Woman Has Casual Convo With Roommate's Friend, Not Prepared for Accusation
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A young woman's dinner preparation turned into a strained roommate standoff after an unexpected conversation was labeled "showing off" and "flirting."
The exchange unfolded in an apartment shared by at least three women, as described in a post by user BeneficialCourse2856 on Reddit, prompting more than 1,300 comments within two days.
Kitchen Conversation
The 21-year-old original poster (OP) explained she was making a fusion meal combining elements of Mexican and Chinese cuisine—recipes developed by her parents.
While cooking, she called her mother for help with the dish and spoke in Spanish.
"The dish I was making was Chinese-inspired tinga, a recipe for which I posted on my profile," the OP told Newsweek.
During the call, her 23-year-old roommate, Ann, came home with friends, including a guest who later entered the kitchen and struck up a conversation.
"He then asked why I was speaking on the phone in Spanish earlier, so I told him that I'm half Mexican and half Chinese, and that I grew up speaking both Spanish and Mandarin with my parents," the OP outlined to Redditors.
Stock image: Two roommates having a disagreement.
Stock image: Two roommates having a disagreement.
Jacob Wackerhausen/iStock/Getty Images Plus
BeneficialCourse2856 shared the background of her parents with Newsweek.
"My dad is from Sichuan, China and my mom is from Puebla, Mexico. They met because they were both international students at [Arizona State University] and were in the same club.
"After graduation, they both got jobs in Philly and moved there, so that's where I am from."
The pair continued chatting about culture, language and food. But the next day, the woman learned through another roommate that Ann felt she had been "showing off" and trying to impress her friend.
When confronted, Ann dismissed the OP's denials and suggested the poster should be more "mindful" about how she interacts when guests are present—despite not informing her beforehand that anyone was coming over.
Experts suggest this kind of miscommunication can flare up among people who live together.
'Communication, compromise and respect'
According to Mental Health America, "You do not have to be best friends with your roommate. Most problems can be resolved through good communication, compromise and respect."
The site advises direct, in-person conversation over texting and encourages both parties to focus on the specific behavior at issue rather than making assumptions or personal judgments.
The University of Mary Washington's Residence Life and Housing resource agrees, recommending that individuals, "provide an objective or neutral point of view," and work together instead of placing blame.
The resource also warns against "venting to others" as that tends to escalate the conflict.
Reddit users responding in droves to the original post were invariably blunt in their opinions.
"Ann clearly has the hots for that guy," one person remarked, while another added, "You should be allowed to be friends with your roommate's friends."
A fellow supporter stated, "You were being cool and interesting and Ann was peanut butter and jealous about it."
The most upvoted comment declared: "So what if you were [flirting]?"
Unresolved Tensions
BeneficialCourse2856 noted that the awkwardness in her apartment remains unresolved.
"I was in a separate room (the kitchen) and he approached me," the OP pointed out to an individual in the thread.
"I wouldn't have minded if she wanted to join the convo, but I wasn't going to go to an entirely separate room to get her just [because] he talked to me."
Newsweek's "What Should I Do?" offers expert advice to readers. If you have a personal dilemma, let us know via life@newsweek.com. We can ask experts for advice on relationships, family, friends, money and work, and your story could be featured on WSID at Newsweek.
