Top 10 Most Efficient Hybrid Cars in 2025: Best Fuel-Saving Picks
Compared to their gas-only siblings, hybrids are much lighter on fuel in most cases. Utilizing electric motors means that the gasoline engine under the hood doesn't have to work as hard. This translates into you having to spend much less money when it comes to filling up the gas tank.
We've found the ten hybrid cars that are more efficient than all of their rivals. Based on EPA estimates, these cars are able to sip fuel whether you're on the highway or driving through the city. We explore what helps them stand out in the hyper-competitive hybrid segment and which individual trims are lightest on fuel.
In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites and other authoritative sources, fueleconomy.gov and TopSpeed. Models are ranked by their estimated combined MPG, from least to most efficient.
The first entry on this list is not one that you'd likely suspect. BMW's sporting coupe is big and quick, yet somehow manages to keep fuel consumption low. It is exceptionally stylish and features an interior that is both plush and also styled with exciting sporty elements. It really is good value for money.
While the inline-six that you'd find in the M440i is certainly attractive, its higher price tag is not. The four-cylinder engine is also impressively light on fuel thanks to its 48-volt hybrid system. Despite being frugal, the 430i is still capable of incredibly spirited driving and definitely offers a ton of thrills.
While Toyota usually leaves luxury to Lexus, the brand recently put out a sedan that is just as plush. The Crown features polarizing styling, with raised suspension putting it somewhere in between a traditional sedan and a crossover. In any case, this hybrid-only model is super comfortable.
The Crown comes with two different hybrid powertrains, one featuring a turbocharged engine and the other naturally aspirated. The latter is the more efficient model, with the more powerful Platinum trim only getting up to 30 miles per gallon combined.
The ES isn't like other mid-size luxury sedans. While its rivals focus on a balance between comfort and driving verve, the ES hybrid instead forgets performance and focuses purely on luxury. What this does mean, though, is that the sedan starts thousands of dollars cheaper than other options.
The ES hybrid is front-wheel drive only, which is one of the many signs that point towards it being a fairly tame sedan. Its 215 horsepower will be enough for most, but it doesn't get you anywhere particularly quickly. However, it is easily the most fuel efficient luxury sedan on the market right now.
The Sonata is Hyundai's mid-size family sedan, and it follows the same ideology as the rest of the Korean brand's lineup, offering value above all else. It looks fantastic and comes packed with tons of features that more than justify its price tag, and it utilizes a good mix of traditional controls and modern technology.
A single electric motor pairs with the humble four-cylinder engine that sits under the hood of the Sonata hybrid. While speed and cornering prowess are not exactly the name of the game with this sedan, its efficiency means its a great family car, especially if you frequently commute long distances on the highway.
If you're looking for simple transportation to get you from A to B without any fuss, the Corolla is likely already on your radar. The hybrid model only furthers this cause, promising to save you money on your fuel bill. The only downside is that you can only get the hybrid in sedan form.
The Corolla Hybrid oozes simplicity, from a functional interior to a humble powertrain. It isn't quick by any means, taking nine seconds to go from zero to 60 miles per hour, but it is fairly comfortable. All-wheel drive is on offer, but these models only manage 44 miles per gallon combined.
It really is hard to find anything negative to say about Honda's mid-size family sedan. The Accord has consistently been one of the best value options in its segment, thanks to a fantastic interior package and strong performance. It is also very spacious on the inside, whether you're sat in the front or the back.
The hybrid Accord strikes an impressive balance between frugality and fun. Its chassis is taught and it handles brilliantly, offering tons of fun on back roads. It is also quicker than most of the other cars on this list, able to shoot to 60 miles per hour in 6.7 seconds. We just wish you could still get one with a manual.
Sitting just above its mid-sized sibling, the brand-new Honda Civic hybrid is one of the most efficient cars on the market. It has been added to the lineup for the 2025 model year, and we think many buyers will make the shift from the gas-only models. It is stylish, packed with features, and fun to drive.
Whether you drive mostly in the city, commute on the highway, or undertake a combination of the two, the Civic hybrid delivers consistent efficiency. The hybrid Civic is also plenty quick, capable of getting to 60 miles per hour from a standstill in 6.2 seconds, and its chassis is tuned to be playful.
