Can Elon Musk run for US presidency? Here's all about America Party and its goals
Elon Musk has launched a new political group named the America Party following disagreements with President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Musk made the announcement through his social media platform X. He said the new party aims to challenge what he calls the 'uniparty' system and promote political reform in the United States. Musk, who cannot run for president due to constitutional limits, plans to use his influence and financial support to back candidates aligned with his political vision.Tech billionaire Elon Musk has announced the creation of his own political group named the America Party. This move comes after a fallout with President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Musk shared the announcement on his platform X, stating that the new party is a response to what he sees as a broken two-party system.
Musk wrote on Saturday that 'we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.' He said the America Party was formed to return 'freedom' to the people. He compared his strategy to a historic Greek military tactic used by Epaminondas, who won a major battle by focusing force in one area. Musk said the party would apply similar precision to break the political system he calls the 'uniparty.'
Also Read: Texas Flooding Live Updates: This is the reason why Kerr County didn't have a flood warning system. All details here
Musk's announcement follows his opposition to a recent tax and spending law signed by Trump. Musk objected to the bill for raising the federal debt limit. He had supported Trump's reelection campaign in 2024 and later served as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). In this role, he was tasked with identifying government waste.
Musk now plans to fund and support candidates who oppose the Republicans backing the same bill he criticized. This includes using his wealth to challenge GOP figures in future primaries.Although Musk has not released a full policy agenda, he has reshared several ideas from others. One repost listed goals such as: Reducing the federal debt
Using AI to upgrade the military
Supporting technology-friendly laws
Cutting energy regulations
Promoting free speech
Encouraging higher birth rates
Taking centrist positions in other areas Musk described the America Party as a solution to replace what he calls the 'Republican/Democrat Uniparty.' He asked followers where and when the party's first congress should be held.
Also Read: Whitney Purvis Arrest: A look at 16 and Pregnant star's tragic events in life Third-party movements have struggled to grow in the US. A 2024 Pew poll found that nearly all voters support either the Democrats or the Republicans. Ballotpedia data shows over 50 political parties exist, but few have gained much influence.Famous third-party efforts include Ross Perot's 1992 Reform Party run, where he won 19 percent of the vote. His campaign was blamed for George H.W. Bush's loss. In 2000, Ralph Nader's Green Party run was blamed by Democrats for Al Gore's narrow defeat. Jill Stein in 2016 faced similar criticism after Hillary Clinton's loss to Trump.Trump himself once ran briefly as a Reform Party candidate in 2000. He also considered an independent run in 2012 before becoming the Republican nominee in 2016.
Can Elon Musk run for US President through the America Party?
No. Elon Musk was born in South Africa and is not eligible to run for president under the US Constitution.
What is the goal of Elon Musk's America Party?
The America Party aims to reduce debt, modernize defense with AI, support tech policies, reduce energy rules, and promote free speech through candidates Musk supports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Mass job cuts, layoffs soon in U.S? Check who will be fired?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for President Donald Trump's administration to resume carrying out mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, elements of his campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The justices lifted San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston's May 22 order that had blocked large-scale federal layoffs called "reductions in force" affecting potentially hundreds of thousands of jobs, while litigation in the case proceeds. Trump in February announced "a critical transformation of the federal bureaucracy" in an executive order directing agencies to prepare for a government overhaul aimed at significantly reducing the federal workforce and gutting offices and programs opposed by the administration. Workforce reductions were planned at the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury, Veterans Affairs and more than a dozen other wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing, siding with a group of unions, non-profits and local governments that challenged the administration. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston judge blocked the agencies from carrying out mass layoffs and limited their ability to cut or overhaul federal programs. Illston also ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs, though she delayed implementing this portion of her ruling while the appeals process plays ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul being pursued by Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in the Republican president's drive to slash the federal spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, DOGE has sought to eliminate federal jobs, shrink and reshape the U.S. government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30 and subsequently had a public falling out with San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the administration's request to halt the judge's 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit."The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations."The 9th Circuit's ruling prompted the Justice Department's June 2 emergency request to the Supreme Court to halt Illston's the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in its filing to the Supreme Court."The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential plaintiffs urged the Supreme Court to deny the Justice Department's request. Allowing the Trump administration to move forward with its "breakneck reorganization," they wrote, would mean that "programs, offices and functions across the federal government will be abolished, agencies will be radically downsized from what Congress authorized, critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will lose their jobs."The Supreme Court in recent months has sided with Trump in some major cases that were acted upon on an emergency basis since he returned to office in cleared the way for Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face. In two cases, it let the administration end temporary legal status previously granted on humanitarian grounds to hundreds of thousands of also allowed Trump to implement his ban on transgender people in the U.S. military, blocked a judge's order for the administration to rehire thousands of fired employees and twice sided with his Department of Government Efficiency.A1. The full form of DOGE is Department of Government Efficiency.A2. President of USA is Donald Trump.