Brazen Walmart ‘thief swipes $500 worth of items with bizarre ticket switching trick at self-checkout'
A WOMAN pulled off a wild ticket-switching stunt at Walmart and walked out with hundreds in goods until surveillance video caught up with her.
She racked up 19 visits using the same sneaky trick, cops said.
3
3
The alleged scheme went down in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, roughly 80 miles from Milwaukee.
Hailey Wildfong, 38, is now charged with one count of felony retail theft, Seehafer News reported.
She's accused of swapping barcodes on merchandise at self-checkout, paying next to nothing for pricier products.
A loss prevention employee flagged the strange transactions and showed the footage to police.
Walmart's loss prevention team claims Wildfong stole over $500 worth of items in total.
The videos reportedly show her scanning swapped tags during nearly 19 separate trips.
Wildfong has appeared in court where she was released on her own recognizance and slapped with a $1,000 bond.
Court Commissioner Patricia Koppa signed off on the conditions, which include a ban on returning to Walmart.
Wildfong's next court appearance is scheduled for June 16.
Cops say she is not the only shopper using high-tech checkouts to pull off low-tech scams.
How Two Shoppers Stole $141k from Target and Walmart Across 21 States
In another case earlier this year, a man named Speedy Gonzalez was arrested in Georgia for ripping off Walmart stores with a trash can trick.
The 40-year-old allegedly stuffed pricey products into empty bins, scanned the bins, and walked out with the loot.
Gonzalez reportedly stole items like nicotine, diabetic strips, and gum, all while avoiding staff detection.
Authorities say Gonzalez pulled the scam off at least 20 times across stores in Georgia.
The Gainesville Police Department says they finally caught Gonzalez after a surveillance camera showed him in action.
Lieutenant Kevin Holbrook told WAGA that Gonzalez returned to the same store just 10 days later, and police were waiting.
Cops searched his car and found stolen items that matched other theft cases across Georgia's Hall, Barrow, Gwinnett, Habersham, White, and Lumpkin counties.
Back in 2020, Gonzales was busted for trying to use stolen checks to buy $3,000 in goods at Home Depot, police said.
Investigators learned the checks came from a mailbox in Suwanee, just outside of Atlanta.
DON'T FORGET FLORIDA
Meanwhile, in Florida, another Walmart shopper tried to pull off a grocery version of the scam.
Cops say Katherine Gordon used the 'banana trick' to scan cheap fruit barcodes on expensive food.
She was able to bag $83 in groceries for a fraction of the price.
Walmart has since rolled out smart cameras at some kiosks that track hand movements and check barcode accuracy to prevent future scams.
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pilot reveals what would really happen if the emergency exit door gets opened mid-flight
While the scenario of an emergency exit door being yanked open mid-flight is a major fear for nervous flyers, one pilot has revealed exactly what happens when it occurs. Emergency exits are strategically placed throughout the aircraft to enable quick and efficient evacuation for all passengers, regardless of their seating location. While it's rare, there have been instances in recent years of passengers - or even flight attendants - opening emergency doors on airplanes on the ground or in mid-air. But American Airlines First Officer, Steve Scheibner, long-haul pilot, Pascal Cooney, and former airline pilot and aviation expert, Dan Bubb, have revealed the truth about what happens once the 'forbidden' door handle is turned at 35,000 feet. According to Bubb, when an emergency exit door is opened while the plane is stationed on the group and unpressurised, it will result in the door opening and an inflatable slide deploying. This is what happened in the infamous JetBlue Steven Slater incident in 2010, where the flight attendant quit his job in style and used the emergency exit to activate the slide and depart the plane following a confrontation with a passenger. Plug-type emergency exits on aircraft are designed to fit snugly into the door frame, creating a seal that is strengthened by the pressure difference between the interior and exterior of the aircraft. These doors are equipped with hardware like vertical rod and rim exit devices to ensure they stay securely closed under pressure. But if the plane is on the ground and accelerates up to a speed of 80 knots - equivalent to roughly 92 miles per hour - a mechanism on the doors locks, meaning they cannot be opened. Once the plane is in the air, it's virtually impossible to open an emergency door mid-flight due to the cabin's pressurisation. The pressure inside the cabin is significantly higher than the pressure outside at cruising altitude, creating a force that keeps the doors securely sealed. This pressure differential makes it physically impossible for a human to overcome the force holding the door closed. As reported by Reader's Digest, Steve Scheibner explained, 'Once this door gets pressurised in flight, it's nine pounds per square inch.' Fellow long-haul pilot, Pascal Cooney, who goes by @pascalklr on YouTube, said in a clip: 'We pressurise our aircraft to a lower altitude so that you guys can breathe. The inside pressure pushes the door in its frame.' While it's physically near-impossible to open emergency doors in the air, there have been documented cases of passengers hijacking planes and even jumping out of exits mid-flight. In 1972, a man named D.B. Cooper hijacked Northwest Orient Airlines Flight 305, demanding four parachutes and $200,000 (£146,070) in ransom. After the plane landed in Seattle, he released the passengers and crew, refueled, and then, while flying towards Mexico, he parachuted out of the plane with the ransom money. Cooper was never found nor seen of again. Many