European flag celebrates 40 years as symbol for EU and predecessor
Europe is celebrating its flag:
Twelve golden stars, explicitly, and in contrast to some national flags, not representing member states or units but "the ideals of unity, solidarity and harmony among the peoples of Europe", how the European Commission website puts it.
In 1983, towards the tail end of its first legislature as a directly elected law-making body, the European Parliament decided to adopt it as the symbol of what we now know as the EU but was then still known as the European Communities.
Two years later, the European Council, the representatives of the then ten member states, approved the decision and by 1986, having just been joined by Portugal and Spain, the flag - officially only called a "logo", to avoid too strong connotations of nationhood - became widely used by the Communities and member states on official buildings, etc.
However, that's not where the story of the flag starts, which is now perhaps most powerfully applied as a symbol for freedom and self-determination by nations struggling to achieve them.
Design ideas had been floated even before WWII for a flag for a united Europe, and in its aftermath, naturally, even more so. They ranged from a green cross on a white background and vice versa, to a white triangle on a variety of backgrounds, and even a combination of all colours of all European flags in five fields, arrived at in painstaking statistical analysis by a citizen of Strasbourg.
Neither of them were adopted, but it was in Strasbourg in 1953 that the now familiar flag was first proposed by members of the Council of Europe. The institution as a whole then adopted it in December 1955.
Thus, it can celebrate another round birthday later this year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
France sets framework for EU's 2040 climate targets
The battle to reach Europe's 2040 climate targets has begun. On 2 July, the European Commission is due to present its proposals for reducing CO2 emissions. It is expected to announce a 90% reduction to take the EU towards carbon neutrality by 2050. This proposal comes at a time when the European Green Deal is being called into question and the EU's competitiveness is being strengthened in the face of international competition. Member states are preparing their political arguments for the debate. France has already taken the first offensive at last week's European summit, setting out its framework. "I'm in favour of having these targets in 2040, but basically I said some very simple things. Firstly, if we want these targets by 2040, we have to give ourselves the means to do so and make them compatible with our competitiveness. What does that mean? Technological neutrality, flexibility, investment," French President Emmanuel Macron said at the end of the meeting of the 27 EU leaders. Flexibility: the word has been thrown around and is used repeatedly in Europe's corridors of power. The Commission has also adopted the same term. The Vice-President of the institution responsible for the Clean, Fair and Competitive Transition seems ready to grant flexibility to convince capitals. "Reducing our emissions by 90% by 2040 is a clear objective. We then need to discuss how we can combine the different elements, the possible flexibilities," Teresa Ribera told Euronews. The grey area of flexibility For environmental NGOs, the figure of 90% reduction in emissions is an important marker, but they do not wish to limit the debate to this numerical assessment. Several organisations are warning of the flexibility and possible flaws in the Commission's proposal. Flexibility could take the form of international credits. "Essentially, the EU and its member states could pay other countries outside the EU to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. This amount would then be included in the 90% of greenhouse gas emissions within the EU's borders," explains Michael Sicaud-Clyet, Climate Governance Officer at WWF EU. For him, this political sleight of hand is "a major problem, because it will divert investment to industry, or to people and municipalities outside the EU and it will cost more and have less positive impact on people and industry in the EU." Other forms of flexibility could involve absorbing carbon through carbon sinks, which are natural carbon absorbers, and permanent absorbers, which are technologies whose large-scale development has not yet been proven", warns Michael Sicaud-Clyet. Time for negotiations France says it does not want to rush the negotiations. The 2040 targets "cannot be a technical debate that takes place in a few weeks. It must be a democratic debate," Macron warned. "It's not a target for Belém (the Brazilian city will host COP30, the UN climate conference, this year). If we have it for Belém, great. If it's going to take longer, let's take longer to do it right." The President repeated his mantra of "flexibility, investment, technological neutrality and trade coherence, meaning that if we set targets for 2040, we want a trade policy that protects us." In this debate, Paris should be able to count on the support of Budapest and Warsaw. However, other member states such as Germany, Spain, Finland and Denmark (which holds the six-month EU presidency from 1 July) fully support the 90% emissions reduction target . The WWF EU also mentions a number of "swing states," countries that are keeping their final position vague. For the European Commission, it is vital that the EU does not miss the turning point represented by the 2040 target. "I think this could be a mistake. I think that this year (2025) marks the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement (on climate), and we want to determine how we can continue to make progress in an area that we consider essential for the economic and social well-being of Europeans," says Teresa Ribera. The Spanish official also opened the door to debate. "We will have to identify the challenges that lie ahead, while trying to reach an agreement between all the European countries."
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
What is France's Loi Duplomb and why are farmers protesting about it?
