Here's how long it takes a hacker to figure out your passwords — and the safest to use
Of course, the more your password has, the longer it takes for a hacker to figure it out.
But it's even more specific than that in terms of how long it would take to guess, according to cybersecurity firm Hive Systems Password Table.
Advertisement
For example, a password with five characters using numbers, upper and lowercase letters would take a hacker just two hours to discover it. However, a password with 18 characters using numbers, symbols, upper and lowercase letters would take 463 quintillion years.
The Hive Systems Password Table shows how long it takes for a hacker to guess your password.
Reddit/u/hivesystems
The password table was first designed in 2020 to show how fast a hacker can 'brute-force' your password based on data from Howsecureismypassword.net.
Advertisement
They started by looking at the strength of a hashed password against a hacking attempt based on length, complexity, hashing algorithm used by the victim and hardware used by the attacker.
A 'hashed' password is a scrambled version of text that can be reproduced if you know what hash software was used.
The experts at Hive Systems analyzed password data breaches from 2007 to now reported by HaveIBeenPwned.
The table focuses on the concept that the hacker is working in a 'black box' situation, starting from scratch to hack the password.
Advertisement
A 'hashed' password is a scrambled version of text that can be reproduced if you know what hash software was used.
DC Studio – stock.adobe.com
This shows the 'worst case' or 'maximum time required' to do the hacking.
Most hackers, according to the blog post, prioritize the words and strings of characters that they'll focus on first through previously stolen hashes, dictionary attacks and rainbow tables.
If your password was part of a previous data breach or uses words in the dictionary, then a hacker can figure out your password — no matter how many characters, symbols or numbers used — instantly.
Advertisement
They noted that these metrics go off the assumption that your password has not been part of a breach in the past.
Hackers will often try hashes of all common and breached passwords before even thinking about moving on to new ones.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
RDDT vs. META: Which Social Media Ad Stock Has an Edge Right Now?
Both Meta Platforms META and Reddit RDDT are major players in the social media domain. Meta Platforms owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, serving over 3.4 billion daily userswhile Reddit focuses on community discussions with 108.1 million daily the stocks generate majority of their revenues from a report by The Business Research Company, the global social media advertising market is expected to grow from $228.18 billion in 2024 to $406.64 billion in 2029, indicating a CAGR of 12.25%. Both companies are heavily investing in AI to enhance their respective advertising capabilities and user experiences. Meta Platforms has deployed AI across its recommendation systems and launched Meta AI with nearly a billion monthly users, while Reddit has integrated AI-powered search through Reddit Answers and improved content recommendation META or RDDT, which has an edge right now? Let's delve deepto find out. Reddit is benefiting from strong growth in user engagement, including rising daily and weekly active users, ARPU gains and expanding advertiser tools like DPA, Reddit Pixel and CAPI. Reddit's AI-powered features, including Reddit Answers, are key catalysts in enhancing content discovery and personalization. Reddit Answers has more than one million weekly users. Reddit aims to deepen advertiser onboarding and improve campaign outcomes through integrations with and Meta Platforms' campaign import expects revenues between $410 million and $430 million for the second quarter of 2025, indicating 46-53% year-over-year growth. AI-led product development is improving platform experience and scale. The company hosts a data trove that becomes the foundation of large language model training. Reddit's platform has more than 100,000 active subreddits, with over 500 subreddits that each have at least one million subscribers. Investments in AI have improved new user onboarding and driven engagement with existing users. Internally developed models are powering feed ranking, onboarding, translation and growth appears less stable despite recent strong performances. While the company reported its third straight quarter of more than 60% revenue growth in first-quarter 2025, several concerns limit its prospects. The platform depends heavily on Google search traffic for new users, making it vulnerable to changes in search algorithms that Reddit cannot control. The platform's community-based model, while unique, makes it harder to grow quickly compared to automated content systems Reddit's subscription services and tools for content creators remain underdeveloped, limiting ways to diversify revenue. The company's advertising technology is less advanced than Meta Platforms and Google, which may hurt its ability to keep advertisers and run effective campaigns in the competitive digital advertising market. Meta Platforms continues to show strong performance across its ecosystem, supported by deep AI integration and a broad user base. Upgrades to its recommendation systems have led to a 7% increase in time spent on Facebook and 6% on Instagram over the past six months. Meta AI now reaches nearly one billion monthly users, underscoring the platform's ability to scale new