Green light for Shell drilling sparks outrage among fishers and activists
They have warned the decision could ignite an environmental crisis.
Mineral and petroleum resources department director-general Jacob Mbele approved the oil giant's environmental impact assessment (EIA) on June 30. Shell announced the news on Friday.
Shell said if valuable resources were discovered offshore, they could play an important role in improving South Africa's energy supply and supporting government development efforts.
According to the authorisation document signed by Mbele, the area Shell wants to explore is between Port Nolloth and Lamberts Bay.
'The project area of interest in the licence block Northern Cape Ultra Deep is 300km offshore, at its closest point, in water depths ranging from 2,500m to 3,200m,' the document reads.
'The department is satisfied with the information made available to it and, subject to compliance with the conditions of this authorisation, Shell Offshore Upstream South Africa BV should be authorised to undertake the listed activities under the EIA regulations.
'By virtue of powers conferred on it by the National Environmental Management Act and EIA regulations, the department hereby grants the authorisation to Shell Offshore Upstream South Africa BV to undertake the listed activities as described.'
Shell submitted the EIA application in February.
Civil society organisation Green Connection, however, described the approval as a slap in the face of small scale fishers. Advocacy officer Lisa Makaula said approval had been granted 'despite repeated objections raised by coastal communities and civil society'.
We've said before: these oceans are our life. We need a healthy ocean to survive. How can they approve something that could destroy our future? This is why we will not back down
Walter Steenkamp, small-scale fisher from Port Nolloth
Makaula said the organisation and Natural Justice submitted detailed objections in August and December 2024. 'This EIA authorisation is a slap in the face of the small-scale fishers and communities who have consistently raised concerns about the project and its potential impact on their livelihoods.'
Shell is allowed to drill up to five wells, starting with one and adding more if it succeeds, using a drillship or similar vessel. Each well could take three to four months to drill, supported by up to three other vessels.
Shell is allowed to carry out wireline logging using vertical seismic profiling, a technique that creates detailed seismic images of the rock layers around the well once the drilling reaches its planned depth.
'The objective is to confirm the presence of petroleum,' the document reads.
Shell is allowed to test up to two wells to assess their commercial potential, carry out sonar mapping and seabed sampling and use remotely operated vehicles to inspect the seabed before and after drilling. Wells will be sealed with tested cement plugs once drilling is complete and a final survey will ensure the area is clear before the drillship leaves.
Makaula said the department's decision was alarming given the climate crisis and risks to marine life and small-scale fishers, especially in the Northern Cape, where many communities are vulnerable.
'Despite industry claims, gas is not a transition fuel — it is a fossil fuel that contributes to the climate crisis. Climate scientists confirm new oil and gas projects are incompatible with limiting warming to 1.5°C.
'Approving this sort of development now undermines climate action and endangers the communities it claims to benefit — especially as gas poses more climate risks, due to methane emissions that have 80 times the heating potential of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period,' said Makaula.
Walter Steenkamp, a small-scale fisher from Port Nolloth, shared Makaula's sentiments.
'We've said before: these oceans are our life. We need a healthy ocean to survive. How can they approve something that could destroy our future? This is why we will not back down,' he said.
Deborah de Wee, a small-scale fisher from Doringbaai, expressed disappointment.
'We are deeply disappointed by this decision. We believe it's a huge mistake that puts our ocean — and our future — at risk. We don't want harmful activities such as oil and gas drilling in our waters because we depend on the ocean for our daily bread,' she said.
'This is how we survive and how our people have survived for generations. These projects don't just threaten our food security — they potentially threaten our way of life.
'If this goes ahead, our children may never experience the ocean the way we did. With this decision, it feels like we are being robbed of our fishing culture. How will we teach the next generation to make a living from the sea when the risks are so high?'
