Amid deadlock over new chief, BJP may get first woman president
Among the frontrunners is Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who recently held a high-level meeting with current BJP National President JP Nadda and General Secretary, BL Santhosh at the party headquarters. Her name is seen as a strong contender, with insiders pointing to her wide-ranging experience and leadership potential.If appointed, Sitharaman's elevation could help the BJP expand its footprint in southern India. Her leadership would also reflect the party's alignment with the proposed 33 per cent reservation for women in the Lok Sabha, expected to be implemented after the next delimitation exercise. A senior leader in the government, Sitharaman has previously served as Defence Minister and has deep roots in the party organisation.D PURANDESWARIAnother key name in the mix is D Purandeswari, the BJP's former Andhra Pradesh state president. A multilingual leader, Purandeswari has had a distinguished career across political lines.Purindeswari was also selected for the 'Operation Sindoor' delegation, a multi-party delegation to the various countries.VANATHI SRINIVASANVanathi Srinivasan is also being considered for the post. A lawyer-turned-politician from Tamil Nadu, she currently represents Coimbatore South in the state assembly. Since joining the BJP in 1993, Vanathi has held a series of key roles, including State Secretary, General Secretary, and Vice President of Tamil Nadu.In 2020, the party appointed her National President of the BJP Mahila Morcha, and in 2022 she became a member of the BJP's Central Election Committee, notably the first Tamil woman in that position.RSS NODSources reveal that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has endorsed the idea of appointing a woman to the party's top post, recognising both the symbolic and strategic advantages of female leadership.Over recent election cycles, women voters have played a pivotal role in securing BJP victories, particularly in states like Maharashtra, Haryana, and Delhi.If the BJP goes ahead with the move, it would mark the first time in its history that a woman has been appointed as the national.- EndsMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Bharatiya Janta Party#Nirmala Sitharaman
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
‘Spare The Sangh From Political Rhetoric': RSS Hits Back At Congress
Last Updated: RSS's Sunil Ambekar reiterated that the Sangh's identity has always been of a social and cultural organisation, and it has always focused on 'nation-building' Reacting to the repeated attacks by the Congress—the latest coming from Karnataka minister Priyank Kharge —the RSS said the political parties should 'spare" the Sangh, as it has no interest in engaging with politically driven narratives. 'Spare the Sangh from such political conversations. We are a social organisation committed to constructive work, not political rhetoric. We do our work organically," said Sunil Ambekar, the RSS's Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh, asserting that an organisation like the Sangh should not be dragged into political controversies. He further reiterated that the Sangh's identity has always been of a social and cultural organisation, and it has always focused on 'nation-building". 'The RSS does not function like a political party and remains committed to its grassroots social work. People support the Sangh's work, and they get associated. Political parties should stop unnecessarily involving the Sangh in their discourse," he added. Centenary preparations A three-day Akhil Bharatiya Prant Pracharak Baithak of the RSS will be held from July 4-6 at Keshav Kunj in Delhi, with a key focus on preparations for the Shatabdi Varsh (Centenary Year) in 2025-26, Ambekar said, addressing the media. While not a decision-making forum, the meeting will review the progress of organisational work across prants (zones) and discuss the functioning of various karya vibhag (sections and zones). Issues related to Operation Sindoor, atrocities on Hindus in Bangladesh, and other geopolitical, social, and border issues, including religious conversion and Khalistani issues in Punjab, will be discussed in the meeting. Two prant pracharaks (in-charges) from Jammu and Kashmir will also join the meeting. Around 46 prant pracharaks from across states and 233 karyakartas will attend the meeting. Responding to a question on the caste census, Ambekar reiterated the Sangh's old stand that it sees no problem with the government collecting data if it is for public welfare. Regarding the recent concerns over the Kanwar Yatra and potential law-and-order issues, Ambekar said, 'Religious events like the Kanwar Yatra happen smoothly every year. Administrative coordination is routine. We also engage with members of the society to ensure peace and harmony." 