logo
China's rare earth export curbs hit auto industry

China's rare earth export curbs hit auto industry

Korea Herald05-06-2025
BERLIN/FRANKFURT, Germany (Reuters) — Some European auto parts plants have suspended output and Mercedes-Benz is considering ways to protect against shortages of rare earths, as concerns about the damage from China's restrictions on critical mineral exports deepen across the globe.
China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world.
China's dominance of the critical mineral industry, key to the green energy transition, is increasingly viewed as a key point of leverage for Beijing in its trade war with US President Donald Trump. China produces around 90 percent of the world's rare earths, and auto industry representatives have warned of increasing threats to production due to their dependency on it for those parts.
"It just puts stress on a system that's highly organized with parts being ordered many weeks in advance," said Sherry House, Ford's finance chief, at an investor conference Wednesday.
She said China's export controls add administrative layers that are sometimes smooth, and sometimes not. "We're managing it. It continues to be an issue, and we continue to work the issues."
EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said Wednesday that he and his Chinese counterpart had agreed to clarify the rare earth situation as quickly as possible.
"We must reduce our dependencies on all countries, particularly on a number of countries like China, on which we are more than 100 percent dependent," said EU Commissioner for Industrial Strategy Stephane Sejourne.
"The export (curbs) increase our will to diversify," he said as Brussels identified 13 new projects outside the bloc aimed at increasing supplies of metals and minerals essential.
Europe's auto supplier association CLEPA said several production lines have shut down after running out of supplies, the latest to warn about the growing threat to manufacturing due to the controls.
Of the hundreds of requests for export licenses made by auto suppliers since early April, only a quarter have been granted so far, CLEPA added, with some requests rejected on what the association described as "highly procedural grounds."
It did not identify the companies but warned of further outages.
While China's announcement in April coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally and are causing worry among business executives around the world.
Earlier Wednesday, Mercedes-Benz production chief Joerg Burzer said he was talking to top suppliers about building "buffers" such as stockpiles to protect against potential threats to supply. Mercedes was currently not affected by the shortage.
BMW said that part of its supplier network was disrupted, but its own plants were running as normal.
German and US automakers have complained that the restrictions imposed by China threaten production, following a similar grievance from an Indian EV maker last week.
Mathias Miedreich, board member for electrified propulsion at German automotive supplier ZF Friedrichshafen, said the company has largely been able to get needed permits from China.
In a media briefing Tuesday, he said he worries though that the situation eventually could resemble the computer-chip shortage during the COVID-19 pandemic, which wiped out millions of vehicles from automakers' production plans.
Many are lobbying their governments to find a quick solution but some companies only have enough supplies to last a few weeks or months, Wolfgang Weber, CEO of Germany's electrical and digital industry association ZVEI, said in an emailed statement.
Swedish Autoliv, the world's biggest maker of air bags and seat belts, said its operations are not affected, but CEO Mikael Bratt said he has set up a task force to manage the situation.
There are few alternatives to China.
Automakers from General Motors to BMW and major suppliers like ZF and BorgWarner are researching or have developed motors with low- to zero rare earth content in a bid to cut their reliance on China, but few have managed to scale production to bring down costs.
BMW has deployed a magnet-free electric motor for its latest generation of electric cars, but still requires rare earths for smaller motors powering components like windshield wipers or car window rollers.
"There is no solution for the next three years except to come to an agreement with China," said Andreas Kroll, managing director of Noble Elements, a rare earths importer for medium-sized companies and startups without their own inventories.
"China controls practically 99.8 percent of global production of heavy rare earths. Other countries can only produce these in minimal quantities, virtually on a laboratory scale."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff hike
Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff hike

