
No 10 says Starmer backs Reeves after Chancellor's tears in Commons
The Chancellor was visibly tearful in the Commons, as her position came under intense scrutiny after the welfare U-turn which put an almost £5 billion black hole in her plans.
But allies said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' and No 10 said she had Sir Keir's 'full backing'.
Sir Keir, who stumbled on his way out of Downing Street for Prime Minister's Questions, faced questions over his handling of a welfare reform package which has been stripped of key elements to limit the scale of a Labour revolt.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged the Prime Minister to say whether the Chancellor would keep her job until the next election.
Sir Keir dodged the question about whether Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the Parliament, saying Badenoch 'certainly won't'.
Changes to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) were abandoned on Tuesday just 90 minutes before MPs voted on them, wiping out the savings that Ms Reeves had counted on to help meet her goal of funding day-to-day spending through tax receipts rather than borrowing.
Badenoch said: 'Today the Prime Minister refused to back his Chancellor, leaving her humiliated.
'She is the human shield for his expensive U-turns. How can anyone be a chancellor for a man who doesn't know what he believes and who changes his mind every other minute?'
As the Chancellor left the Commons after Prime Minister's Questions her sister, Ellie Reeves, took her hand in an apparent show of support.
Asked about her tears, a spokesman for the Chancellor said: 'It's a personal matter which, as you would expect, we are not going to get into.
'The Chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.'
Asked why Sir Keir did not confirm in the Commons that he still had faith in Reeves, the Prime Minister's press secretary told reporters: 'He has done so repeatedly.
'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the Prime Minister's full backing.
'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.'
Asked whether the Prime Minister still had confidence in Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, the press secretary said: 'Yes.'
Labour has promised that income tax, employee national insurance contributions and VAT will not be increased, restricting Ms Reeves' options for raising money if she does look to hike taxes.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies' incoming director, Helen Miller, said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely.
'This will doubtless intensify the speculation over the summer about which taxes may rise and by how much.'
Sir Keir declined to rule out tax rises later this year, telling MPs: 'No prime minister or chancellor ever stands at the despatch box and writes budgets in the future.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
9 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
DWP benefit cuts hit people with Parkinson's and MS
Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money. Labour backbencher Graeme Downie has proposed a welfare reform Bill amendment, so universal credit claimants with Parkinson's or MS (multiple sclerosis) who cannot work do not face repeated medical assessments to receive a payout. If MPs back his amendment, patients with 'evolving' needs who cannot work could also qualify for a higher rate of benefits. The Government's Bill has already cleared its first Commons hurdle at second reading, after work and pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms vowed not to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes coming in only after a review of the benefit. To meet his promise, ministers have had to table amendments to their own draft new law, to remove one of its seven clauses, which MPs will debate next Wednesday. Universal credit claimants with Parkinson's 'are already possibly struggling financially', Mr Downie said, ahead of the debate. He added: 'The cost of living with a condition like Parkinson's can be very high. You may well require or need additional support.' Today the UK government published its Bill that will cut eligibility criteria for, and access to, Personal Independence Payments (PIP). Here is our response 👇 🧵1/3 — Parkinson's UK (@ParkinsonsUK) June 18, 2025 The Dunfermline and Dollar MP said patients who struggle with their motor control might buy pre-chopped vegetables or chicken. 'Those things are expensive, so if you're already on universal credit and you're struggling, being able to do that significantly impacts your health, it significantly impacts your ability to live properly,' he continued. To qualify, claimants must have limited capability for work or work-related activity (LCWRA) and symptoms which 'constantly' apply. 🚨 Reminder: cuts to disability benefits affect everyone. You might not need disability benefits today. Or tomorrow. But you can become disabled at any time and find yourself in need of a financial safety net. — Scope (@scope) July 3, 2025 Mr Downie's amendment would expand these criteria to claimants with 'a fluctuating condition'. It would cover 'conditions like Parkinson's but also multiple sclerosis, ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis), long Covid and a whole range of other conditions where, you know, in the morning things could be really good and in the afternoon things could be really bad, and even hour by hour things could change', he said. 'I felt it was necessary to table an amendment to really probe what the Government's position is on this, and ensuring that people with Parkinson's and conditions like that are not excluded from even applying and being considered.' Mr Downie's proposal has backing from 23 cross-party MPs so far. Recommended reading: Juliet Tizzard, external relations director at Parkinson's UK, said: 'Criteria in the Bill say that a new claimant for the universal credit health payment will have to be 'constantly' unable to perform certain activities to qualify. 'This doesn't work for people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms change throughout the day. 'People with Parkinson's and other fluctuating conditions like multiple sclerosis will be effectively excluded from getting all the financial support they need. 'The Government has responded to our call and withdrawn the damaging restrictions to Pip. 'Now, they must do the same with the universal credit health element. The health of many people with Parkinson's is in their hands.'


