DRDO-Bharat Forge develop an assault rifle lighter than a kitchen pressure cooker, built for urban warfare
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (
DRDO
) and
Bharat Forge
have jointly developed a new Close Quarter Battle (CQB) Carbine for the Indian Armed Forces. The weapon is intended to serve operational needs in
urban warfare
and counter-insurgency missions, where existing assault rifles may be less effective due to their size.
The carbine is the result of collaboration between DRDO's Armament Research and Development Establishment (ARDE),
Pune
, and private-sector manufacturer Bharat Forge. The
Ministry of Defence
(MoD) had earlier issued an Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) for 4,25,213 units of 5.56 x 45mm CQB Carbines in 2022.
Developed through public-private collaboration
'This weapon has been designed by DRDO's ARDE, Pune, and is being manufactured by Bharat Forge,' said Prateek Kishore, Scientist and Director General of Armament & Combat Engineering Systems (ACE), DRDO. 'It's a clear case of full synergy between the development agency and the manufacturing partner, which has contributed to the successful realization of this system. It's an extremely proud moment not just for DRDO, but for the country as a whole.'
Tailored for close-quarter combat
The
CQB Carbine
is designed for rapid response in close-range combat scenarios such as counter-terrorism operations, building clearances, and engagements in dense or urban areas. The compact design improves mobility and response time during missions where standard assault rifles may not be suitable.
Live Events
Combat-ready and performance tested
The carbine has been tested against international performance standards and is considered ready for infantry deployment. According to DRDO, the weapon weighs approximately 3.3 kilograms and has an effective range of 200 meters. It can fire both NATO-standard and INSAS ammunition.
'It is a highly potent weapon for our infantry soldiers,' Kishore said. 'Its ability to accommodate different ammunition types places it in a class of its own.'
Design and specifications
The weapon is equipped with a short barrel and modern ergonomic features, making it easier to use in confined areas. It also includes a 30-round curved magazine for consistent ammunition feeding during rapid fire.
Key specifications:
Ammunition: 5.56x30mm INSAS (compatible with NATO-standard rounds)
Effective Range: Up to 200 meters
Weight: Approx. 3.3 kilograms
Magazine: 30-round curved magazine
Design Advantage: Compact form with short barrel for better manoeuvrability
Step toward defence self-reliance
The carbine represents India's ongoing efforts to strengthen indigenous defence production through collaboration between research institutions and private manufacturers. This development marks a step forward in meeting the Indian Armed Forces' long-standing requirement for a lightweight, efficient weapon system suited for modern combat environments.
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
China's Envoy Urges Australia to Resist US Pressure on Military Spending
China's envoy to Canberra urged Australia not to be 'incited' by NATO's support for US demands to sharply raise defense spending and instead cooperate with Beijing to resolve regional disputes. Ambassador Xiao Qian, in an opinion article published in The Australian newspaper Monday, wrote that both Australia and China rely on the same trade routes and have a major stake in safeguarding maritime security. He emphasized their roles as key trade partners with 'highly complementary' economies. 'Dramatically increasing military spending places a heavy fiscal burden on the countries involved, undermining their efforts to boost economies and improve livelihoods, and further straining a global economy already struggling with weak recovery,' Xiao said. He added some countries at events such as the Group of Seven summit and the recent North Atlantic Treaty Organization meeting have 'hyped up the so-called China threat narrative,' to increase defense spending 'and even incited Australia to follow suit.' Australia spends a little over 2% of its gross domestic product on defense and is under pressure from the US to raise that to 3.5%. The center-left government has pushed back, pointing out it has already increased outlays. At a higher level, Canberra is trying to balance the increasingly confrontational relationship between the US and China, which are respectively Australia's historic security ally and its biggest trading partner. Australia likely wants to avoid raising defense spending excessively and antagonizing Beijing. 'As I often hear from Australian friends, 'we have hundreds of reasons to be friends, and none to be enemies',' Xiao said. NATO leaders last week agreed to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP and renewed their 'ironclad commitment' to mutual security as they aim to push back against an increasingly belligerent Russia. The US wants allies to take up more of the fiscal burden for their own defense so it can focus more heavily on China. Australia's Labor government has managed to rebuild ties with Beijing after they plunged into a deep freeze, which included punitive trade actions against some Australian goods in 2020. The fallout was triggered by the then center-right government calling for a probe into the origins of Covid-19. 'China and Australia are friends, not foes. This should never have been in question,' Xiao said. 'China has been always developing bilateral friendship and co-operation with the utmost sincerity and patience, and we hope Australia will work with us in the same direction.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
India.com
8 hours ago
- India.com
Kisses, Praise, Power And Nothing In Return: Inside Trump's Ego Diplomacy
New Delhi: Leaders discussed missiles, wars and global instability at the summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) in The Hague. But conversation shifted, tone changed and eyes followed when U.S. President Donald Trump walked into the room. Then came the comment that lit up the internet. 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language,' NATO chief Mark Rutte said with a smile, referring to Trump's role in the Israel-Iran standoff. Trump laughed. 'He likes me. Hey Daddy. You are my Daddy,' he told reporters. The White House ran with it. A video soon appeared online – Trump shaking hands in slow motion, grinning and waving – cut to Usher's 'Hey Daddy'. But this was not comedy. This was a pattern. Across capitals, leaders are learning the same lesson – flattery gets you in the room. Whether it gets you results, though, is another matter. The Charm Offensive United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought a personal letter from King Charles. Italy's Giorgia Meloni quoted Trump's slogan and vowed to 'Make the West Great Again'. Prime Minister Mark Carney praised Trump as 'a transformational president' before drawing a hard line on Canadian sovereignty. The techniques vary – gifts, praise and symbolic gestures – but the goal remains constant – make Trump feel seen. Starmer went tactile – handshakes and shoulder taps. Meloni praised Trump's peace ambitions. Carney, more measured, offered respect without bending. But does it work? Not always. Despite the compliments, Trump froze UK military aid to Ukraine, left Meloni waiting for a promised state visit and killed trade talks with Canada after their new digital tax upset US tech giants. Even when leaders tried to match Trump's energy, results stayed elusive. The Ones Who Failed to Flatter French President Emmanuel Macron came prepared for conflict. Their meeting was tense. Trump stuck to a script. Macron pushed for Ukraine. There was no warmth. No shift. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy met a wall. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance berated him in February. Trump accused him of risking a global war. Zelenskyy offered few pleasantries. It did not go well. Meanwhile, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was cornered with a surprise video showing anti-white farmer protests. Trump accused his country of 'genocide'. Ramaphosa defused the moment with patience, but made no attempt at charm. The Fine Line Between Ego, Outcome Experts have long said flattery keeps Trump calm. But calm does not equal compromise. Leaders who praised Trump often walked away empty-handed. Still, some moments stick. Trump called Carney's political comeback 'maybe greater than mine'. He softened his tone after the Canadian prime minister rejected annexation talk outright. Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen did something similar. She refused Trump's Greenland bid. Firm and respectful. He backed down. Global Stakes, Personal Dynamics For some, it is a calculated gamble. Ego-massaging buys time. Sometimes access. Rarely substance. But as world leaders line up with smiles, handshakes and tailored soundbites, one thing is clear – Trump's ego is not just a side show. It is part of the foreign policy stage. And everyone seems to know their lines.
Hindustan Times
9 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Nato remains ambiguous about goals in new world
At the close of the Nato (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) Summit 2025 in The Hague, alliance members made a landmark decision: All 32 nations agreed to raise defence spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) by 2035. The new pledge, up from the long-standing 2% benchmark, marks the most ambitious military investment target in the alliance's history and reflects mounting security concerns across the Euro-Atlantic space. US President Donald Trump hailed the agreement as a 'monumental win' for Washington, claiming that it corrected longstanding imbalances in Nato's burden-sharing. Despite growing anxiety over global hotspots, the summit avoided direct mentions of several key geopolitical challenges (Bloomberg) The summit declaration outlined that the 5% commitment will be split into two distinct categories. Around 3.5% of GDP will go toward traditional defence spending aligned with Nato capability targets, covering military hardware, force readiness, and interoperability. The remaining 1.5% will be directed toward emerging non-military threats — securing critical infrastructure, cyber defence, civil preparedness, innovation, and the defence industrial base. Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, hosting his first summit in the role, emphasised that this investment 'will ensure we have the forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, and resilience needed to deter and defend in line with our three core tasks: deterrence and defence, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security.' Yet, despite the show of unity on funding, the summit exposed cracks beneath the surface. Several members, including Spain and Slovakia, pushed back on the timeline. Spain openly stated that it would not be able to meet the 5% target before 2035, while Slovakia argued that competing economic priorities such as improving living standards and reducing debt made the goal unrealistic. France's President Emmanuel Macron offered guarded support for the new defence goals but expressed concern about broader alliance coherence. Stressing that Russia remained Nato's principal threat, Macron warned against allowing intra-alliance trade tensions to escalate. 'We can't say we're going to spend more on defence and then start a trade war within Nato,' he said, alluding to new US tariffs on European goods. 'It's an aberration. It's time we returned to the principle of trade peace among allies.' In a subtle rebuke of recent US actions, Macron added that he had raised this concern directly with President Trump. 'We cannot build a stronger Europe within Nato while undermining our economic unity,' he said. Despite growing anxiety over global hotspots, the summit avoided direct mentions of several key geopolitical challenges. There was no formal communique on Russia, China, the Indo-Pacific, or flashpoints like Gaza and Iran. While leaders addressed some of these issues in sideline meetings, their omission from the official agenda raised eyebrows. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz acknowledged the shifting focus. Merz also lobbied the US for stronger economic measures against Moscow and added that there needs to be more economic pressure, especially 'on those enabling Russia by buying its fossil fuels — namely China and India.' Trump, for his part, maintained ambiguity on Nato's Article 5 — its core clause of mutual defence. When asked during a bilateral with Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof whether he remained committed to Article 5, Trump responded: 'I stand with it. That's why I'm here.' This came just a day after he had publicly remarked there were 'numerous definitions' of the clause, leading to unease among allies. He also made headlines with a controversial comment about the ongoing Israel-Iran tensions. He claimed both nations were 'tired' and ready to 'go home,' though he warned that the conflict could 'perhaps soon' reignite. Is the US hands off or on in the Middle East? In contrast to past summits, where unity against adversaries like Russia or growing concern over China's Indo-Pacific ambitions dominated discussions, this year's gathering seemed adrift in a sea of rising budgets but unclear strategic purpose. Is Nato marooned on an island of anxiety, preparing for unknown threats without a clear definition of who the enemy is? This strategic ambiguity underscored a deeper issue — while Nato is now better funded, questions linger about what exactly it is preparing to confront. With global power dynamics in flux, and transatlantic relationships under increasing strain, the alliance is investing heavily in its future, but the direction of that future remains uncertain. Gurjit Singh is a former ambassador to Germany, Indonesia, Ethiopia, Asean and the African Union. The views expressed are personal.
