Northern Ont. woman charged in two armed robberies at a convenience store
The Thunder Bay Police Service's Break and Enter, Auto Theft and Robbery (BEAR) Unit led the investigation after the suspect allegedly stole merchandise from the business on June 24.
'When confronted by a staff member, the suspect brandished a weapon and made threats,' police said in a news release.
Linked to second incident
Further investigation revealed the same suspect was involved in a similar robbery at the same location only the day before.
On July 17, members of the BEAR Unit, with assistance from other officers, located and arrested the woman at a residence on Windsor Street.
The accused is charged with two counts of robbery with a weapon.
She appeared in court on Friday and was remanded into custody, with a future court date scheduled.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
21 minutes ago
- CBC
Zoom-bombing concerns prompt Ontario to halt full public access to virtual court
Social Sharing An increasing number of Zoom bombings infiltrating Ontario courtrooms now means the public is banned from attending proceedings virtually. On Wednesday, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Katie Wood sent a memo to court staff across the province saying "the public will not be permitted to observe proceedings virtually." "If the public would like to attend, they will be required to do so in person," the memo said. Virtual court hearings became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic that set in over five years ago, and since then, more concerns have been raised about Zoom bombings. Typically, it's when participants in a video conferencing meeting have had their screens hijacked by someone who's placed words and images on the screen or disrupted the call's audio. Wood's memo noted there's been a notable rise in "Zoom-bombing incidents ... involving offensive content and targeted behaviour that have disrupted court proceedings." Gytis Pabedinskas, a Windsor defence lawyer, has been in court on two occasions when Zoom bombers appeared. "When the account went in, it started playing a pornographic [video] as well as had some audio playing where it was calling the judge an N-word," said Pabedinskas. Even though these incidents are disturbing, local defence lawyer Laura Joy said the courts could have better utilized technology to prevent interruptions instead of instituting a virtual ban for the public. "I understand why they're doing it, but I'm very hopeful that everybody will keep in mind the fundamental cornerstone of Canadian justice is transparency and open courts to the public," said Joy. Concerns over removing public virtual access Noel Semple, an associate professor in the University of Windsor's faculty of law, also said removing the public's virtual access to courtrooms is problematic. "The open court principle is quite foundational in the Canadian legal system. Justice is not supposed to be in private, in darkened back rooms. It's supposed to be done in public. We should be doing everything we can to honour that principle." Victims or complainants who want to appear virtually for their court matters must seek prior approval, Wood's memo says. The media also must get permission before observing court virtually. The memo goes on to warn court staff about "Zoom bomber tactics," such as them posing as correctional institutions, interpreters or even police departments. In a statement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of the Attorney General noted the observer policy is available online and members of the public are permitted to attend court, in person. 'Come on down to the courthouse' Defence lawyer Linda McCurdy applauds Zoom access being removed for observers. McCurdy has been practising law for nearly 30 years, while virtual court only materialized in recent years. "I don't view it at all as restricting or taking away something," she said about Wood's announcement. "It's making sure that the court process is protecting from the kind of stuff that's going on. "If you want to participate, if you want to view, come on down to the courthouse," she added. Since the pandemic, she's seen formalities slip. McCurdy said she's been in court when witnesses attending virtually are laying in bed or walking their dog, or an observer was heard going to the bathroom. "They don't really take it seriously."
CBC
21 minutes ago
- CBC
Toronto police took over an hour to respond to brutal assault, victim says
Social Sharing A Toronto man who says he was the victim of a brutal assault last month says police and paramedics took over an hour to respond to multiple 911 calls, and in that time, another person was attacked. Peter Henry told CBC Toronto he was beaten on June 25 in the stairwell of the alternative housing building where he lives and works as the property manager. He says the assailant was the guest of a tenant and appeared to be on drugs. The attack left him with four broken ribs, a fractured shin bone and a dislocated shoulder, he says. He says he waited for police and paramedics for about 40 minutes before deciding to take a taxi to a nearby hospital. Police arrived at the building on Mutual Street, south of Gerrard Street E., about an hour after he left, he says. But by then, a witness told CBC Toronto that the attacker had already choked another tenant and bitten off part of his earlobe. "911 let us down… Toronto Police Services [has] let me down several times as a property manager. This is the worst," Henry said, sitting in a wheelchair. "This is really disturbing." The attack raises questions about the police's 911 response times and whether they can keep up with demand. As CBC Toronto has previously reported, the volume of 911 calls has grown substantially in recent years, and response times have gotten longer. To address the problem, police launched an upgrade to the system in a bid to eliminate calls that were bogging down the emergency line and vowed to hire more people. Still, delays in emergency response times persist. WATCH | 9 11 caller says he was left on hold for several minutes: Neighbours say they were on hold for several minutes while shooting victim was still alive 1 month ago "We're not protecting the most unprotected," Henry said. "That, to me, is a failure in the system." Busy night across the city, police say In an emailed statement to CBC Toronto, police spokesperson Stephanie Sayer confirmed that the first of nine calls to 911 concerning the attack was made at 5:42 p.m. Police got to the apartment at 7:17 p.m. Toronto police in the area and across the city were dealing with "an exceptionally high-volume evening," Sayer wrote. "Officers in 51 Division were actively responding to multiple priority emergency calls during that same period, including