logo
The neediest people were let down again by the lawmakers they voted for. It's baffling.

The neediest people were let down again by the lawmakers they voted for. It's baffling.

Miami Herald11-07-2025
Cathy Price's words stopped me cold. She's a 72-year-old woman who worked as a nurse at Martin General in a rural part of North Carolina. That area stands to be particularly hard hit by the 'big beautiful bill' Republicans passed and President Donald Trump signed into law on the 249th anniversary of this country's birth.
Martin General was part of ECU Health, a not-for-profit system that serves about 1.4 million people in eastern North Carolina, including rural areas in Martin County.
ECU planned to reopen Martin General, at least for emergency and some diagnostic services. It closed in 2023, then North Carolina finally agreed to expand Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), giving residents hope their local hospital would return.
The nearest hospital is a 30- to 40-minute drive away.
'We're in a life-and-death crisis,' Price told The New York Times. 'People's lives are on the line because of the hospital not being here.'
She knows the dire situation facing rural residents in Martin County, and elsewhere. Still, she told The Times she supports President Trump's supposed efforts to rid Medicaid of fraud and waste.
What she and many other Trump supporters don't seem to understand is that in the eyes of Trump and most other Republicans in Washington, D.C. — including the ones rural North Carolina residents sent to the nation's capital to represent them — they are the fraud and waste.
They are the lazy 'able-bodied' people, supposedly addicted to government assistance, who hate having to take care of themselves.
They are the problem Republicans are trying to solve, the sacrifice the GOP just made to ensure the wealthiest Americans and corporations can receive yet another massive tax cut.
The wealthiest Americans did not need even more money in their pockets, but Price's neighbors and friends in Martin County need the health care that will be taken away, or may never materialize, because of the 'big beautiful bill' billionaire Trump can't stop crowing about.
The Medicaid coverage that, as recalled in The Times article, allowed 58-year-old Lori Kelley in Harrisburg to save a finger and detect two tumors? That might be going away. But at least private plane and yacht owners are gonna have yet another way to write off some of their tax obligations.
For decades now, rural residents have been flocking to the Republican Party. It's mostly been white rural residents, but a small but not-insignificant number of Black and brown rural residents have joined them. Theories abound as to why.
Political analysts will point to policies such as NAFTA, which has been blamed for the loss of manufacturing jobs in rural areas. I grew up in St. Stephen, S.C., and saw the Georgia Pacific paper plant that had sustained us close and leave a devastating void. At least four of my family members worked there. As a journalist, I documented the closing of a bevy of manufacturing plants, including International Paper and Georgetown Steel in Georgetown, and an electricity-producing plant in Conway.
The shifts in manufacturing are complex and multilayered. They've caused real harm to real people. But there is no one cause, which is why I don't believe that can explain the voting shifts.
And the two parties have been exceedingly clear about their priorities. When Democrats are given power, they fight to expand health care coverage, strengthen the safety net and argue for a living wage and higher taxes on the wealthy. The GOP does the opposite. (The same can be said of how the parties view disaster preparedness and assistance. The Trump administration is trying to dismantle FEMA even as natural disasters are causing even more harm and killing more people. Democrats want to better fund such agencies.)
During Trump's first term, one of the Republicans' top goals was to fully uproot Obamacare, risking the lives of tens of thousands of Americans and the health of millions. The 'big beautiful bill' helped the GOP partially accomplish that goal – at the expense of Price and her rural North Carolina neighbors.
It's one of the most baffling truisms of the modern political era. The neediest Americans repeatedly empower the people most likely to ignore their most-pressing needs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House Slams Joy Behar's Recent Trump Comments And Warns Of ABC's ‘The View' 'Being The Next To Be Pulled Off The Air'
White House Slams Joy Behar's Recent Trump Comments And Warns Of ABC's ‘The View' 'Being The Next To Be Pulled Off The Air'

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White House Slams Joy Behar's Recent Trump Comments And Warns Of ABC's ‘The View' 'Being The Next To Be Pulled Off The Air'

