
5 Signs You Feel Truly Safe In Your Relationship, By A Psychologist
Psychological safety means you feel safe to be fully yourself. Unfiltered, messy, vulnerable, always changing, all without fear of being shamed, belittled or emotionally punished. It's a deep sense of trust that you can express your truth and still be held with respect.
But how would you know if your relationship is psychologically safe? Here are five signs to look for, and ways to cultivate more of it in your life.
In psychologically unsafe relationships, saying 'no' often comes at a cost. For example, saying no may be met with guilt trips, emotional withdrawal or a lingering sense of tension in the air. Over time, this teaches you to say 'yes' just to avoid conflict, even when it means ignoring your own needs.
In contrast, psychologically safe relationships respect your 'no' as an essential part of who you are. It's not taken personally, nor is it seen as a rejection. Whether you're declining an invitation, asking for space or expressing disagreement, your partner holds space for it. They don't need you to mirror them in order to feel secure.
This balance between a connection and independence is highlighted in a 2019 study that explored two foundational psychological needs in relationships: relatedness (feeling emotionally close to others) and autonomy (feeling free to act in alignment with your own values).
The study found that people were more likely to respond constructively during conflict (a behavior known as accommodation) when they felt not only close to their partner, but also free to be themselves — independent and self-directed.
In other words, healthy closeness doesn't require losing yourself. In fact, relationships where both people feel safe to say 'no' tend to be more resilient. They can tolerate difference without turning it into distance.
So, what can you do when faced with this dynamic?
Begin with small, honest assertions. Try saying, 'I won't be joining this weekend,' or 'That doesn't feel right to me' — without sugarcoating it with apologies. Then observe if the other person stays emotionally present and responsive. If so, you're likely in a space where both your need for connection and need for autonomy is being respected.
One of the most telling signs of a lack of psychological safety in a relationship is a constant, nagging tension. It's that feeling that you have to watch your words, manage your tone or suppress your feelings to avoid setting the other person off.
This emotional tiptoeing may not always involve loud conflict, but it breeds a quieter kind of distress which manifests as a chronic state of self-monitoring. Over time, you may begin to withhold joy, hide disappointment and shrink parts of yourself to avoid emotional backlash.
A 2012 study published in The American Journal of Family Therapy, examining the relationship between PTSD symptoms, perceived emotional safety and relationship health found that feeling safe in a relationship fully mediated the impact of trauma symptoms on how well the relationship functioned.
In other words, even when someone carries deep relationship wounds, what most determines the health of their relationship isn't the trauma itself but it's how safe they feel with their partner.
Emotional safety, then, isn't a relationship accessory; it's really the foundation of a relationship. When a relationship offers consistent empathy and non-defensiveness, it allows both partners to lower their guard. They don't have to 'perform' emotional control. They can be real, even when that means being confused, vulnerable or not at their best.
In safe relationships, there's room for full expression. You can have a bad day. You can bring up hard topics. You can even disagree without losing closeness.
And if it's ever difficult to establish emotional safety, try this:
Notice the next time you hesitate before sharing something good or bad. Ask yourself, 'Am I afraid of how they'll react?' Choose one thing you've been holding back. Could be an opinion, a request, a silly story, anything. Then share it gently but directly. Then observe: do they lean in, shut down, deflect or become defensive? Their reaction reveals how safe the space between you really is.
More than conflict itself, it's often a lack of resolution that harms relationships. In psychologically unsafe dynamics, disagreements quickly spiral into blame or withdrawal. But in safe relationships, conflict doesn't mark the end of connection. It's simply seen as what it's meant to be — a moment to pause and look into ways of repair.
A 2015 study by John Gottman and colleagues found that the most effective conflict repairs are emotional, not logical. They happen early, often within the first few minutes, and aim to shift the emotional climate through warmth, empathy, humor or vulnerability. These small cues say, 'We're still okay, even if we disagree.'