ITV News
16 minutes ago
- ITV News
How Kier Starmer's government is scoring with the public one year since the North East turned red
It was just a year after his landslide election victory, but following a high-profile humiliation, Sir Keir Starmer seriously considered quitting. I'm actually talking about how he won the Labour leadership in April 2020, and has admitted he thought about stepping down after defeat at the Hartlepool by-election the following May - rather than any indication that he's considering his future as Prime Minister, following the mess made of welfare reforms this week. It is a reminder that he's succeeded in turning things around before. Then, surely more than anything, he benefited from Conservative implosion. But the late spring of 2021 is also seen as a turning point, when he moved away from a message of unity following Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, and took on the left of his party, moving it to the centre ground - from where he won a thumping majority of MPs at last summer's general election. However, any impression that he had the backing of a 400-strong army of loyal 'Starmtroopers' has now been well and truly shattered, with a rebellion against the government's plans for the benefits system leading to the low point of his premiership so far. Labour MPs from the North East and North Yorkshire were at the heart of some extraordinary scenes in the Commons on Tuesday 1 July. York Central's Rachael Maskell, author of the final amendment trying to block the bill, claimed it would lead to "Dickensian cuts" to support for some of the most vulnerable people in society. Shortly before the vote, Disability Minister Stephen Timms then announced a final huge concession - changes to eligibility for Personal Independence Payment would not take effect until after the conclusions of a review he's leading. Blyth and Ashington MP Ian Lavery angrily declared, "This is crazy, man. This is outrageous, man," about the handling of the situation. City of Durham MP Mary Kelly Foy said: "I popped out for a banana earlier on, and when I came back in, things had changed again, so I'm even more unclear on what I'm voting on." That prompted laughter from colleagues in the Commons, but there's been little reason for ministers to be amused, even if Rachel Reeves' tears at PMQs the following day were due to a "personal issue." Despite the capitulation on the contents of the welfare bill, eight Labour MPs from our region still voted against it. Most of them are firmly left-wing, part of a relatively small caucus that remains within Labour's parliamentary ranks. And, with some timing, we've now seen the announcement of plans to form a new left-wing party, involving Mr Corbyn. It's not wise, though, to get too carried away at this stage - who remembers Change UK? The biggest threat to Labour surely remains Reform UK, as evidenced in May's local elections in our region, and with opinion polls suggesting they would make huge gains across the North East and North Yorkshire if a general election was held now. Chris Eynon, who came second in Sunderland Central last year, told us: "the Red Wall is very, very prime for the taking for the Reform party." They won their first seat on North Tyneside Council this week, though also lost one to the Liberal Democrats in County Durham. That came after one of Reform's councillors resigned within days of being elected, because he also worked for the council and you're not allowed to do both. It's the kind of mishap that opponents will hope to see repeated in the coming months and years, as Reform are really tested for the first time, running Durham County Council and nine others around the country. Of course the final years of Conservative rule at Westminster became defined by a certain level of Berwick MP Anne-Marie Trevelyan was moved between six different cabinet or ministerial roles within five years. She told me this week that the Tories need to gradually rebuild confidence, trying to re-assert themselves as "the sensible party". Of course Labour pledged to bring stability, when they all but swept the board in the North East on their way into government last summer. Bridget Phillipson was the country's first confirmed MP that night, thanks to the speedy Sunderland counting system. She became one of the Prime Minister's key lieutenants as Education Secretary, and we spoke to her today (4 July) after she made a speech to teachers in the North East about making sure children are ready to start school. On the election anniversary, she told us, "We haven't got everything right and I think we'd be the first to acknowledge that, but I'm really proud of the achievements of the last year," pointing to investment in schools, free breakfast clubs, and childcare places within her