Back in January 2024, French farmers began a series of protests that included roadblocks on motorways and a 'siege' of the city of Paris. Their demands were varied, but among them was a request for a simplification and scaling back of the rules and paperwork that French farmers operate under. Eighteen months on, a piece of legislation that attempts to address those demands is coming before the French parliament - the Loi Duplomb, named after the right-wing Senator Laurent Duplomb who introduced it. The bill aims to "lift the constraints on the profession of agriculture". It has some measures to simplify the paperwork that farmers must deal with, which are relatively uncontroversial, but the other aspect of "lifting constraints" goes much further - relaxing or scrapping altogether rules relating to the use of pesticides, insecticides and other chemicals as well as rules on water storage and extraction. Advertisement Do farmers support it? This bill illustrates neatly why it's impossible to talk about 'the farmers' - agriculture is a huge and very varied industry that does not speak with one voice. Different types of farmers have different needs and problems, and sometimes those interests are in direct competition. The Loi Duplomb is supported by France's largest farming union the FNSEA - this union is dominated by the large cereal farmers and agri-businesses. They say that they face unfair competition because they cannot use certain types of pesticides and weedkillers which are legal in other EU countries. However other farmers and agricultural producers - especially beekeepers - are staunchly opposed to the Loi Duplomb, with many holding protests over the weekend. The country's third largest farming union, Confédération paysanne which advocates an agro-ecological transition, is opposed to the bill, but the Jeunes Agriculteurs (young farmers) union supports it. What's in the bill? The bill is wide-ranging and contains provisions on a number of topics. Among the most controversial are the relaxing of the rules on pesticide use and changes to rules on water storage. Also proposed are a relaxation around the rules on constructing new agricultural buildings and a weakening of the powers of the French biodiversity office. Advertisement Particularly controversial is the proposal to allow farmers to use a currently banned type of insecticide - acétamipride - which can be fatal to bees. Christian Pons, president of the beekeepers' union Union nationale de l'apiculture française (Unaf) denounced the law , which he says "claims to defend food sovereignty, but since when has it been acceptable to destroy one sector, that of beekeepers, in order to save another, that of hazelnut trees, for example?" Water storage and in particular the building of new water storage sites would be made easier under the Loi Duplomb, with exemptions granted to general rules that require any new project to protect local biodiversity. With increasing temperatures and drought, water supplies are likely to become more and more of a flashpoint in the years to come - in France the issue already led to violent clashes in the south-west town of Sainte-Soline where giant underground water storage basins were being built. Advertisement Farmers insisted the water storage basins were necessary to deal with drought, environmental campaigners accused them of diverting water supplies from local people and effectively trying to 'privatise' water. "The proposed Loi Duplomb will be detrimental to the proper functioning of natural environments, at a time when more than a third of France is already suffering from structural water shortages," said the group France nature environnement , adding that the water clauses of the bill are "yet another gift to a few industrial farmers, and detrimental to future production capacities". Environmental groups including Greenpeace have also raised concerns over the bill. So what next? Debates begin in the French parliament this week and are expected to be finely balanced, making it unclear whether the text will pass. Even within the government there are divisions - the agriculture minister Annie Genevard has asked MPs not to oppose it, saying that "farmers need it", while the environment minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher has said she is against the section on relaxing pesticide rules. The debates are expected to last at least a week, while if the law is passed it would likely need to be referred to the Conseil constitutionnel , which will judge whether the bill strikes a balance with France's environmental obligations. Further protests are also possible - the FNSEA began preemptive protests in May in an attempt to pressure MPs into supporting the bill, while environmental groups and other farming unions may continue protests against the bill.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Greece introduces new tobacco rules to minimise risks to children
Greece is tightening rules around the sale of tobacco and alcohol products to children, according to health minister Adonis Georgiades. From now on, the sale of tobacco products to minors will carry criminal consequences and it will not be possible for adults to send their children to buy cigarettes, which has been common practice in Greece for decades, Georgiades said in an interview. "We are making a very strict bill to protect our minors from both alcohol and tobacco," Georgiades said. "The kiosk attendant, to give a packet of cigarettes to someone, must ask for identification and establish that they are an adult – otherwise they are criminally liable". The rule was set to be published in the Official Gazette of the Government, he said. The bill will also introduce a cap on the amount of nicotine in tobacco pouches. Checks on these products had revealed that some pouches had 70 grams of nicotine, but the cap will bring that limit down to 16 grams. "We as a state will do what we have to do, but all conscientious professionals should help us by asking for identification to protect the young generation from this scourge," Georgiades said. Standstill on EU price increases For months, 15 members of the European Union have been pushing the European Commission to increase taxes, and therefore prices, on tobacco products. The goal is to discourage people from buying cigarettes, vapes, and other tobacco products, and to dissuade young people from picking up the habit. If the plan succeeds, a packet of cigarettes could reach €6 or €7 in Greece. The Greek government, as well as Italy, Bulgaria, and Romania, have opposed large price increases, stressing that they will negatively affect their economies. They also point out that in places with sharp price increases, cigarette smuggling has flourished. The decision to raise tobacco prices would requires unanimous agreement from EU member states, and it is not expected to be enacted anytime soon, if at all.
