Personal loans hit record high in South Africa as cost of living bites
A new report from DebtBusters reveals that a staggering 91% of individuals applying for debt counselling in early 2025 had at least one personal loan – the highest percentage ever recorded.
DebtBusters' head, Benay Sager, warned that this trend signals a deepening financial crisis, especially among middle- and upper-income earners who are now under increasing pressure.
'Basically, eight out of every 10 rands earned by top-income earners applying for debt counselling are being spent on debt repayments,' Sager said.
'That's the highest we've ever seen. It reflects the severe financial strain facing even those who are traditionally better off.'
Although some indicators – like consumer confidence – have shown slight improvement, the financial burden remains immense.
Essentials such as electricity, fuel, and food have seen sharp price hikes, while household incomes have remained virtually flat.
One of the report's most surprising findings is that debt is growing fastest among the country's highest earners.
Traditionally seen as more financially resilient, this group is now increasingly reliant on borrowing to maintain their lifestyles or cover basic expenses.
'This group is under severe pressure,' Sager emphasised.
'The fact that such a high-income bracket is so leveraged shows how widespread the impact of the cost-of-living crisis has become.'
The report paints a sobering picture of South Africa's economic health.
With many households resorting to short-term borrowing at high interest rates, financial experts warn that without interventions – such as improved wage growth, energy cost control, and inflation relief – more South Africans could be pushed into unsustainable debt cycles.
As debt becomes the only option for many South Africans to survive rising costs, financial advisors are urging consumers to prioritise budgeting, seek professional debt advice early, and avoid high-risk lending solutions where possible.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
29 minutes ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Monday, 28 July 2025
Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Monday, 28 July 2025. The New York Times front page reported that the US and Europe have reached an agreement on a 15% tariff. The Washington Post reported that more food has entered Gaza. The Jerusalem Post's front page reported that the IDF declared a localised Gaza ceasefire to facilitate the delivery of food. China Daily's front page reported that the nation is boosting global AI governance. The Daily Mail's front page reported that a migrant protest hotel has now been shut. The Guardian's front page reported that England made history with the Euro 2025 victory. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
The Citizen
29 minutes ago
- The Citizen
The tenant who won't leave
Another tale of a victim of rental fraud and the legal system that allowed the occupant to stay. The owner of a Parkwood home estimates that her direct loss already exceeds R500 000, excluding legal fees and unpaid municipal charges. Picture: AdobeStock South Africans are no strangers to bureaucratic indifference. But sometimes a single story reveals just how deeply systemic failure has set in. A Moneyweb reader – at her wits' end – shared her sad tale of losing more than R500 000 after a tenant moved into her house under false pretences, then refused to pay rent and won't leave. The email describes the owner's serious dilemma and highlights the risks of investing in rental property. She says the elaborate scam involves fake documents, visa violations, falsified payslips and a brazen abuse of legal processes. The reader owns a R4.5 million property in Parkwood and she says almost every institution charged with protecting honest citizens – including the Rental Housing Tribunal, the police, SA Revenue Services (Sars), the Department of Home Affairs, banks and the courts – has failed to act. 'This isn't just about me,' she says. 'This is happening to people all over the country. Just because we are ordinary South Africans, we are expected to absorb the loss and move on. 'Must we accept that this is just the way things are? I have the evidence to show how to thrive illegally in this country and get away with it,' she says. The facts are straightforward. The owner leased her property to a man who arrived in a Land Rover, claiming to run multiple businesses. He promised to pay six months' rent upfront into a trust account. Needless to say, that never happened. ALSO READ: How to evict tenants 'He paid rent for the first three months. Then nothing. After a protracted battle, I managed to extract another three months' payment. Since then, for more than seven months, not a cent. 