For the 2025 model year, Toyota made a fairly dramatic change to the Camry, making it a hybrid-only model. While this means that the V-6 from the TRD model is no longer available, all other models are now more powerful, quicker, and much lighter on fuel. It is also much more comfortable on the inside than before.
Front-wheel drive is standard on the 2025 Camry, and models with this setup pair the inline-four with two electric motors. All-wheel drive models add a third motor and increase output to 232 horsepower. The all-wheel drive model is slightly less efficient, but still manages 50 miles per gallon combined.
The Hyundai Elantra is an impressively handsome compact sedan, with brilliant styling inside and out. Like other Hyundai's, every model comes with a very generous feature package, making it a great value-for-money option, especially because its starting price is so low.
The base Elantra Hybrid Blue model is the most efficient model, with the better-equipped Sport and Limited models featuring larger wheels that drop combined fuel economy down to 50 miles per gallon. The Elantra Hybrid is especially efficient on the highway, saving you more money if you regularly undertake longer trips.
It isn't surprising at all that the Toyota Prius takes the top spot when it comes to fuel efficiency. Ever since the Prius hit American roads back in 2000, it has been the sensible choice. However, the most modern iteration is better looking, more comfortable, and more entertaining to drive than you'd expect.
The LE and Nightshade trims of the 2025 Prius are the most efficient models, especially when you keep them front-wheel drive. The XLE and Limited models decrease overall efficiency, as does opting for all-wheel drive. However, even the least efficient Prius manages 49 miles per gallon combined.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Car and Driver
13 hours ago
- Car and Driver
1977 BMW 320i Test: Never Dull
From the December 1976 issue of Car and Driver. To begin with, it's a splendid little car. The new 320i is not just a successor to the great 1600/2002 legend; it's a whole new level of sophistication and style in the 20-year evolution of BMW from bankrupt-builder-of-kitschy-sedans to personal and public darling of the West German Economic Miracle. You might be a little stunned by the price (about $8000) at first, but the car's undeniable charm makes it seem more reasonable every time you fire it up. Our test car was a glorious sort of restrained dayglo red. Maybe the reddest red on the road. A color you would prefer to be if lost at sea or marooned on the wrong side of Annapurna. At first, it also seemed like a color guaranteed to get you arrested, but in these days of radar and Vascar, old-fashioned visual observation isn't so much a part of the policeman's portfolio. The wheels were good-looking, argent-painted steel cosmetic racers with a lot of offset; there was some discreet black-and-chrome trim laid on the here and there; and the whole thing reeked of understated wedge-shaped go-fast. View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver Open the door, and the vinyl interior is just about perfect. Ours was what the British used to call "biscuit," and the seats were—like the first exterior impression—an open invitation to drive somewhere very nice very quickly. Our test car had a sunroof mit crank that worked very smoothly and seemed quieter than most at speed. The white-on-black instruments were neatly clustered in a semicircle framed by the top half of the steering wheel, right where the driver can see them, and at night they're indirectly illuminated by a red glow that reminds you of war movies shot in submarines. The wheel itself is a thing of beauty—small in diameter, slightly dished, and raked at exactly the correct angle for serious pleasure. Lights, turn signals, windshield wipers and washers are all controlled by wands on either side of the steering column, and the shift lever for the four-speed transmission is on the floor, exactly where you'd have put it yourself. View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver The front seats are firm and very German in the way they position you relative to the business at hand. The rake adjustment is controlled by a handy lever that you push to release, and the range of adjustment goes anywhere from puritan vertical to profligate horizontal. The front seat backs are folded forward by means of a release lever on either side of each seat—making it possible tor the driver to fold the passenger's seat forward without either getting out or lying down across the compartment. Fore and aft adjustment is both smooth and vast—you can even get too far away from the wheel. The rear seats are roomy and comfortable. Real people really can ride there, largely because the rear wheels are set so far back on the chassis. Our first drive in the 320i was a little more than 500 miles from New York City to New Pittsburgh, Ohio. We drove through some awful rain