Unified Pension Scheme: Employees Now Eligible For Retirement, Death Gratuity Benefits, Says Minister
Last Updated:
Jitendra Singh, the Minister of State for Personnel, says the new provision reflects government's commitment to ensure social security for all categories of employees under NPS.
All central government employees part of the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) will now be eligible for retirement and death gratuity benefits available under the Old Pension Scheme (OPS), Union Minister Jitendra Singh said on Wednesday. Responding to this long-pending demand by a large section of government employees, he said, the move addresses a significant demand of government staff and brings parity in retirement benefits.
Singh, the Minister of State for Personnel, said the new provision reflects the government's commitment to ensure social security for all categories of employees under the National Pension System (NPS).
Addressing a presser on the 'transformational" journey of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions over the last 11 years, he highlighted a series of reforms aimed at simplifying governance, empowering citizens, and humanising administration.
Central government employees covered under the UPS will now be eligible for retirement and death gratuity benefits, as per the provisions of the Central Civil Services (Payment of Gratuity under National Pension System) Rules, 2021, Singh said.
The Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare (DoPPW), under the Personnel Ministry, on Wednesday issued an order on the 'options to avail benefits under Old Pension Scheme on death of government servant during service or his discharge from government service on account of invalidation or disability for central government servants covered under Unified Pension Scheme".
'The order gives an employee the option to revert to OPS in case of death in service. It is progressive in nature and addresses the clarifications being sought by employees," DoPPW Secretary V Srinivas told PTI.
President of the All India NPS Employees Federation, Manjeet Singh Patel, welcomed the order and termed it a historic and much-needed move by the government.
Patel said the inclusion of death-cum-retirement gratuity in UPS will remove all the misconceptions of the employees.
He said, the inclusion of OPS benefits in case of death or disability of any employee during the service under UPS is a great justice.
'Therefore, a lot of employees will opt for the UPS now," Patel said.
The DoPPW had notified the Central Civil Services (Implementation of National Pension System) Rules, 2021, to regulate service-related matters of central government employees covered under the NPS.
Under these, Rule 10 provides for the option to be exercised by every central government employee covered under the NPS for availing benefits under the NPS or the Old Pension Scheme in the event of death of a government servant during service or his discharge on the ground of invalidation or disablement.
'UPS has been notified as an option under the NPS. Therefore, it has been decided that the central government civil employees who opt for UPS under the NPS shall also be eligible for option for availing benefits under UPS or the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 or the CSS (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 2023 in the event of death of the government servant during service or his discharge on the ground of invalidation or disablement," the order said.
The finance ministry, on January 24, issued a notification regarding the introduction of UPS as an option under the NPS for recruits to the central government civil service with effect from April 1, 2025. It gives a one-time option to the central government employees covered under the NPS for inclusion under the UPS.
Every central government servant who opts for the UPS under the National Pension System shall, at the time of joining the service, exercise an option in Form 1 for availing benefits under the UPS or under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 2021 or the CCS (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 2023 in the event of his/her death or boarding out on account of disablement or retirement on invalidation, the order said.
'Existing government servants, who have opted for the Unified Pension Scheme under the National Pension System, shall also exercise such option as soon as possible after the notification of these clarifications," it said.
In the case of the death of a government servant while in service, the last option exercised by the deceased employee before his death shall be treated as final, and the family shall have no right to revise the option, said the order issued to all central government departments.
The DoPPW also issued another order on Wednesday to clarify that the central government employees covered under the UPS shall also be eligible for the benefit of retirement gratuity and death gratuity under the provisions of the Central Civil Service (Payment of Gratuity under National Pension System) Rules, 2021.
DoPPW Secretary Srinivas said this order 'brings parity between the NPS and UPS pensioners and they will be eligible for Rs 25 lakh gratuity also".
Both these orders were released by Singh during the conference.
What Is Unified Pension Scheme?
The Union Cabinet in August 2024 approved the Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), for an assured pension post-retirement. The UPS has been implemented from April 1, 2025. The move comes after the long-pending demand of the central government employees to reform the new pension scheme (NPS).
It is the latest pension scheme for government employees.
Under the UPS, there will be a provision of a fixed assured pension, unlike the New Pension Scheme (NPS) which does not promise a fixed pension amount.
The Unified Pension Scheme has five pillars:
Assured Pension: Under the UPS, the fixed pension will be 50 per cent of the average basic pay drawn over the last 12 months prior to superannuation for a minimum qualifying service of 25 years. This pay is to be proportionate for lesser service period up to a minimum of 10 years of service.
Assured Family Pension: It will also have an assured family pension, which is 60 per cent of the pension the employee was receiving. It will be given immediately in case of the retiree's demise.
Assured Minimum Pension: In the case of superannuation after a minimum 10 years of service, the UPS has a provision of an assured minimum pension of Rs 10,000 per month.