experiences across advertising business remains the core revenue engine. AI-powered improvements have boosted conversion rates by 5% in Facebook Reels. More advertisers are adopting Meta's creative tools, making campaign development faster and more accessible. WhatsApp's push into business messaging, especially in emerging markets, is expected to open additional revenue company recently announced features to the Ads Manager that enable businesses to manage their marketing strategy across WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram. Businesses can now upload their subscriber list and either manually select marketing messages as an additional placement or use Advantage+. META's AI system will then optimize budgets across placements to maximize performance. Ads Manager will help businesses in creating ads in Status once the feature is available. Meta Platforms is planning to introduce Business AI that can make personalized product recommendations and facilitate sales on any business' website. Over a WhatsApp chat, the Business AI can also follow up with customers to answer questions and provide updates. Moreover, Meta Platforms plans to launch calling and voice options for large businesses that use the WhatsApp Business Platform, thereby strengthening the relationship between businesses and customers. Shares of Reddit have plunged 8.6% year to date and have underperformed the appreciation in Meta Platforms shares which were up 24% over the same period. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Both Meta Platforms and Reddit are overvalued, as suggested by the Value Score of D and F, respectively. In terms of forward 12-month Price/Sales, Meta Platforms shares are trading at 9.06X, lower than Reddit's 12.62X. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Reddit's 2025 earnings is pegged at $1.21 per share, unchanged over the past 30days. The figure marks an improvement over 2024's loss of $3.33 per share. Reddit Inc. price-consensus-chart | Reddit Inc. Quote The Consensus mark for META's 2025 earnings is pegged at $25.35 per share, up by 3 cents over the past 30 days, indicating a 6.24% increase over 2024's reported figure. Meta Platforms, Inc. price-consensus-chart | Meta Platforms, Inc. Quote Meta Platforms offers better growth potential through its diverse business model, proven AI implementation and multiple revenue sources, including advertising improvements and business messaging. The company's financial strength, operational skills and ability to use its large user base for new products provide lasting competitive advantages. While Reddit has unique appeal, its limited money-making ability and execution challenges present significant risks. Currently, Meta Platforms with a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), has an edge over Reddit, which has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) : Free Stock Analysis Report Reddit Inc. (RDDT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Android Authority
5 hours ago
- Android Authority
Not again: Sony's WH-1000XM6 hinge shows signs of cracking
TL;DR A WH-1000XM6 user has reported a broken hinge, even after using the headphones 'carefully.' While there has only been this one report so far, Sony supposedly redesigned the XM6 hinge to prevent this. The problem echoes an issue that plagued the previous XM5 model. The flagship Sony WH-1000XM6 headphones are barely two months old, but a new report is raising concerns about their durability. Specifically, it's an issue from the predecessor device we had hoped was in the past. A Reddit post spotted by Gizmodo shows what may be the first reported case of a WH-1000XM6 with a snapped hinge near the headband — a location many will remember as the weak point that plagued the previous-generation XM5. The original source appears to be a user on the Chinese platform Red Note, who shared photos and claimed to have handled the headphones 'carefully.' Red Note A Red Note user shared this image of the XM6's broken hinge. That's important context because the XM6 was supposed to fix this exact problem. According to our sister site, SoundGuys, Sony completely redesigned the hinge with this new model, embedding a metal component within the plastic housing and reintroducing a folding mechanism for compact storage. The XM5 used a flatter design with no folding arms and suffered enough failures that 25% of SoundGuys readers polled said their hinge had broken. Even when you factor in that people with a broken hinge might be more likely to partake in such a poll, it was still a concerning stat. It's far too soon to say whether this is an isolated case or the start of another widespread durability issue. After all, there will always be some devices that break, and we can't be sure that the report of the headphones being handled carefully is accurate. Nevertheless, it was enough to concern some of the Reddit users in the thread, especially given the $450 price tag and Sony's track record with hinge strength. The WH-1000XM6 has been seen as a fix-it release, addressing complaints about things like hinge durability. SoundGuys' review praised the headphones for solid audio, excellent ANC, and being a meaningful step up from the XM5 in most categories. If the hinge is once again a potential point of failure, it could undermine Sony's efforts. For now, this appears to be a single failure, but we'll keep an eye out. If you've upgraded to the XM6 and experienced any issues, let us know in the comments. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is there any hope for the internet?
