
Tejashwi escapes injury as drone crashes during rally
Tejashwi Prasad Yadav
, narrowly avoided injury on Sunday when a drone crashed onto the stage during the 'Waqf Bachao-Dastoor Bachao' rally at
Gandhi Maidan
in Patna.
The incident occurred while the former deputy chief minister was addressing the crowd. The drone came hurtling towards the podium, prompting Tejashwi to instinctively duck, escaping what could have been a serious mishap.
Patna SP (central) Diksha told reporters that police were examining the incident. "We will investigate the matter," she said, adding that police personnel were occupied with crowd management during the rally.
The organisers later clarified that the drone had been deployed for aerial coverage of the event. Tejashwi resumed his address shortly after the disruption.
The rally, held under the banner of Imarat-e-Shariah, was convened by Ameer-e-Shariat Maulana Ahmad Wali Faisal Rahmani. Despite soaring summer temperatures, lakhs of people gathered to protest against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 and express support for the Constitution.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Keep 'secular', drop 'socialist'
Some people, including big leaders, are saying that two words – 'secular' and 'socialist' – should be removed from the beginning (called the Preamble) of India's Constitution. They say these words were added in 1976 by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi during a time when people's rights were heavily controlled – called the Emergency. But the Supreme Court of India has said these words are important and mean something special in the Indian context. Let's start with 'secular'. This means the government should treat all religions equally. It should not favour one over another. India has many religions, castes, and languages, so this idea is very important. Our Constitution already supports this through rules like: Article 15 , which says no one should be treated unfairly because of religion or caste Article 25 , which says everyone is free to follow any religion So 'secular' truly belongs in the Constitution. Now about 'socialist'. This word is more complicated. It comes from a system where the government owns most businesses and land so that wealth is shared more equally. But today, India is a mix of capitalism (private business) and social justice (helping the poor and giving everyone a fair chance). Our Constitution supports fairness, not full government control. In fact, a strong economy with private businesses and good welfare schemes (like free schools or health care) works better for India than old-style socialism. Also, being secular helps make social justice happen. In a country with many religions and castes, only a fair, religion-neutral government can treat people equally. So here's the simple answer: Keep secular – because it's essential Drop socialist – because it doesn't fit India's needs today Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
In a first, Govt directs offices of ministers: Clear all files pending for over two months
Pushing to cut delays in decision-making at the top, the Cabinet Secretariat has for the first time sent letters directly to the offices of Central ministers where files have been pending for more than two months, asking them to clear the backlog at the earliest, The Indian Express has learnt. The letters were sent in the second half of June and mention the number of pending files. Until now, the pendency of files used to be reviewed at the level of joint secretary, additional secretary and secretary, and not by the offices of ministers. The Cabinet Secretariat is learnt to have been monitoring pendency at each level using the Government's E-Office digital workplace, which has around 7,000-8,000 e-files in circulation daily, of which about 2,000 go to the offices of ministers. A majority of these files pertain to inter-ministerial subjects, such as national policies and schemes. It learnt that the Cabinet Secretariat has flagged files pending at ministers' offices for 61-90 days, 91-120 days and over 180 days. At one minister's office, several dozen files were found pending, it is learnt. At another minister's office, files related to the release of funds for a state were found pending for more than six months. The move to flag pendency at this level is the latest measure taken by the NDA Government to cut bureaucratic delays. The Government has earlier launched PRAGATI (Pro-Active Governance and Timely Implementation) to monitor implementation of infrastructure projects. It has been described as a three-tier system that includes officials at the Prime Minister's Office, Central Government Secretaries and Chief Secretaries of states. The Prime Minister chairs a monthly meeting of PRAGATI where he interacts with Central Secretaries and Chief Secretaries through video-conferencing. This platform has helped accelerate over 340 'critical projects' since its inception in March 2015, sources said. In October 2021, the Government launched the PM GatiShakti platform to facilitate planning and decision-making on infrastructure projects. Another platform, e-SamikSha, is also being used as a real-time monitoring system for follow-ups on announcements and decisions pertaining to Central ministries. Harikishan Sharma, Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express' National Bureau, specializes in reporting on governance, policy, and data. He covers the Prime Minister's Office and pivotal central ministries, such as the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Ministry of Cooperation, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Rural Development, and Ministry of Jal Shakti. His work primarily revolves around reporting and policy analysis. In addition to this, he authors a weekly column titled "STATE-ISTICALLY SPEAKING," which is prominently featured on The Indian Express website. In this column, he immerses readers in narratives deeply rooted in socio-economic, political, and electoral data, providing insightful perspectives on these critical aspects of governance and society. ... Read More