'Outreach' as the key He further confirmed that extensive preparations are underway for the 100-year anniversary of the RSS, with all states and zones having submitted proposals. The centenary year will officially begin with a grand programme in Nagpur on Vijay Dashami, October 2. Regional and zonal programmes will follow along with 'Hindu Sammelan" across states. RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat will also undertake a pravas (outreach tour) of four major cities—Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Kolkata—as part of the centenary outreach. Special initiatives include Grih Sampark Abhiyan (door-to-door contact), Samajik Sadbhav Baithaks (social harmony meetings), and Pramukh Nagrik Goshthis (citizen dialogues) on Hindutva and national vision. Youth engagement will be central, as over 28,571 people registered through the 'Join RSS" portal between April and June. Ambekar also outlined the Panch Parivartan vision for societal transformation—spanning social harmony, environmental consciousness, cultural pride, family bonding, and civic responsibility—which RSS volunteers will promote in collaboration with wider society. About the Author Madhuparna Das First Published: July 04, 2025, 05:12 IST
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Can't compel Rahul Gandhi to produce book he cited in speech against Savarkar: Court
Pune: A special magisterial court on Thursday rejected the plea filed by the great-grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Satyaki, seeking a direction to the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, to supply a copy of the book he cited during his alleged defamatory speech in London in 2023 against the Hindutva ideologue. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Satyaki is the complainant in the defamation case he filed against Gandhi under the provisions of IPC section 500. Judicial Magistrate First Class Amol Shinde, in his three-page order, observed that Gandhi couldn't be compelled to disclose his evidence before the trial commencement. The court noted, "The accused cannot be compelled to produce the document/book sought by the complainant. As per Article 20 (3) of the Constitution of India, no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself. Therefore, this court is of the opinion that an order cannot be passed directing the accused to file incriminating documents." Satyaki's lawyer, Sangram Kolhatkar, filed a plea under the provisions of section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a copy of the book cited by Gandhi in his speech in London on March 5, 2023. Opposing the plea, Gandhi's lawyer, Milind Pawar, submitted that the trial in the case has not yet commenced and his client couldn't be compelled to disclose or divulge or submit any part of the documents relied upon before the trial could commence. Pawar argued Satyaki was required to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt and the burden of proof was entirely on him. "My client is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. If the complainant's plea is allowed, it would cause serious prejudice to Gandhi's right to a fair trial," he said, adding that forcing the defence to prematurely disclose the defence was not permitted under the Criminal Procedure Code and Constitution. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court order read, "No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself and nor can he be compelled to produce incriminating documents material against him. The plea filed by Savarkar is liable to be rejected."
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oppn backing move to oust Justice Varma, process to initiate motion to start soon: Rijiju
NEW DELHI: Prominent opposition parties have agreed in principle to support a motion seeking the removal of Allahabad high court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, Union minister Kiren Rijiju said on Thursday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The process of collecting signatures from MPs to initiate the motion could begin shortly, he added. The govt is yet to decide whether the motion will be tabled in Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha. For the lower House, at least 100 MPs must endorse the proposal, while in the upper House, support from 50 MPs is required. Rijiju said the signatures will be gathered once a decision is taken on which House will take up the motion. The monsoon session of Parliament is scheduled from July 21 to Aug 21. Under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, once a motion for removal is admitted in either House, the presiding officer constitutes a three-member committee to examine the allegations. The panel comprises the Chief Justice of India (or a Supreme Court judge), a chief justice of a high court, and a distinguished jurist. The move comes months after a fire at Justice Varma's official residence led to discovery of sacks stuffed with charred cash in the outhouse. Though Justice Varma denied knowledge of the money, an SC-appointed panel found evidence against him after recording witness statements and his own deposition. Justice Varma, then serving in Delhi HC, was sent back to Allahabad HC, where he has not been assigned judicial work. Sources said former CJI Sanjiv Khanna had urged him to resign, but Justice Varma refused. The CJI subsequently wrote to the President and the prime minister, recommending his removal - the first step in the constitutional process for sacking a judge.