remit. On room for improvement, she seemed to agree with analysis that ministers haven't been good enough at setting out a real narrative and vision, saying the government should be "clearer in communicating what we're doing". That surely applies to any focus on supporting regions like the North East to tackle regional inequalities - what the Conservatives used to call "levelling up". More quietly, Labour have looked to work closely with regional mayors, and tweaked borrowing and value-for-money rules to allow longer-term investment. We've seen the announcement of the Tyne and Wear Metro being extended to Washington, but also the cancellation of plans to upgrade the A1 in Northumberland. The recent spending review promised investment in 350 deprived areas around the UK, which it's expected will mean funding for things like youth clubs, libraries and community-run grocers, in an effort to bring visible change. That does feel similar to the last government's various funding pots for local regeneration schemes. More widely, Labour ministers argue they have set their own direction by making "tough decisions." It's too early for much data to show whether they've set the country on the right course. But, for example, the future of the two-child benefit cap was a controversial topic when I interviewed Bridget Phillipson a week into her new government role last July, and it's an issue that remains to be resolved now. Another fight with Labour MPs looks likely - particularly with expected welfare savings now lost, the Chancellor having pledged not to raise taxes on "working people", and little sign of roaring economic growth materialising. The next year doesn't look much easier.


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How to balance the UK books: six options open to Rachel Reeves
Rachel Reeves is under pressure to tackle a multibillion-pound shortfall in the government finances. Labour's high-stakes welfare U-turn and a spike in bond markets triggered by speculation over the chancellor's position has dragged the government's tax and spending plans into the spotlight. Ministers have warned of 'financial consequences' after the backtracking on disability benefits and winter fuel payments for pensioners, which have a price tag north of £6bn. Alongside a sluggish economic outlook and potential downgrade in productivity forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility at the autumn budget, economists at Deutsche Bank warn that Reeves could face a £30bn shortfall against her self-imposed fiscal rules. This has raised questions over how the chancellor responds. Reeves has several options: Likelihood: 1/5 Reeves has said her fiscal rules are 'iron-clad' and 'non-negotiable,' despite mounting economic headwinds that have made them tougher to meet. Her primary target rule requires revenue to meet day-to-day spending by 2029-30. From next year, there is a little extra wriggle room: the rule will shift to a rolling three-year target, and will require the day-to-day budget to be in surplus or deficit by no more than 0.5% of GDP. Several leading economists argue the fiscal rules are not fit for purpose and ought to be replaced, with pressure growing from within Labour ranks, too. Many economists, however, warn that financial markets would balk at higher borrowing. Part of the issue is that Britain's fiscal rules have been repeatedly changed before, testing patience in financial markets. Aiming to hit the rules by a fine margin, weak economic growth, higher interest rates and already elevated debt levels also make conditions challenging. Likelihood: 2/5 After the U-turns on the welfare bill and pensioners' winter fuel payments, the government's ability to find politically feasible budget savings has taken a heavy blow. Labour outlined its priorities up to the next general election at last month's high-profile spending review, which makes it challenging for the chancellor to find further savings. Reopening talks with her cabinet colleagues from a weakened position, so soon after the spending review, would be a tough ask. To make way for bigger cash injections for health and defence the spending review settlements for some departments already entailed cuts in real terms, with the Home Office among the biggest losers. All departments were also tasked with finding savings of at least 5% by the end of the decade. However, some economists say the size of the British state is climbing at an unsustainable rate. Spending as a share of GDP is forecast to remain permanently higher than pre-pandemic levels, at about 44%. A fresh round of cuts would imperil Labour's promises to fix Britain's battered public services and for 'no return to austerity'. They could come with severe political costs if voters saw little progress before the next election. 