When repair becomes part of the relationship culture, missteps feel less threatening. Partners don't fear conflict or tiptoe around hard feelings. Instead, they return to each other with care and curiosity, even if that return begins with an argument.
The core idea is that you don't wait until emotions boil over. Reconnect early. Try saying, 'I've been thinking about what happened earlier, can we talk?' or 'I care more about us than about being right.' Early repair softens tension and steers the conversation away from escalation.
Based on Gottman's research, repair doesn't have to be complicated. It just needs to be timely, genuine and emotionally aligned. Here are six tools to help achieve this:
Remember, the goal isn't to avoid conflict. It's to make space for it and meet it with compassion.
One of the hallmarks of relationship safety is that you feel expanded. You speak more freely, laugh louder and bring your full, layered self into the room. There's room for your contradictions: the thoughtful and the silly, the confident and the unsure. You're not filtering yourself to fit into a version you think will be more palatable. You're simply you, and that feels easy.
Research on relational self-change supports this experience. It shows that in close relationships, our self-concept can shift in meaningful ways. People in supportive relationships often experience self-expansion (gaining positive traits) and self-pruning (letting go of negative ones). These changes are linked to greater satisfaction, more empathy and a stronger capacity for forgiveness. In short, the right relationship helps you grow into a better version of yourself.
Unsafe relationships, on the other hand, lead to self-contraction where you shrink, suppress your voice or mold yourself to avoid tension. Over time, this chips away at your confidence and desire to stay in the relationship.
So, try this check-in: After spending time with someone, ask yourself: 'Do I feel more like myself — or less?' If you feel clearer, lighter and more at ease, chances are you're in a relationship that supports your evolution rather than stifles it. Healthy relationships don't require performance. They welcome your becoming.
As humans, we're not meant to stay the same. As we grow, our preferences, boundaries and beliefs will most definitely shift. Psychologically safe relationships allow space for that evolution without any guilt or resistance.
A 2020 study published in Personal Relationships found that people who adapt their thoughts and behaviors in response to life changes experience greater well-being and relationship quality. Their openness also benefits their partners, deepening mutual connection and resilience.
In unsafe dynamics, however, change is seen as a threat. You may be stuck in rigid roles like always being agreeable or emotionally available. Any attempt to redefine yourself is treated as confusing or disloyal. Your growth becomes a problem to solve, not a transformation to support.
But safe relationships welcome your evolution. You're allowed to be dynamic. You're encouraged to set boundaries that reflect who you're becoming.
So, whenever you notice yourself changing, name it. Point it out by saying, 'I know I used to be okay with this, but I've realized I'm not anymore.' Watch for whether you're met with curiosity or criticism. The answer speaks volumes about your relational safety.
Do you also experience psychological safety outside of your relationship? Take the science-backed Psychological Safety Scale to find out.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Are Sharing Which US States Have The Friendliest People, And I Didn't Expect Some Of These
Between Southern hospitality, Midwest Nice, and endless debates over being kind-but-not-nice or nice-but-not-kind, every state seems to have a reputation when it comes to friendliness. So when u/NewFeature asked, "Which US state has the friendliest people, and why?" the responses were all over the map, literally and emotionally. Here's what people across the country had to say about where they felt truly welcomed — and where they definitely didn't: 1."Wyoming, because there are no people there." —u/AnnDestroysTheWorld 2."No one is answering Alaska because fewer than a million people live here. It's a very friendly place, and as long as you do not stand in the middle of the road to take a picture, we love tourists." —u/PondRides 3."I have lived in Illinois, Colorado, and now New Mexico. Whenever family comes to visit us in New Mexico, they talk about how absolutely nice and welcoming everyone is here and how you do not see that back home (in Illinois, for example). So, I will say New Mexico." —u/question_girl617 4."New York. I was shocked. All