To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Child-Free Woman Convinced She'd Use Cloth Diapers—Then Comes Viral Response
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 32-year-old woman "undecided" about children asked moms for their opinions on cloth diapers—and the response is going viral. Miam-based Chanel Goodson wrote in her post on Threads: "As … someone who cares about the planet, I know I'd want to use cloth diapers." She asked parents on Threads why cloth diapers, despite being reusable and potentially more eco-friendly, aren't more widely adopted—especially given the rising concerns about chemicals in disposables and the mounting cost of single-use products. Stock image: A baby lays on a bed wearing a cloth diaper. Stock image: A baby lays on a bed wearing a cloth diaper. Aurora Uribe As a vegan of 12 years, Goodson told Newsweek that her values around sustainability shapes all aspects of consumption—including food, fashion and household products. "I'm very mindful about recycling and limiting single-use items, and disposable diapers have always struck me as incredibly wasteful," Goodson said. "When I saw a box of diapers in-store priced at $50, that honestly shocked me." That is when she started learning about cloth diapers—the cost savings, sustainability, and reusability made her want to understand them better. But many parents on Threads, moms in particular, had answers. The post itself was viewed over 135,000 times and received more than 2,000 comments. "The amount of labor involved with cleaning human s*** out of fabric is more intense than you will understand until you have a kid and it's a regular occurrence," one mom wrote. Another added: "I wanted to do cloth diapers but quickly realized I had to choose convenience for my sanity." Many others highlighted logistic hurdles such as day-care restrictions, lack of laundry access, and sheer exhaustion. "A washing machine makes it significantly easier and not everyone has one. High up front cost is off-putting. Add in exhaustion from having a newborn and most people give up," another mom posted. Some parents, however, shared positive experiences. "We use cloth diapers and have a service," one user commented. "Every Tuesday they drop off 60 clean diapers and pick up the soiled ones. It costs $80 a month. Everyone assumes it's ultra-luxury, but it's actually affordable." Sarah Topalian Davies, director of communications and media at Earth Day ( told Newsweek that cloth diapers are a hard sell, even as a committed environmentalist. "I … was given a bag of them for free by my midwife, but I quickly realized you have to be 100 percent committed as they get filthy fast," Davies said. "You need to be able to scrape the poop off the diaper, flush it and then hot-wash a ton of cotton diapers, easily five to 10 times a day to keep your supplies ready." Davies added that all the washing and drying is time-consuming, not to mention driers being the most energy-demanding appliances in the home. "The thing that makes the disposables so convenient is you can change your baby in the back of the car and just put the diaper in a trash bin after," Davies said. "A cotton diaper is much more demanding, and then you have to carry a soiled cotton diaper around with you till you get home, too." Davies said we need safer, plastic-free disposables, but finding affordable options is challenging. Goodson's aim, she said, wasn't to make a statement online, and understood that choosing cloth diapers involves a demanding washing schedule and extra time. "It didn't deter me from considering cloth diapers, but it definitely helped me understand that it's not just a sustainable choice; it's a lifestyle one that takes real commitment," Goodson said.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Colleges Should Begin Putting Science First
One of my pet peeves is going to the drug store and seeing necessary items locked behind a plastic case. Whether it's razor blades, Advil, or skin cream, drug store shelves have become pharma jail cells as chains like CVS and Walgreens take draconian measures to combat shoplifting. A recent Washington Post column showed I'm not alone in my drug store distress, but rather part of community of curmudgeonly customers. In CVS was so worried about shoplifting that it stole its own soul, Matt Bai makes a convincing case that 'someone has turned the CVS I knew into a Museum of the American Pharmacy.' When we encounter a necessary item locked away, we're instructed to ring the service bell for assistance. So we ring and, after a minute or two, an employee shows up and opens the case. As Matt points out, the problem for infrequent shoppers is that most of the time we don't know exactly what we want. In Matt's case, his son asked for teeth whitening strips. So Matt's in a pickle: In the old CVS, I'd have happily spent five minutes idly breaking down the pros and cons. But now, this poor woman is standing there watching and waiting, and I'm self-conscious. She's the only one working here. She has things to do. It's not like the CVS has assigned me a personal shopper. I ask her for advice, and I can tell she wants to be helpful, but this is the CVS, and we all know that the employees are basically silent observers… 'I think they're pretty much the same,' she says hopefully… The pressure I'm feeling here is more than I can stand. I grab a random box, and the woman quickly locks the case before I can change my mind. Then the same thing happens two aisles over: When my new friend reappears and opens the case, I grab the first three bottles of bodywash I see. I cannot subject her to another round of anguished vacillation. We're not picking out a puppy here. Ring the service bell for assistance. Of course, he buys the wrong things. I've known Matt for 30 years since he worked with my (then future) wife at Newsweek. That's back when Newsweek was a respected weekly magazine owned by the Washington Post's Graham family – one where an old-school beverage cart provided libations to journalists working late Friday nights to 'close the book.' And back when CVS was a needed respite from our under-air-conditioned New York apartment, not a locus of stress and frustration. Matt's not a total crank – at least no more than me. And he's clearly onto something about likely consequences for organizations that close themselves off to the world. That's certainly the case in higher education. Colleges have locked themselves behind a plastic case in the two most important ways imaginable. First, programs of study haven't been responsive to economic needs. Nearly all schools continue to offer the same degree programs they've run for generations. The list of most popular majors – starting with business, nursing, psychology, biology, and engineering – looks like it could be wearing a poodle skirt, love beads, or sideburns. (Or if shopping in a drug store, buying Lustre-Crème Shampoo, Dippity-Do Hair Gel, and a carton of Chesterfields.) Only computer science (#11) would have