Study: Real-world results of GLP-1 drugs don't match trials
Real-world results for blockbuster weight-loss meds like Ozempic, Wegovy and Zepbound aren't as impressive as those promised by the drugs' clinical trials, a new study says.
People taking such GLP-1 drugs lost just under 9% of their body weight on average after a year, researchers reported Tuesday in the journal Obesity.
That's far less than the 15% to 21% body weight reduction promised by the clinical trials that led to the approval of Wegovy (semaglutide) and Zepbound (tirzepatide) for weight loss, researchers said.
"Patients treated for obesity with semaglutide or trizepatide lost less weight on average in a regular clinical setting compared to what is observed in randomized clinical trial," lead investigator Hamlet Gasoyan said in a news release. He is a researcher at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Value-Based Care Research.
People taking the drugs in real-world settings appear to be more likely to quit taking the meds, researchers said. They also might be prescribed lower dosages in clinical practice than were used in the drug trials.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) drugs mimic the GLP-1 hormone, which helps control insulin and blood sugar levels, decreases appetite and slows digestion of food.
For this study, researchers tracked nearly 7,900 patients being treated by the Cleveland Clinic for severe obesity, of whom about 6,100 were prescribed semaglutide and the rest tirzepatide.
Average body weight loss after a year was nearly 9% for the whole group, results show.
But weight loss varied based on when a person stopped taking the drugs, researchers found.
Average weight loss was under 4% for those who stopped treatment early, versus nearly 7% or those who stopped later on, the study says. Those who stayed on their medications lost an average 12% body weight.
Results also show that more than 4 in 5 (81%) of patients were prescribed a low maintenance dose of their GLP-1 drug, and that made a difference as well.
People who stayed on their meds and received high doses lost nearly 14% of their body weight with semaglutide and 18% with tirzepatide.
"Our findings about the real-world use patterns of these medications and associated clinical outcomes could inform the decisions of health care providers and their patients on the role of treatment discontinuation and maintenance dosage in achieving clinically meaningful weight reductions," Gasoyan said.
Overall, patients had higher odds of losing 10% or more of their body weight after a year if they remained on their meds, were prescribed a high dosage, were taking tirzepatide rather than semaglutide, and were female, results show.
The cost of the drugs and problems were insurance were a common reason for patients stopping GLP-1 treatment, along with side effects and medication shortages, researchers said.
Staying on the GLP-1 meds particularly helped the nearly 17% of patients who had prediabetes, a condition in which elevated blood sugar levels increase a person's risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.
About 68% of those who stuck with their treatment wound up with normal blood sugar levels, compared with 41% who stopped taking the drugs later in the study and 33% who stopped earlier.
"Type 2 diabetes is one of the most common complications of obesity, so diabetes prevention is very important," Gasoyan said. "This study highlights that treatment discontinuation, especially early, negatively affects both weight and glycemic control outcomes."
A follow-up study is in the works to better track why patients stop taking their GLP-1 drugs, researchers said.
More information
Harvard Medical School has more on GLP-1 drugs.
Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Citi Expresses Optimism for Eli Lilly and Company (LLY)
Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) is one of the 13 Best Long Term Growth Stocks to Invest in Right Now. On June 25, Citi reported that 'compelling' data shows that Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) and Novo Nordisk (NVO) have turned obesity into a treatable disease from a lifestyle-based condition. The firm models more than $40 billion in obesity sales by 2030, well above the consensus estimates of $25 billion. Citi stated that as the obesity space evolves from injectables to convenient orals, such as orforglipron, the emergence of a 'dynamic' consumer-centric market is possible, and LillyDirect by Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) is well-positioned to connect high consumer visibility for orforglipron with global access. In a research note, Citi further stated that it estimated penetration rates via income-based tiers for pricing and out-of-pocket costs in low- and mid-body mass index patients. The results place Eli Lilly and Company's (NYSE:LLY) consumer platform opportunity at $15B, which is not assumed in the firm's model. It thus believes that Eli Lilly and Company's (NYSE:LLY) is in a position to expedite access outside the US, employing a centralized out-of-pocket payment model instead of the traditional country-by-country launch. It contended that an 'income-based tiered pricing of orforglipron via LillyDirect could unlock unprecedented volume, all the while allowing it to maintain overall pricing power.' Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) develops, manufactures, discovers, and sells pharmaceutical products. These products span oncology, diabetes, immunology, neuroscience, and other therapies. Investors are bullish on Eli Lilly and Company (NYSE:LLY) due to its in-demand GLP-1 drugs, used to treat diabetes and obesity, which are still in their early growth stages, and the company's strong financials. While we acknowledge the potential of LKQ as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Make healthy food more appealing, government tells supermarkets
Food businesses must make it easier for customers to buy healthy food, under new government plans announced on Sunday. Supermarkets and food manufacturers in England will partner with the government to tackle obesity rates by encouraging people to make their weekly shop healthier. Ministers say it will be up to food retailers to decide how they do that, but it could involve offering promotions on healthy food, tweaking loyalty points to incentivise healthy options, or changing shop layouts. It may also involve changing products to make them healthier. It is hoped the plans will help to make healthy eating more accessible to customers and relieve pressure on the NHS. The policy will see major food retailers report on healthy food sales in a bid to increase accountability, but it does not impose specific targets. The plan is part of a raft of measures aimed at improving the health of the nation that will be included in the 10-year plan for the NHS in England, which is expected to be published next week. "Unless we curb the rising tide of cost and demand, the NHS risks becoming unsustainable," Health Secretary Wes Streeting said. "This government's ambition for kids today is for them to be part of the healthiest generation of children ever. That is within our grasp." The upcoming report will show that more than one in five children are living with obesity by the time they leave primary school, rising to almost one in three in the most deprived areas. A recent report found a basket of healthy food costs more than double that of less healthy options. The Food Foundation reported that 1,000 calories of healthy food such as fruit and veg costs £8.80, compared to £4.30 for the equivalent amount of less healthy food, such as ready meals and processed meats. Andrew Opie of the British Retail Consortium said the news is "really positive" but said "all food businesses" must work together to drive down obesity. "Engaging all food businesses makes a difference," Opie told the BBC. "It can't just be about supermarkets- we consume about a quarter of our calories outside the home, so unless we get all supermarkets, food retailers, and restaurants on board, we won't move the dial on obesity." Opie said that he agreed with the government's flexible approach on the standards, as businesses have "a lot of insights and data" into how we shop for food and what would be best for their customers. Katharine Jenner, director of the Obesity Health Alliance said: "The government has rightly identified the root cause of obesity-related ill health: a food system that makes healthy eating difficult." She said it was encouraging to see the government putting the spotlight on businesses "rather than placing the burden on individuals who are already struggling to get by." Alongside the new partnership, the government said it will also: Offer shopping vouchers to customers in return for being active and eating healthily, via a new app Double the number of spaces on the NHS Digital Weight Management Programme, which supports obese individuals with either diabetes or high blood pressure Introduce stricter rules on advertising alcohol to in line with current regulation on promoting junk food It is hoped the new guidance will reduce people's sugar and calorie intake overall. The government cited research showing that cutting just 50 calories a day would lift 340,000 children and two million adults out of obesity. If everyone who is overweight reduced their calorie intake by just 216 calories a day, which is equivalent to a single bottle of fizzy drink, obesity would be halved, researchers said. This is not the first time the government has sought voluntary partnerships with industry. Over the last 20 years there has been numerous food reformulation programmes aimed at reducing salt, sugar and calories in certain foods. Success has been mixed with a push to reduce sugar in certain foods by 20% between 2015 and 2020 falling well short. Sarah Woolnough, from The King's Fund think tank, said while welcome, the impact of the scheme may be limited. 'A lot of less healthy food and drink is purchased from local convenience shops and takeaways. 'The stark fact remains that unhealthy food is far cheaper and more readily available and so unless this change is part of a wider, comprehensive strategy it will not be enough.' Support not shame to tackle obesity - health chief
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supermarkets to introduce healthy food standard under government plans to tackle obesity
A healthy food standard will be introduced for supermarkets and other retailers as part of government plans to tackle obesity levels in the UK.