my life, I heard about how mean and aggressive people in New York City and the state were. When I went, all I saw was kindness and compassion. Their language is curt and aggressive, but their actions are totally different. I saw a homeless guy accidentally tip over his shopping cart into the street. People rushed to help him, and though they were verbally irritated, they all helped him pick up his belongings and get back on the sidewalk." —u/Any_Pool1739 5."Vermont. Nice old grandpas." —u/Born-Professor6680 6."I have lived all over, and I have to say, despite their reputation, people who live in New York might be the most solid. The South has more 'neighborly' people, but they can be overly nice (or nosy) at times. I currently live in Los Angeles, and it's probably the worst, though." —u/WillOk6461 7."I was pleasantly surprised by how friendly people are in North Carolina." —u/joeasks 8."I have lived all over the US. I'm going to say Nebraska. Genuinely nice." —u/theAntidepresser 9."Hawaii — my wife and I were born there, and the people are amazingly friendly! Also quite friendly here in Oregon!" —u/Kalepa 10."I don't know, but it sure as hell isn't fucking Florida." —u/soupysyrup 11."I lived in New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and now Florida, and visited most states in the Eastern half of the US, and some in the Western half. I would say Tennessee has the friendliest people. The worst are in Florida." —u/Whatstheplanpill 12."Michigan." —u/Fearless-Spread1498 13."Minnesota." —u/treetopalarmist_1 14."Southern Californians are definitely the most chill. You can walk into any bar, club, or restaurant and meet someone cool. I think the nicest, in terms of cookie-baking-grandma kind of niceness, is probably Maine." —u/GermanyIturbide 15."I have traveled to nearly all states multiple times for work. I would have to say Iowa. I've also done their bike ride across the state. They truly set the standard for nice." —u/crburger 16."I have lived in numerous places. Hawaii is the nicest place — assuming you adapt to it. I'm semi-serious when I say Hawaii is not part of the US. It has its own art, music, and outlook on life. You treat the locals with respect, and they're kind in return." —u/stjoe56 17."Wisconsin." —u/Acrobatic-Ad3010 18."Hawaii. I have lived in five or six different states and am notoriously antisocial, and Hawaii was the only place I've lived where I had legitimate friends — and not because of anything I had done. They are very community-oriented. Everyone is family." —u/Guuhatsu 19."Definitely not Connecticut." —u/Make_It_Sing 20."In Connecticut, I had an issue with my car, so I pulled into a gas station. Every single person who pulled in after me offered to help in some way. One guy was a carpenter and had a van full of tools that he offered me to use. One guy worked at the landscaping company next to the gas station and said he would help me push my car over to their parking lot so I could use their tools. I knew the issue was that the metal clamp keeping the hose on the transmission broke off, so I was leaking transmission fluid. I just zip-tied it on to drive up the hill to a mechanic to get a new one. When I was going to leave, this older lady chillin' in her car said she would follow me up the hill to make sure I got there safe. When I pulled into the mechanic's parking lot, she beeped and waved with a big smile. People in Connecticut and New England in general get a bad reputation, but there is so much kindness everywhere here." "Most will go out of their way to help a stranger." —u/hypothalanus 21."I'm from New Jersey, so I'm used to some abrasive but friendly strangers, if that makes sense. Like, I will hold the door for you, but call you a shmuck while I do it. I travel to North Carolina often (I know we need to get out of your state, but I have family there), and the people there are generally nice for no reason. There's lots of baby-name calling — 'honey,' 'sweetheart' — even if they do not know you. Also, courtesy is kind of just a given there. Part of me is creeped out by the overt kindness because I'm used to most people just minding their business and not being too much." —u/ceceae 22."Utah, for a creepy, fake friendliness." —u/s0618345 "Utah. I went there for a friend's funeral, and yet every store I went to was bombarded with smiles and, 'Can I help you find anything?'" —u/AdventurousSong4080 23."Everyone shits on Ohio, but those people do not care who you are — you're always invited." —u/Artistic-Listen7975 24."Just stand on a Midtown sidewalk in New York City looking at your phone, baffled, and a couple of folks will ask if you need help. I have now lived in the Twin Cities in Minnesota for 15 years, and still