
Fury as popular tax break set to end in the fall: 'Hypocritical and short-sighted'
The Republican sweeping Big, Beautiful Bill will eliminate the $7,500 tax credit for new EV and plug-in hybrid purchases — a key incentive created under the Inflation Reduction Act.
A $4,000 credit for buyers of used electric vehicles will also get the axe on September 30.
Critics of the credit argue it reins in spending on programs that haven't lived up to expectations.
'Following the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, there have been significant concerns about the cost of these tax credits,' Bernie Moreno, a Republican Senator from Ohio and former car dealership manager, wrote in an open letter.
But supporters of the tax break see a missed opportunity.
'It's almost hilariously hypocritical and short-sighted — but that's the Trump Administration,' Robby DeGraff, the manager of consumer insights at AutoPacific, told DailyMail.com.
'It's really all a shame, especially from a paranoid administration so hellbent on ensuring "consumer choice."'
Buyers can still qualify for credits on eligible vehicles purchased before September 30.
Republicans have long criticized the EV credits, arguing the incentives were out of step with consumer demand and too generous to an industry they see as premature.
EV adoption has steadily grown since the program launched. But the vehicles still make up just around 10 percent of the overall new car market — falling short of the rapid transition lawmakers envisioned.
The credit was designed with two main goals in mind: supercharge domestic manufacturing and encourage Americans to transition to lower-emission vehicles.
DeGraff outlined three key ways he believes the removal of the credit under Trump's bill will backfire.
First, he said the bill will push car prices even higher.
In June, it cost around $49,000 to drive a new set of wheels off a dealership lot. That pushed the average monthly payment above $700.
Right now, Americans are paying a premium for electric vehicles, in part due to the costs of ramping up domestic production.
The now-expiring credit helped offset those investment costs for consumers, but only for vehicles built largely in the US.
Second, DeGraf said the tax bill will crush American manufacturing.
'Slower sales and demand will lead to production pauses at plants and consequently layoffs,' he said.
'Perhaps the comical thing to consider, is that many of these states that do build EVs and have received massive investments and had automakers employ massive amounts of workers are Republican states.'
Finally, DeGraff said it makes it harder for US automakers to compete globally.
Major Chinese automakers have received huge subsidies for their vehicles.
Companies like BYD, Nio, XPeng, and Zeekr have built competitive, low cost vehicles in highly automated factories.
The cars typically have higher build quality, electric range, and technology, all for a cheaper price. And they're coming to global markets, where American manufacturers want to be competitive.
China and EU officials are currently negotiating how to bring the cheap EVs to the European market without crushing the continent's local carmakers.
American delegates are reportedly not involved in that negotiation.
Detroit's big three carmakers likely aren't having their voices heard in the market, which is the largest in the world.
Meanwhile, some of America's biggest carmaking employers — including GM, Ford, Stellantis, Toyota, Nissan, Honda, and their parts suppliers — are already under pressure.
Carmakers are paying 25 percent tariffs on some of their vehicles and parts shipped to the US.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Sussex to get extra electric vehicle charging points
A network of electric vehicle charging points in West Sussex is set to grow as an additional 30 on-street sites have been sites were agreed following a county-wide consultation and work was set to be led by West Sussex County Council along with district and borough councils and company Connected West Sussex Chargepoint Network already has hundreds of sites on streets and in car parks across the Pateman-Jones, CEO of Connected Kerb, says it is "one of the most ambitious and accessible public charging networks in the UK". He said: "This next phase is another important step towards building a cleaner, greener future for the county, giving drivers the confidence that reliable charging is never far away."The latest charging points will be installed with additional underground wiring to make it easier to expand further in the Dennis, the county council's cabinet member for highways and transport, said no changes to existing parking arrangements were proposed yet, and any future changes would be subject to the normal consultation process.