TimesLIVE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Book review- A new era for State-Owned Enterprises: Dr Nimrod Mbele's blueprint for change
Dr Nimrod Mbele agues that affirmative action take South Africa back in his new book Reimagining State-Owned Enterprises For Africa and Beyond Image: supplied In a landscape riddled with governance failures, Reimagined SOEs in Africa and Beyond emerges not from frustration, but from a profound sense of hope. Author Dr Nimrod Mbele, whose journey from the township of Thokoza profoundly shapes his perspective, presents a powerful diagnostic and blueprint for transforming State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) across Africa. His inspiration is deeply rooted in a decade of firsthand observation—engaging with boardrooms, public institutions, and media, all while witnessing the persistent governance failures plaguing SOEs. Yet, this experience didn't lead to despair. Instead, it ignited a conviction that reform is possible if governance is reframed "not as compliance, but as a leadership system rooted in public value." 'South Africa must shift from leader-centric to leadership-centric systems - where performance is not dependent on individual personalities but institutionalised within strong, accountable structures. 'This requires reinforcing board independence, implementing merit-based appointments, instituting clear performance compacts, and establishing a capable and credible State Holding Company to ensure strategic coherence and protect SOEs from political interference,' Mbele said. This central message, to "go beyond governance" toward institutional integrity, developmental purpose, and democratic accountability, is the driving force behind the book. 'Moreover, strategic SOEs like Eskom, SAA, and Transnet should operate on a commercial basis, with clearly defined mandates. 'Their profits should be reinvested into the national fiscus to support essential social objectives such as education, healthcare and social security. 'Persisting with outdated ideological approaches only entrenches inefficiency and deepens the financial reliance of SOEs on the fiscus, an unsustainable model, especially in a context where the economy has grown at less than 2% over the past decade. Reimagining SOEs is, therefore, not only about governance reform but also about restoring both public trust and institutional capability,' Mbele said. His Thokoza upbringing, marked by systemic challenges like under-resourced schools and weak service delivery, provides a critical lens. Mbele witnessed how dysfunctional institutions deepen inequality and erode hope, fueling his belief that reform transcends mere policy or structure. 'My journey from Thokoza, a township shaped by struggle and resilience, to becoming a thought leader in governance profoundly informs my perspective on institutional reform. Growing up amidst systemic challenges - under-resourced schools, weak service delivery, and socio-economic hardships. 'I witnessed firsthand how dysfunctional institutions deepen inequality and erode hope. This lived experience fuels my conviction that reform is not just about policy or structure, but about restoring trust, dignity, and accountability in public institutions. Institutional reform must be people-centered, prioritising transparency, ethical leadership and inclusive participation to break cycles of exclusion,' he said. For him, it's about "restoring trust, dignity, and accountability in public institutions." This lived experience, coupled with insights from consulting, academia, and broadcasting, culminates in a strategic agenda for renewal that bridges personal narrative, rigorous research, and public dialogue. Mbele's advocacy for "governance that is accessible and responsive" underscores his commitment to ensuring institutions serve all citizens, especially those from historically marginalised communities. This empathetic approach, combined with a demand for technical excellence, forms the bedrock of his vision for sustainable SOE reform. The book is, at its core, a testament to the author's unwavering conviction that African SOEs can and must be instruments of transformation, not political patronage. [email protected]

IOL News
23-07-2025
- IOL News
Environmental concerns arise as Shell gains approval for oil drilling
Shell plans to drill exploration or appraisal wells in the Northern Cape Ultra Deep Block in the Orange Basin. Image: Reuters SHOULD viable resources be found from drilling up to five exploration and/or appraisal wells within the Northern Cape Ultra Deep (NCUD) block, this could significantly contribute to South Africa's energy security and the government's economic development programmes, says oil giant Shell. However, environmental activists have decried the decision to grant the company an Environmental Authorisation to drill, saying the promise of development was nothing new while environmental destruction, the hardships of communities and towns becoming ghost towns when mining activities end are lived experiences. The five exploration and/or appraisal wells within NCUD block are 300km offshore, in water depths of 2500m - 3200m. 'As part of this process, an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment was completed following widespread community engagements. South Africa is currently reliant on energy imports for many of its energy viable resources be found offshore, this could significantly contribute to South Africa's energy security and the government's economic development programmes,' said Shell spokesperson Pam Ntaka. Citing the devastation caused by a recent oil spill on the West Coast, activists speaking on behalf of fishing communities, said this provided a glimpse of the devastation an oil spill can cause. 