Witness History The Iran nuclear deal
Officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), it was agreed between Iran and a group of world powers known as the P5+1 – the US, UK, France, China, Russia and Germany, together with the EU.
The accord came after years of tension over Iran's alleged efforts to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran insisted that its nuclear programme was entirely peaceful, but much of the international community did not believe that. Iran agreed to limit its nuclear programme and facilitate international inspections, in return for economic sanctions relief.
Baroness Catherine Ashton, who was the European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, tells Ben Henderson how the plan was achieved.
Eye-witness accounts brought to life by archive. Witness History is for those fascinated by the past. We take you to the events that have shaped our world through the eyes of the people who were there.
For nine minutes every day, we take you back in time and all over the world, to examine wars, coups, scientific discoveries, cultural moments and much more.
Recent episodes explore everything from the death of Adolf Hitler, the first spacewalk and the making of the movie Jaws, to celebrity tortoise Lonesome George, the Kobe earthquake and the invention of superglue.
We look at the lives of some of the most famous leaders, artists, scientists and personalities in history, including: Eva Peron – Argentina's Evita; President Ronald Reagan and his famous 'tear down this wall' speech; Thomas Keneally on why he wrote Schindler's List; and Jacques Derrida, France's 'rock star' philosopher.
You can learn all about fascinating and surprising stories, such as the civil rights swimming protest; the disastrous D-Day rehearsal; and the death of one of the world's oldest languages.
(Photo: Baroness Catherine Ashton and Javad Mohammad Zarif, Iranian Foreign Minister, during nuclear negotiations in 2014. Credit: Dieter Nagl/AFP via Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Free speech under threat as Brits fear causing offence over race religion and immigration
Free speech is under threat in Britain because people fear causing offence over race, religion and immigration, according to a new study. More than a third of Britons felt they had to self-censor their views on race or ethnicity while 32 per cent said they felt they could not speak freely about immigration or religious extremism. Some 41 per cent felt they had to hold back their views on transgender issues while 31 per cent felt constrained from discussing the conflict in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas terror attack. Almost half of Britons believe people are too easily offended, according to research for the Commission for Countering Extremism, which advises the Government. Older, white males are among those who feel the most restricted, and the more outspoken a person's views, the more likely they are feel constrained by the risk of offending others. The study, based on interviews with 2,500 people, was conducted by Ipsos to establish the state of free speech in Britain and was first reported by the Telegraph. People who are white, male, older and not university educated were more strongly in favour of free speech, regardless of the issue, but felt less able to speak their minds, the poll found. Some 48 per cent of this group said they felt they had to hold back their comments on race, far higher than the average of 36 per cent. The same was true on immigration, where 43 per cent felt they had to hold back on their views compared to an overall average among the public of 32 per cent. Among religious groups, Christians were more likely to back the right to free speech, but also more likely to feel they had to hold back on expressing their views. By contrast, women, younger Britons and people from ethnic minorities or non-Christian religions tended to think that people needed to be more sensitive in the way they spoke. Meanwhile the poll found that people predominantly held back from expressing their views to avoid causing offence or starting an argument. Some 46 per cent resisted expressing their views on any religious figure, text or teaching and 35 per cent held back their political views to avoid causing offence. Some people held back because of heightened concerns about their safety, with a quarter restraining themselves from discussing religion because of safety fears and 17 per cent their political views. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said that the Left's 'determination to shut down debate around immigration has created a chilling environment for free speech'. He told the Telegraph: 'In this context, a catch-all definition of Islamophobia would be a disaster, worsening the culture of fear that has spread throughout society.'
