logo
Why ‘Next to Normal' is your grief and rage catharsis in 2025

Why ‘Next to Normal' is your grief and rage catharsis in 2025

Many of us might want to yowl like a rock star, shut ourselves off in a fantasy world, alternately numb ourselves with pills and fling them in the trash or simply indulge a fit of histrionics.
To all that, Ray of Light Theatre's 'Next to Normal' says, 'Hold my beer.'
One of musical theater's sacred duties, exemplified by the production that opened Saturday, May 31, at the Victoria Theatre, is to give expression to all the chest-beating, teeth-gnashing, hair-tearing grief and rage that all of us feel but most of us suppress. Actors rip off their shells, and we sit quietly in the dark, thinking, 'Yes, that's what it's like,' and feel cleansed.
Brian Yorkey and Tom Kitt's 2010 Pulitzer Prize winner begins with a facade. Diana (Anne Warren Clark) sings of her 'perfect loving family, so adoring.' But before long, she's frantically making sandwiches on the floor, while her husband and kids back slowly away and look at her like she's a crazy person.
Diana zings to life in a tango with her psychopharmacologist Dr. Fine (Courtney Merrell), with one dancing her fingers up the other's body. Under the frisky direction of Jenn BeVard, Dr. Fine grinds powders with a mortar and pestle like it's a kink, and Diana recites her side effects, including constipation, like she's a movie star giving an Oscar acceptance speech.
The pill-popping Diana doesn't just have bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression and a grab bag of other hazily defined maladies that append to her diagnosis whenever she says the right thing at the right time. She's also bearing a herculean grief that's metastasized and hobbled her, preventing her from interacting with her family in the way they crave.
In Yorkey and Kitt's brilliant writing, that mourning takes human form, singing with a voice of pure joy. It understands, condoles and boosts, and in Christian Mejia's lighting design, it's as colorful as a jar of candy. Between it and demanding, unhappy family members, why wouldn't Diana choose the former?
Yorkey and Kitt's writing keeps turning over stones to unearth the creepy-crawlies underneath. It dares to let a mother admit she doesn't love her child that much or that a wife finds her husband 'boring.' Caring for a mentally ill family member is 'just a slower suicide,' Diana's husband Dan (Albert Hodge) sings. Elsewhere, asking her what she's so afraid of, he adds, 'Can you tell me why I'm afraid it's me?'
In a show where agony succeeds agony, performers don't always find ways to show how one fresh hell is distinguished from the last, and voices aren't as tuneful as they might be. But as Diana, Clark is sensitive to microbeats within microbeats. When she remembers her younger self, singing, 'I miss the mountains,' it's as if she has a whole mighty peak within herself. When Diana realizes that in her life, 'nothing's real,' and decides to throw away all her pills, Clark combines the shock of discovery with the rage of all the time she's wasted by pretending.
If 'Next to Normal' doesn't cure Diana or elbow its way into a hunky-dory ending, nor does it force its characters to just sink deeper into a quagmire of despair. The show gives Diana and her family permission to say the status quo isn't working and make different choices — still suboptimal, but at least different. In a genre famous for happily-ever-afters and kicklines, such down-to-earth restraint is a balm and a gift.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' Caused Years of Strain Between Michael and Kirk Douglas
Why ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' Caused Years of Strain Between Michael and Kirk Douglas

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' Caused Years of Strain Between Michael and Kirk Douglas

Producing the brilliant One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest in 1975 at age 29 launched Michael Douglas' filmmaking career and gave him an Oscar, but it came at a price — it caused years of strain between him and his way more famous father, Kirk Douglas, who was supposed to star! Kirk was thought too old for the role and got the boot in favor of Jack Nicholson as the spirited con pretending to be a mental patient, who shockingly winds up lobotomized and broken. Michael has acknowledged how much the snub hurt his dad, but they managed to mend fences after some time had passed. Solve the daily Crossword

'The Fantastic Four' makes us ask: Is it possible to give birth in space?
'The Fantastic Four' makes us ask: Is it possible to give birth in space?

USA Today

time19 hours ago

  • USA Today

'The Fantastic Four' makes us ask: Is it possible to give birth in space?