been out of place when our grandparents were college-age, and we're merely missing classics and agricultural sciences. Unless forced by budgetary exigencies, colleges never discontinue programs in order to redirect teaching resources to more productive uses. In an economy that's experienced radical changes in the last few decades, this level of movement is glacial. Second, the people teaching at colleges and universities aren't responsive to economic needs. Tenured faculty – the highest paid, permanent faculty – are required to have terminal degrees, almost always PhDs. And having a doctorate typically means a straight line from college to graduate school to employment at a postsecondary institution. It's even true at community colleges. When full-time positions open up, competition is fierce and candidates without doctorates stand as little chance as cold symptoms after taking Nyquil, or heartburn post-TUMS. This means the people educating and preparing students for work in the real economy have never worked in the real economy. Just as CVS employees can't help us choose, faculty without real-world experience can't provide helpful career guidance. And because academic departments control curriculum and faculty control departments, the lack of real-world experience produces the museum-like quality of university offerings. With college safely locked away, undergraduate majors rarely offer a straight line to good first jobs. Lightcast has documented the lack of direct pathways: a swirl from the most popular majors to the most popular jobs. The unemployment rate for the last five classes of college graduates is up 40% in the last two years and 12% of grads in their 20s are currently unemployed, particularly men. Meanwhile, underemployment for college grads one year out is at 52%. Between the Scylla of unemployment and the Charybdis of underemployment, two-thirds to three-quarters of the class of 2025 are struggling to launch. Like CVS customers, college graduates need to ring for assistance. In response to these criticisms, colleges and universities have offered bromides – i.e., vague ideas intended to placate, not Bromo-Seltzer which is no longer available at CVS – about building industry or employer partnerships. But partnerships ebb and flow and nothing really changes. Sooner or later, higher education will need to meet the problem head-on by addressing the source of the economic change we've witnessed over the past half-century: scientific progress and digital transformation. Prioritizing science worked for higher ed during the Cold War when, in search of solutions to military challenges, federal funding skyrocketed like CVS sales of Wegovy and other semaglutides. Today's biggest problems are environmental, socioeconomic, and biological. But if and when they are solved, they're more likely to be solved by science/tech than other disciplines. If more colleges and universities led with science, they'd launch more economically relevant programs. According to one study of new programs, only 15% were STEM; 75% were in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. And schools would be more likely to discontinue unproductive programs. Science tends to move on faster than other fields of study. After all, no college still offers programs in phrenology or alchemy. They'd also focus more resources on higher value programs. One of higher education's unsung scandals is enrollment caps for the most remunerative majors, namely the most technical and scientific. While student demand for quantitative programs – computer science, engineering, data science, and now machine learning/AI – doubles and doubles again, colleges and universities have added faculty slower than it now takes to shop at CVS. The result: not nearly enough seats, particularly at public institutions. Many publics play a bait-and-switch game, admitting students as freshmen then rejecting them from higher value technical programs as sophomores and juniors – ostensibly via use of outdated prerequisites, weed-out courses, and GPA requirements, but actually due to lack of capacity. So nearly half of all students who say they want to complete these programs never do. What would it mean to make science primus inter pares in American higher education? Here's a modest proposal: The education and labor market challenges we're facing are not unique to the U.S. As they're a byproduct of digital transformation of the economy and education's failure (so far) to keep up, everyone is in the same boat. A recent OECD survey of high school students across 80 countries found 'high levels of career uncertainty and confusion' because 'job expectations… bear little relationship to actual patterns of labor market demand.' Career-launch confrères in Canada and the UK are struggling like never before to land good first jobs. But all the more reason to build new educational models to keep up with economic change. New STEM programs delivered by faculty with industry experience are likely to provide straighter lines to more good first jobs. As America leads the world in digital transformation, we should lead in our response to digital transformation. A science-first system of higher education would also give us a better shot at preserving our AI lead because universities would attract more research funding. The federal government – at least this Administration – is more likely to provide Cold War-era levels of research support to universities that privilege and prioritize science. Although STEM faculty and researchers are the primary victims of Trump Administration attempts to cut federal research funding by a third, higher education's political and public funding challenges have hardly stemmed from STEM. Prioritizing science anew doesn't mean no room for arts, humanities, and social sciences. We need them not only to graduate well-rounded students, but also to push back when science yields inhumane outcomes (like locking up the pharamaceutical products you need). But that doesn't mean that 70% of students should concentrate in these fields, certainly not without a hybrid-tech component. The recent increase in double majors indicates that many students already intuit as much. And note that our economic rival, China, isn't putting humanities professors in charge of universities. The vast majority of Chinese university presidents are scientists, engineers, or economists. Not surprisingly, China is pulling ahead of us across a panoply of scientific metrics. If this isn't another Sputnik moment, I don't know what is. The alternative is to remain closed off from our changed world. Matt Bai notes one survey showed that 'less than 1 in 3 shoppers are willing to hang around once they realize that the item they want is behind glass.' So let's make CVS stand for Colleges Value Science rather than a Museum of the American University. Unless and until we begin putting science and technology first, colleges and universities will have a problem that neither teeth whitening strips nor body wash will fix.