'Recent events have confirmed one thing: spending cuts have likely reached their political limits,' said Sanjay Raja, senior economist at Deutsche Bank. Likelihood: 3/5 Labour made a manifesto promise not to increase income tax, VAT and employee national insurance contributions (NICs). While party strategists felt this was vital to win the general election, most economists think it was a serious mistake. Several leading experts argue the chancellor should reconsider. Raising the basic rate of income tax by 1p would yield an extra £8bn a year, while a 2p increase in employee NICs would result in about £10bn. The consultancy Capital Economics said one option could be to introduce a new variant of income tax, for example through a new health and social care or defence levy – similar to the plan made by Boris Johnson that was scrapped by Liz Truss. Some economists highlight the £20bn worth of cuts to employee national insurance contributions made in the final months of the last Tory government. Viewed by many as a post-election trap for Labour Reeves did not oppose them. Reversing this position now would be tougher , but could be done by blaming the Tories for an irresponsible and unsustainable decision. One more palatable option could be to extend a freeze on personal tax thresholds. First introduced by the Tories in 2021, the 'stealth' tax-raising measure drags people into paying the higher rate of income tax. Due to end in 2028, a two-year extension would raise £8bn a year extra by 2029-30. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Reeves has previously vowed not to repeat anything of the scale of her £40bn tax-raising autumn budget, and has said Britain's tax levels as a share of the economy are already at record levels. While the UK tax bill is historically high, at about 35%, it remains below many comparable advanced economies; including France, Germany, and the high-tax and spend Nordic states. Likelihood: 4/5 Reeves could dust off a memo from Angela Rayner sent to her before the March spring statement, in which the deputy prime minister urged the chancellor to consider a series of wealth taxes to raise up to £4bn a year. Suggestions included ending inheritance tax relief on shares listed on the smaller Aim stock market, scrapping the £500 dividend tax-free allowance, and freezing the threshold at which the 45p additional income tax rate applies. With voters broadly supporting higher taxes on wealth, and facing mounting pressure from her own backbenchers, such measures would be politically astute. One option could be to target the pension tax free lump sum. At present, individuals can withdraw 25% of a pension pot up to £268,000 as a tax-free lump sum. Restricting this to £100,000 could raise about £2bn a year. Another commonly floated idea, adding pensions to inheritance tax, could also raise about £2bn. Likelihood: 3/5 Reeves has tried to court business leaders and pledged not to raise the headline rate of corporation tax. However, businesses bore the brunt of her October budget through a £25bn increase in employer NICs, and are loudly warning that further tax rises would hit jobs and growth. Rayner's memo suggested raising corporation tax rate for banks. Reeves has prioritised supporting the City of London. However, banks have benefited from higher interest rates, as well as a windfall on reserves held at the Bank of England under its quantitative easing programme, which is losing the Treasury money. Reversing a Tory-era cut to a levy on bank balance sheets, from 8% to 3%, could raise about £1.5bn. Other options could include higher taxes on the gambling industry, raising about £3bn. Breaking the manifesto promise on headline corporation tax could raise about £4bn through a one percentage-point increase. Likelihood: 2/5 Economic conditions have turned against Reeves since the autumn, but the chancellor could get lucky. Britain's economy grew at the fastest rate in the G7 in the first quarter and the Bank has cut interest rates twice in 2025. City investors are betting on at least two more reductions. Despite Wednesday's bond market wobble, the UK's borrowing costs are still lower than earlier this year. If sustained, this could lead to improved forecasts for the government's debt servicing costs from the OBR. Monthly borrowing figures coming in below predicted levels would also help. The chancellor will be hoping efforts on deregulation, infrastructure investment, and labour market support could bolster the economic outlook. Trade deals with the US, India, and closer ties with the EU could also help. However, economists warn a rapid turnaround is unlikely. Labour's tax increases introduced in April have weighed down activity, while geopolitical tensions and Donald Trump's trade wars cloud the global outlook.