Geeky Gadgets
26 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Claude Code vs Cursor : AI Coding Assistants Compared
What if the key to unlocking your full coding potential lies not in your skills, but in the tools you choose? As AI coding assistants continue to evolve, developers are faced with a growing array of options, each promising to transform workflows and boost productivity. Among the frontrunners in this space are Claude Code and Cursor, two platforms that take radically different approaches to assisting developers. While Claude Code features innovative AI capabilities tailored for complex, large-scale projects, Cursor shines with its streamlined simplicity, making it a favorite for those who value ease of use. But which one truly delivers on its promises, and more importantly, which is the right fit for your unique needs? In this comparative overview, AI Labs explore the strengths, limitations, and standout features of these two AI coding assistants. From Claude Code's ability to handle intricate tasks with its expansive context window to Cursor's intuitive interface that simplifies iterative development, each tool offers a distinct value proposition. You'll also discover how innovations like Claudia—a GUI tool designed to enhance Claude Code's usability—are reshaping the landscape of AI-powered coding. Whether you're tackling multi-layered logic or seeking a seamless, beginner-friendly experience, this guide will help you weigh your options and make an informed choice. After all, the right tool isn't just about functionality—it's about finding the perfect balance between power and accessibility. Claude Code vs Cursor Claude Code: Advanced AI for Complex Projects Claude Code stands out for its ability to handle large-scale and intricate coding tasks. Its expansive context window enables the processing and generation of detailed code, making it particularly effective for developers tackling projects that require a deep contextual understanding. This feature is especially valuable for tasks involving extensive datasets or multi-layered logic. The platform also offers a cost-effective pricing model, including a $20 pro plan that unlocks advanced functionalities. Among these features is the ability to create custom AI agents, which operate in isolated sandboxes with tailored system prompts. This flexibility allows developers to adapt the tool to specialized requirements, enhancing its utility for diverse applications. Despite its strengths, Claude Code has faced challenges in usability. Tasks such as image pasting and MCP server integration often require manual intervention, which can disrupt workflows. These limitations have historically made it less appealing to developers seeking a seamless, out-of-the-box experience. Cursor: User-Friendly and Streamlined Cursor takes a different approach by prioritizing ease of use and a streamlined development experience. Its intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) simplifies common tasks, making it accessible even to developers with limited experience in AI tools. Features like image pasting and a checkpoint system allow users to quickly restore previous states without relying on external tools such as Git. This functionality is particularly advantageous for iterative development, where frequent changes and rollbacks are part of the process. Cursor also excels in simplifying MCP server integration and tool configuration, reducing the time and effort required to set up and manage development environments. These qualities make it an attractive choice for developers who value efficiency and accessibility. However, Cursor's smaller context window limits its ability to handle highly complex or large-scale tasks. For developers working on projects that demand extensive code generation or deep contextual analysis, this constraint may pose a significant challenge. Comprehensive AI Coding Assistant Comparison Watch this video on YouTube. Here are more detailed guides and articles that you may find helpful on AI coding assistants. Claudia: Enhancing Claude Code's Usability The introduction of Claudia, a dedicated GUI tool for Claude Code, addresses many of the usability issues that previously hindered its adoption. Claudia bridges the gap between functionality and accessibility, making Claude Code more approachable for a broader range of developers. Claudia offers two primary modes to streamline workflows: Agents Mode: Assists the creation of custom AI agents, complete with isolated sandboxes and tailored system prompts, allowing developers to design specialized solutions efficiently. Assists the creation of custom AI agents, complete with isolated sandboxes and tailored system prompts, allowing developers to design specialized solutions efficiently. Projects Mode: Provides a visual interface for managing tasks, file operations, and workflows, enhancing organization and productivity. Additional features, such as a built-in preview window, timeline checkpoints, and usage dashboards, further improve the user experience. These enhancements resolve earlier challenges, such as the lack of image pasting and the complexity of MCP server integration. By combining Claude Code's powerful AI capabilities with an accessible interface, Claudia significantly improves the tool's usability, making it a more balanced option for developers. Installation and Compatibility Installing Claudia involves building the application from source, requiring tools like Rust, Bun, and Git. While this process may be complex for some users, Claudia is compatible with Mac, Windows, and Linux platforms, making sure broad accessibility across different operating systems. However, as the tool is still under development, users may encounter occasional minor UI bugs. These issues are expected to diminish as the platform matures, but they are worth considering for developers seeking a polished experience. Choosing the Right Tool for Your Needs The decision between Claude Code and Cursor ultimately depends on your specific priorities and project requirements. If your work involves complex, large-scale projects that demand