Customer Orders 20 Sandwiches at Drive-Thru—Disbelief at What They Do Next
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A routine brunch rush at a Tim Hortons turned into a mild traffic nightmare, when a customer refused to move their vehicle after placing a massive order through the drive-thru.
According to an employee, who asked to only be referred to by the initials "VD," the incident occurred around 11:30 a.m., one of the busiest times for the store in Ontario, Canada.
While large orders are not uncommon, the poster explained that staff typically request that customers with sizable orders pull into a designated waiting area so that others can be served.
But the customer refused to budge from the pickup window, despite being asked multiple times, causing fury among other customers and the staff.
"They had their windows rolled up, blasting loud music, and just wouldn't acknowledge us," VD told Newsweek. "We usually have the food out within 10 minutes, but in this case, we rushed the order with three or four people working on it and managed to finish in five minutes. Still, the cars behind them were honking, and it created a really frustrating situation for everyone."
A picture of the large order at the Tim Hortons that sparked conversation online.
A picture of the large order at the Tim Hortons that sparked conversation online.
bipolar-scorpio/Reddit
Tim Hortons fast food restaurant chain was founded in 1964 by NHL legend Tim Horton and businessman Jim Charade. They now have locations spanning 13 countries, and are famed for bringing a taste of Canadian culture to audiences worldwide.
Newsweek reached out to Tim Hortons via email for comment.
The employee emphasized that incidents like these highlight the unexpected challenges faced in fast food jobs, and they wanted to share it to raise awareness of what people working in fast food deal with on a daily basis. "You really become a people person in this line of work," they said. "Every experience, even the frustrating ones, teaches you something valuable about patience, empathy, and resilience."
Read more
Map reveals every US state's favorite junk food
Map reveals every US state's favorite junk food
The story was shared on Reddit's popular r/mildlyinfuriating subreddit last week, where it has over 77,000 upvotes and thousands of comments.
"Person ordered 20 sandwiches in drive-thru and won't move ahead to wait in the parking lot. Infuriating and on top of that, cars behind them started honking," VD captioned the post.
Here people shared their reactions. Redditor WasabiAdorable6951 said: "My manager would've canceled the order and gave them a refund."
While Humble-Plankton2217 wrote: "There should be a rule that large orders need to be pre-ordered or collected by coming inside."
"My dad would do stuff like this. I'm lucky I didn't inherit his lack of empathy," said Fat-randin.
Redditor DeceptiJon warned: "The last thing I want to do is p*** off the people making my food."
This isn't the first time a drive-thru incident has gained viral attention. In 2022, a McDonald's customer blocked a drive-thru for hours while demanding a refund. While a mother and daughter gained attention online when a prank at Starbucks hilariously backfired.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Investing advice that Reddit got very wrong — or very right
You can find advice about anything pretty much anywhere on the internet, especially if you need to learn about investing. The only problem is, not all of it is accurate or helpful, especially if it's from a random thread on Reddit. Sure, Reddit can be a great place to learn new recipe hacks, ask embarrassing questions and receive some validation from other people experiencing the same thing you're going through. But when it comes to investing, don't take Redditors' word for it — check out what they're saying for yourself. Here's a look at some of the best and worst investing advice on Reddit, why some of it is just downright wrong and what to do instead. After scrolling through hundreds of investing subreddits, here are some of the worst investing suggestions and recommendations. 'I'm very lazy and I don't want to put any effort into investing. How important is rebalancing? Is there a way I could set up a portfolio where I only rebalanced every 10 years or maybe even never? Do I have to do it across all my accounts?' —Mysterious_Mix_6660 Here were some of the responses to this user's question: 'No; it's not super important. It can squeeeeeeze a tiny bit more out of your portfolio over the long haul, but not enough to make me excited.' — buffinita 'I've been at it for roughly 30 years and had rebalancing set for one investment for a couple of years. I stopped that a long time ago. No, I don't think it's worthwhile to rebalance. If you are indexing, the market forces are deciding in part how you should be invested (split between US and international; I don't own bonds). I've ended up 79% US/20% international just by drifting there.' — Sagelllini Why this isn't helpful: It's tempting not to rebalance, especially if you don't have a financial advisor to help and have to figure it out yourself. However, it's crucial to rebalance. 