Time Business News
11 hours ago
- Time Business News
Why ItaliaChains Has the Best Moissanite Tennis Chains (And Why Yours Keeps Flipping)
If you've ever worn a men's tennis chain that flips more than a politician during election week, chances are it didn't come from ItaliaChains. Because let's be honest — the moissanite tennis chain might be one of the shiniest pieces in men's jewelry, but not all of them are created equal. Especially when 90% of what's out there is mass-produced in China, with stones that fall out faster than your trust in gas station sushi. Enter: — the real ones behind the best handmade Italian tennis chains, made from solid 925 sterling silver, set with VVS D-color moissanite, and polished smooth like a glass of aged limoncello. Let's start with the obvious: these chains are actually made in Italy. Not 'Italy-inspired,' not 'Italy-designed,' and definitely not 'ships from Italy but made in who-knows-where.' ItaliaChains handcrafts their moissanite tennis chains in Arezzo, Italy, the jewelry capital of the country. Each link is carefully engineered and polished to lie flat and smooth on the neck — no flipping, twisting, or awkward tangling. Because what's the point of an iced-out chain if the back of it is always the part showing? Look, we're not here to throw shade — but let's call it what it is. Mass-produced Chinese tennis chains often: Use cheap prongs or glue to hold stones (not good) Don't have proper link balancing, so the chain flips like a pancake Feature stones that look shiny… until you turn on the light shiny… until you turn on the light Are plated over brass or mystery metal instead of real silver Meanwhile, ItaliaChains offers: Real VVS D-color moissanite stones — yes, they pass the diamond tester stones — yes, they pass the diamond tester Solid 925 sterling silver bases or 14k gold vermeil over silver bases or over silver Hand-set stones that won't pop out the second you sneeze that won't pop out the second you sneeze Polished links that are smooth, flexible, and made to lay flat like a pro 1. 'This moissanite tennis chain looks better than my friend's real diamonds. No one can tell the difference — not even the jeweler.' — Andre M., New York, NY 2. 'Finally, a tennis chain that doesn't flip! I've worn mine every day for two months and it still sits perfectly flat.' — Brian S., Los Angeles, CA 3. 'I bought the 4mm moissanite tennis chain from ItaliaChains and paired it with their matching bracelet. People think I dropped 10K — I let them think that.' — Jason R., Miami, FL 4. 'I compared mine to one I bought from another site. The ItaliaChains version was heavier, the stones were brighter, and it didn't turn my neck green.' — Elijah W., Chicago, IL 5. 'Customer service helped me pick the right length, and the quality blew me away. Handmade in Italy really does hit different.' — Marcus D., Houston, TX If you're looking for a moissanite tennis chain that shines like diamonds, doesn't flip like a fish, and actually lasts more than two parties, is where it's at. With real Italian craftsmanship, GRA-certified moissanite, and no middleman markup, they're delivering men's tennis chains that check every box: ✅ Shine✅ Weight✅ Comfort✅ Durability ✅ Not made in a warehouse that also sells fidget spinners Skip the hype. Go for the handmade. ItaliaChains has the smoothest, iciest, flattest moissanite tennis chains on the market — and your neck will thank you. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