'Meanwhile, rates and taxes have gone unpaid, my bond with Investec is under pressure and my overdraft facility has been threatened,' she says. The reader says she had to sell her car, take on extra consulting work, and drained her savings to keep the house from being repossessed. Despite the clear breach of contract, her efforts to get rid of the defaulting tenant were unsuccessful. She alleges that the Gauteng Rental Housing Tribunal has refused to enforce the lease's termination clause or allow eviction proceedings. 'Instead, they insist on inspecting the house to determine whether the tenant's 'comfort' has been adequately prioritised. 'The tenant has refused entry to me as the owner and landlord as well as the rental agents – and even the inspectors that were appointed by the tribunal. Nonetheless, the tribunal has imposed maintenance obligations on me, but I cannot access my own property to do the work. 'They told me that my notice of termination means nothing. They say we must wait for another inspector. Or another tribunal officer. Or another counterclaim. Each one delays the case for months,' she says. ALSO READ: More South Africans rent, but arrears and tenant risk rise False documents According to the homeowner, the tenant submitted false payslips with tax deductions that do not match standard Sars tax tables. His visa documents appear fraudulent – a claim the owner says has been (verbally) confirmed by Home Affairs officials. Despite this, officers at the Rosebank Police Station refused to open a case of fraud. When she tried to remove her furniture from the property, the police were called and stopped her. She says the tenant's personal bank account, held at RMB Private Bank, has seen more than R2 million in activity over just two months, based on the copy of the bank statements she insisted on when considering the lease. 'He lives on the premises with his girlfriend and at least two other men who are not SA citizens. He claims to run several businesses, but I could not find any confirmation that any of the businesses exist. None are registered with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). 'He writes his own legal letters, which a real law firm then forwards on their official letterhead. He knows the system better than anyone,' the homeowner claims. 'He knows that all you need is a delay. Just say 'I submitted a counterclaim', and the tribunal will postpone again. No one checks anything.' She believes the bank statements the tenant offered are fake. 'But RMB has ignored my repeated emails asking for verification.' ALSO READ: Your rights when you rent a place to stay Institutions in silos What's striking in this case is how every institution involved seems either unwilling or unable to act. There appears to be no coordination between Home Affairs, Sars, CIPC, the banks or the tribunal. The homeowner has done a lot of research about the errant tenant. She says he has a student and a working visa, a contradiction in itself. 'He apparently operates businesses in clear violation of his immigration status. He is not Vat registered, has no visible employees, and does not file tax returns. His companies' addresses cannot be verified. 'And yet, the banks have not flagged his transactions under anti-money laundering or Fica (Financial Intelligence Centre Act) rules. Home Affairs will not intervene unless he is found on a public street or place of business. The tribunal demands that the landlord comply with obligations, even while being denied access to the property. 'I've contacted every institution I can think of,' she says. This is not just a personal nightmare. It points to a national governance failure that affects thousands of property owners, particularly middle-income landlords who cannot afford long legal battles. South African law appears to offer tenants near-absolute protection, while offering landlords almost no practical recourse when contracts are ignored or fraud is involved. This imbalance is often justified as protecting vulnerable tenants, but the unintended result is that unscrupulous operators, including illegal immigrants and con artists, can exploit the system with impunity. 'What is the point of the law if someone with fraudulent documents can move into a house, refuse to pay rent, violate immigration law and still be protected?' the aggrieved landlord asks. ALSO READ: Here's a list of what your landlord is responsible for in your rented flat Legal delays The economic cost is real. The property owner estimates that her direct loss already exceeds R500 000, excluding legal fees and unpaid municipal charges. Multiply that across similar cases nationwide, and the scale becomes obvious. 'This tenant lives rent free in a R4.5 million home with a permanent 'guard' who's not South African. Meanwhile, I've had to sell my car to pay rates.' The homeowner adds that the system fails to protect landlords and actively penalises them for trying to enforce legal agreements. She argues that her problem highlights significant gaps in the legal system: Rental Tribunal: There must be clearer legal boundaries regarding the tribunal's powers. Leases must matter; otherwise, why have contracts at all? There is no coordination between institutions. Visa status, tax compliance, business registration and tenant behaviour must be cross-checked in cases of alleged fraud. Bank oversight: Financial institutions must be held accountable for monitoring and flagging suspicious activity. 