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Worst attack on Constitution": INDIA bloc delegation meets with ECI regarding SIR in Bihar
New Delhi [India], July 3 (ANI): A delegation of INDIA bloc leaders from 11 political parties met with the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the national capital on Wednesday to register their opposition to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls currently underway in Bihar, calling it the 'worst attack on the basic structure of the Constitution.' Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, part of the delegation that met Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, questioned the timing of the SIR exercise, noting that it is being carried out only months before the upcoming Assembly elections. 'Firstly, the last revision was in 2003. For 22 years, more than four of five Bihar elections have happened. Were all those elections faulty?... Secondly the Special Intensive Revision which was held in 2003, was held one year before the Lok Sabha Elections, two years before the Assembly election. Today you are having in July, a maximum period of one or two months for an electoral revision exercise of the second most largest electoral populated state in India, want to have it in one and a half to two months,' the Congress leader told reporters after the meeting. Representatives of the Communist Party of India, CPI (Marxist-Leninist), Samajwadi Party, Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar), Rashtriya Janata Dal, Congress and other parties were present. Singhvi warned that such a rushed revision process could distort the electoral rolls and called it a direct threat to constitutional democracy. 'This enfranchisement is the worst attack on the basic structure of the Constitution. Today, every word counts, even if you wrongfully delete or wrongfully add a single voter, it is creating a non-level playing field that affects democracy and elections. This violates the basic structure of the Constitution,' Singhvi added. The ECI has claimed that the SIR is only meant to verify voters and to identify any 'ineligible voters' ahead of the Assembly elections which are expected to be held later this year in Bihar. However, multiple political parties part of the Opposition, including Congress and Bihar's Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) has raised objected to the exercise, claiming that it will be used to deny people their constitutional rights. Singhvi also raised objections to how the meeting was conducted, stating that new restrictions on who could attend were introduced without precedent. 'For the first time we were told rules for going inside. This is the first time we were told that only the heads or chairpersons of parties can go in. This is not possible or practical, this has not happened before. I have been part of multiple delegations before. This restriction being put in makes sure that a conversation which is expected to happen in a democracy between political parties' representatives and the Election Commission does not happen,' he said. He added that senior Congress leaders Pawan Khera, Jairam Ramesh, and Akhilesh Pratap Singh were among those made to wait outside during the meeting. Meanwhile, RJD MP Manoj Jha, who was also part of the delegation, called the SIR a 'conspiracy' to remove the people of Bihar, and said that most people might not have the required documentation to keep one's name in the electoral rolls. 'We all have kept the worry of Bihar in front of them...I have handed over to them the letter of the RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav. This is a conspiracy to evict the purpose of any exercise is exclusion instead of inclusion, then what can we had no answer when we asked that the exercise (Special Intensive Revision), which had not been done in 22 years, why is being done now?... The documents that are important for proving eligibility, most people don't have them,' Jha said during the press conference. Communist Party of India's (CPI) General Secretary D Raja also said that the poll panel should consider the possibility of heavy rains, floods and other natural calamities during the season making the verification exercise challenging. 'We went there to discuss the problems involved in holding Bihar elections because there is an exercise which has been initiated, started by the Election Commission, that is Special Intensive Revision. We asked the Election Commission to postpone that SIR because Bihar will face floods, heavy rains and natural calamities that should be taken into consideration,' Raja told ANI. He mentioned that there was a demand to postpone the SIR and conduct the assembly elections based on the 2024 Lok Sabha electoral rolls. NCP (SCP) leader and Member of Parliament Fouzia Khan said that the poll panel is dismissing the concerns of the migrants of Bihar. 'Election Commission is not willing to consider the concerns of Bihar's migrants, they do not live in ordinary houses. We feel that in the name of strengthening democracy whether the death of it does not happen, that is the question. If crores of people can be denied voting then where does the democracy stand?' the NCP (SCP) leader told ANI. In a post on X following the meeting, the Election Commission stated that all concerns raised by party representatives were addressed, and the SIR was being conducted in accordance with legal provisions. 'Commission stated that SIR is being conducted in accordance with provisions of Article 326,RP Act 1950 & instructions issued on 24.06.2025 Party representatives raised concerns related to SIR. Each concern which was raised by any member of PP was fully addressed by Commission,' the EC's post read. The Bihar Legislative Assembly elections are expected to be held later this year, however no official date has been announced by the ECI as of yet. (ANI)