Inflation Indexation: There is a provision of indexation benefit on assured pension, on assured family pension and assured minimum pension.
top videos
View all
Gratuity: Lump-sum payment at superannuation in addition to gratuity. It will be 1/10th of the monthly emolument (pay + dearness allowance) as on the date of superannuation for every completed six months of service. This payment will not reduce the quantum of assured pension.
(With Inputs from PTI)
About the Author
Business Desk
A team of writers and reporters decodes vast terms of personal finance and making money matters simpler for you. From latest initial public offerings (IPOs) in the market to best investment options, we cover al...Read More
Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates—only on News18. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
National Pension Scheme (NPS)
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 18, 2025, 19:19 IST
News business » savings-and-investments Unified Pension Scheme: Employees Now Eligible For Retirement, Death Gratuity Benefits, Says Minister
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
35 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP ‘first party' to push for caste census: Union Minister
Bengaluru:Union Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change Bhupender Yadav claimed on Saturday that the BJP was the 'first party' since Independence to push for a caste census. He said that under the 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas' (Together with all, development for all) policy, the BJP aims to bring change to all sections of society based on scientific data. He said that over the past 11 years, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, numerous developmental and welfare schemes had been implemented for the benefit of the poor and marginalised. He noted that it was PM Modi who gave constitutional status to the OBC Commission. Yadav emphasised that the Registrar General of India was empowered to conduct caste censuses and said that for the first time since Independence, such an exercise was being carried out to responsibly collect data on social, economic, caste-based, and educational indicators. He recalled that after the end of the Emergency, a non-Congress government, the Janata Party, came to power at the Centre and constituted the Mandal Commission. Yadav asserted that the BJP was the first party since Independence to push for a caste census. He mentioned that the Congress mouthpiece 'National Herald' had even published an article advocating for one-party rule in India. Following this, BK Nehru had written a letter, and a committee was reportedly formed within the Congress on this matter. Yadav alleged that Congress had long been engaged in a systematic effort to equate the party with the family, and the family with the nation. This ideology, he said, led to the declaration of Emergency. He concluded by saying that the Emergency was remembered as a dark chapter in Indian democracy, one that ignited a people's struggle driven by national self-respect and democratic values.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Nirmala Sitharaman: ‘Economic buoyancy can't be overstated; else, we wouldn't have been where we are'
From welcoming the idea of the India-US trade deal to a raft of 'second-generation reforms' to be unleashed soon, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in a free-wheeling interview with The Financial Express . Excerpts: How difficult is it for a sovereign country like India to put up with President Donald Trump's unilateral statement that the US will 'open up' our economy, when the trade talks are just underway? In fact, I would like to see it also from the Indian side. The US is one of our leading trade partners, topmost, if anything. At the junction we are in, and given our growth goals and ambition to reach Viksit Bharat by 2047, the sooner we have such agreements with strong economies, the better they will serve us. So, I'd rather put my own statement on (Trump's): 'Yes, I'd love to have an agreement, a big, good, beautiful one; why not?' But, what are the red lines India has drawn? The negotiating team ensured that industry's concerns were all taken on board before they sat at the table for talks. Agriculture and dairy have been among the very big red lines, where a high degree of caution has been exercised. There are some areas where one can always look at, seek greater market access for us, and also open up. Even in agriculture, there're areas with little or no domestic vulnerabilities… Possibly. But that (opening them up) is only with the consent of the department agriculture. There's no way we could do anything that which would weaken our agriculture, our farmers' positions. You had reiterated recently that, 'tariff king' tag doesn't befit us. Our applied tariffs are mostly low… We have only eight duties, inclusive of zero tariff. There have been drastic cuts of tariffs in the July (main) and February (interim) budgets. The effective tariff rates are (lower than the limits) announced in the gazette with Parliament approval, which is itself far below the WTO boundary. So, for India to be called a tariff king and so on is absolutely unjustified. Yet, there's scope for further lowering of tariffs, without causing any harm to domestic industry… Those are the points on which the negotiators will have to work with the country concerned. So, (our) tariff being a consideration is being addressed. Sector-specific considerations on agriculture, dairy etc. are being addressed too. Other concerns of the industry — automobile units, etc. — are also being addressed with deep consultations. I will credit the Commerce Minister (Piyush Goyal) for having had consultation prior to, during, and after the completion of the negotiations. The US tariffs are already very low. Do you see any further reduction for us? For reducing duties, the US President has to go to the Congress, a time-consuming process. So they may pitch in for it (duty cut), but it has to be done after the agreement. Could it be part of the broader deal, if not the interim one? Yes, it can be. Could India offer any major relaxations to