logo
‘Just do it': Abbie Chatfield sparks outrage with shocking call to American ‘incels'

‘Just do it': Abbie Chatfield sparks outrage with shocking call to American ‘incels'

News.com.au5 hours ago
Abbie Chatfield is under fire for a video heavily insinuating 'incels' should harm US President Donald Trump.
The Sydney-based social media personality, 30, a prominent left-wing podcaster and influencer, shared the clip to TikTok where she referenced 'incels' and asked 'when are you going to do it?', without directly naming the President.
Incel, short for 'involuntarily celibate', refers to an online subculture of young men who blame women for denying them sexual attention.
A number of so-called incels have been involved in violent attacks, most notoriously Alek Minassian, 32, who killed 10 people and injured 16 when he drove a van into a crowd of pedestrians in Toronto, Canada, in 2018.
Chatfield, who regularly posts videos railing against Mr Trump, did not directly name the President in her video, but hinted he should be harmed while making a gun symbol with her fingers.
'Americans, when are you going to do it?' she said.
'Why is it not already done? Every day, there's another [gun symbol] happening, right? Awful for your country, right? Awful, right? Why don't we redirect this energy to something else, you know?
'There's all these incels, 'no one wants to f**k me', so they go and do [gun symbol]. You know what would actually make people respect you a little bit, and maybe want to f**k you? Is if you did it.
'You'd get heaps of fan mail. Oh my God. Oh my God. Just do it. Like, you're all doing it every day anyway. Like, I don't f**king get it.'
Chatfield's management has been contacted for comment.
Chatfield, a former Bachelor star who now hosts the popular podcast It's A Lot, has more than 1.2 million followers on Instagram and TikTok.
Social media users condemned the video, which comes as the US experiences a disturbing rise in politically motivated violence.
'This isn't free speech,' wrote X user Chris Mate. 'It's not activism. It's incitement — and at the very least, she should be detained and questioned by federal police.'
Another user wrote, 'This is the person who Albanese promotes.'
Chatfield interviewed Mr Albanese on her podcast in February in the lead-up to the election.
The pair discussed a range of issues including political strategy and voter engagement, climate change, women's rights, Mr Albanese's upcoming wedding, the war in the Middle East and Mr Trump.
Chatfield, a vocal Greens supporter, later came under fire from feminist activist Clementine Ford, who branded her a 'f**king fake' over her political views, particularly on Palestine.
Mr Trump has already narrowly survived two assassination attempts.
Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, shot then-candidate Trump in the ear at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13 last year, killing crowd member Corey Comperatore, 50, and severely injuring two others.
Crooks was immediately shot and killed by Secret Service snipers.
Just nine weeks later, on September 15, Ryan Wesley Routh, 59, allegedly attempted to assassinate Mr Trump at his golf club in West Palm Beach, Florida.
The North Carolina construction worker was allegedly lying in wait with an AK-style rifle in the bushes by the golf course when he was spotted by a Secret Service agent, who opened fire and caused Mr Routh to flee the scene before being captured nearby.
He has pleaded not guilty to five federal charges, including attempted assassination. His trial has been set for September 8.
In addition to the attacks on Mr Trump, a number of other high-profile killings have recently shocked the US.
Luigi Mangione, 27, accused of gunning down health insurance CEO Brian Thompson, 50, in New York in December, has attracted a large fanbase of largely left-wing, female supporters.
Mr Mangione has pleaded not guilty to state and federal charges including murder and will return to court in December.
Last month, a Minnesota Democratic state representative and her husband were killed in their home in a 'politically motivated assassination', with another politician and his wife surviving being shot multiple times.
Vance Boelter, 57, was captured after a massive manhunt. Mr Boelter plans to plead not guilty to murder charges, which could carry the death penalty.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Needs to change': Thousands support Speak Up for Kids campaign after childcare abuse exposed
‘Needs to change': Thousands support Speak Up for Kids campaign after childcare abuse exposed

News.com.au

time3 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Needs to change': Thousands support Speak Up for Kids campaign after childcare abuse exposed