'If you never rebalance your portfolio by selling stocks and buying more bonds, you will open yourself up to a much bigger impact from market swings than your risk tolerance may allow,' says Crystal McKeon, a certified financial planner and chief compliance officer of TSA Wealth Management in Houston. 'This could lead to panic selling in choppy markets like we are experiencing now. If you have a diversified allocation where you are comfortable with the range your portfolio can swing, then you are more likely to keep your long-term positions instead of panic fire selling.' When you rebalance your portfolio, you reassess how your risk tolerance lines up with your long-term financial goals and how your asset allocation fits into that picture. There is a 'lazy' way to rebalance though: You can invest with a robo-advisor. The best robo-advisors will automatically rebalance your portfolio for you. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals 'So, I've been reading a lot, and most places predict Nvidia will have a $20 trillion market cap by 2030. SP [Stock price] of $134 currently, they say it could soar to 800 by then. Is it too late to go in, given the current price? Would it be worth it to start going heavy on Nvidia?' — humanityIsL0st Why this isn't helpful: While the question is a valid one, the short answer is that going all in on one stock, or heavily tilting your portfolio toward one stock, isn't a great idea. If you're invested heavily in just one stock and it performs poorly, you have nothing else in your portfolio to offset the loss and stabilize your returns. It's important to have multiple assets in your portfolio — think a combination of stocks, bonds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), mutual funds and other assets — so that you reduce the concentration risk of owning a single stock. 'A diversified portfolio has been a solid strategy for decades now because it will allow you to ride out ups and downs in the markets with some investment losses balancing out other investments' gains,' says McKeon. 'I sold a coin at 3.5k profit that would've been 80k at the peak. Made a post about it a few days ago [about] how it randomly started getting volume again after being dead for ten months. Total investment was around 50 bucks.' — Single_Offshore_Dad 'So my plan is to go all in on meme coins. Why? Because once BTC takes out its previous highs (like on Oct 20th, 2021), every meme coin shot up for the next 2-7 days. I'm predicting that meme coins will start to climb and tank once news about BTC is being pushed mainstream to the general public within the next 6–12 months. I'm planning on cashing out on all my meme coins within 48hours after BTC breaks its previous high.' — Redditor Why this isn't helpful: For starters, cryptocurrencies (especially memecoins) have no intrinsic value. Their prices are based on what others are willing to pay for the coin. In other words, their prices are based on 'vibes,' or how people feel about the coin, not cash flow or business performance. This makes it impossible to tell how the coins are actually going to perform. If you invest in crypto or a memecoin, you should only invest what you're OK with losing. On top of that, investing in memecoins is somewhat glamorized on social media. There are stories of people who have gotten lucky and went all in on a coin and made a ton of money — and even more stories about people who've lost every dollar of their investment. The first Redditor above claims they could've made an $80,000 profit at the coin's peak, but even their strategy fell short. The reality is, most people who invest in these coins and do profit from them simply get lucky. 'Speculation is when you buy something hoping it will rise quickly, like crypto or 'hot' stocks,' says Jamie Bosse, CFP, and senior advisor at CGN Advisors. 'There is usually a lot of hype and not a lot of history or data. Investing, on the other hand, is about the value of assets growing over time to build wealth. One is chasing returns and trying to get rich quick, and the other is building a solid financial foundation.' If you just can't resist, most financial pros say that if you are going to invest in crypto, don't put in more than 5 percent of your overall portfolio. For all the bad investing suggestions on Reddit, there was plenty of good advice, too. From advocating for diversification, to explaining why maxing out your 401(k) should be a priority, these Redditors got it right. 'Stay in it for the long haul. Continuously add money. Ignore it when times are tough.' — Saul_T_C_Man Why this is helpful: This is some of the best investing advice, period. A buy-and-hold strategy, or staying invested for the long haul, is typically the way to go for long-term investors. But how do you continuously add money to your investments and not touch it when times are tough? One of the easiest ways is to use a strategy called dollar-cost averaging, which is where you gradually invest a fixed amount of money at intervals over time. By making regular and consistent contributions, you invest whether the market is up or down, average your purchase price over time and increase your share count. 