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Afghan data breach: What we do and do not know
A major data breach which led to thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK became public knowledge for the first time this Tuesday, the High Court ruled it was time for the details to see the light of day - but the revelations have raised as many questions as they answered. What data was leaked and how was it discovered? A spreadsheet containing the personal details of almost 19,000 people who had asked to come to the UK in order to flee the Taliban was accidentally leaked by an official working at the Ministry of Defence in February unnamed official emailed the document outside of the government team processing Afghan relocation applications and it made its way into the public domain. The police decided no investigation was needed - but we do not know if that official is still employed by the government. The leaked document contained the names, contact details and, in some cases, family information of a huge number of people who believed their association with British forces during the Afghanistan war could leave them at risk of leak only came to light in August 2023, when the names of nine people who had applied to move to the UK on government realised the list was out there and, fearing it could fall into the hands of the Taliban, sought to supress any knowledge of it by getting a court injunction. How many people were relocated after the breach? In September 2023, it was feared as many as 100,000 could be impacted by the leak, when taking into account family April 2024, the government covertly set up the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR) for people whose details were included to offer them a way out of Afghanistan - but they were not told about the new, secret route was separate from the main Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) May 2024, the court had seen evidence that around 20,000 people could be eligible for relocation under the new Secretary John Healey said on Tuesday that around 900 people are already in the UK or are on their way, along with 3,600 of their family members.A further 600 offers having been made, though he did not specify whether that included those people's do not know how many people who were on the leaked list are still in total, around 36,000 Afghans have moved to the UK since the withdrawal of international troops. Both the ARR and Arap schemes are now closed. Did anyone die as a result of the leak? It is not possible to say definitively whether anyone came to harm as a direct result of the leak, and the MoD has refused to be drawn on this a review carried out for the government in early 2025 by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer found the leaked document "may not have spread nearly as widely as initially feared", and cast doubt on previous assessments that the information would have been of great value to the Rimmer concluded that, given the Taliban already has access to masses of data about the population of Afghanistan, it was "unlikely" it would have been the sole reason for a reprisal said while killings and human rights abuses against former officials are carried out, concern about a widespread retribution campaign had "diminished".But those included in the leaked document consider it a catastrophic failure which has increased the risk to them and their families. What was the financial cost of the secret relocation plan? The government has spent £400m on the scheme so far and anticipates spending a further £ is far below estimates heard in secret in the High Court in May 2024, which said it could cost "several billions".In total, the eventual cost of all efforts to relocate Afghans since 2021 will be around £5.5-£6bn, the government has said. What is a super-injunction and why was one put in place? Then-Defence Secretary Ben Wallace made an application to the High Court on 1 September 2023, seeking an injunction which would criminalise making the leak Taliban could seek out the list and use it to target people, the government Justice Knowles said the request was "exceptional" and went "further" than the government had asked, upgrading it to a super-injunction. This made it illegal to both reveal details of the leak and refer to the existence of the court order was regularly reviewed by another judge, Mr Justice Chamberlain, who in November 2023 said it was the first injunction of its kind and raised freedom of speech sought to lift the order the following May but the government appealed and it remained before being lifted on injunction was granted to prevent some of the most sensitive details in the leaked document being made public. Who knew what in government, and when? From August 2023, efforts were made to restrict the number of officials within the MoD who knew about the leak, and it is unclear when then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and other cabinet ministers were made December 2023, Healey - who was then shadow defence secretary - was briefed on the leak by then-Armed Forces Minister James said the shadow cabinet more widely was not told until after the general no point were MPs made aware of the leak, which has led to questions about the ability of the Commons to scrutinise the News understands that Labour ministers decided last Autumn that they needed to look at whether to lift the were held in November 2024 and a senior MoD source told BBC News the government's position at that time was that the super-injunction should be kept in place "pending further work".But the source said ministers had privately agreed that a review looking at the possibility of ending the super-injunction was the time the super-injunction was lifted, seven media organisations had become aware of the leak and had been blocked from publishing details. Additional reporting by Jack Fenwick
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Migration will make UK population grow faster than any other large EU country and could increase by nearly 7% to 74.3million by the 2100, UN figures suggest
Record-breaking levels of immigration is causing Britain's population to grow faster than any other major EU country, figures have claimed. According to the United Nations, the UK's population is expected to balloon 6.8 per cent from 69.6million to 74.3million by the end of the century. Only Luxembourg, with a tiny population of around 672,000, is expected to rise more, at 10 per cent. It's feared the main driving force behind the surge is the Britain's skyrocketing immigration crisis - which political parties have so far failed to tackle. The news comes as the number of people living in the UK swelled by 9.2 million in the last 25 years, according to a cross-party Lords report today. The study, drafted by Conservative peer Robin Hodgson and 'Blue Labour ' grandee Maurice Glasman, raised concerns the UK was well on track to becoming Europe's most crowded country. They have called for a new independent Office for Demographic Change amid fears the number of people living in Britain could increase to record levels. In their report, the pair say the current expansion is 'the most rapid increase in our nation's history' - and comes amid the small boats crisis which sees tens of thousands of immigrants sailing into the country illegally on small boats from the EU. Slamming politicians for 'kicking the can down the road', Lord Hodgson said: 'If we don't start putting plans in place now, the problems we face later will be far harder to solve.' However, according to the latest UN estimates, cumulative net migration to the UK will total 14.3million by the end of the century, fuelling the skyrocketing population surge. This figure is almost double the 7.8million predicted for France over the same period and just under a quarter more than Germany's expected growth. Data from the UN's World Population Prospects 2024 claims just three of the 27 current EU member states will see their populations increase between now and 2100. As well as Luxembourg's predicted boom, Sweden is also anticipated to grow by 6.7 per cent, while France will see its population swell by 2.8 per cent to just under 68.5million. The UK's figure is by far the largest, however, in terms of growth of any European country with more than a million residents in. Without positive net migration, the number of people living in the UK would fall by more than a quarter to below 50million by 2100. This is about what it was in 1950. This is because the average number of children conceived per woman is set to level off well below the 2.1 replacement rate, meaning the population will ultimately shrink. Between 2022 and 2023, the total fertility rate in England and Wales stood at just 1.44 children per woman, following a downward trend in recent years. The UN's summary also found the UK's median age by 2100 will rise from 40 last year to 47. However, without immigration - where arrivals tend to be younger - this figure will skyrocket to 50 as early as 2067. But Britain is currently facing an immigration crisis, which has seen tens of thousands of migrants illegally enter the country in recent years. Since January of this year, a record-breaking number of Channel crossings have been made, with more than 21,000 asylum seekers unlawfully reaching the UK. The toll of the migrant crisis has already placed a strain on government coffers, with Whitehall splashing out billions to house new arrivals in hotels. Likewise, the number of foreign nationals claiming Universal Credit has also swelled over three years, from 906,018 in June 2022 to a staggering 1.26million last month, figures published on Tuesday claimed. Of these, refugees made up 118,749, with 54,156 on humanitarian visas. Some 59.1 per cent were found to be unemployed in May. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'These are staggering figures and are clear proof that the Labour Government has lost control of our welfare system. 'We've set out a clear, common-sense position. Universal Credit should be reserved for UK citizens only. This is about fairness, responsibility and protecting support for those who've contributed to this country.' According to the separate cross-party report by Lord Hodgson and Lord Glasman, housing and public services now risk being strained due to the growing number of Britons. Lord Glasman has now called on political parties of all colours to tackle the issue, saying: 'Issues of demography and immigration have disfigured our public debates for too long. 'The general public is clearly looking for ways to address these challenges.' The Government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore, including changing existing rules to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water. The rule is in the process of being scrapped - but some police appear to be acting early, prompting anger from refugee charities. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer and French leader Emmanuel Macron announced a new migrant return deal to combat the crisis. However, only a day after unveiling the scheme alongside Mr Macron, the Prime Minister was facing objections from Europe and charities that helped ground the Tories' Rwanda plan. The new scheme was condemned by campaigners, who said they would support court cases brought by small-boat arrivals chosen to be sent back to France. A border union boss said the legal challenges could take a year.