Thousands of Aussies are jumping on board a new petition demanding an urgent safety overhaul to our early childcare industry, after exposed yet another alarming case of widescale sexual abuse within a family day care service. This morning exclusively revealed the horrifying case of David Neil Tuck: a family day care owner who is suspected of sexually abusing up to 55 children in Batemans Bay alone. Tuck had already been charged with 10 counts of child sexual abuse in NSW when Eurobodalla Shire Council licenced him to operate a family day care service run out of his remote property on Bluemoor road in Batemans Bay. Tuck, who also operated two other childcare facilities in the region, was able to continue running his licensed service despite multiple additional children coming forward to authorities with complaints of sexual abuse at his centres. Laura-Jane Singh (LJ) and Hailey* were just seven and five years old when they were first sexually abused by Tuck at his overnight child care centre. The women, who have tracked down around 30 other survivors of Tuck, are now using their experience as a platform to push for national reform to Australia's Working With Children Check scheme. More than 5000 people have already jumped on board to sign their petition, which launched just a few hours ago. 'What could be more important than protecting our children?' wrote one signee named Tarek. 'Stop protecting child predators. We need to do everything possible to keep our kids safe. This isn't just for people who have kids, we were all kids once. Give every child a voice, and sign now.' 'What are our politicians doing here? Working with Children Checks are totally useless and a joke,' wrote Valerie. 'This needs to be changed now. We know there's a problem, there's no excuse to leave it any longer,' added Sarah. According to the petition, more than one million Australian families currently have at least one child attending a registered childcare service. And alarmingly, every day there is at least one report of sexual misconduct coming out of a child care facility in this country. 'The children who are impacted are far too young to speak. As adults, we must use our voices to demand their safety,' reads the petition. The campaign is titled Speak Up for Kids and is calling for an overhaul to Australia's widely derided Working With Children Check (WWWC) scheme. The campaign has the backing of experts, advocates, academics, and survivors. One issue of concern is that each state and territory has an entirely different WWCC scheme with its own legislation, operating system, eligibility criteria, and administrative processes. According to the petition, this creates 'inconsistency, confusion and loopholes which offenders can easily exploit'. The fragmented approach also leads to poor information sharing between the various states and territories and offenders who move between jurisdictions can then easily evade detection. Another concern is that once a WWCC is issued, it is valid for five years with no interim monitoring. As a result, families can be lulled into a false sense of security, particularly since complaints that don't result in criminal charges may not necessarily be enough to trigger the high threshold for action. Currently more than 5.8 million people in Australia hold a valid WWCC and no training or exam is required to get one. 'Children need to be protected from these mongrel predators, it's abhorrent what they do to the kids let alone the psychological damage they cause,' wrote Colin who signed the petition. 'Why isn't there a national database for convicted offenders? Each state doesn't talk to each other and an offender can be convicted in Queensland and then move to NSW and their offence will not follow them. This is ludicrous,' added another signee, Kerry. 'Our youngest and most vulnerable voices in society need to be heard RIGHT NOW! To the lawmakers and lawbreakers, how can you sleep at night knowing that your actions and inaction have destroyed innocent lives? Enough is enough!' wrote one individual who signed off 'L'. The petition is calling for a suite of reforms including national harmonisation of legislation and standards across all jurisdictions; the establishment of a centralised WWCC database to facilitate cross-border information sharing; a one strike policy for breaches; increased monitoring of WWCC holders; and finally a $2 million government investment to develop mandatory training which would then become a compulsory component for all WWCC holders. 'Do this now. My next vote depends on it,' wrote Jason. 'I 100 per cent support the petition,' added Peter. 'It chills me to the bone that this could happen in our society. Let's get these monsters away from our children.' 'How on earth we are not already doing absolutely everything to protect our children,' added Alan. LJ and Hailey have been incredibly moved with the response so far and hope more people continue to join the fight. The women, who are now both mothers, say they are speaking out on behalf of all children - including the little girls they once were. 'As children we were defenceless. We did not have the language and we were too young to understand - let alone speak out about - the sexual abuse we were experiencing in childcare,' wrote the women. 'Now we are raising our voices for all those children who can't. We were not safe. But we hope that your children will be. 'Australia, please sign this urgent petition. All children deserve safety. The time for action is now.' Nina Funnell is a Walkley award winning journalist who specialises in reporting sexual violence. She is the creator of the Speak Up for Kids campaign.

‘Going to bash me': Man involved in Paul Kent brawl claims self defence
‘Going to bash me': Man involved in Paul Kent brawl claims self defence

News.com.au

time29 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Going to bash me': Man involved in Paul Kent brawl claims self defence

