
Obesity drug prices are dropping, but getting a steady supply remains a challenge
The drugs are still in high demand
Wegovy and Zepbound are part of a wave of obesity medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists that have soared in popularity.
Zepbound brought in $2.3 billion in U.S. sales during this year's first quarter, making it one of drugmaker Eli Lilly's best sellers.
Advertisement
Novo Nordisk says Wegovy has about 200,000 weekly prescriptions in the U.S., where it brought in nearly $1.9 billion in first-quarter sales.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Insurance coverage is increasing — for some
The benefits consultant Mercer says more businesses with 500 or more employees are adding coverage of the injected drugs for their workers and family members.
And Novo says 85% of its patients who have coverage in the U.S. pay $25 or less per month.
Plus some patients with diabetes can get coverage of the GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Mounjaro from Novo and Lilly that are approved to treat that condition.
But most state and federally funded Medicaid programs don't cover the drugs for obesity and neither does Medicare, the federal program mainly for people age 65 and older.
Advertisement
Even the plans that cover the drugs often pay only a portion of the bill, exposing patients to hundreds of dollars in monthly costs, said Dr. Beverly Tchang.
Drugmakers offer help with these out-of-pocket costs, but that assistance can be limited.
'Coverage is not the same as access,' said Tchang, a New York-based doctor who serves as a paid advisor to both Novo and Lilly.
But coverage remains inconsistent
Bill-payers like employers are nervous about drugs that might be used by a lot of people indefinitely.
Some big employers have dropped coverage of the drugs due to the expense. Pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, also are starting to pick one brand over the other as they negotiate deals with the drugmakers.
One of the nation's largest PBMs, run by CVS Health, dropped Zepbound from its national formulary, or list of covered drugs, on July 1 in favor of Wegovy.
That forced Tchang to figure out another treatment plan for several patients, many of whom took Zepbound because it made them less nauseous.
Dr. Courtney Younglove's office sends prospective patients a video link showing them how to check their insurer's website for coverage of the drugs before they visit.
'Then some of them just cancel their appointment because they don't have coverage,' the Overland Park, Kansas, doctor said.
Cheaper compounded drugs are still being sold
Compounding pharmacies and other entities were allowed to make off-brand, cheaper copies of Wegovy and Zepbound when there was a shortage of the drugs. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determined earlier this year that the shortage had ended.
That should have ended the compounded versions, but there is an exception: Some compounding is permitted when a drug is personalized for the patient.
The health care company Hims & Hers Health offers compounded doses of semaglutide, the drug behind Wegovy, that adjust dose levels to help patients manage side effects. Hims says these plans start at $165 a month for 12 months, with customers paying in full upfront.
Advertisement
It's a contentious issue. Eli Lilly has sued pharmacies and telehealth companies trying to stop them from selling compounded versions of its products.
Novo recently ended a short-lived partnership with Hims to sell Wegovy because the telehealth company continued compounding. Novo says the compounded versions of its drug put patient safety at risk because ingredients are made by foreign suppliers not monitored by US regulators.
Hims says it checks all ingredients to make sure they meet U.S. quality and safety standards. It also uses a third-party lab to verify that a drug's strength is accurately labeled.
Prices have dropped
Both drugmakers are selling most of their doses for around $500 a month to people without insurance, a few hundred dollars less than some initial prices.
Even so, that expense would eat up about 14% of the average annual per person income in the U.S., which is around $43,000.
There are some factors that may suppress prices over time. Both companies are developing pill versions of their treatments. Those could hit the market in the next year or so, which might drive down prices for the older, injectable doses.
Younglove said some of her patients save as much as 15% by getting their doses shipped from a pharmacy in Canada. They used to get them from an Israeli pharmacy until the Canadians dropped their prices.
She says competition like this, plus the introduction of pill versions, will pressure U.S. prices.