'Forty kilometres of West Coast beaches were polluted, fishermen could not go out to fish for three months, and marine life and livelihoods were severely impacted. The government has no regard for the people, as many fisher communities, environmental activists and organisations have appealed and opposed the application. The false promise of development we heard before, but the only thing we see is environmental destruction, the hardships of communities and towns becoming ghost towns when mining activities end,' said Ubuntu Rural Women and Youth Movement's Wendy Pekeur. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Environmental justice organisation, The Green Connection said oil spills were not limited to what floats on the surface. It can travel through the entire water column, contaminating ecosystems and affecting fish health and behaviour. 'One of our key concerns is the reliance on the Saldanha Bay oil spill response 'stack,' which is designed for shallow water incidents and may not be appropriate or effective at ultra-deep levels. If something goes wrong at these depths, the consequences could be catastrophic and irreversible. Fish may migrate away or become unsafe to consume, leaving small-scale fishers without catch and income. In addition, the chemical impact of oil can kill off plankton – the foundation of the marine food chain – with widespread implications for ocean health,' said the organisation. The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment said their Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMRE) counterparts were the competent authority to grant the green light for Shell. DFFE spokesperson, Peter Mbelengwa, could not respond to further questions on concerns over the impact of oil spills and pollution on marine life and livelihoods, as well as community consultation. 'The matter is sub judice and therefore the Department cannot provide any comment at this stage'. The DMRE did not respond to requests for comment by deadline. Cape Times


Daily Maverick
22-07-2025
- Daily Maverick
New offshore oil and gas projects in direct conflict with SA's climate commitments
Virtually the entire coastal zone of South Africa (95%) has been leased out by the state for oil and gas exploration. How can a goal of 30% Marine Protected Areas align with 95% of the ocean under exploration leases? The ocean-loving public has justifiable concerns about plastic pollution, because it is horribly visible. Much less visible, but hugely important, is the relationship between climate change and the ocean. It's a multi-directional relationship, the ocean and us. A healthy ocean is our life support system. Half of global oxygen comes from phytoplankton growing in the ocean. The ocean removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which means it is working against climate change. But the more the ocean is damaged through warming and acidification (caused by warming), the less able it is to produce oxygen and absorb our carbon emissions. And then there is another threat: the ocean is a new frontier for fossil fuel mining. Virtually the entire coastal zone of South Africa (95%) has been leased out by the state for oil and gas exploration. Environmental organisations have been fighting for our lives in court. The high profile Shell-Wild Coast case opposing seismic testing led to victories for the environment in 2022 and 2024. However, perceptions that the battle against offshore oil and gas is over are misguided. In spite of wins in the high court and the Supreme Court of Appeal, Shell is still planning to go to the Constitutional Court. Similarly, the Searcher seismic case off the West Coast, from St Helena to Hondeklipbaai, was interdicted in 2022, but the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy subsequently granted new exploration permits in 2024 and 2025. Exploration by TotalEnergies EP South Africa is currently being legally contested by Green Connection and Natural Justice. These include a block between Cape Town and Cape Agulhas (see map: Blocks 5,6,7) and between Mossel Bay and Cape St Francis (see map: Blocks 11/12B). The scene is set for a battle between life and death, with environmental organisations challenging fossil fuel development in the ocean. Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe has loudly proclaimed that natural gas is a transition fuel that will take us into a sustainable (environmentally friendly) energy future. He claims it will provide an alternative to coal-based energy, and is in line with South Africa's Just Energy Transition. He hopes to set up a centralised 'war room' and dedicated courts to bypass environmentalists. Mantashe's campaign is a great gas greenwash and needs to be exposed. New oil and gas projects are in direct conflict with South Africa's climate commitments. We have agreed to net zero carbon emissions by 2050. That's not so far off. Your new baby will be 25 years old, and your granny may still be alive. And South African emissions are meant to peak in 2025 (that's now) and decline thereafter. How is that possible with new oil and gas projects coming online in the next 10 to 30 years? Our emissions are already too high. The International