
South Korea moves to end 'baby exports,' state to take full responsibility
In just a few days, South Korea will officially end its decadeslong practice of allowing private agencies to handle adoptions and begin a new era in which the state takes primary responsibility for the process, grounded in public oversight and the protection of children's rights.
The shift is more than a bureaucratic change. It is a historical reckoning.
For over 70 years, beginning in the aftermath of the Korean War, South Korea sent more than 170,000 children overseas for adoption, a number some experts say is closer to 250,000 when unofficial records are considered. This made Korea one of the most prolific 'exporters' of children for adoption in the world.
Under the new system, domestic and international adoptions will be regulated separately by two new laws: the Special Act on Domestic Adoption and the Act on Intercountry Adoption. Both were passed by the National Assembly in 2023 and come into force this Saturday. With these changes, the Ministry of Health and Welfare becomes the primary authority on adoption policy, while local governments and the National Center for the Rights of the Child (NCRC) will directly oversee procedures.
'From July 19, the state, local governments and the NCRC will carry out what private adoption agencies have handled until now,' the NCRC said in a written response. 'All procedures will be based on the best interests of the child, as laid out in the Hague Adoption Convention.'
What's changing
The reforms reorganize how adoptions are handled from beginning to end, both domestically and internationally.
In domestic adoptions, local governments will identify and protect children in need of adoption before placement. Prospective adoptive parents will apply through the NCRC, which will assign certified agencies to conduct family counseling and home studies.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare's adoption policy committee will review and approve child-parent matches, with the NCRC serving as its secretariat. Courts will continue to issue final adoption approvals and now have the power to authorize temporary custody before final approval, to support early bonding.
In international adoptions, the state becomes the official 'central authority,' responsible for overseeing both outbound (Korean children abroad) and inbound (overseas children to Korea) adoptions. The Ministry of Health and Welfare negotiates procedures with other countries and monitors post-adoption welfare.
Certified agencies conduct screening and monitoring, while the courts finalize placements.
Children's participation is also newly enshrined in law. Courts must now listen to adoptees' views regardless of age, a change from the previous threshold of 13 years old.
'It's not just a system, it's our life'
While many adoptees have welcomed South Korea's adoption reform, they emphasize that for them, the issue is not just administrative — it is deeply personal.
'I think it's great to move all those files to the government,' said one adoptee who was sent to a European country as a child and requested anonymity. 'But it's not just about the files. It's about who we are. These documents are the only legacy we have from Korea.'
For many adoptees, their adoption records — sometimes just a handwritten note or an intake form from decades ago — are the only remaining link to their birth families and origins. The nationalization of adoption has meant that these records are now being transferred from private agencies to the NCRC. But the process, some say, has been opaque and confusing.
'There's real chaos in the adoptee community right now,' she said. 'We don't know what's going on with the file transfer. Are we sure they're really moving everything? Are they giving up on anything along the way? That's what we're scared of.'
'It's not just a document. It's our life. It's our only hope of finding out who we were," she emphasized.
Access to the files is also a growing issue. During the transition, adoptees have faced delays and uncertainty.
'For the past few months, we haven't been able to access anything. Not from the agencies, not from the NCRC,' she said. 'They need time to archive and organize the materials, and I understand that. But we need to be told what's happening.'
For her, the hope is that greater public awareness, stronger support systems, and more inclusive attitudes will lead to a future where children in need are embraced within Korean society.
"Korean society should see us as assets. Not discriminating (against) us by saying, 'Why don't you speak Korean?'" she added."It's not the pity look we need, we would love to hear how Korea is proud of us, how much they want us here, how much they welcome us."
Challenges ahead
Despite the milestone reform, structural and logistical challenges loom large.
As of mid-2025, the state has received original documents from only four major adoption agencies. Records held by many child welfare institutions remain unaccounted for. Even among those received, secure and permanent storage remains a challenge.
The NCRC had requested 2.4 billion won this year to establish proper storage facilities, but only 1.78 billion won was approved. A temporary archive has been established controversially, in a former logistics warehouse near Goyang's Jichuk Station.
'It's painful to hear that adoptees' documents, these irreplaceable pieces of their identity, are sitting in a remote warehouse with poor transportation access,' said Hellen Noh, professor emeritus of social welfare at Soongsil University.
The government has pledged to build a permanent adoption archive in the future, but no timeline has been announced. Meanwhile, access to records remains heavily restricted.
Under current law, adoptees may only obtain personal information about birth parents if the parents are deceased and the request meets a narrowly defined medical or legal threshold.
A constitutional review is now underway on whether such limits violate adoptees' right to know their origins.
'Adoption must be the last resort'
For Professor Noh, the deeper issue is not how well the adoption system works but how little is done to prevent the need for adoption in the first place.