Korea Herald

time10 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff hike

Auto giants to boost US production, cut costs, shift supply chain to offset tariff burden The reduction of US tariffs on South Korean automobiles to 15 percent offers only limited relief for Hyundai Motor Group, which faces mounting challenges in the world's second-largest car market. Stripped of its former zero-tariff advantage under the FTA, the automaker is bracing for a tougher fight to maintain its competitive edge. According to Seoul's presidential office, Korea and the US negotiated a 15 percent tariff on Korean-made automobiles on Thursday, lowering the rate from 25 percent. This adjustment addresses item-specific tariffs that were initially imposed to protect strategic US industries alleged to have contributed to trade imbalances. Japan and the EU had previously faced a 2.5 percent tariff on automobile exports to the US before securing their respective 15 percent trade deals. In contrast, South Korean automobiles entered the US tariff-free under the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. Citing this discrepancy, Seoul had pushed for a lower 12.5 percent tariff rate in the latest negotiations. However, Washington rejected the proposal, saying it faced political pressure to apply a uniform 15 percent tariff across all three regions. 'When Japan first secured the 15 percent rate, it had already faced strong backlash from the United Auto Workers and Detroit's Big Three US automakers (General Motors, Ford and Stellantis),' said Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo during a press briefing earlier in the day. Emphasizing that Korea might have risked any chance of tariff reduction if it had insisted on the 12.5 percent levy, Yeo added, 'From the US perspective, maintaining a minimum 15 percent levy was crucial to protect its auto industry and align with the political climate, regardless of (our) FTA status.' Yeo noted that further tariff reductions are unlikely for the time being, given the need of the US to maintain a balance with other partners like Japan and the EU. He emphasized the government's commitment to capitalizing on every chance to lower tariffs 'even if it's by just 1 percent.' Industry insiders indicate that the 15 percent auto tariff represents an 'unsuccessful bargain' for Korea, as it loses the advantage it had over Japan, the EU and other competitors under the FTA-based zero tariff benefits it previously held. 'While Korea, Japan and the EU are now subject to the same 15 percent auto tariff, Korea must address the additional costs brought on by losing the 2.5 percent tariff advantage it previously held over the other two regions under the FTA,' said Kim Pil-su, an automotive engineering professor at Daelim University. 'Although 15 percent is better than the previous 25 percent, it's not a win for Korea,' Kim added. Kim Tae-hwang, an international trade professor at Myongji University, echoed that view and noted, 'Even if Korea had granted the US full access to its rice and beef markets, Donald Trump wouldn't have allowed a single-digit tariff on Korean automobiles, citing the need for fairness with other car exporters. From the start, it was a losing game for Korea.' According to NH Investment & Securities, under the 15 percent levy, Hyundai's annual tariff burden is projected to be approximately 2.6 trillion-2.7 trillion won ($1.87 billion-$1.94 billion) annually. Samsung Securities estimates Kia's annual tariff impact to be 2.3 trillion won. Hyundai Motor and Kia already experienced the impact of 25 percent US tariffs in the second quarter. Despite a surge in sales revenue, Hyundai and Kia's operating profit declined on-year by 15.8 percent to 3.6 trillion won and 24.1 percent to 2.8 trillion won, respectively. The combined negative effect of tariffs on the two carmakers totaled 1.6 trillion won. Kim, the engineering professor, stated that Hyundai Motor Group's key strategy would involve fast-tracking its production in the US while expanding its presence in other key auto markets such as Europe. On March 24, Hyundai Motor Group Chair Chung Euisun announced a $21 billion investment over four years in the US, focusing on achieving an annual production capacity of 1.2 million vehicles. In its second-quarter earnings conference call, Hyundai Motor said it plans to implement flexible pricing strategies and cost-saving measures and bolster production in the US, including local sourcing of auto parts. Kia vowed to redirect approximately 25,000 vehicles produced at its Georgia plant toward the US market. In response to the finalized tariffs, Hyundai Motor Group stated, 'We extend our deepest gratitude to the government departments and the National Assembly for their dedicated efforts in resolving the tariff issues with the US.' 'Hyundai Motor and Kia plan to pursue diverse strategies to minimize the impact of tariffs while further strengthening their competitiveness through enhanced quality, stronger brand positioning and technological advancements.'

Seoul shares snap 6-day winning streak after US tariff deal
Seoul shares snap 6-day winning streak after US tariff deal

Korea Herald

time12 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Seoul shares snap 6-day winning streak after US tariff deal

South Korean stocks ended their six-day winning streak Thursday on profit-taking, as investors assessed the impact of the long-awaited tariff deal between Seoul and Washington on the industry and the broader economy. The local currency fell against the US dollar. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index lost 9.03 points, or 0.28 percent, to close at 3,245.44, after hitting a four-year high in the previous session. Trade volume was heavy at 536.75 million shares worth 16.29 trillion won ($9.31 billion), with losers beating winners 466 to 405. The index opened higher and had risen by about 1 percent after the two nations announced an agreement that would impose a 15 percent tariff on South Korean imports. US President Donald Trump earlier had threatened to impose a 25 percent levy. But earlier gains were all pared on heavy selling by institutions. Institutions sold a net 705.36 billion won worth of shares, while foreign and retail investors bought a net 344.41 billion won and 223.67 billion won worth of shares, respectively. "Market uncertainties have eased, but the deal was somewhat expected and largely priced in," said Han Ji-young, a researcher at Kiwoom Securities. "Going forward, corporate strategies and export trends will likely affect the market." Top-cap shares traded mixed. Market bellwether Samsung Electronics fell 1.65 percent to 71,400 won, while chip giant SK hynix surged 3.8 percent to 273,500 won. Major battery maker LG Energy Solution dipped 2.67 percent to 382,500 won, and leading pharmaceutical firm Samsung Biologics slid 2.82 percent to 1.07 million won. Defense giant Hanwha Aerospace jumped 1.94 percent to 996,000 won, and nuclear power plant manufacturer Doosan Enerbility advanced 2.98 percent to 65,600 won. But No. 1 steelmaker Posco sank 1.44 percent to 308,500 won. Carmakers lost ground amid concerns about the US' item-specific tariffs. Top automaker Hyundai Motor sank 4.48 percent to 213,000 won, while its sister Kia nose-dived 7.34 percent to 102,300 won. But shipbuilders gathered ground on hopes for stronger cooperation with the US Leading shipbuilder HD Hyundai Heavy soared 4.14 percent to 490,500 won, and its rival Hanwha Ocean spiked 13.43 percent to 112,300 won. The local currency was quoted at 1,387 won against the greenback at 3:30 p.m., down 3.9 won from the previous session. (Yonhap)

Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff parity
Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff parity

Korea Herald

time13 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Hyundai, Kia lose FTA edge as Korea accepts US tariff parity

Auto giants to boost US production, cut costs, shift supply chain to offset tariff burden The reduction of US tariffs on South Korean automobiles to 15 percent offers only limited relief for Hyundai Motor Group, which faces mounting challenges in the world's second-largest car market. Stripped of its former zero-tariff advantage under the FTA, the automaker is bracing for a tougher fight to maintain its competitive edge. According to Seoul's presidential office, Korea and the US negotiated a 15 percent tariff on Korean-made automobiles on Thursday, lowering the rate from 25 percent. This adjustment addresses item-specific tariffs that were initially imposed to protect strategic US industries alleged to have contributed to trade imbalances. Japan and the EU had previously faced a 2.5 percent tariff on automobile exports to the US before securing their respective 15 percent trade deals. In contrast, South Korean automobiles entered the US tariff-free under the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement. Citing this discrepancy, Seoul had pushed for a lower 12.5 percent tariff rate in the latest negotiations. However, Washington rejected the proposal, saying it faced political pressure to apply a uniform 15 percent tariff across all three regions. 'When Japan first secured the 15 percent rate, it had already faced strong backlash from the United Auto Workers and Detroit's Big Three US automakers (General Motors, Ford and Stellantis),' said Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo during a press briefing earlier in the day. Emphasizing that Korea might have risked any chance of tariff reduction if it had insisted on the 12.5 percent levy, Yeo added, 'From the US perspective, maintaining a minimum 15 percent levy was crucial to protect its auto industry and align with the political climate, regardless of (our) FTA status.' Yeo noted that further tariff reductions are unlikely for the time being, given the need of the US to maintain a balance with other partners like Japan and the EU. He emphasized the government's commitment to capitalizing on every chance to lower tariffs 'even if it's by just 1 percent.' Industry insiders indicate that the 15 percent auto tariff represents an 'unsuccessful bargain' for Korea, as it loses the advantage it had over Japan, the EU and other competitors under the FTA-based zero tariff benefits it previously held. 'While Korea, Japan and the EU are now subject to the same 15 percent auto tariff, Korea must address the additional costs brought on by losing the 2.5 percent tariff advantage it previously held over the other two regions under the FTA,' said Kim Pil-su, an automotive engineering professor at Daelim University. 'Although 15 percent is better than the previous 25 percent, it's not a win for Korea,' Kim added. Kim Tae-hwang, an international trade professor at Myongji University, echoed that view and noted, 'Even if Korea had granted the US full access to its rice and beef markets, Donald Trump wouldn't have allowed a single-digit tariff on Korean automobiles, citing the need for fairness with other car exporters. From the start, it was a losing game for Korea.' According to NH Investment & Securities, under the 15 percent levy, Hyundai's annual tariff burden is projected to be approximately 2.6 trillion-2.7 trillion won ($1.87 billion-$1.94 billion) annually. Samsung Securities estimates Kia's annual tariff impact to be 2.3 trillion won. Hyundai Motor and Kia already experienced the impact of 25 percent US tariffs in the second quarter. Despite a surge in sales revenue, Hyundai and Kia's operating profit declined on-year by 15.8 percent to 3.6 trillion won and 24.1 percent to 2.8 trillion won, respectively. The combined negative effect of tariffs on the two carmakers totaled 1.6 trillion won. Kim, the engineering professor, stated that Hyundai Motor Group's key strategy would involve fast-tracking its production in the US while expanding its presence in other key auto markets such as Europe. On March 24, Hyundai Motor Group Chair Chung Euisun announced a $21 billion investment over four years in the US, focusing on achieving an annual production capacity of 1.2 million vehicles. In its second-quarter earnings conference call, Hyundai Motor said it plans to implement flexible pricing strategies and cost-saving measures and bolster production in the US, including local sourcing of auto parts. Kia vowed to redirect approximately 25,000 vehicles produced at its Georgia plant toward the US market. In response to the finalized tariffs, Hyundai Motor Group stated, 'We extend our deepest gratitude to the government departments and the National Assembly for their dedicated efforts in resolving the tariff issues with the US.' 'Hyundai Motor and Kia plan to pursue diverse strategies to minimize the impact of tariffs while further strengthening their competitiveness through enhanced quality, stronger brand positioning and technological advancements.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store