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mass job cuts, layoffs soon in U.S? Check who will be fired?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for President Donald Trump's administration to resume carrying out mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, elements of his campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. The justices lifted San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston's May 22 order that had blocked large-scale federal layoffs called "reductions in force" affecting potentially hundreds of thousands of jobs, while litigation in the case proceeds. Trump in February announced "a critical transformation of the federal bureaucracy" in an executive order directing agencies to prepare for a government overhaul aimed at significantly reducing the federal workforce and gutting offices and programs opposed by the administration. Workforce reductions were planned at the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury, Veterans Affairs and more than a dozen other wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing, siding with a group of unions, non-profits and local governments that challenged the administration. "As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," Illston judge blocked the agencies from carrying out mass layoffs and limited their ability to cut or overhaul federal programs. Illston also ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs, though she delayed implementing this portion of her ruling while the appeals process plays ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul being pursued by Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in the Republican president's drive to slash the federal spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, DOGE has sought to eliminate federal jobs, shrink and reshape the U.S. government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30 and subsequently had a public falling out with San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the administration's request to halt the judge's 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge's order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit."The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration's actions "an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations."The 9th Circuit's ruling prompted the Justice Department's June 2 emergency request to the Supreme Court to halt Illston's the personnel of federal agencies "lies at the heartland" of the president's executive branch authority, the Justice Department said in its filing to the Supreme Court."The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the president does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers," the filing said, referring to the constitution's section delineating presidential plaintiffs urged the Supreme Court to deny the Justice Department's request. Allowing the Trump administration to move forward with its "breakneck reorganization," they wrote, would mean that "programs, offices and functions across the federal government will be abolished, agencies will be radically downsized from what Congress authorized, critical government services will be lost and hundreds of thousands of federal employees will lose their jobs."The Supreme Court in recent months has sided with Trump in some major cases that were acted upon on an emergency basis since he returned to office in cleared the way for Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face. In two cases, it let the administration end temporary legal status previously granted on humanitarian grounds to hundreds of thousands of also allowed Trump to implement his ban on transgender people in the U.S. military, blocked a judge's order for the administration to rehire thousands of fired employees and twice sided with his Department of Government Efficiency.A1. The full form of DOGE is Department of Government Efficiency.A2. President of USA is Donald Trump.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cryptocurrency Live News & Updates : Uniswap Faces Price Pressure Amid Whale Activity
08 Jul 2025 | 11:55:14 PM IST Uniswap's token price has surged recently, but indicators suggest a possible decline as whale buying increases and exchange supplies rise. Uniswap's recent price surge to $7.55 has raised concerns as technical indicators hint at a potential pullback, especially with rising exchange supplies signaling possible selling pressure. Meanwhile, Sequans Communications has made headlines by reallocating $384 million into Bitcoin, marking a significant corporate shift towards cryptocurrency. This move reflects a growing trend among traditional finance entities embracing digital assets. In the broader market, Bitcoin has crossed the 109,000 USDT mark, indicating a steady increase. Additionally, Core Scientific's stock has been downgraded to neutral due to its acquisition by CoreWeave, which adds complexity to its operations. Lastly, Elon Musk's announcement of the America Party, which aims to embrace Bitcoin, raises questions about the future of cryptocurrency in political discourse. Musk's fluctuating stance on Bitcoin, particularly regarding its environmental impact, continues to attract attention as he seeks to align his political ambitions with eco-friendly initiatives. Together, these developments highlight the dynamic interplay between cryptocurrency and traditional finance, as well as the evolving narrative surrounding digital assets. Show more