Energy Association and University College London have stated that we cannot meet international climate goals if new oil and gas projects are opened up. Risk of oil spills The offshore oil and gas industry also brings the risk of oil spills, which to date have not been adequately factored into mining permits. Although infrequent, they have devastating consequences. The rapid Agulhas Current along the East Coast could disperse oil as far as the West Coast. An oil spill affects the water column, the water surface, the shorelines and the seabed. It kills thousands of marine animals and destroys coastal livelihoods. A new scientific oil spill model in South Africa can predict the impacts of an oil blowout. It provides an objective, scientific tool for assessing the risks of ocean mining. Environmental organisations can now use this model to oppose offshore drilling. Even without an oil spill, offshore mining damages the ocean ecosystem. It physically damages the ocean floor and releases polluting sediments and toxic metals into the water. These activities destroy habitats, and biodiversity. Additionally, offshore oil and gas is economically risky. New markets would have to be developed in South Africa in tandem with massive infrastructure investment. This would lock South Africans into expensive dirty energy or could lead to stranded assets as the world turns away from fossil fuels. South African consumers and taxpayers would bear the brunt of this choice. At the same time, there is increasing evidence, including from the government's own models, that show that renewable energy is a cheaper, safer and faster source of energy for South Africa. Some consolation may be found in financial institutions around the world shifting away from investment in fossil fuel projects. In light of the above, why is the South African government supporting offshore mining? There is a lot of oil and gas out there — possibly 27 billion barrels of oil and 60 trillion cubic feet of gas. This may be profitable for the oil and gas industry in the short term, depending on how long it takes for global prices to decline. Cosy relationship with the gas industry And the government has a close and cosy relationship with the gas industry. The 2022 Gas Masterplan Basecase Report released by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy promotes a gas pathway for South Africa. It has been criticised for relying solely on input from the gas industry and for its lack of credible independent research. The relationship between the department and the gas industry is illustrated by the Mantashe-Ayuk bromance. NJ Ayuk is the chairperson of the non-profit Africa Energy Chamber, a trade group connecting oil and gas executives with government officials. Ayuk's Africa Energy Week is sponsored by a number of state-owned entities. Unsurprisingly, Ayuk has nothing but praise for Mantashe, describing him as a voice of reason regarding climate concerns. Mantashe, who is once again a target for investigation into criminal corruption, is on the same wavelength as Ayuk. The latter has criminal records for fraud, money laundering and maliciously targeting a journalist. Could the Mantashe-Ayuk bromance be contributing to this plan for ocean plunder? The figures don't add up. The government is deceiving us. How can a goal of 30% Marine Protected Areas align with 95% of the ocean under exploration leases? How can carbon emissions decline from 2025 if offshore oil and gas projects come online in the next 10 to 30 years? The next few years will be crucial in deciding the health of our oceans. Without this we face exponential global heating and the destruction of the ocean life support system. And yes, there are things that the ordinary person can do. The oil and gas industry knows that they face environmental and governance challenges, both globally and in South Africa. We can stop their ambitions from becoming reality, by supporting environmental organisations that are taking the legal route. These include organisations such as All Rise Attorneys, Natural Justice, Greenpeace Africa, The Green Connection, the Legal Resources Centre and 350Africa, as well as local coastal communities and organisations. Fighting for small-scale fishers A number of these organisations are also fighting for the customary rights of small-scale fishers who have been increasingly excluded from the ocean economy. This includes participation in the governance of marine resources. These organisations have already shown that, like David, they can tackle the giant. We need to inform ourselves and others about what they are doing. Everyone has a stake in this invisible threat of ocean destruction. In addition to legal challenges to offshore mining, the oceans need long-term protection. Marine Protected Area (MPAs) allow marine life to recover, climate resilience to improve and prevent mining. The government has committed to protecting 30% of South African oceans by 2030. At the moment only 5% is protected. That means that in the next five years, an additional 25% of South Africa's oceans must be declared protected areas. It sounds impossible but it's a goal worth fighting for. David Attenborough's words can inspire us to action: 'The ocean can bounce back to life. If left alone it may not just recover, but thrive beyond anything anyone alive has ever seen.' DM Dr Moraig Peden is a spokesperson for Extinction Rebellion, Cape Town. She is a retired academic with a background in environmental education.