Judge Says Feds Can't Withhold Money From State EV Charger Programs
CORTE MADERA, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 15: In an aerial view, Tesla cars recharge at a Tesla charger station on February 15, 2023 in Corte Madera, California. Electric car company Tesla is partnering with the U.S. federal government to expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the United States. Tesla announced plans to open an estimated 7,500 of its Tesla Superchargers in the country to all brands of electric vehicles by the end of 2024.The latest car news, reviews, and features.
When the Trump administration vowed earlier this year to claw back funds that had previously been awarded for the construction of new electric vehicle charging infrastructure, a California representative slammed the move as 'unconstitutional.' On Tuesday, a U.S. district judge in Washington State stopped short of agreeing, but found merit in the plaintiffs' argument in a suit filed by California, 15 other states and the District of Columbia, that the administration acted illegally. Judge Tana Lin said it was likely that the states will ultimately win, giving the admin a week to re-open its coffers—or, more likely, to appeal the ruling, which may be destined for the Supreme Court, Reuters reports.
The sixteen states who sued the administration claimed that the administration's move to cut funding would result in immediate financial harm, citing the money already spent on their contributions to the infrastructure projects for which they'd received federal funding approval. Judge Tin carved out exceptions for two of them (Minnesota and Vermont) in her ruling, along with the District of Columbia, as they failed to demonstrate how they'd been monetarily impacted by the administration's actions.
President Trump began targeting Biden-era EV mandates almost immediately after taking office again. His administration is attempting to roll back the expansion of charging infrastructure, federal incentives for private EV purchases, and the federal government's expansion of its own electrified fleet. Judge Tin's ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks for the administration, which is facing both legal and legislative hurdles to its initiatives.
During his first term, Trump's administration pushed hard to not only roll back federal emissions standards, but to weaken the power of individual states to set their own limits on internal-combustion engines. The administration's campaign against California and its coalition of blue-leaning 'CARB states' seemed decisive at first, but all of its early victories were ultimately for naught, as the Supreme Court ultimately sided with the states over the federal government. It's a battle Trump has pledged to take up again in his second term, but it's unclear what avenue the admin will be able to pursue that wasn't explored previously; anything setting a permanent framework would likely have to be approved by Congress, where the Republican majority is slim.
Got a tip? Send it our way at tips@thedrive.com.
.article-sidebar]:pt-0>
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants Canada's digital services tax gone before trade talks resume
U.S. President Donald Trump says he's ending all trade discussions with Canada to hit back at Ottawa for slapping a tax on web giants — and he wants it removed before negotiations can begin again. Canada and the U.S. have been locked in talks to get Trump to lift his punishing tariffs on Canadian goods, levies that have already led to major economic dislocations, job losses and a drop in southbound exports. Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney agreed at the G7 last week to reach some agreement on the trade dispute within 30 days. Speaking in the Oval Office on Friday afternoon, Trump said the U.S. has "such power over Canada," and that he's upset the country is following a taxation strategy similar to Europe's. "It's not going to work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it," he said of imposing the DST, which was passed into law last year with a delayed application."We're going to stop all negotiations with Canada right now until they straighten out their act," he said. Asked if there's anything Canada can do to appease him, Trump said Ottawa could remove the tax. "They will," he said. "They do most of their business with us. When you have that circumstance, you treat people better." Earlier Friday, Trump posted on social media he may impose some sort of blanket tariff on Canadian goods as retribution for the DST, which will primarily hit U.S. firms since it targets only the biggest earners. Speaking briefly to reporters before Trump's Oval Office comments, Carney said he hadn't talked with Trump that day. "We'll continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," Carney said. He did not address a reporter's question about whether his government is prepared to drop the DST — something the Business Council of Canada is calling on Ottawa to do in exchange for U.S. tariff relief. Set to take effect on June 30, the DST would have U.S. companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb pay a three per cent levy on revenue from Canadian users. The policy will apply retroactively, leaving U.S. companies with a $2-billion US bill due at the end of the month. These global digital firms are often able to skirt paying taxes in the countries where they operate, and the last Liberal government pitched the DST as a way to bring the tax code up to date and capture revenues earned in Canada by firms located abroad. U.S. long opposed DST It's been a bone of contention between Canada and the U.S. for years, with former president Joe Biden's ambassador to Canada warning during his tenure that, if a DST was enacted, the U.S. would hit back. While Canada and other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries had been discussing some sort of global DST, the Trudeau government