think they are the unfriendliest people on Earth." —u/Purple_Joke_1118 25."Louisiana, I have found, is the friendliest state I have been to." —u/AbsolutelyDeleuchted 26."Colorado has pretty friendly people." —u/El_mochilero 27."Oregon. The only people who aren't accepted are those who are prejudiced against minority communities. Otherwise, people go out of their way to be nice. Southern states can be very nice too, but unfortunately, a lot of their communities are not very tolerant of other cultures, religions, sexualities, and ethnic backgrounds. What's great about Oregon is that, even in the less populated areas, people are more or less accepting of all walks of life. Everybody is laidback and friendly. Violent crime is nearly nonexistent compared to other populated states." —u/Extreme_Today_984 28."I'm going to give it to Kansas. I grew up there in the 1990s and 2000s, born to immigrants from Southeast Asia. Everyone was welcoming, and I never felt like an outsider. Hell, the people who sponsored my dad and uncle were Americans born and raised in Kansas, and I will lovingly call them my grandparents (rest in peace to both of them). Zero issues with racism there." —u/RebirthCross 29."I have lived in quite a few states. I found western New York to be the friendliest. Boston, while a beautiful city, was tougher to meet people in. Bostonians told me that Maine was even harder on any 'outsiders,' but I have no regrets about living there. I did eventually make some great friends. I also like New Jersey people — they call it like they see it." —u/No-Vacation7906 30."I have been in Texas my entire life. It used to be very friendly. It's not that way anymore. Texas has become a terrible place to live, mired in poverty, wage stagnation, and blind devotion to all things Red Hat. Major cities still have a lot of diversity, but everyone pretty much just sticks to their own these days." —u/Ayste 31."West Virginia. I haven't been there many times, but have only had positive experiences." —u/arcticblobfish 32."I can safely assure you it is not Pennsylvania." —u/DankestMemeSourPls 33."I moved to Austin, Texas, from Northern California. Within the first couple of weeks of living here, multiple times, while just walking down the street past a person, they've been like, 'Hello' or 'Hey, how are you doing?' I did not understand. My first thought was, 'What do you want from me?' I was not used to people saying hello just to say hello. I know Texas has a reputation on the political spectrum, but people are very friendly here. Generally." —u/CautiousWrongdoer771 34."I have lived in 11 states and been to a lot more — Iowa, definitely Iowa." —u/Starrfall74 35."As someone who has traveled over 75 percent of the country, Maryland. Maine is a close second. I cannot begin to tell you how often I've been invited to someone's home after a regular conversation. They will not let you merge in traffic, but you can come try their bean dip on a Thursday." —u/PreferredSex_Yes 36."Alabama, specifically the Birmingham area. I got to interact with people from all walks of life, and all went above and beyond to be generous and kind." —u/Iztac_xocoatl 37."I nominate Delaware, because they use turn signals when driving." —u/[deleted] 38."Georgia is nice. Also, I live in Idaho. Anyone who says Idaho is their answer is either a liar or has only been here a few times. People here can be quite the assholes to outsiders." —u/MacDaddyCheesus 39."Indiana." —u/ElJefeDelCine 40."Kentucky by far! I worked there in 2023 and was absolutely blown away by how nice people were. It was like they knew me personally." —u/Dense-Resolution8283 41."I have been to every state. It's between Alaska and Minnesota. I grew up in Chicago and currently live in California. Of all 50 states, the only state I have ever been threatened in is Mississippi. As for why: In Alaska, people shared time and food with me and a buddy on a motorcycle trip. It happened in many small towns — people were great. In Minnesota, I had the pleasure of going to two major sporting events, and the people were so kind. It was another motorcycle trip, and we even bar-hopped with some kind Minnesotans. The issues in Mississippi were racially motivated. I do not hold it against the state, but it happened three times in one eight-hour leg of a trip." —u/seramasumi 42."I have lived in 12 states, and the friendliest people in the US live in Louisiana. I have met people in line at the grocery store who invited me to their crawfish boil — and meant it. The least friendly is South Carolina. They want to know where your grandmama went to high school and turn away if the answer isn't right. We lived there for three years and made two friends." —u/contrarykate 