squalls in Eastern Ohio, averaged just about 55 mph for the trip (including a stop for lunch) and achieved a not-to-be-sneezed-at 22.7 mpg for the trip, cruising at 75 most of the time. The car was superb. It ran like a train, hour after hour, and the absence of features like a radio or air-conditioning or power steering was never noticed. It's surprising how inconsequential such things become when you're in a car that works. View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver Our photographer, Humphrey Sutton, drove the BMW back from Detroit a few days later after photographing the new Ford Thunderbird. His reaction was like ours. "It's a wonderful car, that," he said. "It's very comfortable, quite nippy, really perfect for that sort of long drive. It gives you the feeling that people who really cared actually sat down and thought seriously about all the things that went into the design. Everything works the way you'd want it to. I'd swear that it's bigger inside than the Thunderbird and it goes faster. It'd be hard to come up with a reason for buying anything else." Once we got going, we tried to catalog our initial impressions. First, it's a much more sophisticated car than the 2002, the design of which was getting a little long in the tooth, no matter how much we loved it. Second, the smoothness and quiet in no way detract from the car's overall sportiness. Third, it's a long-legged car-while waiting to pass somebody at 55 or 60, you can preselect third and cruise along indefinitely without any feeling that the engine is straining or that the noise level is becoming intolerable. All the frequencies seem to be tuned for blissful cruising somewhere between 60 and 80 mph. It isn't one of those Europeans that simply rebels at the 55-mph limit, but it does feel best going a little faster. It's possible that the car would settle down at 55 a little more enthusiastically if you ordered it with the optional ZF three-speed automatic transmission (our test car had the standard four-speed). View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver The heater/fresh-air system has been improved and will now move 89 percent more fresh outside air or 42 percent more heated air through the passenger compartment than its predecessor. We tried both. For the first 400 miles of our westward journey, we ran with the sunroof open, the heater controls in the maximum fresh-air "Vent" mode and the swing-out rear windows open, because it was hot and muggy. We never felt too warm, and neither the fan nor the sunroof noise was in any way obtrusive. We could still talk without shouting. Near Youngstown, Ohio, the temperature had dropped considerably and the rain reached cloudburst proportions. With the BMW all buttoned up, the windshield suddenly fogged over at about 70 and we needed defrosting fast. Slam the vents closed, open the defrost lever, push the temperature-control lever about a half-inch toward the red and, voila, a clear windshield again. Not many European cars could have done so well under those circumstances. Our second set of impressions were more those of the traditional road-tester and a bit less those of the blown-away car fancier. The gear spacing in the transmission was a little hard to get used to. First is a fairly short starting gear, with a longish gap between it and second. Then second, third, and fourth ratios are spaced logically and predictably. Unless we wound the engine pretty tight, the first-second upshift never sounded or felt quite the way we wanted it to. Also, we found the engine a little rough and hesitant below 3000 rpm. It never actually balked or spit back at you, but it did seem to vibrate and stumble a little when trying to cruise at lower rpm. We avoided this by simply changing down to a lower gear whenever the revs dropped below 2800, but less-keen drivers might find the phenomenon disquieting. View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver As our experience with the car grew, we came to appreciate how large and commodious the luggage compartment turned out to be. Initially, we threw in a rather heavy load of luggage, which was no problem. Then there was a side-trip in Ohio for a little antique shopping and several more parcels disappeared into the well-appointed cavity. Then two framed prints we'd promised to pick up for Bruce McCall and, finally, a framed painting—a wedding gift—that measured about 30 by 40 inches and simply slid into place on top of everything else without any danger of compression or damage from the hinges. And as a sort of luggage-compartment tour de force, we peered under the open deck lid and discovered a neat little fitted tool kit, offering exactly those six or eight implements without which one should never leave one's driveway. In the cold hard light of testing, the brakes are a delight, pulling this new BMW down straight and sure from 70 in 218 feet. The 2002's arrangement of a power-assisted front disc/rear drum system has been carried over, but front