'If you happen to be successful in timing the market, then you will do better. The recommendation is based on the fact that very few are successful in doing so.' — YoungestDonkey Why this is helpful: There's a theory in economics called the 'efficient market hypothesis,' which basically means that markets are efficient and already factor in all available information. Because of this, consistently timing the market in your favor is nearly impossible because prices already reflect what investors know. To time the market, you'd have to essentially predict the future. Unless you're somehow a wizard, this can be very difficult to do. What matters more is your total time invested in the market, allowing compound returns to do their thing. Let's break it down. On average, the S&P 500 returns roughly 10 percent each year. This means if you had invested $10,000 in 1974, you'd have $2.5 million now, according to Legendary investor Warren Buffett is a proponent of this long-term approach to investing, often emphasizing the importance of buying and holding, rather than selling for a profit. 'I was telling my father that if we continued investing at our current rate, we should theoretically be able to retire with a good chunk of change (hopefully). And he said, 'Yeah, I thought that too when I was your age. I calculated and thought I'd retire a millionaire, but that didn't pan out.' So I asked him what he invested in, and he looked me dead in the eyes and said it was just one stock he invested in. So, folks, diversify, diversify, diversify.' — Illustrious-Nose3100 Why this is helpful: Investors diversify to protect against the unknown. If we knew what was going to happen, there would be no reason to diversify. We would all buy Nvidia (NVDA) for pennies a share in 1997, watch the 388,344 percent returns roll in and retire millionaires. Or we'd buy Netflix (NFLX), not Blockbuster. Because we can't know, a solid investing plan should include diversification — and remember to diversify across companies, industries, countries and time frames. You can make diversification easier by investing in ETFs or other funds that hold a broad range of assets, such as an index fund. You may also want to consider robo-advisors or target-date funds that automate diversification based on your goals and timeline. 'Max [out] your 401k and other tax-advantaged accounts before you start investing in a taxable account.' — JustMeerkats Why this is helpful: Tax-advantaged accounts, such as an IRA or 401(k), offer tax breaks, either now or later. That's why maxing out your contributions to those accounts first can be a good move. This strategy boosts your investment growth through tax-free compounding, and may include an employer match on your 401(k). Compounding explains how $10,000 becomes $2.5 million over 50 years. You might only get a 10 percent return each year, but that adds up over time. If you give your invested money enough time to grow, it acts as a snowball, picking up more cash on its way down the hill. Also, these retirement accounts have annual contribution limits — $23,500 for a 401(k) and $7,000 for an IRA, so you can't exactly catch up later. You can make catch-up contributions after certain ages, but those amounts are lower and only available once you're closer to retirement. For example, the extra $1,000 in your IRA from 50 to 67 adds up to $18,000, less than three years of maxed-out contributions that you have missed out on in your 20s. If you're not able to max out your tax-advantaged accounts, contributing whatever you can as early as you can is better than contributing nothing. Get matched: Find a financial advisor who can help you maximize your investments 'You don't invest to make as much money as possible, but to meet your financial goals. This means that you should limit the amount of risk you take while investing and that you don't gamble with your savings. Take as much risk as needed, but also as little risk as possible.' — Redditor Why this is helpful: At the end of the day, you can listen to and read all the investing advice you want. Some of it will be good, other ideas will be bad. The most important thing that you can do as an investor is begin by establishing what goals you're trying to achieve. Maybe it's saving for retirement, maybe it's buying a home or maybe it's sending a kid to college. The point is, reaching those goals will look different for everyone. Don't take on unnecessary risks. Instead, prioritize decisions that will safeguard your financial future. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation.
Hamilton Spectator
4 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What if killing Canada's digital services tax is just the beginning for Donald Trump?
