Congress, VCK demand action against Periyar University professor accused of caste discrimination
More than 10 Ph.D. scholars at Periyar University recently lodged complaints against Prof. Periasamy, claiming he subjected them to caste discrimination and verbal abuse, and made them work at his house and on his land. Quoting a report published in The Hindu, the TNCC, VCK, and DVK demanded action against the Tamil professor.
In a social media post on X, TNCC president K. Selvaperunthagai said 'without delay, the professor who allegedly subjected the Ph.D. scholars to caste discrimination should be placed under suspension.' He further demanded that the Tamil Nadu government form a high-level inquiry committee and conduct a proper investigation into the allegations.
In a statement on social media, VCK deputy general secretary Vanni Arasu also demanded the professor's suspension, and alleged that he was affiliated with the teachers' wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Prof. Periasamy acted against the principles of social justice, along with former Vice Chancellor R. Jagannathan, Mr. Vanni Arasu alleged, adding that Chief Minister M.K. Stalin must take action against the professor.
DVK president Kolathur Mani, demanding action against the professor, said that the scholars had lodged the complaint 20 days ago, but the university's administrative committee has still not acted on it.
'The government should not tolerate caste discrimination and must act firmly to prevent it. Steps should be taken to help the affected scholars complete their Ph.D. Stern action must be taken against the professor's accomplices who created trouble for the scholars. Protection should also be provided to the complainants,' the DVK president added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
8 hours ago
- The Print
There's poison of regionalism, linguism in Maharashtra. Condemn & remove it: YB Chavan
Even recently, when I was in Bombay, I held a press conference, and about what I said there was misrepresented in some papers in the south. There are certainly some problems for Maharashtrians in Bombay – of poor people. I am one of those who believe that whether it is a poor Tamil or a poor Telugu or a poor Kannadiga, or a poor Maratha, their problems are the same. I was asked to unveil a statue of Shivaji at Shivaji Park in Bombay. It was a huge gathering of 3-4 lakh people. I made my first statement there condemning these activities and appealing to the people of Maharashtra not to take up this linguistic attitude in this particular matter. I am on record about it. Maharashtra has a tradition of nationalism, and Maharashtra has produced leaders as humble servants of the nation. The poison of regionalism or linguism, just as it is making its appearance and is raising its ugly head elsewhere, made a somewhat ugly appearance in Maharashtra also. Certainly, we shall have to condemn it and make every effort to remove that poison. I would like to assure this House that the Maharashtra Government are quite aware of this thing. The Chief Minister and the Revenue Minister themselves have made statements about it, and they have assured me that they will take all the necessary action against all manifestations of it, whatever they are. The agony and the pangs of unemployment are the same. There are certainly some economic grievances. At the same time, I would say that however justified the economic grievances may be, nobody has a right to take unlawful means in his hands to solve even those economic grievances. This is my approach to this matter. I would like to put on record a certain statement on this matter. Our Constitution accepts only one citizenship and all citizens have the fundamental right to reside and settle in any part of India. … to acquire, hold, and dispose of property anywhere and to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. This fundamental right must be unreservedly respected both by the governments in the country and by the people. It is in the interest of the economic development of the country and of national integration that any citizen of India should feel free to go to any part of the country, seek employment or pursue any business or occupation of his choice. He should have the confidence that while doing so, there will be no discrimination of any kind against him and that, in a very real sense, the principle of equality of opportunity would be respected. In the matter of public employment, equality of opportunity has been guaranteed by the Constitution itself, and this is a guarantee which we have been endeavouring, and will continue to endeavour, to have fully respected by all the public authorities in the country. In respect of the Central Government's corporate public enterprises, we have been issuing instructions that there should be no discrimination against people who come to seek employment from other parts of the country or against the local people. The only preference which our instructions provide is that at the lower levels of employment, special consideration should be shown to people who had been displaced by a project. I am sure the House will agree this is a sound and humane policy. Complaints are sometimes made of discrimination in the organised sectors of private employment. This is not a matter in which anything can or should be done through legal regulation, but the wider interests of the country require, as indeed does the enlightened self-interest of the employers themselves, that here, too, the principle of equality of opportunity should be observed. People will have grievances. Sometimes they are justified, and sometimes they are not. Obviously, where there are any legitimate grievances, they should be redressed to the extent possible. But one thing is certain. Nobody has any right to seek redress of his grievances, genuine or otherwise, by unlawful means. There can be no justification whatever for creating hatred or ill will, for one section of the community to show any kind of antagonism to another. If there is anything of this kind, it should be strongly condemned, and where legal action is possible, such action should be taken. Some weeks ago, I said categorically at a press conference in Bombay that any agitation directed against any particular linguistic group deserved to be condemned. I also described the attitude of the Shiv Sena as reactionary and harmful, and against the unity of the country. I take this opportunity to reaffirm those observations. I have heard from the Maharashtra Government again recently, in which the assurances and the determination to take necessary action have been reaffirmed. I am confident that the Maharashtra Government will stand by their assurances and take whatever action is necessary to prevent any manifestation of parochialism. Editor's note: This is an edited excerpt from Yashwantrao Balwantrao Chavan's 1967 address in the Lok Sabha. Read the full speech here. This is part of ThePrint's Great Speeches series. It features speeches and debates that shaped modern India.