A man who was involved in a wild brawl with Paul Kent has told a court that he was afraid the rugby league journalist and commentator was going to 'bash' him during a now-infamous incident outside a Sydney restaurant. Tamer Uzun, 37, on Monday appeared in Manly Local Court for a hearing after pleading not guilty to one count of affray stemming from his altercation with Kent outside Totti's Rozelle in April last year. In footage which quickly went viral on social media, Kent pushed past several people before trading blows with Mr Uzun on the public street, with the fight ending when Kent was thrown into a tree. The prosecution has argued Mr Uzun threw punches and failed to de-escalate the incident when he continued to trade verbal barbs with Kent and took off his jumper. Police prosecutor Sergeant Adrian Walsh told the court on Monday that Mr Uzun threw punches before grabbing and throwing Kent into a tree. However Mr Uzun's solicitor Bryan Wrench told the court his client was acting in self defence. He said that Mr Uzun, who was sober at the time, was wrongly accused of making comments towards Kent. 'Mr Kent is the person provoking the incident and our client has had to defend himself,' Mr Wrench told the court. Mr Wrench told the court that a 'thoroughly intoxicated' Kent had consumed 21 beers over 11 hours at the nearby Sackville Hotel and was walking home at the time of the confrontation. Mr Uzun told the court on Monday that he was at the popular restaurant for a birthday and was waiting outside for his partner. Video played to the court showed Kent and another man walking past but they doubled back and accused Uzun and his friend of 's---potting' him. In court on Monday, Mr Uzun denied that either he or his friend made a comment to provoke Kent. 'At the start I thought it was a joke,' Mr Uzun told the court. 'I didn't know what he was talking about, we were laughing about the accusations.' Mr Uzun said he told Kent to 'f--k off' and 'keep going'. He said that backed up as Kent was 'swearing and carrying on'. Mr Uzun told the court that Kent took off his watch and pushed past several people to ignite the brawl. Asked what his state of mind was at that point, Mr Uzun said: 'This bloke's going to bash me.' He said he attempted to strike Kent as the brawl spilled onto the roadway. 'And that's when he ended upside down in the tree,' Mr Uzun said. He said that he was crash tackled into the gutter by a man who was with Kent. When he got up, Mr Uzun told the court that Kent abused him again and spat at him. He told the court that he went back into the restaurant, asked for the manager and requested they preserve CCTV footage. He suffered bruises on his neck and head and grazes on his shoulder. Sgt Walsh told the court that Uzun 'beckoned' Kent and moved towards him on a number of occasions despite the presence of a security guard. 'I didn't want a fight,' Mr Uzun told the court. He also asked him why he had taken off his jumper and handed it to his friend and had not walked back into the restaurant. 'That was you throwing Mr Kent into a tree,' Sgt Walsh asked. 'Push Mr Kent away,' Mr Uzun replied. 'You agree it was more of a throw,' Sgt Walsh asked. 'A bit of both,' Mr Uzun said. The hearing before Magistrate Michael Blair continues. Kent in July last year failed in his bid to have a one charge of affray dealt with on mental health grounds before he pleaded guilty. Kent did not have a conviction recorded against him and he was sentenced to a two-year good behaviour bond. He departed Fox Sports and The Daily Telegraph following the incident.

Demoted Liberal senator pushes indexation cap on Labor's HECS Bill
Demoted Liberal senator pushes indexation cap on Labor's HECS Bill

News.com.au

time29 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Demoted Liberal senator pushes indexation cap on Labor's HECS Bill

Demoted Liberal senator Sarah Henderson is pushing for an indexation cap on Labor's student debt-slashing Bill. Central to Labor's re-election pitch, it was the first piece of legislation the Albanese government introduced when parliament resumed last week. NewsWire understands it did so confident the Coalition would back it in, despite opposition posturing that it was not guaranteed. Sussan Ley and her education spokesman Jonno Duniam have since publicly signalled they would pass it as is, making Senator Henderson yet another Coalition backbencher to break from the party line on a key issue. 'This is a proposal for a HECS loan inflation guarantee, so effectively saying that HECS should not be above 3 per cent indexation,' Senator Henderson told Sky News on Monday. 'We've seen student debt completely run out of control under Labor. 'It's been an absolute fiasco, which is why they brought forward their student debt discount. 'At one stage, it was close to 16 per cent increase, and even after the change in indexation, it's still 14.3 per cent up since Labor was elected.' Senator Henderson was opposition education spokeswoman under Peter Dutton but banished to the back bench in the new Coalition front bench under Ms Ley. She said she put her indexation policy forward before the May 3 election but it ended up on the 'cutting room floor' – a decision she labelled 'regrettable'. 'I did actually propose this in the lead up to the last election,' Senator Henderson said. 'I've been talking to my colleagues, I've received a very positive response. 'So I'm hoping that we'll go through our ordinary party room processes, but I'm very much hoping that this amendment will get the support not just of the Coalition, but also of the parliament.' However, she said the opposition should not vote against Labor's Bill. The Bill would cut student debts by 20 per cent for some 3 million graduates, or wipe off $5500 from the average debt. The changes would also raise the repayment threshold for student loans from $54,000 to $67,000. Unless members of the Coalition back her amendments, Senator Henderson will have a hard time getting her changes off the ground. The Greens have ruled out working with her, with the minor party's education spokeswoman Mehreen Faruqi saying on Monday that the 'Coalition and Sarah Henderson are no friends of higher education'. Senator Faruqi has blasted the Bill for not going far enough. But with support from the Coalition, whether the Greens back it matters little to getting through the Upper House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store