a person armed with a knife, a threat of suicide, an intimate partner assault, multiple wanted persons, a person in crisis, and an Echo-tier call requiring an immediate joint response from police, fire, and paramedics, among others," she said. An Echo-tier call is among the highest priority levels assigned to 911 calls. Shortly after officers arrived, they arrested a 32-year-old man with no fixed address, Sayer said, and confirmed there were two victims. One was assaulted inside the building, the other outside and both had serious but non-life threatening injuries. The suspect now faces nine charges, including aggravated assault, assault causing bodily harm and uttering death threats. Henry wonders if emergency responders would have arrived sooner had he said something different to the 911 dispatcher. "Maybe if I'd said 'There's weapons involved', they might have," he said. In the last year, the average police response time has fallen from 17 minutes to 13, Sayer said. Still, what happened that evening speaks to "real-time pressures faced by frontline officers responding to multiple high-priority emergencies in a large city like Toronto," she said. "We are reviewing the circumstances around this call." Toronto Paramedic Services is doing the same and also experienced more calls than usual that evening, spokesperson Jennifer Chung said in an email. 'The whole thing was just traumatizing' The ordeal began with complaints from residents about a man who didn't live there, Henry said. The first time Henry told him that he needed a resident escort to stay, everything was fine. But the second time he told the suspect to leave, he became violent, Henry said. The man chased him, kicked him down a set of stairs, punched and kicked him more as he lay on the ground, he said. "I was banging on the door with my one hand that was free and screaming for help," Henry recounted. Suddenly, the man left, and eventually, a resident found Henry and called 911, he said. If it wasn't for campus security at the nearby Toronto Metropolitan University jumping into action, the suspect wouldn't have been arrested, says Mark Jackson, a tenant who witnessed the incident and also serves as board president at Myrmex Non-Profit Housing Inc. But by the time campus police arrived just after 7 p.m., "it was too little, too late," because another person had been assaulted outside the building and other people were put in danger, Jackson said. He calls the police's response time 'unconscionable.' "It was absolutely horrendous, unacceptable and very potentially even more tragic than it was," he said. "The whole thing was just traumatizing and tragic." This isn't the first time the building has faced safety concerns, Henry and Jackson said, but Myrmex can't afford to hire security. Henry says he's hoping to talk to Mayor Olivia Chow about the issue and intends to make a formal complaint with the police. "I don't want anybody having to deal with this ever again," he said.
CBC
21 minutes ago
- CBC
'Too many unanswered questions' in William Bryant's killing to make NCR ruling, judge says
Social Sharing An Ottawa judge has taken the rare step of asking counsel to expand on and clarify some evidence in the 2023 killing of an Amnesty International worker, and said that without it, she's unable to decide whether the man accused of murder should be found not criminally responsible (NCR) due to mental disorder. Superior Court Justice Anne London-Weinstein told court last week there are still "too many unanswered questions" about the relationship between the victim and the accused, whether the accused might have known what he did was wrong, and whether he might have had a motive. She also wants to be assured that a forensic psychiatrist who testified conducted a thorough review, and that the matter wasn't "rushed." William Bryant, 74, was found dead in the stairwell of an apartment building on May 9, 2023. Ahmed Ismail, now 46, who lived in the building, was charged with second-degree murder. Crown, defence agree on proposed NCR finding "To state the obvious, this is a murder trial where a 74-year-old man — who, according to his friends, was a kind and gentle person who tried to help others — was brutally and senselessly slashed in the throat and left for dead in a public stairway," London-Weinstein said in court Friday as she explained the reason for her lack of a decision to a courtroom gallery that included people expecting a decision and prepared to give victim impact statements. "The stakes could not be higher for Mr. Ismail or for the public, who are relying on the court to arrive at the correct conclusion." Assistant Crown prosecutor Marie Dufort and defence lawyer Richard Addelman jointly proposed at a hearing in April that Ismail should be found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder, and the Crown called an expert witness — forensic psychiatrist Dr. Joel Watts — to testify to that effect. On Friday, London-Weinstein said she's satisfied that Ismail suffers from schizophrenia, resulting in psychosis and paranoid delusions, and added that there's a "significant body of evidence" that Ismail may have been not criminally responsible at the time of the killing because he was incapable of knowing his actions were wrong. But Watts was not subjected to questioning under cross-examination, and therefore "no critical evaluation of [his] evidence could occur," London-Weinstein said. Nature of relationship still unclear The judge repeatedly said Dufort had the best interest of justice in mind by acting as she did in leading Watts's evidence, but that London-Weinstein's role as gatekeeper required her to reach this conclusion. Things the judge is concerned about include, but aren't limited to: That there was no explanation for why an original psychiatric opinion was deemed insufficient, requiring Watts to be brought in to provide his opinion. That the nature of Ismail and Bryant's relationship remains unclear, and some circumstantial evidence suggests it may have been romantic (which, if true, could speak to motive). That Watts didn't watch Ismail's "critically important" statement to police because the file was corrupted, and that Watts didn't appear to understand the significance of Ismail denying that he knew Bryant at all during that statement (which could speak to knowing that his actions were wrong). That Watts didn't review other evidence, and that he met with Ismail only once for four hours in jail. Judges can't order counsel to call specific evidence. An amicus curiae, or friend of the court, could be appointed to ask Watts questions under cross examination, but London-Weinstein said she'd give counsel time to think everything over and suggest how to "cure the deficiencies" in the record at a later date.