passengers have also attempted to open doors mid-flight and whilst on the runway. A manic passenger was wrestled into a seat after trying to open the emergency exit mid-flight and threatening to kill all onboard a All Nippon Airways plane in May. In April, a flight headed to Melbourne was forced to turn around after a woman tried to open the aircraft door at 30,000 ft as the plane flew over the Indian Ocean. Budget airline JetStar said in a statement that flight JQ-34 had to return to Denpasar airport in Bali after a 'disruptive passenger' attempted to force the plane door open mid-air. In most cases, opening an emergency door mid-flight would lead to arrest, with specific charges and potential prison sentences depending on various factors, such as whether anyone was harmed or damage had been caused to the aircraft. Steven Slater, for example, escaped a prison sentence of seven years after being charged with a string of offences - including reckless endangerment and criminal mischief. However, the former JetBlue flight attendant was made to pay his old airline employer $10,000 (£7,303) in restitution to make up for some of the cost of his spectacular exit. In April, AirAsia X passenger, Shadi Taiseer Alsaaydeh, was charged with two counts of endangering the safety of an aircraft, as well as one count of assaulting crew members, when he attempted to open the plane's emergency doors several times. Each charge carries a maximum sentence of 10 years behind bars. He was restrained by crew members and passengers with one worker allegedly assaulted in the process.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Disabled Amazon workers in corporate jobs allege ‘systemic discrimination'
Disabled corporate workers at Amazon have accused the company of engaging in 'systemic discrimination', aggressively quashing their attempts to organize, and using artificial intelligence systems that they allege do not comply with US disability laws. At the center of the Amazon workers' complaints are allegations that the company has denied requests for accommodations for disabled staff in an 'automated' or 'semi automated' way and have allegedly repeatedly removed messages and a petition from an employee Slack channel. Amazon disputes allegations that it discriminates against disabled workers. A 31 May letter sent on behalf of a group of more than 200 disabled workers to top executives, including Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy, claimed the company was fundamentally out of step with federal requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the 1990 civil rights law that protects people against discrimination based on disabilities. The letter cited policies related to return-to-office mandates, which the letter said were being pushed on disabled workers who previously were allowed to work from home based on medical recommendations, accommodation procedures and accessibility. Among other issues, it raised concerns that employee decisions around accommodation were being driven by AI processes that – one source claimed – do not necessarily follow ADA rules. One disabled corporate employee who had feared retribution for coming forward about workplace complaints told the Guardian they had been fired without explanation over the course of being interviewed for this story. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity while they were in the process of seeking new employment. 'After the removal of the messages on Slack and my firing, others are now afraid. I talk with them and they are terrified about Amazon doing this,' the person said. The employee who was fired was one of the leaders of a campaign to organize disabled workers. An email the person sent to senior Amazon managers on 6 June, which was seen by the Guardian, accused the company of violating federal labor rules that ensure rights to collective bargaining and disability-related rights to share information with others who have a disability. 'My Slack access was removed preventing me from sending updates, coordinating and engaging in [National Labor Relations Act] protected activities,' the person said. The Guardian was also provided screenshots of Slack messages and a petition that appears to have been removed from an Amazon employee Slack channel on disability and accessibility issues. Amazon did not dispute claims that the messages had been removed. The company said the messages were a violation of company policy to use Amazon's electronic systems for solicitation purposes. Amazon did dispute claims that it had retaliated against employees for seeking to organize on labor issues. A spokesperson said: 'Amazon respects employees' rights to organize and doesn't interfere with these rights. We don't discriminate or retaliate against employees for engaging in organizing activities.' In the 33-page letter to Jassy and other senior Amazon executives, the disabled workers said: 'The systemic discrimination, retaliation, and policy failures documented here not only violate the ADA but also erode trust, harm individual health, and compromise the company's integrity. We demand immediate action to reform these policies, foster a truly inclusive workplace, and uphold the rights of all employees.' The letter cited internal polls conducted by the group of Amazon employees, with 93% of respondents with disabilities claiming that current policies have harmed them. Another 71% of respondents claimed that more than half of their job accommodation requests had been denied or were unmet, and 92% reported a lack of an accessible job accommodation process. 'Employees requesting accommodations often encounter a lack of meaningful dialogue – requests are ignored, denied without explanation, or dismissed via automated systems,' the letter stated. The workers made a public petition to Amazon executives to address their concerns shortly after the email, earlier this month. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion In response to a request for comment, Amazon said an external survey of what it called a small number of unverified employees was not reflective of the opinions of everyone with a disability and that it was inaccurate to suggest otherwise. The company also said its disability and leave services team ensured that employees had access to accommodations and adjustments and that the decisions were driven by empathy. The process was not automated or semi-automated, Amazon said, and it denied that AI had been used for case processing or decision-making in the accommodation process. The disabled Amazon workers are overwhelmingly corporate, not warehouse, workers. People who spoke to the Guardian on the condition of anonymity were particularly angry about their claims that efforts to organize on Slack – which they said was a modern-day version of the office water cooler – were being denied and suppressed, including by the company allegedly removing posts that sought out workers' opinions. 'The company is cracking down, and they're very concerned, and many people are being told not to post here,' claimed one Amazon employee. Another employee who no longer works at Amazon claimed management had dismissed disabled workers' complaints as being 'disruptive and unproductive', and had undermined the first-ever corporate union collective bargaining group. The National Labor Relations Board, the federal agency that is meant to protect federal worker rights, has recently weighed in on employers suppressing workers' organizing efforts on workplace Slack accounts: in October 2024, the NLRB issued a complaint against Apple, alleging the company was interfering with workers' rights to collectively advocate for improved working conditions on Slack. In a statement at the time, Apple said it disagreed with the claims. The case was indefinitely postponed by the NLRB in March 2025; the reasons for that move are unclear. In 2023, Amazon touted a ranking of 'best place to work for disability inclusion' from a non-profit it funds. But the company has also faced a handful of legal challenges related to its treatment of disabled workers. A 2023 report by United for Respect alleged Amazon's warehouse workers face systemic barriers in obtaining reasonable job accommodations for their disabilities or workplace injuries at the company. A 2024 lawsuit was filed against Amazon for allegedly failing to provide a sign language interpreter to a deaf employee at a warehouse in California. Amazon has denied the claim and the case in still being litigated. Pamela Hayter, a former Amazon employee, accused Amazon in 2023 of retaliating against her for advocating for remote work in response to Amazon's return-to-office mandate. Amazon has claimed she had performance issues.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US city declares 12-year-old boy a hero for saving his family from house fire
A city in Virginia has awarded a hero's proclamation to a 12-year-old boy who rescued his grandmother and two younger siblings from a fire that burned their house down recently. The courage that Ramir Parker demonstrated when confronted with the blaze 'is a shining example of resilience, responsibility and the power of instinctive leadership in our youth', said the proclamation that officials in Petersburg gave to the local seventh-grade student. Ramir's story gained attention among corners of the internet dedicated to spotlighting positive news. As he put it in an interview with the Virginia news station WTVR, Ramir heard a strange noise in his family's home on 3 June, went downstairs and realized there was 'black smoke all throughout the house'. Ramir ran directly to a couch where his brothers – aged one and two – were sleeping on opposite ends and 'picked both of them up' as the fire that had broken out quickly spread, he recalled to WTVR. 'I fitted them inside my arms and … ran outside the house,' Ramir added. Not everyone was out of danger yet, however. The boy knew his grandmother was still in the home at that point. So he ran back inside, navigated the thick smoke to find his grandmother, and helped lead her to safety as the fire raged. By the time local firefighters arrived, which was within four minutes of being called, Ramir had already gotten everybody out of the house, Petersburg fire chief Wayne Hoover told WTVR. 'The bottom line – he saved his family's life,' Hoover said of the boy. An investigation later determined a downstairs electrical problem ignited the fire. Images published online showed how the blaze – which investigators determined was accidental – had destroyed Ramir's family's home. Subsequently, at a local government meeting on 17 June, Petersburg's mayor, Samuel Parham, gave Ramir a proclamation declaring him a municipal hero because of how 'critical' his 'swift response was in preserving life and minimizing harm'. A statement from the city's government noted that those who were at the meeting gave the boy a standing ovation for what the proclamation described as 'a level of bravery and presence of mind well beyond his years'. The proclamation offered 'deepest gratitude and admiration for his bravery and selfless actions in the face of danger'. 'The city … recognizes Ramir Parker in celebration of his remarkable heroism and in acknowledgment of the inspiration he provides to our entire community,' the proclamation also said. Hoover, meanwhile, told WTVR that Ramir had a job waiting for him at the Petersburg fire department as soon as the boy turns 18 and legally becomes an adult. Petersburg has about 33,500 residents and is about 20 miles (32km) south of Virginia's capital, Richmond. The station asked Ramir about risking it all before first responders' arrival to save his siblings and grandmother. 'It's my little brothers – I don't care,' Ramir said. ''Cause the only thing that matters is I got my little brothers out of the house – and my grandma.'
