. 'There were multiple moments where it almost came close,' he said. In the Missouri House, where it is easier for leadership to shut down debate and quash factionalism, a top Republican leader said there's no reason to revisit the current map. 'We do redistricting every 10 years,' House Speaker Pro Tem Chad Perkins of Bowling Green said. 'We've already done that. To do it again would be out of character with the way Missouri operates.' There may be some willingness to try a new redistricting effort. Cierpiot said he could support it if he is convinced Republicans would not lose seats in years favoring Democrats. But it could backfire, he said. 'Right now, in Missouri, we're in a Republican wonderland,' Cierpiot said. 'We've had decent years, and we haven't had an off year since probably 2008, but I'm old enough to remember those things do cycle through.' State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, a Republican from Arnold, enthusiastically backs the idea. 'We should have written a 7-1 map' in 2022, she said. 'Our failure to do so almost cost the GOP the majority in Congress. I'm up for it.' It is encouraging, Beck said, that most Republican comments are opposed to the idea of redistricting again. But pressure could change that. 'I don't know how much they're gonna get pushed to change those views,' he said. 'I've watched these people say things before and then change their mind.' There are a lot of legal questions, involving both the federal and state constitutions, that will be played out in the courts in states that try to redraw lines set after the 2020 census, said Justin Levitt, a professor of law at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles. Levitt, who monitors redistricting efforts nationwide and was deputy attorney general for civil rights at the end of President Barack Obama's administration, said a redistricting effort in Missouri would create legal issues over minority voter rights. Both of Missouri's Democratic members of Congress, Cleaver and U.S. Rep. Wesley Bell of St. Louis, are Black. To gain a seat, 'you'd have to effectively target the minority communities of St. Louis and Kansas City,' Levitt said. It would also create problems because the stated goal is to increase Republican representation in Congress, he said. 'The Supreme Court has said with crystal clarity that excessive partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional, that it is inconsistent with basic democratic principles,' Levitt said. 'It said that in the same breath that it also said that the federal courthouse doors are closed to adjudicating that claim, but just because the cops are not outside your door doesn't mean shoplifting is legal.' Missouri's constitution is silent on whether lawmakers have the power to redraw lines outside the 10-year cycle of the census. That silence, Levitt said, would have to be interpreted by the courts. 'Other states have construed that constitutional time in their own state constitutions to say, once every 10 years and no more frequently,' he said. With a 219-212 majority — four seats are vacant, including three previously held by Democrats — Republicans are worried that a small shift in voter sentiment could put them again in the minority. Texas, with a 25-13 split in favor Republicans, is looking at possibly moving five seats to the Republican column, according to the Texas Tribune. It took a telephone call from Trump to Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott to get it on the special session agenda amid concerns that GOP voters might be spread too thin. In retaliation, California Gov. Gavin Newsome has threatened to redraw that state's 52 districts, currently 43-9 in favor of Democrats, to counter the Texas move. So did New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, who told reporters Monday that it's 'too early' to make a definitive statement on the issue, the New Jersey Globe reported, adding he would speak to other Democratic governors about redistricting. With Missouri now involved, it is clear that Trump is looking everywhere he can for new GOP seats, Levitt said. 'They're casting a wide net,' he said. 'The president seems to be abundantly nervous, and it wouldn't surprise me that he is in desperation, looking wherever he can.' Congressional districts are already gerrymandered so the result isn't in question, Beck said. It is already hurting the country and redistricting between censuses makes it worse, he added. U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner, who represents the 2nd District in eastern Missouri, received 54.5% of the vote in November and is the only member of Congress from either party in the state who did not win 60% or more of the vote. 'There's only a select few seats that are actually up for grabs ever. The other ones are safe,' Beck said. 'They've done this over time, and it's a shame. Now the politicians pick their voters, instead of the voters pick their politicians.'