Advertisement
'I think price wars are going to drive it down,' she said. 'I think we are in the early stages. I have hope.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Growth Buy: Eli Lilly vs. Viking Therapeutics
Eli Lilly is a leader in the weight loss drug market, generating blockbuster revenue. Viking Therapeutics recently launched a phase 3 trial for its weight loss candidate -- and could have a promising future in the market. 10 stocks we like better than Eli Lilly › Though you may think "tech stocks" when someone mentions growth, you actually can find growth stocks throughout a wide variety of industries. Even those like pharmaceuticals, often known for the steadiness of their earnings, may, through certain specialty areas, offer you the opportunity for explosive growth. And today, the perfect example is weight loss drugs. Today's $28 billion weight loss drug market is on track to reach nearly $100 billion by 2030, according to Goldman Sachs Research, offering companies in the space an extremely solid opportunity over the next several years and likely beyond. Two names that have been making headlines in this field are Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) and Viking Therapeutics (NASDAQ: VKTX). The former is a current leader, already selling two blockbuster drugs prescribed for weight loss, and the latter is an up-and-coming player, with a candidate in late-stage trials. Which is the better growth buy today? Let's find out. Eli Lilly shares weight loss drug market leadership with fellow big pharma player Novo Nordisk. They each commercialize two drugs prescribed to people aiming to lose weight and have brought in billions of dollars in annual revenue. Here, I'll focus on Lilly. The company's drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound, are actually the same compound, tirzepatide. But it's sold under the name Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes and under the name Zepbound for weight loss. The drug acts by stimulating hormonal pathways involved in the control of blood sugar levels and appetite. Thanks to the efficacy of tirzepatide, demand has soared, even surpassing supply until Lilly expanded its production capacity. But Lilly isn't sitting still in the area of weight loss. The company also is developing other drug candidates that may improve upon tirzepatide. The closest to market right now is orforglipron, Lilly's oral candidate for weight loss that recently delivered positive phase 3 trial results. If approved, it would be the only oral weight loss drug of its class that doesn't require strict food and water restrictions. Lilly aims on applying for regulatory review by the end of this year. All of this could result in more growth for Lilly this year and well into the future. Viking Therapeutics is a biotech company specializing in metabolic conditions, and it's made great progress with its obesity drug candidate, VK2735. The potential drug, in subcutaneous form, recently entered a phase 3 trial, and an oral form is involved in a phase 2 trial. These candidates are in the same class as tirzepatide, so work in the same way. Investors have shown their excitement about Viking's program in the past: When the company reported positive phase 2 data for the subcutaneous VK2735 last year, the stock soared more than 120% in one trading session. The stock hasn't maintained those gains, but the movement shows that investors are interested in the program -- and more good news ahead could boost the stock again. Now you might wonder why investors are so excited about Viking if there already are other successful weight loss drugs on the market -- and Lilly even is likely to reach commercialization with an oral weight loss drug ahead of Viking. This is because demand is high, and this is set to continue, so there is plenty of room for more than a couple of companies to succeed in the space. Investors also have speculated about the idea of a big pharma company acquiring Viking to get in on this high growth market. Lilly has the first-to-market advantage, is closer to the finish line with an oral candidate, and already is generating major revenue from its weight loss portfolio. Viking, if successful through clinical trials, could carve out market share and deliver major revenue growth down the road -- or the company could be acquired, offering investors another way to potentially gain. Each company offers certain advantages. Now let's answer our question. If all goes well for Viking, it could represent the better growth buy as, starting from zero product revenue today, this player could see revenue soar if and when it brings a weight loss drug to market. And we've seen that Viking's stock price is very reactive to news, meaning the stock could skyrocket in such a scenario. But, if you go the Viking route, you should be comfortable with risk as uncertainty remains: The company hasn't yet reached the finish line with a product. If you're more of a cautious investor, though, don't worry. You may opt for Lilly as, even though it's climbed 140% over the past three years, it still could have plenty of room to run over the long term thanks to this weight loss drug growth story. Before you buy stock in Eli Lilly, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Eli Lilly wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Adria Cimino has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk and Viking Therapeutics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Growth Buy: Eli Lilly vs. Viking Therapeutics was originally published by The Motley Fool

an hour ago
Obesity drug prices are dropping, but getting a steady supply remains a challenge
Prices are falling for the popular obesity treatments Wegovy and Zepbound, but steady access to the drugs remains challenging. The medications still amount to around $500 per month for those without insurance — out of reach for many patients. And even for people with insurance, coverage remains uneven. 'The medications should be available, the question is at what price and can people sustain that,' said Matt Maciejewski, a Duke University professor who studies obesity treatment coverage. Doctors say the situation forces them to get creative in treating patients, but there's hope that prices may fall more in the future. Wegovy and Zepbound are part of a wave of obesity medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists that have soared in popularity. Zepbound brought in $2.3 billion in U.S. sales during this year's first quarter, making it one of drugmaker Eli Lilly's best sellers. Novo Nordisk says Wegovy has about 200,000 weekly prescriptions in the U.S., where it brought in nearly $1.9 billion in first-quarter sales. The benefits consultant Mercer says more businesses with 500 or more employees are adding coverage of the injected drugs for their workers and family members. And Novo says 85% of its patients who have coverage in the U.S. pay $25 or less per month. Plus some patients with diabetes can get coverage of the GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Mounjaro from Novo and Lilly that are approved to treat that condition. But most state and federally funded Medicaid programs don't cover the drugs for obesity and neither does Medicare, the federal program mainly for people age 65 and older. Even the plans that cover the drugs often pay only a portion of the bill, exposing patients to hundreds of dollars in monthly costs, said Dr. Beverly Tchang. Drugmakers offer help with these out-of-pocket costs, but that assistance can be limited. 