OTTAWA—Call it a prudent climbdown, a show of weakness, or an unavoidable concession. There are several ways to look at Prime Minister Mark Carney's 11th-hour decision to cancel the federal government's Digital Services Tax last weekend. But what if it's also a tangible example of exactly what Carney warned would happen? The Liberal leader won a minority government on April 28 with a pitch that no one was better placed than himself to protect Canada from Donald Trump. The U.S. president has mused about using 'economic force' to annex Canada. As if taunting or teasing this country, he questions why it exists, and keeps floating the prospect of it becoming the '51st state' of the U.S. Two days before the election, Carney spelled out how he understood all of this. 'The U.S. is trying to put economic pressure on us to gain major concessions, to the extreme of a level of integration of our countries that would impinge our sovereignty,' Carney said that day in King City, north of Toronto. Carney, in his final campaign conference, ruled out any prospect the U.S. would use military Flash forward to last week. There was Trump, posting on social media that Canada's incoming Digital Services Tax — a policy that would force American tech giants and other firms, including Canadian ones, to pay up — was nothing short of a 'blatant attack' on the United States. Trump declared he had cut off all negotiations to resolve the trade war that started earlier this year with his wave of tariffs on Canadian goods. In other words, Canada's most important commercial and military partner, the destination for 76 per cent of all exports last year , was willing to ditch talks and dictate terms that could jeopardize thousands of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity. All over a domestic policy the Americans didn't like. Barely 48 hours later, shortly before midnight on a Sunday, the government announced the tax was dead. Not only would Canada not implement the policy as planned, it would repeal the 2024 law that created it. Is this Trump using economic pressure to force Canada's hand? 'It is exactly that,' said Lawrence Herman, a veteran trade lawyer and special counsel with the firm, Cassidy Levy Kent. 'It's an example of, on a particular issue, how much pressure can be brought to bear to force Canada to abandon not only a policy, but a law that has been in force for 18 months.' In Herman's view, the decision looks like a 'significant retreat' by the government, which shows 'how dependent we are on a reasonable relationship' with Canada's largest trading partner. Other policies that Trump has complained about, such as the supply management system for dairy and poultry, could be next, he said. Pete Hoekstra, the U.S. ambassador to Canada, told the CBC this week that he has a 'strong belief' Canada could water down that system by changing a law designed to protect it if that becomes part of a new trade deal. 'It's not a particularly good start to this so-called new economic and security relationship,' Herman said. He was referring to Carney's stated goal of talks that are now continuing under an agreement struck at the Group of 7 summit in the Alberta Rockies last month to strive for a deal to redefine the relationship by July 21. Others have been harsher in their judgment. Lloyd Axworthy, a former Liberal foreign affairs minister, posted online that Carney was acquiescing to Trump in a way that contradicts his 'elbows up' mantra on the campaign trail. 'Forget any dreams of a more sovereign, self-directed Canada. We're doubling down on the corporate cosiness and U.S. dependency that's defined our last half-century,' he wrote on Substack. Axworthy did not respond to an interview request Thursday. For Jean Charest, a former Quebec premier who sits on the government's Canada-U.S. advisory council, the situation illustrates the 'chaos' of dealing with Trump, whose administration is grappling with trade talks and tariffs threats against most countries on the planet. This meant that Carney's government was operating 'in a world of very bad choices,' Charest said. Deciding to scrap the Digital Services Tax, in that context, was 'certainly a legitimate choice,' he said. 'We are not in an ordinary world of negotiations,' Charest added. 'It would be nice to think, 'You give, I give ... we compromise.' It doesn't work that way with Donald Trump, and we're making our way through this by trying to protect essentially what's the most important for us in the short term, and that's a negotiation that has some legs.' Charest noted that there was opposition inside Canada to the Digital Services Tax, which would have applied back to 2022 with a three per cent tax on Canadian revenues from digital services companies with more than $1.1 billion in global earnings and $20 million inside Canada. The U.S. also pushed back against the policy when Joe Biden was in power. David Pierce, vice-president of government relations with the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said his business lobby group felt the Digital Services Tax should be paused. He also said it would have been wrong to proceed with it after the U.S. dropped a controversial provision from Trump's major budget bill last week: the so-called 'revenge tax' that would have hit the U.S. assets of foreign businesses and individuals. That decision came as the G7 agreed to exempt American firms from a co-ordinated effort to ensure corporations pay a minimum tax, which was 'absolutely a win' for the U.S. Even so, Pierce said Canada likely had no choice but to drop the policy, given Trump's exploitation of Canada's 'weakness' — its major economic reliance on trade with the U.S. 