the US on the non-tariff front — IPR, data localisation, government procurement and such? Our approach has always been that the trade negotiations should not get initiated by non- tariff concerns. Issues such as environment, gender, sustainability, carbon tax, government procurement, industrial relations, haven't been strictly part of trade negotiations. But it's now become a part and parcel of the whole thing, and we therefore take well-considered discrete positions. We just can't walk into it, because India is an emerging market, with our own market requirements. On government procurement, a lot of carve-outs have to made, to ensure purchases from MSMEs, start-ups etc. Our domestic procurement itself is very considerate towards those sections that need hand-holding. We can't open it up for someone without these concerns addressed. Manufacturing has ceded some share in GDP It's clear from the policy we announced that labor-intensive units will be given support. We have been specific that handicrafts, handmade goods etc. will get succour. So there is no way in which we are choosing between one (labour) and the other (capital/tech). Manufacturing, whether it is employment-intensive, or requires automation, policy support will be given. But these lines are becoming thin. Textiles & apparels, for instance, has conventionally been a labour- intensive sector, but it is being rapidly automated. A large knitwear unit in Tirupur, which used to employ, say, over 30,000 people, has now brought in AI to aid the production process, leading to increased productivity. A third of its workforce may now not be required to do what they were doing earlier. You cannot grudge that. But such units aren't retrenching people; rather they try to upskill them for gainful employment. A complete recast is happening even in labor-intensive industries, to the extent that traditional labels don't hold. Of course, despite this, there are some sectors where automation doesn't come in so quickly; even among a section of manufacturing units and MSMEs, automation may not be an alternative they would want at this juncture. We have to have a policy for them, to facilitate credit access to them. So the long and short of it is there is no longer the old watertight areas, the old silos are now opening up horizontally. Everybody has to be updating on their skills, and everywhere. There is fluidity in the labour market; some are becoming movable, fungible, and others, going upwards. The RBI monetary policy has gone in for not just a sharp cut in policy repo rate, but a CRR cut also. This has taken many sections by surprise, because the liquidity was already there. Some would say this showed that the RBI had a sense of foreboding, and was in a desperate move to stave off a slowdown. Now, the RBI's front-loading in the interest of growth cannot be imputed for a knee-jerk reaction. Nor is it correct to say that the RBI is doing this, as it probably sees something which we are not. Institutions such as the RBI, which have a record of good documentation don't do things that way. RBI doesn't simply undertake interest rate reduction or increase, but explains its moves in the minutes of (monetary policy meeting) in detail, and these are put out in their entirety. Investment-driven growth is inordinately delayed. Gross fixed capital formation fell to a 3-year low of 30 per cent of the GDP in FY25, whereas the aspired rate is 35 per cent-plus. How feasible is a broad-based investment cycle, which includes the MSMEs and other segments, rather than just the big corporates? There is a buoyancy in the economy, which cannot be overstated. Had it been absent, you wouldn't have remained where you are (in terms of growth), with institutions periodically updating their forecasts (S&P has recently revised India's FY26 growth estimate upward to 6.5per cent). Or you would not have generated (consistently high) GST revenues. In fact, today, people are using the GST to indicate how strongly the economy is moving forward. (GST receipts at over 7 per cent of GDP seem to have crossed VAT/excise-era levels). In GST, the data is very clearly, openly laid. You see the states and sectors where it is getting collected from. So the economy in its multifarious indicators is showing vibrancy. Of course, we would like to have higher growth, even 10 per cent, and we are only at 6.4 per cent (gross value added in FY25). But it's still 6.4 per cent and not 2-2.5 per cent, which is where Europe, and even some of the Southeast Asian countries are. So I'm not gloating at this number, but to repeatedly lamenting it is (uncharitable) given the global scenario. If Indians are working and moving the needle despite heavy odds, we should recognise it. Countries which are known for exports are no longer able to grow with such strategy. At this time, Indian exports are doing well.—FE
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Secularism, democracy not in Congress blood: Union Minister Prahlad Joshi
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The Congress lacks the moral integrity to speak about protecting the Constitution, Union Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution Pralhad Joshi said. He was speaking after inaugurating the 50th anniversary observance of the Emergency, organised by the BJP's Thiruvananthapuram district committee on Sunday. 'Secularism and democracy are not in the blood of the Congress. The party amended the Constitution 50 times during the 21-month-long Emergency. Fundamental rights were violated. An amendment was introduced to overcome the courts as well,' he said. Joshi said the Congress government committed several heinous crimes during the Emergency. Around 2.29 lakh people were put in prisons, which had the carrying capacity of 1.83 lakh. Around 1.71 crore people were forcefully sterilised and 1,771 died due to post-surgical infection. Several persons were shot dead. Over 25,000 officers who disobeyed illegal orders from the government were dismissed from service. BJP state president Rajeev Chandrasekhar and senior leader V Muraleedharan spoke. Muraleedharan condemned the Kerala government's attempts to silence the governor on the occasion.