'Coverage is not the same as access,' said Tchang, a New York-based doctor who serves as a paid advisor to both Novo and Lilly. Bill-payers like employers are nervous about drugs that might be used by a lot of people indefinitely. Some big employers have dropped coverage of the drugs due to the expense. Pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, also are starting to pick one brand over the other as they negotiate deals with the drugmakers. One of the nation's largest PBMs, run by CVS Health, dropped Zepbound from its national formulary, or list of covered drugs, on July 1 in favor of Wegovy. That forced Tchang to figure out another treatment plan for several patients, many of whom took Zepbound because it made them less nauseous. Dr. Courtney Younglove's office sends prospective patients a video link showing them how to check their insurer's website for coverage of the drugs before they visit. 'Then some of them just cancel their appointment because they don't have coverage,' the Overland Park, Kansas, doctor said. Compounding pharmacies and other entities were allowed to make off-brand, cheaper copies of Wegovy and Zepbound when there was a shortage of the drugs. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determined earlier this year that the shortage had ended. That should have ended the compounded versions, but there is an exception: Some compounding is permitted when a drug is personalized for the patient. The health care company Hims & Hers Health offers compounded doses of semaglutide, the drug behind Wegovy, that adjust dose levels to help patients manage side effects. Hims says these plans start at $165 a month for 12 months, with customers paying in full upfront. It's a contentious issue. Eli Lilly has sued pharmacies and telehealth companies trying to stop them from selling compounded versions of its products. Novo recently ended a short-lived partnership with Hims to sell Wegovy because the telehealth company continued compounding. Novo says the compounded versions of its drug put patient safety at risk because ingredients are made by foreign suppliers not monitored by US regulators. Hims says it checks all ingredients to make sure they meet U.S. quality and safety standards. It also uses a third-party lab to verify that a drug's strength is accurately labeled. Both drugmakers are selling most of their doses for around $500 a month to people without insurance, a few hundred dollars less than some initial prices. Even so, that expense would eat up about 14% of the average annual per person income in the U.S., which is around $43,000. There are some factors that may suppress prices over time. Both companies are developing pill versions of their treatments. Those could hit the market in the next year or so, which might drive down prices for the older, injectable doses. Younglove said some of her patients save as much as 15% by getting their doses shipped from a pharmacy in Canada. They used to get them from an Israeli pharmacy until the Canadians dropped their prices. She says competition like this, plus the introduction of pill versions, will pressure U.S. prices. 'I think price wars are going to drive it down,' she said. 'I think we are in the early stages. I have hope.'


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Insurance cutbacks on costly GLP-1 coverage are good for small businesses
So it was welcome news in April when Advertisement 'We've been hearing from employers, with increased alarm, about the cost of these medicines,' Blue Cross spokesperson Amy McHugh told the Globe. 'They need some relief.' Advertisement Small, fully insured employers in Massachusetts already operate at a severe disadvantage on premium costs for a variety of regulatory and marketplace reasons, compared to their larger competitors. As president and CEO of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts, representing about 4,000 mostly smaller employers, I know of many small businesses that have faced double-digit premium increases year to year. It is now not unusual for a small employer in the Commonwealth to have annual premiums of $40,000 for each employee with a family plan. The primary tools employers have to lower those premiums are to go to high-deductible and high-copay plans, shifting more costs to employees. The disproportionate cost of health insurance for small employers is rapidly making them less competitive for workforce recruitment and retention, and salary growth is being held back because of increases in employee benefit costs. Meanwhile, drug manufacturers continue to seek revenue growth through high reimbursement rates and increases in the use of their products. When they can increase both their prices and sales volume, they see massive bottom-line growth. And they wield considerable political power to get provider-friendly public policy. If it weren't for that political power, government regulation could cap name-brand drug reimbursements at reasonable levels. But absent regulation, we need consumer choice — and engaged insurers — working for the premium payers, not the drug companies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Point32Health are now doing the right thing for premium payers: They are giving large employers the option of paying more to retain coverage of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss. But all employers can now restrict coverage of these drugs to their original purpose of combating diabetes. In so doing, insurers representing struggling small businesses and their workforces are effectively telling the drug companies that they may seek a rapidly growing customer base or charge unjustifiably high prices, but they can't have both. Advertisement Consumers will still have the choice to pay for these drugs out of pocket or to move to an insurer or plan that covers the drugs — but that will mean higher monthly premiums. If consumers don't want the drugs, they shouldn't be forced to pay higher premiums for others who are using them. The drug manufacturers have choices, too. They could simply lower their prices to the levels they charge in other countries. That would be the best possible outcome. As the two largest health insurers in the state, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Point32Health are right to exert this kind of pressure on drug companies. We need more of this from other insurers as part of broader efforts to bring down unaffordable health care costs in the Commonwealth. Ultimately, to make health care more affordable, consumers paying insurance premiums must become more important than drug manufacturers. For that, Massachusetts needs both lower prices and more empowerment of consumers to choose the insurance coverage they need and can afford.