In 2001, social theorist bell hooks warned about the dangers of a loveless zeitgeist. In 'All About Love: New Visions,' she lamented 'the lack of an ongoing public discussion … about the practice of love in our culture and in our lives.' Back then, the internet was at a crossroads. The dot-com crash had bankrupted many early internet companies, and people wondered if the technology was long for this world. The doubts were unfounded. In only a few decades, the internet has merged with our bodies as smartphones and mined our personalities via algorithms that know us more intimately than some of our closest friends. It has even constructed a secondary social world. Yet as the internet has become more integrated in our daily lives, few would describe it as a place of love, compassion and cooperation. Study after study describe how social media platforms promote alienation and disconnection – in part because many algorithms reward behaviors like trolling, cyberbullying and outrage. Is the internet's place in human history cemented as a harbinger of despair? Or is there still hope for an internet that supports collective flourishing? I explore these questions in my new book, 'Attention and Alienation.' In it, I explain how social media companies' profits depend on users investing their time, creativity and emotions. Whether it's spending hours filming content for TikTok or a few minutes crafting a thoughtful Reddit comment, participating on these platforms takes work. And it can be exhausting. Even passive engagement – like scrolling through feeds and 'lurking' in forums – consumes time. It might feel like free entertainment – until people recognize they are the product, with their data being harvested and their emotions being manipulated. Blogger, journalist and science fiction writer Cory Doctorow coined the term 'enshittification' to describe how experiences on online platforms gradually deteriorate as companies increasingly exploit users' data and tweak their algorithms to maximize profits. For these reasons, much of people's time spent online involves dealing with toxic interactions or mindlessly doomscrolling, immersed in dopamine-driven feedback loops. This cycle is neither an accident nor a novel insight. Hate and mental illness fester in this culture because love and healing seem to be incompatible with profits. In his 2009 book 'Envisioning Real Utopias,' the late sociologist Erik Olin Wright discusses places in the world that prioritize cooperation, care and egalitarianism. Wright mainly focused on offline systems like worker-owned cooperatives. But one of his examples lived on the internet: Wikipedia. He argued that Wikipedia demonstrates the ethos 'from each according to ability, to each according to need' – a utopian ideal popularized by Karl Marx. Wikipedia still thrives as a nonprofit, volunteer-ran bureaucracy. The website is a form of media that is deeply social, in the literal sense: People voluntarily curate and share knowledge, collectively and democratically, for free. Unlike social media, the rewards are only collective. There are no visible likes, comments or rage emojis for participants to hoard and chase. Nobody loses and everyone wins, including the vast majority of people who use Wikipedia without contributing work or money to keep it operational. Wikipedia is evidence of care, cooperation and love hiding in plain sight. In recent years, there have been more efforts to create nonprofit apps and websites that are committed to protecting user data. Popular examples include Signal, a free and open source instant messaging service, and Proton Mail, an encrypted email service. These are all laudable developments. But how can the internet actively promote collective flourishing? In 'Viral Justice: How We Grow the World We Want,' sociologist Ruha Benjamin points to a way forward. She tells the story of Black TikTok creators who led a successful cultural labor strike in 2021. Many viral TikTok dances had originally been created by Black artists, whose accounts, they claimed, were suppressed by a biased algorithm that favored white influencers. TikTok responded to the viral #BlackTikTokStrike movement by formally apologizing and making commitments to better represent and compensate the work of Black creators. These creators demonstrated how social media engagement is work – and that workers have the power to demand equitable conditions and fair pay. This landmark strike showed how anyone who uses social media companies that profit off the work, emotions and personal data of their users – whether it's TikTok, X, Facebook, Instagram or Reddit – can become organized. Meanwhile, there are organizations devoted to designing an internet that promotes collective flourishing. Sociologist Firuzeh Shokooh Valle provides examples of worker-owned technology cooperatives in her 2023 book, 'In Defense of Solidarity and Pleasure: Feminist Technopolitics in the Global South.' She highlights the Sulá Batsú co-op in Costa Rica, which promotes policies that seek to break the stranglehold that negativity and exploitation have over internet culture. 'Digital spaces are increasingly powered by hate and discrimination,' the group writes, adding that it hopes to create an online world where 'women and people of diverse sexualities and genders are able to access and enjoy a free and open internet to exercise agency and autonomy, build collective power, strengthen movements, and transform power relations.' In Los Angeles, there's Chani, Inc., a technology company that describes itself as 'proudly' not funded by venture capitalists. The Chani app blends mindfulness practices and astrology with the goal of simply helping people. The app is not designed for compulsive user engagement, the company never sells user data, and there are no comments sections. What would social media look like if Wikipedia were the norm instead of an exception? To me, a big problem in internet culture is the way people's humanity is obscured. People are free to speak their minds in text-based public discussion forums, but the words aren't always attached to someone's identity. Real people hide behind the anonymity of user names. It isn't true human interaction. In 'Attention and Alienation,' I argue that the ability to meet and interact with others online as fully realized, three-dimensional human beings would go a long way toward creating a more empathetic, cooperative internet. When I was 8 years old, my parents lived abroad for work. Sometimes we talked on the phone. Often I would cry late into the night, praying for the ability to 'see them through the phone.' It felt like a miraculous possibility – like magic. I told this story to my students in a moment of shared vulnerability. This was in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, so the class was taking place over videoconferencing. In these online classes, one person talked at a time. Others listened. It wasn't perfect, but I think a better internet would promote this form of discussion – people getting together from across the world to share the fullness of their humanity. Efforts like Clubhouse have tapped into this vision by creating voice-based discussion forums. The company, however, has been criticized for predatory data privacy policies. What if the next iteration of public social media platforms could build on Clubhouse? What if they brought people together and showcased not just their voices, but also live video feeds of their faces without harvesting their data or promoting conflict and outrage? Raised eyebrows. Grins. Frowns. They're what make humans distinct from increasingly sophisticated large language models and artificial intelligence chatbots like ChatGPT. After all, is anything you can't say while looking at another human being in the eye worth saying in the first place? This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Aarushi Bhandari, Davidson College Read more: Social media can support or undermine democracy – it comes down to how it's designed A 'coup des gens' is underway – and we're increasingly living under the regime of the algorithm The hidden cost of convenience: How your data pulls in hundreds of billions of dollars for app and social media companies Aarushi Bhandari does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