'We just hope that this now paves the way for a good renewed deal,' said Pierce. The ultimate goal of the federal government in that deal, at least publicly, has been to return to the terms of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which Trump signed in 2018 during his first term, after disparaging North American free trade as unfair to his country. That would mean lifting the rounds of tariffs Trump has imposed since the winter, with import duties tied to concerns about drugs and migration over the border, and others that Trump slapped on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum in a bid to promote those sectors in the U.S. Canada has responded with countertariffs on its own that the government says hit more than $80 billion worth of American imports to Canada. Canada's lead trade negotiator with the Trump administration, Ambassador Kirsten Hillman, was not available for an interview this week, the embassy in Washington told the Star. Charest, however, said he believes it is possible that Canada could accept some level of tariffs in a July 21 deal, so long as they have no material effect. Such 'zero-effect' tariffs could only kick in at levels of trade that Canada doesn't or likely won't achieve, for example. Yet there's a question of how much any deal can be relied upon, so long as Trump is in the White House, unilaterally imposing tariffs that Canada views as 'illegal' violations of the 2018 trade deal. 'Trump is arguing about supply management and the (Digital Services Tax), but it's the U.S. that is in flagrant breach of its trade obligations. It's abandoned the CUSMA, virtually behaving as if it did not exist and the U.S. signature has no meaning,' Herman said. 'So we are in a world where rules and the rules-based system, and the stability that that treaty was supposed to provide, have gone by the board.' That means, at least for now, the Carney government is operating in a world where Canada's foremost ally, the colossus to the south, will use economic force to get what it wants.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
People Are Sharing The Under-Hyped Jobs That Are Actually Really, Really Great, And It Might Be Time For A Career Change
When it comes to careers and work life, finding your dream job is something everyone's after. With so many different industries, it might feel overwhelming to determine where to start your search. Reddit user Excellent_Owl_8125 recently asked, "What job is under-hyped but in reality is giving good pay and a good work environment?" Here's what people had to say, in case you're looking for a new gig: 1."Garbage collectors. Not glamorous, but stable income, benefits, and mostly outdoors!" —u/Pitiful-Channel737 Related: 2."Paralegals. Get enough experience under your belt, and you're making six figures. Plus, it's a nice, quiet environment where you can work on your own but collaborate with others when needed. Listen to music while working when possible. There are good benefits at better firms. And in a large enough market, you can job hop every three years, and show the level of experience that's needed." —u/million_monkeys 3."USPS and UPS drivers." —u/HistoricalLiving2636 4."I know a couple of guys who fix power lines. When a storm comes, the overtime pays for another vacation." —u/WimbledonWombat 5."I like being a teacher. Good hours, middle-class pay, union, and benefits. Honestly, my work environment is pretty nice most of the time. Maybe I've just never had a good job before, so I don't know, but I don't mind it." —u/Trialbyfuego 6."Auto body. Good pay, good hours, but you have to work, sweat, and get dirty." —u/iamthebirdman-27 Related: 7."People hate on insurance, but if you get in the commercial side of the business, it's pretty interesting trying to find solutions for client problems. You rarely work over 35 hours a week, and make six figures." —u/supabowlchamp44 8."Compliance specialists at banks or fintech companies. You can work your way up without a college degree, starting as a bank teller or customer service agent. It only takes a few years to get to six figures, and chief compliance officers can make several million dollars a year." —u/LRS312 9."Accountant." —u/Alternate_Ending74 Related: 10."Installing high-rise sprinkler systems." —u/ZealCrow 11."Cemetery plot sales rep. Totally under-hyped, yet the pay is to die for, and the work environment is so quiet you'll never hear a complaint. You spend your days selling eternal real estate to folks who can't argue back…" —u/rastawolfman 12."I've been driving a milk truck for two years after working in an oil field for 20 years, and I wish I had found this 12 years ago. It's 80% the money, I work four on and four off, I'm home every night, and get paid well for taking short drives in the country to pretty farms. There's enough physical movement to keep my body up, and there's great camaraderie between drivers." —u/whatgoodisausername 13."Trade jobs. Everyone's chasing degrees, but plumbers and electricians are quietly raking it in!" —u/Charming_Program_732 14."Fire inspector in big cities." —u/ZealCrow Related: 15."Dental hygienist. Two-year program and a salary of about $70k." —u/General_Sprinkles386 16."Tree trimmer. $30–$40 an hour, and you're working outside in the shade." —u/Constant-Current-340 17."Recruiting. I had no experience and was lucky enough to get into a great agency and a successful local office. After two years, I was paid $150k+. Then I moved to a large tech company, and with my RSUs, I make over $200k. I have long hours for half the year, and the other half is easy. I use a lot of skills and have a lot of influence. The job is more than people think it is if you work hard and have business acumen." —u/stevenk4steven 18."If you want a high-paying job, like the math side of finance, want to work on interesting problems, but don't want to work 90 hours a week as a glorified PowerPoint jockey, I suggest looking into becoming an actuary." —u/agallantchrometiger 19."My stepbrother is a self-employed delivery driver; he absolutely loves it. I'm not sure how he does it, but he has an Amazon app where he picks his hours and predetermined routes for preset payments. Never seen him stressed or skint, honestly." —u/Ok_Bottle_8796 What's the most underrated job? Share your thoughts in the comments or using the anonymous form below. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:
