Thousands of drivers are failing test before they even get behind the wheel
Thousands of learners in the UK are flunking their driving tests before they even touch the ignition, all due to a simple yet crucial task – failing to read a number plate from 20 metres away. Over 3,000 aspiring drivers blundered at this common hurdle and missed out on hitting the road.
They didn't just fall at the first sight test; they also splashed out roughly £200,000 collectively on unsuccessful driving tests without ever revving an engine. Research by Feel Good Contacts revealed how many potential motorists' visions put the brakes on their practical driving aspirations in the UK.
Forking out between £62 and £75 for a test can cause a bit of a sting in your wallet, but for 3,061 hopefuls between 2018 and 2023, it was money down the drain before they could even buckle up.
The vital eyesight check is straightforward - spot the letters on a reg plate from 20 metres as gov.uk stipulates, "You must be able to read (with glasses or contact lenses, if necessary) a car number plate made after 1 September 2001 from 20 metres."
A mix-up with spectacles or just poor vision led these learners to cough up a staggering £229,000 for exams that were doomed to fail before they could so much as adjust the rear-view mirror.
It seems that learner drivers are not taking the importance of good eyesight for their practical exam seriously, with the number of test fails at the initial eyesight check gradually increasing and returning to pre-Covid levels.
The figures peaked at 697 in 2018, sharply fell to 280 in 2020 and have been gradually rising year-on-year to 600 in 2023, reports Lancs Live. In terms of gender, men are 41 per cent more likely to fail their driving test at this stage than women, with males aged 21-30 being the most likely group to fail their driving test at the initial eyesight check.
Men were responsible for 1,842 of the fails, while women only accounted for 1,219 of the fails at this stage of the driving test. Younger drivers failed most at the initial eyesight check, with those aged 21-30 accounting for more than a third (36 per cent) of them.
Over 14 million drivers in the UK need eyesight correction as a condition of their licence, meaning out of 42 million licence holders, a third (34 per cent) contain an '01 - Eyesight Correction' code.
More than a third (35 per cent) of 2,000 Brits surveyed, who wear glasses or contacts when driving, confess they've not declared it to the DVLA - potentially putting people's safety on the roads at risk.
Motorists who have informed the DVLA about their need for corrective eyewear could face a hefty £1,000 fine and three penalty points if they fail to wear them while driving.
Khuram Sarwar, a dispensing optician at Feel Good Contacts, emphasised: "Wearing prescription glasses or contact lenses is a must while driving for those who need vision correction to meet the 'standards of vision for driving'.
"Having crystal-clear eyesight at multiple distances is needed to achieve an adequate field of vision during driving and to see number plates, road signs and other vehicles with optimal visual activity.
"It's a simple process to get your vision corrected and it's not worth the risk of failing your driving test or putting others in danger."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Ask the expert: Why is the DVLA fining me for not taxing a racing car?
Dear Alex, A letter from the Motor Insurers' Bureau (MIB) informed me that according to the Motor Insurance Database (MID), my 1963 MGB was not insured. It stated that, unless my vehicle was declared off-road with a valid Statutory Off-Road Notification (SORN), it must be continuously insured, and that I had 28 days to check that I was covered and avoid a fine. The MG is a racing car and, therefore, not on the road, so I thought this might be a scam, but I then received a letter from the DVLA saying I must pay a £100 penalty, reduced to £50 for early payment. Clearly the simple solution is to send the hard copy of the SORN, but I am still very suspicious of these documents and threatening communications. Are you familiar with this approach to non-insurance? Am I being neurotic? – HC Dear HC, I am familiar with this approach, because I had a similar letter myself recently. My 1970 Citroën DS was insured and 'taxed' (for a zero rate, as a historic vehicle), but then I switched the insurance to a different vehicle. Because I wasn't paying any 'tax', I didn't think to declare SORN until I received a letter like the one you describe. In my case, the situation was a result of my oversight; yours appears to be a genuine mistake. But I suspect the communications you've received are legitimate; the MIB is a recognised body, and if you've had a corresponding fine from the DVLA, it's safe to say you should probably take action before matters escalate. Firstly, check that your vehicle is still declared SORN. It should be, given you don't have to renew the SORN declaration, but it isn't beyond the realms of possibility that a mistake has been made at the DVLA, or there has been a computer glitch. Check online at If the car is still showing as SORN, then send evidence of this to the DVLA and MIB by recorded delivery, to prove that the vehicle is off the road. With a bit of luck, they'll cancel the fine and you can forget the whole thing.
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits warned over £450 driving fine for anyone flashed 3 times by new AI cameras
UK motorists that think they have gotten away with speeding could be in for a huge shock, as the government prepares to roll out artificial intelligence (AI) cameras that can log repeat offenders Brits risk being stung with hefty fines ranging from £150 to £450 if they're caught-out by sneaky new tech. From August 2025, drivers in the UK will be subject to a significant change in speeding enforcement as the Department for Transport introduces a new penalty system powered by artificial intelligence (AI). The overhaul is designed to improve road safety, reduce repeat offences and ensure that drivers receive consistent penalties — no matter where they are in Great Britain. The new system will use automated, AI-integrated speed cameras that can identify repeat offenders and store violation data across regional boundaries, meaning drivers will no longer be able to avoid harsher penalties by committing offences in different jurisdictions. The new technology tracks the entirety of a driver's recent history to determine penalties. Under the revised framework, the consequences for speeding will escalate according to the number of offences within set timeframes. A first infraction of the law results in a warning and the option to attend a speed awareness course. Similarly, a second offence within twelve months will incur a fine, starting at £150, and carries three penalty points. For a third infringement within eighteen months, drivers can be slapped with a fine of up to £450 and six penalty points, as well as a possible licence review or suspension. This progressive penalty model is intended to encourage responsible driving and penalise those who repeatedly ignore speed limits. The AI system ensures that enforcement is consistent across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland — repeat offenders could previously escape harsher penalties by crossing regional lines. The AI cameras do more than just catch speeding vehicles too. They actually store driver identification data and violation history, use number plate recognition to track vehicles and issue penalties automatically based on behavioural patterns. These cameras work in real time across counties and cities, allowing enforcement agencies to link offences across jurisdictions. This centralized approach addresses shortcomings in the old system, which often failed to connect offences committed in different locations. The importance of these changes is underscored by road safety statistics from recent years, which show that almost a quarter of fatal accidents in the UK involve speeding. Police statistics show that more than half (56 per cent) of fatal collisions in 2023 had at least one speed-related factor. The changes coming in August 2025 represent a smarter, data-driven approach to road safety. For most drivers, this will mean safer roads and fairer enforcement. For repeat offenders, the cost of carelessness will be much higher, with fines reaching £450 and six penalty points, as well as the risk of having their driving licences suspended. As the system comes into force, the message is clear — slow down or pay the price.
Daily Mirror
20 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Thousands of drivers are failing test before they even get behind the wheel
More than 3,000 learner drivers have failed their practical driving test in the last five years due to not meeting the required eyesight standards for the exam Thousands of learners in the UK are flunking their driving tests before they even touch the ignition, all due to a simple yet crucial task – failing to read a number plate from 20 metres away. Over 3,000 aspiring drivers blundered at this common hurdle and missed out on hitting the road. They didn't just fall at the first sight test; they also splashed out roughly £200,000 collectively on unsuccessful driving tests without ever revving an engine. Research by Feel Good Contacts revealed how many potential motorists' visions put the brakes on their practical driving aspirations in the UK. Forking out between £62 and £75 for a test can cause a bit of a sting in your wallet, but for 3,061 hopefuls between 2018 and 2023, it was money down the drain before they could even buckle up. The vital eyesight check is straightforward - spot the letters on a reg plate from 20 metres as stipulates, "You must be able to read (with glasses or contact lenses, if necessary) a car number plate made after 1 September 2001 from 20 metres." A mix-up with spectacles or just poor vision led these learners to cough up a staggering £229,000 for exams that were doomed to fail before they could so much as adjust the rear-view mirror. It seems that learner drivers are not taking the importance of good eyesight for their practical exam seriously, with the number of test fails at the initial eyesight check gradually increasing and returning to pre-Covid levels. The figures peaked at 697 in 2018, sharply fell to 280 in 2020 and have been gradually rising year-on-year to 600 in 2023, reports Lancs Live. In terms of gender, men are 41 per cent more likely to fail their driving test at this stage than women, with males aged 21-30 being the most likely group to fail their driving test at the initial eyesight check. Men were responsible for 1,842 of the fails, while women only accounted for 1,219 of the fails at this stage of the driving test. Younger drivers failed most at the initial eyesight check, with those aged 21-30 accounting for more than a third (36 per cent) of them. Over 14 million drivers in the UK need eyesight correction as a condition of their licence, meaning out of 42 million licence holders, a third (34 per cent) contain an '01 - Eyesight Correction' code. More than a third (35 per cent) of 2,000 Brits surveyed, who wear glasses or contacts when driving, confess they've not declared it to the DVLA - potentially putting people's safety on the roads at risk. Motorists who have informed the DVLA about their need for corrective eyewear could face a hefty £1,000 fine and three penalty points if they fail to wear them while driving. Khuram Sarwar, a dispensing optician at Feel Good Contacts, emphasised: "Wearing prescription glasses or contact lenses is a must while driving for those who need vision correction to meet the 'standards of vision for driving'. "Having crystal-clear eyesight at multiple distances is needed to achieve an adequate field of vision during driving and to see number plates, road signs and other vehicles with optimal visual activity. "It's a simple process to get your vision corrected and it's not worth the risk of failing your driving test or putting others in danger."