brakes are now ventilated. On the skidpad, the adhesion is impressive at 0.71 g, but the combination of slow steering (4.0 turns lock-to-lock), softened ride and rather upright body is tough to keep track of. At the limit, the semi-trailing arm rear suspension occasionally kicks wide, and retrieving it takes great flinging of elbows. However, none of these aberrations occurred on the road, under any circumstance, so we're inclined to ignore them. It would appear, however, based upon this road test and on conversations with BMW personnel here in the States, that the new 500-series and 300-series products do represent a deliberate move away from the racer-you-can-drive-to-work concept and toward a sophisticated road machine. View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver The 300-series BMWs have a great deal to live up to. The 1600/2000 series enjoyed amazing success over a decade or so, and were in many ways the cornerstone of BMW's new-found preeminence in the upper atmosphere of enthusiast automobiles. The new cars seem to be worthy successors to that critical responsibility. They are undeniably better and more contemporary cars in every way. All of the basic pieces are recognizable to anyone familiar with the older car, but they've all been reshaped, honed and upgraded, then assembled in more sophisticated ways. Brakes are bigger, cooling capacity is greater, the structure has become far more crashworthy, noise and vibration are sharply reduced, the heater/ventilation system is a paragon of thermal virtue, and the car looks right for the next 10 years. View Photos Ben Humphrey | Car and Driver The BMW 320i stands as eloquent rebuttal to all those who'd have us believe that small economical cars that conform to the U.S. safety and emissions standards must be, by definition, slow and dull, or that automotive performance for the late 1970s is best achieved with decals and trick names. This car is good-looking, sublimely comfortable, fast, safe, economical, and exciting. It is also expensive, but then what isn't? To drive through any major city in North America and check its inventory of Mercedes, Jags, BMWs, Porsches, Cadillacs, and Lincolns is to come face to face with the fact that there is apparently no top on the market for truly expensive cars anymore. The BMW 320i is real value-for-money, no matter how much it costs, because it's beautifully engineered and it's not boring. If that isn't reason enough to buy a car, then we'll transfer our allegiance to mass transit. Specifications Specifications 1977 BMW 320i Vehicle Type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 2-door sedan PRICE As Tested: N/A ENGINE SOHCinline-4, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injection Displacement: 121 in3, 1990 cm3 Power: 110 hp @ 5800 rpm Torque: 112 lb-ft @ 3750 rpm TRANSMISSION 4-speed manual CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: struts/trailing arms Brakes, F/R: 10.0-in vented disc/9.8-in drum Tires: Continental TS771 185/70HR-13 DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 100.9 in Length: 177.5 in Width: 63.4 in Height: 54.3 in Curb Weight: 2606 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 10.5 sec 1/4-Mile: 17.3 sec @ 77 mph 90 mph: 29.8 sec Top Speed (observed): 108 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 218 ft Roadholding: 0.75 g C/D FUEL ECONOMY City/Highway: 21/24 mpg C/D TESTING EXPLAINED
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series?
Electric vehicles promise a lot, including lower emissions, less maintenance and high-end tech. But for everyday drivers, the real question is simpler: How much does it actually cost to run one? Not the sticker price or tax incentives. The monthly cost to keep it moving. Consider the Tesla Model 3 and the gas-powered BMW 3 Series, two well-known sedans with similar performance. One charges up, the other fills up. And when you break down the costs, the gap between them gets surprisingly wide. Check Out: Read Next: Charging a Tesla The Tesla Model 3 rear-wheel drive (RWD) has an EPA-estimated range of 272 miles and a usable battery capacity of 57.5 kilowatt hours (kWh), according to Green Cars Compare. This translates to an efficiency of about 4.61 miles per kWh under ideal conditions. Assuming an average monthly driving distance of 1,200 miles, the Tesla would use roughly 260 kWh of electricity each month. At the current U.S. average residential electricity rate of 17.45 cents per kWh, according to Choose Energy, monthly charging costs come to about $45.37. Using Tesla Superchargers or other public fast chargers, which typically cost between 40 and 60 cents per kWh, will raise the monthly cost accordingly if relied upon frequently. Discover More: How Long Does Charging Take? Charging time depends on how and where it's done, according to the Department of Transportation. Level 1 (120V outlet): Two to five miles of range per hour. A full charge could take 40 to 50 hours — only useful for very light