Can't compel Rahul Gandhi to produce book he cited in speech against Savarkar: Court
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Satyaki is the complainant in the defamation case he filed against Gandhi under the provisions of IPC section 500. Judicial Magistrate First Class Amol Shinde, in his three-page order, observed that Gandhi couldn't be compelled to disclose his evidence before the trial commencement.
The court noted, "The accused cannot be compelled to produce the document/book sought by the complainant. As per Article 20 (3) of the Constitution of India, no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.
Therefore, this court is of the opinion that an order cannot be passed directing the accused to file incriminating documents."
Satyaki's lawyer, Sangram Kolhatkar, filed a plea under the provisions of section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking a copy of the book cited by Gandhi in his speech in London on March 5, 2023.
Opposing the plea, Gandhi's lawyer, Milind Pawar, submitted that the trial in the case has not yet commenced and his client couldn't be compelled to disclose or divulge or submit any part of the documents relied upon before the trial could commence.
Pawar argued Satyaki was required to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt and the burden of proof was entirely on him.
"My client is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. If the complainant's plea is allowed, it would cause serious prejudice to Gandhi's right to a fair trial," he said, adding that forcing the defence to prematurely disclose the defence was not permitted under the Criminal Procedure Code and Constitution.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The court order read, "No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself and nor can he be compelled to produce incriminating documents material against him. The plea filed by Savarkar is liable to be rejected."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
Court's notice to cops in case filed by Sameer Wankhede's sister against Nawab Malik
Mumbai's Bandra Magistrate Court on Friday issued a show-cause notice to the Amboli Police for failing to comply with its order in a case filed by Yasmeen Wankhede against NCP (Ajit Pawar faction) leader Nawab court had earlier, on January 20, directed the Amboli Police to conduct an inquiry into a criminal complaint of defamation and stalking lodged by Yasmeen Wankhede. Yasmeen is the elder sister of IRS officer Sameer Wankhede, the former Zonal Director of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) in case stems from a long-standing dispute between Malik and Sameer Wankhede that began in January 2021. That month, Wankhede's team arrested Malik's son-in-law for alleged involvement in a drug-related business. In retaliation, Malik launched a public campaign targeting Sameer Wankhede. He made personal allegations related to Wankhede's religion, marital life, and educational background. During the peak of the Malik-Wankhede row, Malik also made remarks about Yasmeen Wankhede, which led her to file the defamation and stalking feud further intensified in October 2021 when Wankhede's NCB team arrested actor Shah Rukh Khan's son, Aryan Khan, in a high-profile drugs case. Malik criticised the investigation on social media, pointing out flaws in the case. Eventually, the NCB did not file a chargesheet against Aryan directive was issued under Section 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which empowers the magistrate to order an investigation before proceeding with a the court's order, the Amboli Police failed to submit the investigation report twice over the past six months. Advocate Ali Kaashif Khan Deshmukh, representing Yasmeen Wankhede, informed the court that the police had yet to file the required report, prompting the magistrate to issue a show-cause notice. The Amboli Police must now respond by July 28.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Maharashtra
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
Denying Visas To Athletes On Political Grounds Violates Olympic Charter, May Risk Future Hosting Rights
Sources in the sports ministry said that the Olympic Charter states that every individual must have access to the practice of sport without discrimination of any kind, in line with internationally recognised human rights. Non-Discrimination Principle The Charter prohibits discrimination based on nationality, ensuring all qualified athletes can participate in international competitions, regardless of political relations between countries. Political Neutrality of Sport The Olympic Movement emphasises autonomy and independence from political interference. Denying visas on political grounds violates this principle. Impact on Future Hosting Rights International Precedent There are many precedents of IOC sanctions on India. India denied visas to athletes from Kosovo in 2018 for participation in the World Boxing Championship 2018. India denied visas to 2 athletes and one official from Pakistan for participation in the ISSF Rifle/Pistol World Cup in 2019. The International Olympic Committee, in its letter on 21.2.2019, informed that its Executive Board took the following decisions: (i) Suspend all discussions with the Indian NOC and government regarding potential applications for hosting future events and Olympic-related events in India until clear written guarantees are obtained from the Indian government to ensure the entry of all participants in events in full compliance with the rules of the Olympic Charter. (ii) Revoke the Olympic qualification status of the specific event (men's 25-metre Rapid Fire Pistol) (iii) Recommend that international federations neither award nor hold sports events in India until guarantees are obtained. There are a few international precedents as well. In the 2019 World Para Swimming Championships, Malaysia denied visas to Israeli athletes. The IPC stripped Malaysia of hosting rights, reinforcing the expectation that hosts must allow entry to all qualified athletes. The event was moved to London, and the IPC reaffirmed its commitment to inclusivity and the separation of sport and politics The United Arab Emirates in 2009 denied a visa to Israeli tennis player Shahar Pe'er in the Dubai Tennis Championships. The WTA fined Dubai organisers and required future compliance. The following year, visas were granted after international pressure. India at the 2019 ISSF World Cup denied visas to Pakistani shooters post-Pulwama attack. The IOC suspended India's right to host Olympic qualifiers until assurances were given for future non-discrimination.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
2 habeas pleas in HC over Bengal workers detained in Odisha
Kolkata: Two habeas corpus petitions were filed in Calcutta High Court on Friday against Odisha Police for "illegal detention" of migrant workers from Bengal. Trinamool MP and chairman of West Bengal Migrant Workers' Welfare Board Samirul Islam said the parents of two workers filed the petitions to bring the detainees before the HC. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Bengali-speaking people were detained in Odisha since June 25 while the country was observing 50 years of Emergency," Islam said. On Thursday, Bengal chief secretary Manoj Pant wrote to his Odisha counterpart, Manoj Ahuja, for release of the detained workers and to stop their harassment, urging immediate intervention. The chief secretary of Odisha, SP of Jagatsinghpur and OC of Balikuda police station have been made parties in the petition along with the Bengal CS and Murshidabad district magistrate. Nasima Mondal, mother of detained Rakhibul Islam Mondal, a resident of Hariharpara in Murshidabad, filed one of the petitions. She sought judicial intervention under Article 226 of the Constitution. Rakhibul, a migrant labourer working at Jagatsinghpur, was detained beyond 24 hours without being produced before any court of law, she claimed. This was against Supreme Court's guidelines and his fundamental rights were violated, Nasima's petition said. The police, while conducting an identity verification drive on June 25, detained Rakhibul and other Bengali-speaking people without any warrant. Nasima said though her son had valid documents — including Aadhaar, voter ID and ration card — these were not taken into consideration. Rakhibul was detained on suspicion of being a Bangladeshi for speaking Bengali, her petition claimed, adding that Odisha officials did not even cross-check his identity. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She pleaded that her son be produced before the court. A similar petition was filed by Rajjak Sk, also a resident of Hariharpara, for his son Sainur Islam. Rajjak claimed his son had been detained by Jagatsinghpur police since June 30 during the identification drive of Bengali-speaking people. Sainur has not been given any legal support to seek bail, he said, seeking his son to be produced before the court and his "lost dignity restored". Islam posted on X: "We have moved court against the barbaric torture and atrocity on migrant workers in BJP-governed states like Odisha. The atrocity on Bengali-speaking people is a sheer violation of the Constitution."