advanced AI capabilities and scalability, Claude Code—with the added usability of Claudia—offers a robust and comprehensive solution. Its ability to handle intricate tasks and support custom AI agents makes it a powerful tool for developers seeking flexibility and depth. On the other hand, if you prioritize simplicity, efficiency, and an intuitive interface, Cursor remains a strong contender. Its user-friendly design and streamlined features make it ideal for developers who value accessibility and quick setup. Both tools have their strengths and limitations, and recent advancements—such as Claudia's introduction—have further blurred the lines between them. By carefully evaluating your development needs and workflow preferences, you can select the AI coding assistant that best aligns with your goals, making sure a more productive and efficient coding experience. Media Credit: AI LABS Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Weinstein victim lawyer: Don't let Diddy case fool you. MeToo is alive and well
The Sean 'Diddy' Combs verdict does not mean MeToo is dying as most sexual assault cases are settled privately, America's most prominent female lawyer has said. The music mogul was this week acquitted on charges of sex trafficking and racketeering after two of his ex-girlfriends, including the R&B singer Cassie Ventura, testified he coerced them into having sex with male escorts. Combs, 55, was convicted on two lesser charges of transportation for prostitution. But Gloria Allred, who is representing several of Combs's alleged victims, including two who have filed civil lawsuits, said the outcome is symptomatic of a waning MeToo movement. 'Nobody should judge the MeToo movement based on what happens in a criminal case,' Ms Allred, who also represented a number of Harvey Weinstein's accusers said. 'Criminal cases are rare, and most of the civil lawsuits that we do and the confidential settlements never result in a criminal case.' Speaking exclusively to The Telegraph, she added: 'There are many, many more civil lawsuits than there are criminal cases. In addition to that, we do many more confidential settlements without a lawsuit than even civil lawsuits, so it's [MeToo] alive and well.' Around 70 lawsuits have been filed against Combs, including two by Ms Allred's clients: Joi Dickerson-Neal, who alleges the star drugged and sexually assaulted her in 1991, and Thalia Graves, who claims she was drugged and raped by Combs 10 years later. Combs has denied all the allegations against him. During her famed career spanning more than 50 years Ms Allred has represented alleged victims of the rich and powerful, including Bill Cosby, Donald Trump, R Kelly and Mohamed Al-Fayed. Her clients include an unknown number of Weinstein's accusers, including Miriam Haley, who the disgraced film mogul was found guilty of sexually assaulting in his New York criminal retrial last month. When Mr Trump won the election in November, some feared electing a man who had been found liable for sexual abuse marked the end of the MeToo movement, which sprung up after more than 80 women came forward claiming they had been raped or sexual assaulted by Weinstein. Following the latest Weinstein verdict, which acquitted the disgraced producer of one count of sexual assault and resulted in a mistrial for his rape charge, Ms Allred, said: 'For those of you in the press who have predicted that the MeToo movement might be dead, that obituary was obviously premature.' Ms Allred insists victims are still contacting her firm Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, which she describes as the most prominent women's rights law firm in the country, every day. 'We won over a billion dollars in the years that we've been in practice for victims, so I am not concerned that this is going to deter victims,' she said. 'Maybe they won't want to perhaps report to law enforcement, but they still want accountability, they still want justice, they can all get that through a civil case, lawsuit or a confidential settlement,' she added. Several of the witnesses who testified against Combs had pending civil lawsuits against the mogul, including Dawn Richard, who is represented by Ms Allred's daughter Lisa Bloom. Ventura, 38, settled her civil suit against Combs within 24 hours of filing. She was paid $30 million by the Bad Boy Entertainment founder. Last year, lawyer Tony Buzbee, who is representing dozens of Combs's alleged victims, claimed several high-profile celebrities had settled with victims quietly before to avoid being named in a public lawsuit. This week a judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Jay-Z, real name Shawn Carter, accusing Mr Buzbee of trying to blackmail him with false claims of sexual misconduct. Carter sued after Mr Buzbee contacted the star about a complaint from an anonymous accuser who alleged that Carter and Combs sexually abused her. Mr Buzbee then filed a lawsuit accusing Carter and Combs of raping the alleged victim when she was 13. The lawsuit was later withdrawn by the accuser. There is still a separate lawsuit pending which Carter filed against Mr Buzbee in federal court in Alabama. Following the Combs trial, which included showing the Manhattan court CCTV footage of the star beating Ventura at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, Ms Allred said she plans to propose legislation stating that women cannot legally consent to sex if they are beaten before or after the act. 'We all saw the video, he beat her, he dragged her back, and if that's not force, if that's not coercion, I don't know what is,' she said. Discussing her recommended legislation, she said: 'In the same way that if... a woman is under the influence of alcohol or narcotics, she could not, from a legal point of view, does not have the capacity to consent to a sex act.' She added: 'I'm proposing that if a woman is beaten, a victim of domestic violence before or after the sexual assault, it should be considered that she couldn't consent to it. 'And so that's what I'm going to propose to legislators to change the law, so hopefully something good can come out of this.'