The White House lashed out at Joy Behar after she said on ABC's The View that Donald Trump's attacks on his predecessor, Barack Obama, were motivated by jealousy, while noting the current president's role in the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. On Wednesday, Behar and the other View co-hosts talked about Obama's response to Trump's claim that his predecessor was guilty of treason. The Trump administration claims that Obama and his team conspired to alter intelligence assessments to boost the notion Russia was attempting to help Trump get elected in 2016. More from Deadline Candace Owens Accuses Brigitte Macron Of Bullying Her With Defamation Suit Over Claims French First Lady Was Born A Man: "Candace Owens Is Not Shutting Up" - Update Skydance Commits To CBS News Ombudsman, Pledges No DEI Policies As Company Seeks FCC Greenlight Of Paramount Merger Patrick Soon-Shiong Says He Plans To Take Los Angeles Times Public; Shares Will Be Offered Through Regulation A Financing - Update Obama's spokesperson called the allegations 'bizarre' and a 'weak attempt at distraction.' On The View, Behar said, 'First of all, who tried to overthrow the government on January 6th? Who was that again?' Behar added, 'The thing about him is is so jealous of Obama, because Obama is everything that he is not. Trim. Smart. Handsome. Happily married. And can sing Al Green's song Let's Stay Together better than Al Green.' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said, 'Joy Behar is an irrelevant loser suffering from a severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's no surprise that The View's ratings hit an all-time low last year. She should self-reflect on her own jealousy of President Trump's historic popularity before her show is the next to be pulled off air.' EW first reported on the White House response. Trump has celebrated the decision by CBS to cancel The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, hosted by another of his critics. On Tuesday, he predicted that ABC's Jimmy Kimmel 'is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone. These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television. It's really good to see them go, and I hope I played a major part in it!' At the same time, the White House highlighted Trump's claims about 2016. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, who has claimed that Obama's team was engaged in 'a years-long coup intended to subvert President Trump's entire presidency,' appeared at the White House press briefing to talk about the release of new documents. That was a 2017 GOP House Intelligence Committee report on Russian interference, casting doubt on the intelligence that Russian President Vladimir Putin favored Trump to win the election. But a 2020 bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Russia did interfere in the election, while detailing contacts between Trump campaign officials and Russian influence actors. Obama's spokesperson said that 'nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' On The View, other hosts said that Trump's focus on Obama, and the referral to the Justice Department to investigate, was an attempt to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein story. Alyssa Farah Griffin, who was Trump's director of strategic communications in his first term, said, 'I saw the intelligence that we had. I actually was with Mike Pence when he confronted Vladimir Putin in Signapore and said, 'We know what you tried to do in our elections, Do not do it again.' It was the consensus of the people in the first term, including the director of national intelligence that Russia did try to meddle in our elections.' Best of Deadline Everything We Know About Season 3 Of 'Euphoria' So Far 'Wednesday' Season 2: Everything We Know About The Cast, Premiere Date & More Everything We Know About 'Only Murders In The Building' Season 5 So Far

Supreme Court allows Trump to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission
Supreme Court allows Trump to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court allows Trump to remove 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the Trump administration to remove three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, who had been fired by President Donald Trump and then reinstated by a federal judge. The justices acted on an emergency appeal from the Justice Department, which argued that the agency is under Trump's control and the president is free to remove commissioners without cause. The three liberal justices dissented. The commission helps protect consumers from dangerous products by issuing recalls, suing errant companies and more. Trump fired the three Democrats on the five-member commission in May. They were serving seven-year terms after being nominated by President Joe Biden. U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox in Baltimore ruled in June that the dismissals were unlawful. Maddox sought to distinguish the commission's role from those of other agencies where the Supreme Court has allowed firings to go forward. A month earlier, the high court's conservative majority declined to reinstate members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, finding that the Constitution appears to give the president the authority to fire the board members 'without cause.' The three liberal justices dissented. The administration has argued that all the agencies are under Trump's control as the head of the executive branch. Maddox, a Biden nominee, noted that it can be difficult to characterize the product safety commission's functions as purely executive. The fight over the president's power to fire could prompt the court to consider overturning a 90-year-old Supreme Court decision known as Humphrey's Executor. In that case from 1935, the court unanimously held that presidents cannot fire independent board members without cause. The decision ushered in an era of powerful independent federal agencies charged with regulating labor relations, employment discrimination, the airwaves and much else. But it has long rankled conservative legal theorists who argue the modern administrative state gets the Constitution all wrong because such agencies should answer to the president. The Consumer Product Safety Commission was created in 1972. Its five members must maintain a partisan split, with no more than three representing the president's party. They serve staggered terms. That structure ensures that each president has 'the opportunity to influence, but not control,' the commission, attorneys for the fired commissioners wrote in court filings. They argued the recent terminations could jeopardize the commission's independence. ___ Mark Sherman, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

New York Republicans Unite in Attacking Mamdani
New York Republicans Unite in Attacking Mamdani

New York Times

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Times

New York Republicans Unite in Attacking Mamdani

Zohran Mamdani may well be far out of sight, visiting family in Uganda some 7,000 miles from New York City. But he is clearly not far from the minds of Republicans. On Wednesday, within a matter of a few hours, Mr. Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor of New York City, was targeted by two prominent Republican House members in New York and the New York Young Republican Club. Representative Mike Lawler, a Republican who represents a crucial Hudson Valley swing seat, introduced a bill called the MAMDANI Act, an acronym that stands for Measuring Adverse Market Disruption And National Impact. The bill is aimed at studying the effect of Mr. Mamdani's proposal for five city-owned grocery stores. 'Zohran Mamdani's push for government-owned grocery stores is straight out of the Marxist playbook, and history shows exactly how this experiment ends,' Mr. Lawler said, arguing that the candidate's 'socialist fantasies' would fail. Mr. Mamdani has proposed creating one municipal grocery store in each borough to help lower prices for shoppers. The stores could help reduce costs by using city land or buildings, buying food wholesale and receiving an exemption from property taxes. An hour earlier, Representative Elise Stefanik, a fellow New York Republican and close ally of President Trump, issued a drive-by attack on Mr. Mamdani, warning that a 'radical communist defund-the-police antisemite may be elected mayor of New York City.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store