'Adoption is not the solution we should be working toward,' she said. 'What we need to build is a society where every family, regardless of its form, has the support to raise their own children.'
She pointed to the legacy of coercion and profit in South Korea's international adoption system. 'Too many children were sent abroad not because it was best for them, but because it sustained institutions and made money,' she said. 'That must never happen again.'
She also underscored the need for support services for struggling families, including single parents, disabled caregivers and low-income households, so that children are not separated due to poverty or stigma.
'If a child can grow up safely and lovingly in their birth family, that's what should happen,' she said. 'Only when that is impossible, and I mean truly impossible, should adoption be considered.'
South Korea, she added, must also confront its social biases. 'When a single mother wants to raise her child, she's often called selfish. There's no celebration, only shame. That has to change.'
The shift to public adoption coincides with South Korea's long-delayed ratification of the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, which is expected to take effect in late October.
The convention, adopted globally in 1993, seeks to prevent child trafficking and ensure ethical standards in international adoptions. Korea had joined the treaty in 2013 but failed to ratify it due to misalignment with domestic law, a gap now being closed through the 2023 legislation.
Still, the road ahead is uncertain. Many of the reforms will require further legislative action and budgetary support under the new administration following the June 3 presidential election.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee, Kazakh president hold phone talks, discuss bilateral cooperation
President Lee Jae Myung held phone talks Wednesday with Kazakhstan's president and discussed ways to enhance bilateral cooperation, Lee's office said. During the call, Lee expressed gratitude to Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev for sending a congratulatory message on the launch of his administration, presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said in a written briefing. The two leaders agreed to expand cooperation in areas such as infrastructure and critical minerals, Kang said. Lee also voiced hope that the two countries' strategic partnership, established in 2009, will continue to grow stronger. In particular, he thanked Tokayev for his active support for the repatriation of the remains of Gen. Hong Beom-do, a historic South Korean independence fighter against Japan's 1910-45 colonial rule of Korea. Hong led Korean independence forces to major victories against Japanese troops in 1920. He moved to the Soviet Union the following year to escape Japanese persecution, and in 1937 was forcibly relocated to present-day Kazakhstan under Soviet leader Joseph Stalin's deportation policy targeting ethnic Koreans. He died in Kazakhstan's Kyzylorda region in 1943, two years before Korea regained independence. His remains were repatriated to South Korea in 2021. Lee also called for continued interest and support for South Korean companies operating in Kazakhstan, the office said. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Toddlers cramming for English tests: Time for a legal ban?
Bill seeks to curb intensive English courses for young kids amid frenzy over elite English preschools A legislative proposal seeking to ban intensive early English education for toddlers and cap lesson hours for young children was submitted to South Korea's National Assembly on Wednesday, amid a continued frenzy over English-language preschools. The bill, introduced by Rep. Kang Kyung-sook of the minor Rebuilding Korea Party, proposes banning private English instruction for children under 36 months and limiting lessons for those aged 3 and older to 40 minutes per day. Violators could face penalties such as suspension of business or revocation of business licenses. 'Early childhood is a stage when children naturally learn through play and grow both physically and mentally,' states the bill, which seeks to amend the current law regulating the private education industry. 'Private education at this stage not only yields limited educational benefits relative to its excessive cost, time and difficulty, but also raises concerns about potential violations of young children's rights. Prompt policy reform is urgently needed.' While private English academies, commonly known as English kindergartens, have long catered to parents seeking early exposure to English for their children, the latest legislative move comes amid an intensifying race to gain admission to elite educational programs. Children typically enter English kindergartens around the age of 4 or 5, but industry sources say more parents are now enrolling children as young as 3 in preparation courses to boost their chances of acceptance. This trend is especially pronounced in areas like Seoul's Gangnam district, known for its high concentration of private academies. One famous English kindergarten with three branches in Gangnam requires prospective students as young as 3 years old to take an entrance exam. The test includes tasks such as identifying the correct English spelling of pictured objects and describing images in full English sentences. The trend of early English education is spreading beyond Gangnam, according to a joint survey released on June 10 by the Rebuilding Korea Party and the civic group World Without Worries About Private Education. Last year, private academies in five cities across Gyeonggi Province — Goyang, Anyang, Seongnam, Yongin and Hwaseong — offered 376 English classes for toddlers, an increase of 101 from 275 classes the previous year. The average daily lesson time at these institutions was five hours and eight minutes, nearly two hours longer than the three hours and 20 minutes received by first and second graders in elementary school in 2024. However, a separate survey conducted by the World Without Worries About Private Education showed that nine out of 10 daycare and kindergarten teachers nationwide are skeptical about English education for young children. Of the 1,733 respondents, 87.7 percent said English instruction offered by institutions such as English kindergartens was "unnecessary." When asked to identify the most serious issue with early English learning, 63.5 percent pointed to "caregivers demanding academic performance from children without considering their developmental stage." As for potential solutions, 65.6 percent supported "expanding public education," while 62.7 percent called for "reforms to the entrance exam-oriented education system." Other suggestions included "enhancing parental guidance on early development (57.6 percent)" and "regulating academies targeting young learners (50.7 percent)." Regarding the appropriate starting age for private education, 49 percent answered that it should begin after entering elementary school, followed by age 5 (30.5 percent) and age 4 (11.9 percent). Meanwhile, some parents claim that restricting private education constitutes an excessive violation of their personal freedoms. 'For children who are naturally gifted in languages, whether it's Korean or English, English kindergartens can provide a great learning environment. Dismissing them altogether without considering individual differences could ultimately harm a child's future,' Bu Dae-hye, a 35-year-old office worker in Seoul whose 3-year-old son attends an English kindergarten in Bundang, Gyeonggi Province, told The Korea Herald. "Parents know their children best, and making the right educational choices for them should be a given. Regulating that through law doesn't align with the principles of a democratic society."


Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Senior N. Korean presence at PLA banquet marks thaw in China Ties
North Korea dispatched senior officials to a Chinese Embassy reception in Pyongyang marking the anniversary of China's armed forces — one of several emerging signs of thawing ties between the two countries after a period of diplomatic chill. Chinese Ambassador to North Korea Wang Yajun hosted the event at the embassy on Tuesday to mark the 98th anniversary of the founding of the People's Liberation Army, which falls on August 1, North Korean state media reported Wednesday. "The banquet participants raised their glasses for … the militant friendship and unity between the armies of the DPRK and China, and for the continuous strengthening and development of the Chinese People's Liberation Army,' the Rodong Sinmun, the official newspaper of the ruling Workers' Party of Korea, reported. DPRK is the abbreviation for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The celebration was notably attended by senior North Korean officials, including Vice Defense Minister Kim Kang-il, Deputy Director of the General Political Bureau of the Korean People's Army Pak Yong-il, Deputy Director of the Party Central Committee Mun Song-hyok and Vice Foreign Minister Pak Myong-ho. Pak Yong-il delivered a congratulatory speech at the reception, according to the Chinese Embassy in Pyongyang. 'He stated that the Chinese and Korean militaries fought side by side in multiple wars to resist imperialist invaders, standing shoulder to shoulder in the same trench and creating a shining example of friendly unity,' Pak was quoted as saying in a Chinese-language statement provided by the Chinese embassy. 'The DPRK side is willing to work together with the Chinese side, in accordance with the noble will of the top leaders of the two parties and two countries, to jointly make efforts to provide solid support for the development of DPRK–China friendly relations and the socialist cause of both countries," Pak was quoted as saying in the statement. North Korea has marked the PLA anniversary in various ways — though not consistently each year — such as publishing occasional editorials in the Rodong Sinmun or dispatching envoys to banquets hosted by the Chinese Embassy in Pyongyang. Although this year did not mark a quinquennial milestone such as the 90th or 95th anniversary, North Korea still dispatched senior officials to the PLA event. The move echoed the 2017 reception for the 90th anniversary, which was attended by then–Deputy Minister of the People's Armed Forces Kang Sun-nam. Beijing and Pyongyang reconnect Tuesday's event was one of the emerging signs of thawing ties between China and North Korea, following a period of strained relations that overlapped with North Korea's closer alignment with Russia. North Korea on July 9 sent higher-ranking officials than in previous years to a banquet hosted by the Chinese Embassy in Pyongyang, commemorating the 64th anniversary of the 1961 Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance between the two countries. While last year's event was attended by Kim Sung-chan, president of Kim Il Sung University and chair of the DPRK-China Friendship Parliamentary Group under the rubber-stamp Supreme People's Assembly, this year saw the presence of Kang Yun-sok, vice president of the SPA Presidium — a notable upgrade in diplomatic protocol. The Rodong Sinmun published the article "DPRK-China Friendship and Cooperation Strengthening Along the Socialist Path," highlighting the enduring significance of the treaty on July 11, the day the treaty was forged. The Rodong Sinmun has traditionally carried an article marking the anniversary of the 1961 pact. Speculation of strained ties arose when no such article appeared last year. However, this year, the coverage reappeared. Although 2024 was designated as the "Year of DPRK-China Friendship" to commemorate the 75th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries, no high-profile events took place that year. Separately, North Korea's state-run tourism website DPRK Tourism posted a schedule of international train routes in mid-July. The list included round trips between Pyongyang and Beijing, Pyongyang and Dandong, and Pyongyang and Moscow. All three routes had been suspended since February 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Service on the Moscow line resumed in mid-June this year, while the Beijing and Dandong routes to China remain inactive. If resumed, cross-border passenger rail service with China would return more than after five and a half years.