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Delhi University fee hike with emergency powers of VC draws flak
NEW DELHI: In the Executive Council (EC) meeting held on Saturday, members voiced objections to fee hikes across several academic programmes, criticising the use of emergency powers by the vice-chancellor to implement such decisions without adequate discussion. A supplementary agenda item revealed steep fee hike for the academic year 2025–26 across programmes like MA (Bengali/MIL/Tamil/CIL), PhD, Integrated Law, and Faculty of Education. For instance, the MA programme has seen a hike along with additional charges under the University Development Fund and EWS Support categories. The Integrated Law Programme fee has reached `60,870 for 2025–26. Dr Mithuraaj Dhusiya, an EC member, expressed concern over the unilateral implementation of these hikes using emergency powers, bypassing consultation with the Council. 'Students and faculty remain unaware of the rationale behind these increases,' he said, adding that there was no adequate discussion of the impact, particularly with the growing number of self-financing courses. He warned such fee increases threaten the public-funded nature of the university. The Executive Council members raised concerns about the use of emergency powers by the V-C. In his dissent, Dr Dhusiya pointed out that crucial policy matters, particularly those concerning recruitment and the scheme of examination for non-teaching staff, had been decided without prior discussions, bypassing the Executive Council's involvement. The agenda item in question focused on decisions taken by the V-C on recruitment rules and the exam scheme for non-teaching staff, which were notified in May 2025. Dr Dhusiya argued that these changes, which impacted over 5,000 employees, should have been discussed and approved by the Council.
New Indian Express
10 hours ago
- New Indian Express
EPS misleading AIADMK cadre on alliance: DMK
CHENNAI: Reacting to Union Home Minister Amit Shah's assertion that the saffron party will join the government if the AIADMK-BJP alliance wins in 2026, DMK organisational secretary R S Bharathi said, 'That is the BJP's agenda. Palaniswami, despite already knowing this, is misleading his own party cadre out of fear that they themselves will not accept it.' Countering Shah's claims, in an interview to TNIE, that the NDA would win by a landslide in TN in 2026, Bharathi said, 'They definitely cannot win. Since 1967, TN has been ruled only by Dravidian parties. The Tamil people will never accept a coalition government. EPS is falsely claiming that the AIADMK is leading the coalition. In reality, it is the BJP that is leading it.' To support his point, Bharathi recalled the DMK-Congress alliance in 1980, which ended in a debacle. Meanwhile, Dravidar Kazhagam president K Veeramani questioned the AIADMK leadership in response to Shah's interview. Veeramani asked, 'More than just saying it will be a coalition government, Shah goes one step further and says the election will go 'their' way. What will the AIADMK, which is mortgaged, say about it?' CPM state secretary P Shanmugam said, 'Shah's interview is proof that the AIADMK-BJP alliance has been in constant confusion. On the one hand, Shah says it will be a coalition government; on the other, EPS claims the AIADMK will form a majority government. EPS must clarify this confusion. We can't even be sure how an AIADMK-led government alone would function. In this situation, a coalition government with the BJP will surely cause great harm to Tamil Nadu.'