43."South Dakota. I have been to 30-plus states for work. Hands down: South Dakota. Most hospitable, friendliest people I have ever met." —u/moebiusgrip 44."I used to think Washington state, but I was there recently, and their dislike for outsiders is palpable. I drove down to Oregon, and the difference was like night and day. They were the most welcoming, friendliest people everywhere I went." —u/throwaway_202010 lastly: "There's no single answer; it's usually dependent on your ethnicity and the state you're from. Try driving a car with California plates through Texas, Idaho, or parts of the South, and see how 'friendly' folks are." "I cannot believe the number of folks saying Texas. I lived there for almost a decade, and they are not that friendly." —u/Alarmed-Extension289 So, what do you think of these takes? Do you agree or disagree? Let us know which state you believe has the friendliest (or unfriendliest) people in your experience by dropping your stories in the comments below! Note: Some responses have been edited for length/clarity. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can peptides really help erase wrinkles? Dermatologists weigh in
In you've shopped for any kind of skin care products over the past year, you've probably noticed peptides popping up everywhere. As the beauty world's trendiest, anti-aging ingredient du jour, these small chains of amino acids (which are the building blocks of proteins) are now present in everything from lip plumpers to hair-growth tonics. But experts say their most promising use is as part of an effective daily skin care routine, where research suggests they may in fact have a Botox-like effect on wrinkles by softening fine lines, building collagen and brightening and plumping wizened skin as they go. How do peptides work? "In skin care, peptides are used to mimic natural processes in the skin and encourage anti-aging effects like collagen production, skin repair and improv[ed] elasticity," says board-certified dermatologist and facial plastic surgeon Dr. Akshay Sanan. "As we age, collagen production declines, leading to wrinkles, sagging, and thinner skin. Signal peptides, like Matrixyl and copper peptides send messages to skin cells, essentially 'telling' them to produce more collagen, elastin and other structural proteins to keep the skin firm and plump." Sanan says peptides also strengthen the skin barrier, protecting against moisture loss and environmental damage. And, yes, "some peptides even have a 'Botox-like' effect by relaxing facial muscles and reducing the depth of wrinkles caused by repetitive movements," Sanan explains. Should you try peptides? Dermatologists I spoke with agreed that if you've reached an age when you're starting to spot wrinkles and collagen loss, it's worth adding peptides to your skin care regimen, if only for their plumping, moisturizing effects. In term of acting as a Botox-y wrinkle eraser, research suggests a quality peptide product will soften lines, though the result will be more subtle and less dramatic than that of a neurotoxin. "Collagen peptides do work to boost collagen production in the skin which may, over time, reduce the appearance of wrinkles," says Houston cosmetic surgeon Dr. Rukmini Rednam. What should I look for in a peptide serum? There are loads of types of peptides, but for the most bang for your skin care buck, experts recommend seeking out complexes with the most clinical data behind them, which essentially narrows things down to the Matrixyl 3000 blend and copper peptides. Both of which have some research to back up their claims, with benefits that include skin barrier support, wrinkle softening and complexion brightening. How should I use a peptide serum? Peptides are one of those skin care ingredients you can add to your routine both in the morning and at night. And, as is the case with any lighter-weight serum, for best absorption, these products should be applied after cleansing your face but before you slather on heavier creams like moisturizers and sunscreens. In terms of more detailed order of operations, you can combine peptides with vitamin C and layer them with retinoids, but most skin care experts say you shouldn't mix them with an exfoliating products. Our top 5 favorite peptide serums If you have Amazon Prime, you'll get free shipping, of course. Not yet a member? No problem. You can sign up for your free 30-day trial here. (And by the way, those without Prime still get free shipping on orders of $35 or more.) The reviews quoted above reflect the most recent versions at the time of publication.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warren Buffett's Next Big Buy? Why This Beaten-Down Blue Chip Stock Fits His Playbook Perfectly.