Spoiler alert! The following story contains major plot details about "The Fantastic Four: First Steps" (now in theaters). As Sue Storm, Vanessa Kirby gets to turn invisible and generate force fields to save the world from a cosmic giant. But in Marvel's "The Fantastic Four: First Steps," her most superheroic feat just might be giving birth in zero gravity. Midway through the film, a very pregnant Sue ventures into space with her husband Reed (Pedro Pascal), brother Johnny (Joseph Quinn) and friend Ben (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) to confront Galactus (voiced by Ralph Ineson) and his fierce mininon, the Silver Surfer (Julia Garner). As luck would have it, she goes into labor just as Galactus threatens to destroy the Earth if they don't hand over their then-unborn son, Franklin. The superheroes run back to the ship, where Sue starts to have contractions. Between contractions, she uses her powers to make the vessel invisible to hide it from the villains. While Johnny is off trying to kill the Silver Surfer, Ben stands at the foot of her makeshift delivery table in order to catch the baby, and Reed holds his wife down so she has gravity to push. Whoa, baby! The real story behind the adorable star of 'Fantastic Four' While it's nowhere near as traumatic as Kirby's birth scene in her Oscar-nominated "Pieces of a Woman," it's still an incredibly intense moment as our heroes attempt to deliver the newborn in fraught circumstances. And according to experts, the movie's depiction of zero-gravity birth isn't far from the truth. "Labor and delivery is not dependent on gravity, so births would be expected to occur without gravity," says Dr. Hugh Taylor, chair of the department of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at Yale School of Medicine. Nonetheless, he adds, "there are many aspects to consider. Movement cannot be well controlled, and positioning may be difficult. Movement of the baby or maneuvering the baby to aid in delivery could set the mom moving rather than the baby. The mom would need to be held in place. Strapping down the mom and any healthcare providers would be necessary. Amniotic fluid, blood and other bodily fluids would fill the room rather than drain to the floor. On the brighter side, no one would ever have to worry about dropping the baby!" Taylor is not aware of any humans or animals that have actually been born in space. But if it was to occur, he says the biggest issues would be cosmic radiation, as well as a lack of resources to care for the infant after it's born. "The developing fetus is more sensitive to radiation and there may be a greater risk of pregnancy loss or problems in development," Taylor says. "There are not likely to be medical units to care for newborns in space. Without the advanced care such as NICUs, some babies would be in jeopardy. Normal development after birth is far more dependent on gravity; this would clearly affect the growth and development of the baby. I would be more worried about the baby than the delivery." In short, what you see in "The Fantastic Four" is "feasible, and could occur," Taylor continues. "However, I would not recommend it. It would not be optimal for the baby's health."

Gary Busey pleads guilty to criminal charge for unwanted touching
Gary Busey pleads guilty to criminal charge for unwanted touching

USA Today

time20 hours ago

  • USA Today

Gary Busey pleads guilty to criminal charge for unwanted touching

Actor Gary Busey is pleading guilty in a sexual misconduct case in New Jersey. Busey, 81, made a virtual appearance in New Jersey Superior Court Thursday, July 31, and entered a guilty plea to one charge of fourth-degree criminal sexual contact, Busey's attorney Blair R. Zwillman confirmed to USA TODAY on Aug. 1. With the plea, Busey has admitted to "touching the buttocks of a woman without her permission," Zwillman said. The case stems from his August 2022 appearance at the Monster-Mania Convention, where several woman accused him of inappropriately touching them. The "Buddy Holly Story" actor initially faced five criminal charges in the case and pleaded not guilty during a March arraignment, court records show. Prosecutors have since dismissed the other charges. The actor was "overcharged" by county prosecutors due to his "celebrity status," Zwillman said, adding that his client should have faced a lower-level charge such as a disorderly persons offense for harassment. USA TODAY has reached out to the Camden County Prosecutor's Office for comment. Busey was nominated for an Oscar for his portrayal of Buddy Holly in 1978's "The Buddy Holly Story." Aside from his film credits, which include "Point Break" and "Lethal Weapon," he's also forayed into reality television. In 2014, he won Season 14 of the U.K. show "Celebrity Big Brother." Busey also competed on Season 21 of "Dancing with the Stars" and in 2011 on "The Apprentice." In 2023, Busey was allegedly involved in a hit-and-run collision in Malibu. According to Entertainment Weekly, the unidentified woman whose car he collided with did not press charges against the actor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store