'It cannot fall on private citizens to investigate a bank's clients,' the homeowner says. She also asks that landlords get some support. 'Middle-income landlords need legal mechanisms and government-backed structures to address tenant abuse without being forced into expensive court battles.' The landlord says her crooked tenant 'is smart, charming, eloquent, and knows the law better than most lawyers. He is completely without accountability. The system seems to reward his behaviour'. However, she's not giving up, even if she knows she's unlikely to recover her losses. 'This isn't just my story. It's a SA story. It is playing out, house by house, lease by lease.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
IOL News
29 minutes ago
- IOL News
The 30% U. S. tariff and Its global ripple effects
On August 1, the United States will impose a 30% tariff on select South African exports, a move the Trump administration frames as a corrective to trade imbalances but which South Africa decries as a unilateral overreach. President Cyril Ramaphosa has rejected the U.S. justification, noting that 77% of U.S. goods enter South Africa duty-free, with an average tariff of just 7.6%. Yet, the policy threatens to derail South Africa's fragile economic recovery, destabilise global supply chains, and escalate protectionist tensions worldwide. South Africa will be hit with a 30% tariff on all its exports to the United States from August 1, following a formal letter from US President Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa demanding action on trade imbalances and long-standing market restrictions. This article examines the tariff's sectoral impacts, systemic risks to multilateral trade, and strategic responses to mitigate the fallout. South Africa's automotive sector, a beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), faces existential risk. Reuters reported that the U.S. absorbed 6.5% of South Africa's vehicle exports (worth $1.8 billion in 2024) and is a critical market for manufacturers like BMW and Ford. The 30% tariff could force plant closures and mass layoffs, eroding a sector contributing 5.2% to GDP. The U.S. accounts for 5–6% of South Africa's citrus exports ($100 million annually), supporting 35,000 jobs. Tariffs may cede market share to Chile and Peru. Wine: Producers are scrambling to redirect stock or absorb price shocks, but the U.S. market's premium margins are irreplaceable. High-value perishables face logistical hurdles in pivoting to new markets swiftly. The textile sector may lose competitiveness in the U.S., while aluminum exports face a $534.5 million risk, with 24.6% going to the U.S. Furthermore, the South African Reserve Bank warns of 0.3% GDP contraction and 100,000 job losses. Fiscal strain from reduced export revenues and a weaker rand. The tariffs will disrupt global logistics: Freight bottlenecks: A pre-tariff rush to ship goods to the U.S. has already caused 6–10-week delays on routes like China and South Africa. Cost inflation: U.S. consumers will pay more for South African goods, while businesses face redundant inventory and working capital crunches. The U.S. has threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS-aligned nations, politicizing trade. South Africa may expand its exports by increasing trade with markets in the EU and Asia. The trade deal reached on July 27, between the United States and the European Union will ease tariff barriers and improve market access between the two economies. For South Africa, this development could have significant ramifications. First, EU exporters may displace South African goods in U.S. markets, particularly in competitive sectors like wine, citrus, and manufactured components. Second, the EU may divert more of its exports to the U.S., limiting the space for South African exports to expand into Europe. Unless offset by diplomatic interventions and aggressive trade diversification, this deal risks marginalizing South Africa in both the U.S. and EU markets simultaneously. To navigate the crisis, South Africa must leverage trade finance tools: Export Credit Facilities: Bridge cash flow gaps for exporters facing margin compression. The U.S. tariffs are a stress test for South Africa's economic resilience. While the short-term pain is inevitable, strategic diplomacy, trade finance innovation, and market diversification could transform this threat into an opportunity for long-term resilience. The world will watch whether South Africa and the global trading system can adapt without fracturing further. Nyaniso Qwesha, MBA, is a trade finance consultant with expertise in global commerce and risk management. He advises clients on trade policy, market access, and financial solutions in emerging economies.