decided to move ahead with its own tax rather than wait for co-ordinated action. Carney's finance minister, François-Philippe Champagne, said last week Ottawa planned to enact the tax even while negotiations with Trump are ongoing. That's what's prompted the president's ire. "We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products, has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country," Trump said. WATCH | Foreign Affairs minister on the trade war: As he has done in the past, Trump mischaracterized Canada's tariff regime on U.S. dairy products. The high tariff rates Trump frequently cites are only applied if U.S. exports exceed a set "tariff-rate quota," something that has never happened. Trump's own Department of Agriculture noted earlier this year that almost all agricultural products traded between the United States and Canada are free of tariffs. In an interview with CBC's Power & Politics, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand said supply management, which places limits on certain products, including dairy, to ensure stable prices, is a "cornerstone" Canadian economic policy that is "extremely important." Anand said that despite Trump's threats, Canada will push ahead with trying to broker a deal that's in the best interest of workers and businesses, "while at the same time ensuring we diversify our supply chains so we are never again dependent on one economy." She touted the New EU-Canada Strategic Partnership of the Future that Carney brokered with the European Union earlier this week. Trump's abrupt decision to call off negotiations may have caught Canadian officials off guard. Speaking to CBC Radio's The House hours before Trump's post, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said Canada's negotiators "continue to be optimistic about the constructive tone" between the two countries. Still, Candace Laing, president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said there have been signs the "tone and tenor of talks has improved in recent months." Trump and Carney have had two friendly meetings in that time, and she hopes to see "progress continue" despite Trump's apparent attempt to derail the talks. "Negotiations go through peaks and valleys. With deadlines approaching, some last-minute surprises should be expected," Laing said.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry and Meghan at heart of King's funeral plans
There has been increasing talk of olive branches and reconciliation between the King and Prince Harry. Much of it has been conveyed, on the Duke of Sussex's side at least, through television interviews; his emotion, anger and frustration on full display. From Buckingham Palace, there has been little said on the record. Beyond the occasional frustrated shrug, royal aides have kept their counsel, determined not to fan the flames of this deeply personal rift in public. But behind the scenes, the King is very much hopeful that he will be reunited with Prince Harry and that he might still build a relationship with his two California-based grandchildren. Opportunities would seem to present themselves at the next iteration of the Duke's Invictus Games, due to take place in Birmingham in 2027, and the King's 80th birthday celebrations the following year. Given that set-piece royal events are planned years in advance, it is possible to cast the net further into the unknown. Indeed, The Telegraph can reveal that the King has factored not only the Duke but the Duchess of Sussex and their two children, Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, three, into the heart of his funeral plans. Credit: BBC Whenever the time comes, the monarch is adamant that his youngest son take his rightful place at the centre of his family, perhaps mindful of that final chance to create family harmony. There is no suggestion that the King's reign will not continue for many more years. Planning for such set-piece ceremonial events begins sometimes decades in advance, evolving over time through briefings with senior representatives from the Royal household, the police, the military and the Church. The Telegraph understands that the Sussexes remain enveloped in the King's funeral plans at the highest level, with the Duke expected to walk side by side with his brother, by then the King, at the forefront of the sombre processions through the streets of central London. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be invited to take part in the family vigil during the lying in state at Westminster Hall and play a prominent role alongside the most senior royals during the funeral service. Arrangements have also been made for Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, the King's youngest grandchildren, to attend the funeral service at Westminster Abbey, as well as the committal at St George's Chapel, Windsor, should they wish. While the vast majority of the state funeral, codenamed as for all monarchs Operation London Bridge, will look and feel much like Elizabeth II's, the King has made some changes to the plans, which are reflective of his own personal beliefs. His lifelong dedication to the environment is expected to be recognised with the incorporation of sustainable elements wherever possible. Meanwhile, the period of royal mourning will be reduced, bringing it into line with the period of national mourning. This will begin on the King's death and last until the day of his funeral, 10 or 11 days later. When Elizabeth II died in September 2022, the period of royal mourning continued for a further week after the funeral. As always, detailed plans cover every eventuality in terms of the potential location of the King's death, with procedures in place to transport the monarch's coffin from each royal residence to Buckingham Palace. However, while the royal train was factored into plans for the late Queen's death in Scotland, that mode of transport is now thought to have been removed from any royal death plans. In the event, plans to use the train in 2022 were scrapped over fears for public safety and disruption, with the Queen's body instead flown to RAF Northolt in London, accompanied by the Princess Royal. Buckingham Palace aides insisted that the King's funeral plans had not been finalised and cautioned against speculation. The King, who is still undergoing weekly cancer treatment, maintains a full work schedule with planning underway for engagements and events well into the future. The inclusion of the Sussexes in the plans, however, will prove a talking point. Their involvement, not just throughout the public-facing ceremonial elements, but behind the scenes in briefings and rehearsals, will avoid further rupturing relations with the couple. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are thought to have returned home on the day after Elizabeth II's funeral feeling more ostracised than ever, their new status in the general hierarchy having been made abundantly clear. Barely on speaking terms with several of their closest relatives, the lack of communication between Buckingham Palace and their own office was blamed for various dramas, from a mistaken invitation to a state reception to confusion over military uniforms, not to mention differing versions of exactly when Prince Harry learnt of his grandmother's death. At the King's Coronation eight months later, the Duke cut a lonely, peripheral figure. He made a dash straight from Westminster Abbey to the airport, opting not to join the rest of his family for lunch at Buckingham Palace, and was not in any of the official portraits that captured the moment for the history books. The Duke was said to have been determined to make it back to the family home in Montecito in order to kiss his son, Prince Archie, goodnight on his fourth birthday. By putting aside any differences and signing off plans that place the Sussexes at the heart of his funeral, the King will ensure that his final public act brings his family together. While the Duke has vowed never to bring his family back to the UK unless he can guarantee full police protection, they would automatically be enveloped into the official security operation for such a state occasion. Elizabeth II's death marked the first time in history that the grandchildren of a monarch had taken part in ceremonial events that followed. All eight, from Peter Phillips, the eldest at 44, to James, Viscount Severn, the youngest at 14, stood vigil around her coffin as she lay in state at Westminster Hall. At the King's request, Prince Harry wore military uniform for the first time since 2020. The cousins stood in silence with their heads bowed as members of the public continued to file past. The family vigil following the King's funeral is likely to look rather different, not least owing to the relatively young ages of his grandchildren. While Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis, currently aged 11, 10 and seven, will almost certainly be involved in some of the most public-facing elements of the mourning period, they would be shielded from certain duties. Prince Louis, then four, did not join his elder siblings at Elizabeth II's funeral. Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, while factored into current plans as the grandchildren of the monarch, may similarly be considered too young or simply not equipped to be thrust into the global spotlight in such circumstances. Similarly, younger members of the King's family such as Zara and Mike Tindall's children, Mia, 10, Lucas, six, and Lucas, three, Princess Beatrice's daughters, Sienna, three and Athena, six months, and stepson Wolfie, eight, and Princess Eugenie's sons, August, four, and Ernest, two, are likely to have been factored in but may not be involved. During planning for royal funerals, each member of the family is given a different, bridge-themed codename. As heir to the throne, the King's plans were codenamed Operation Menai Bridge, while his elder son's were Operation Clare Bridge. Prince William's plans are now codenamed Menai Bridge.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Key Factors That Make AT&T (T) a Top Pick for 2025
AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) is one of the Best Stocks to Buy for Dividends. Ken Wolter / In recent years, the company has moved away from non-core businesses such as DirecTV and Time Warner, refocusing on its core operations in wireless and fiber connectivity. This renewed focus allows the company to better meet growing customer expectations for faster and more dependable service. As a result, profit margins have improved, cash flow has shown consistent growth, and the company has reduced its debt by $45 billion since John Stankey became CEO in July 2020. Secondly, AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) typically competes in a limited field, mainly with Verizon and T-Mobile in wireless, and smaller regional players in cable. With few rivals able to match its scale, the company benefits from long-term stability. Its continued investment in fiber strengthens this advantage. As telecom remains essential to daily life, AT&T is well-positioned for lasting success through 2030 and beyond. In addition, AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) maintains a solid cash position, providing enough support for its dividend payments. Over the past twelve months, the company generated $40.2 billion in operating cash flow and $14.4 billion in levered free cash flow. Although investors may hope for higher free cash flow to cover capital spending, reduce debt, or raise dividends, the current levels are sufficient to maintain the company's existing dividend. AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) currently offers a quarterly dividend of $0.2775 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.98%, as of June 25. While we acknowledge the potential of T as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