Key Points Buffett understands the business of this beleaguered insurer. He would likely find its financials appealing. Buffett would almost certainly like the stock's valuation. 10 stocks we like better than UnitedHealth Group › Warren Buffett has a lot of money burning a hole in his pocket. Technically, it's Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B) pocket, but Buffett gets to decide how to use the cash. And when I say a lot of money, I mean a lot of money: Berkshire's cash position totaled nearly $348 billion at the end of the first quarter. The problem is that Buffett can't find many stocks to buy that meet his stringent investment criteria. However, I think there's one beaten-down blue chip stock that fits his playbook perfectly. A business Buffett understands Buffett has stated on multiple occasions, in various ways, that he will only invest in a business that he thoroughly understands. In his 1996 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, he wrote: "You don't have to be an expert on every company, or even many. You only have to be able to evaluate companies within your circle of competence." Probably no business is within Buffett's circle of competence more than insurance. Berkshire generates a significant portion of its revenue from its property and casualty business. But the core principles of running an insurance business are the same regardless of what type of insurance it is. The key to success is to effectively evaluate risk and charge premiums that cover that risk while making a profit. UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) is the largest health insurer in the United States. I don't doubt that Buffett knows its business quite well. After all, he bought a stake in UnitedHealth for Berkshire's portfolio in 2006 and owned the stock for three years. Financials Buffett would find appealing UnitedHealth Group's share price has plunged more than 50% this year. The company delivered lower-than-expected results in the first quarter. It initially cut full-year guidance and then withdrew the guidance altogether. However, I suspect that Buffett would still find UnitedHealth's financials appealing. Buffett has talked about the importance of return on equity (ROE) in the past. He has hinted that 20% is his preferred ROE threshold. UnitedHealth Group's ROE over the past 12 months was 22.7%. Despite its disappointing Q1 results, UnitedHealth Group's revenue still grew $9.8 billion year over year to $109.6 billion. The company also generated a profit of nearly $6.3 billion. It had nearly $34.3 billion in cash and cash equivalents with a manageable debt load. I think Buffett would focus on UnitedHealth's hard numbers more than he would Wall Street's expectations. A price Buffett almost certainly likes Why hasn't Buffett put more of Berkshire's massive cash stockpile to work? He can't find many stocks with attractive valuations. But UnitedHealth Group has a price Buffett almost certainly likes. The healthcare stock trades at roughly 12 times trailing 12-month earnings. UnitedHealth Group's earnings multiple was significantly higher when Buffett first initiated a position in early 2006. Of course, Buffett focuses on future earnings potential. Could he be worried that UnitedHealth Group's profits will continue to all? I don't think so. The company's primary issue is that costs for some of its Medicare Advantage plans were higher than expected. Buffett knows that insurers can easily address these kinds of problems in the next year by increasing premiums. He would likely believe UnitedHealth Group's prediction that the company will return to growth in 2026. Is Buffett buying UnitedHealth Group stock? I also don't know if Buffett is buying UnitedHealth Group stock. He could be content to sit on Berkshire's cash and leave it to Greg Abel to make any big moves after Buffett steps down as CEO at the beginning of next year. What I do know, though, is that UnitedHealth Group fits Buffett's playbook. And that playbook has been enormously successful through the years. Investors wanting to emulate Buffett might want to consider buying shares of the beaten-down blue chip stock while it's a bargain -- whether or not the "Oracle of Omaha" buys it himself. Should you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group right now? Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $634,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,046,799!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,037% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Keith Speights has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool recommends UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett's Next Big Buy? Why This Beaten-Down Blue Chip Stock Fits His Playbook Perfectly. was originally published by The Motley Fool