driving. Level 2 (240V home charger): 10 to 20 miles per hour. Fully recharges in about 4 to 10 hours. Tesla Supercharger: A charge to 80% typically takes 20 minutes to an hour, and adds 180 to 240 miles. Fuel Cost for a BMW 3 Series A 2025 BMW 330i averages around 31 miles per gallon combined, according to Edmunds. Driving 1,200 miles per month means buying about 38.7 gallons of gas. At $3.16 per gallon, the national average as of July 2025, that works out to $122.41 per month. Charging a Tesla Model 3 RWD at home costs about $45 per month, while fueling a BMW 3 Series averages around $122 per month. That's $77 in monthly savings, or $924 annually, just on energy expenses if you choose the Tesla over the BMW. Cost Per Mile Tesla: Uses about 0.22 kWh per mile, with a cost of $0.1745 per kWh. This comes out to roughly 3.8 cents per mile. BMW 3 Series: With gas prices around $3.16 per gallon and an average fuel economy of 31 miles per gallon, the cost comes to about 10 cents per mile. Other Cost Considerations Electric vehicles like the Tesla avoid many routine maintenance expenses common to gas cars, such as no oil changes, no spark plugs and no emissions tests. Regenerative braking also extends brake life, reducing replacement frequency. BMW owners typically face higher maintenance and repair costs, especially as the vehicle ages, along with fluctuating fuel prices that can spike unexpectedly. In contrast, electricity prices tend to be more stable and predictable. More From GOBankingRates 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value This article originally appeared on What Does It Cost To Charge a Tesla Monthly Compared To Gas for a BMW 3 Series? 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Car and Driver
a day ago
- Car and Driver
2015 BMW 3-Series Wagon on Bring a Trailer Is Built to M3 Spec
BMW never built an M3 wagon for the North American market. Here's one anyway. Virtually OEM inside and out, it's the hot Munich longroof we all wished for. This car is CARB certified and fully approved by California's Bureau of Automotive Repair. BMW's decision to bring the wagon version of the current M5 to this side of the Atlantic probably doesn't make a lot of sense to the company's accountants, but it's great for the fans. Uber-fast sedans are great, but there's something cooler about a wagon variant. It's a shame Bimmer didn't do the same with the M3. Bring a Trailer But wait, Bavarian sports wagon fans! Here's a 2015 BMW 328i xDrive wagon, fully converted to F80-series M3 specification, and it's up for sale on Bring a Trailer (which, like Car and Driver, is part of Hearst Autos). It's got the twin-turbo inline-six, the wider track with fenders and bumper covers, and best of all, a six-speed manual transmission so you can row your own gears while you laminate a labradoodle to the back window. Bring a Trailer Conversions can be hit or miss sometimes, but this one looks like it was factory-built in Munich. The exterior and mechanical upgrades are all OEM, and the interior of the M3 has been largely swapped over as well. It's got CARB approval, certification by the sometimes fussy California Bureau of Automotive Repair, and a modest 63K miles on the odometer. Bring a Trailer The M3 donor car was a Competition package model, which means the S55 3.0-liter twin-turbo inline-six makes a hearty 444 horsepower. Formerly equipped with BMW's xDrive all-wheel drive, it's now rear-wheel drive with a limited-slip differential, and fitted with M3 subframes and chassis bracing. Bring a Trailer The car rides on M3 Competition-spec 20-inch wheels, fitted with Michelin tires, and the suspension and brakes are also M3 grade. The only aftermarket addition appears to be a set of KW height-adjustable springs. A 328i wagon of this generation is a pretty likable car all by itself, and as BMW no longer sends the touring version of the 3-series to North America, they're holding their value well. This car gets you something unique, all the firepower of a proper M3, but with extra carrying capacity and cool factor. For the winning bidder on this auction, the fact that BMW never built an M3 wagon for the U.S. market isn't a drawback but a bonus. Bimmer fans are going to go nuts when you roll up in it at your local German car show. The auction ends on July 30. Brendan McAleer Contributing Editor Brendan McAleer is a freelance writer and photographer based in North Vancouver, B.C., Canada. He grew up splitting his knuckles on British automobiles, came of age in the golden era of Japanese sport-compact performance, and began writing about cars and people in 2008. His particular interest is the intersection between humanity and machinery, whether it is the racing career of Walter Cronkite or Japanese animator Hayao Miyazaki's half-century obsession with the Citroën 2CV. He has taught both of his young daughters how to shift a manual transmission and is grateful for the excuse they provide to be perpetually buying Hot Wheels. Read full bio
