Trump's two-week delay on Iran strike decision leaves Israel in limbo
US President Donald Trump's self-imposed two-week delay to decide whether to strike Iran has sparked confusion and conjecture in Israel.
Some of Israel's most senior officials had openly pushed for US involvement, arguing that American military involvement can shorten the conflict and allow Israel to achieve its goal of removing what is has long perceived as an existential threat of a nuclear Iran armed with ballistic missiles.
'We believe that the United States of America and the president of the United States have an obligation to make sure that the region is going to a positive way and that the world is free from Iran that possesses (a) nuclear weapon,' former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant told CNN earlier this week. Gallant was involved in planning the Iran operation before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu fired him in November.
But after Trump's new timeline, Israel's political leaders are being careful in their statements, not wanting to be seen as pushing the president into the exact type of Middle East conflict he has long sought to avoid. Netanyahu and others are more cautious now in their public messaging, extolling the potential benefits of US involvement without calling for it.
CNN spoke to half a dozen Israeli officials to better understand how the country's leadership sees this critical moment in the conflict, as Trump weighs whether to join the Israel's ongoing military campaign. Most spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the relations between the US and Israel.
US involvement would dramatically change the nature of the conflict, Israel has argued, including a far greater chance of successfully striking Iran's Fordow nuclear facility, which is hidden deep in a mountain south of Tehran. Such a decisive strike would likely require 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs carried only by American bombers.
'There is an understanding that the Israelis will go for Fordow anyway, but it can be much nastier and less decisive without the Americans,' said Yaki Dayan, the former Israeli consul general in Los Angeles.
After the first week of Israel's strikes in Iran, the Israeli military no longer has the element of surprise, and the country's political leadership must decide how far to go with the campaign, a decision that relies heavily on what Trump decides to do.
Israel has followed closely the debate within Trump's MAGA base between the more isolationist wing that opposes US involvement in a new Middle East war and the camp that sees this as the best opportunity for decisive military action against Iran.
The political echelon has been careful in its public statements because of the isolationist wing, Dayan told CNN, but Israel's perspective is getting across, with Netanyahu confidant Ron Dermer and others giving interviews to right-wing media outlets in the US.
Publicly, Netanyahu has effusively praised Trump. On Wednesday, the Israeli leader said the two speak 'frequently.' In a pre-recorded video statement, Netanyahu said, 'I think President Trump for his backing.'
But Trump has deviated from the US' traditional pro-Israel footing in the Middle East, including on negotiations with Iran, a ceasefire deal with the Houthis, and a trip to the region that skipped Israel. The White House decisions have exposed sharp divides between the two leaders.
Even so, the two governments have maintained an ongoing dialogue since Israel began attacking Iran. Dayan said that coordination between Netanyahu and Trump is 'much better than people think,' but acknowledged that Trump makes decisions unilaterally, after consulting only a small circle of advisers.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was meeting his counterparts from the UK, Germany and France on Friday in Switzerland, which will allow the US to gauge the viability of a diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear program. On Thursday, the White House said the contact between the US and Iran 'has continued' without offering any details of the communications, even as Trump weighs military strikes.
But the government has not signaled any sense of hysteria about Trump's decision to hold off on a strike on Iran for two weeks.
Several Israeli officials who spoke with CNN see the president's statement as 'smoke and mirrors,' as one put it – part of a deception act to keep Tehran guessing when Trump has already decided to get the US involved.
'He wouldn't give himself a deadline that he would have to keep to if he hadn't already made the decision,' the official said, while acknowledging this interpretation is the most favorable to Israel.
But others who spoke with CNN were more concerned.
'If you follow the statements for the last two or three weeks, it's been a lot of zigzagging,' said another Israeli official.
What seemed like a certainty to Israeli officials just 48 hours ago – that Trump would order US military involvement – now appears far less assured. Trump went from saying 'we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran' – taking credit for Israel's military successes – to giving himself two more weeks to make what could be one the most fateful foreign policy decisions of his presidency.
Israel launched the operation against Iran without a commitment from the US that it would take part in the campaign, officials have said, but the belief was that the headlines of Israel's military accomplishments could entice Trump to authorize US military involvement.
But as the campaign enters its second week, Israel's 'pace of success is slowing down,' the official said. And as Israel continues its operations over Iran – roughly a thousand miles away – the likelihood of error is increasing, which could affect not only Israel's actions, but also reduce the chance of US involvement.
'Every day that this goes on, there's a greater chance that something goes wrong,' the official said, without elaborating.
'They don't know what this means,' Alon Pinkas, the former Israeli consul general in New York City, told CNN. 'Israel will get more worried with each day that passes.'
Pinkas said Trump's deadline to make a decision underscores that the American leader 'cannot be deciphered.' It also raises the possibility that 'maybe Netanyahu overplayed his cards here,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Live updates: Senate considering raft of amendments to Trump's massive tax and immigration bill
The Senate is set to convene Monday morning to consider a raft of amendments to President Donald Trump's massive tax and immigration package, most of them offered by Democrats and destined to fail in the Republican-led chamber. Trump has urged Congress to get the bill to his desk by July 4, which is Friday. A Senate-passed bill would require action in the House, which narrowly passed its own version of the One Big Beautiful Bill last month. The legislation would extend tax cuts passed in 2017, enact campaign promises such as no tax on tips and spend hundreds of billions of dollars on the White House's mass deportation drive and national defense priorities. To partially offset the cost, it would make steep cuts to safety-net programs. Democrats are united in opposition. Democratic groups are launching a major organizing push Monday to attack Republicans' signature bill this summer and prepare for the coming elections, an effort that will focus on voter registration and volunteer efforts to make their case to community groups not focused on politics. TORONTO — Canada said late Sunday it would rescind a new tax it planned to collect from large tech companies after President Donald Trump last week called the levy a 'blatant attack' on the United States and said he would suspend trade talks with Ottawa over it. Senate Republicans spent Sunday marshaling support for the centerpiece of President Donald Trump's second-term agenda, a sprawling tax and immigration package, working to prevent defections after a near-revolt over the weekend. The GOP is racing to push the mammoth budget proposal across Trump's desk by a self-imposed July 4 deadline, but fissures remain within the party over the cuts to social benefit and anti-poverty programs and the bill's growing price tag. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said Sunday that he will not seek reelection next year, less than 24 hours after President Donald Trump threatened him with a primary challenge for opposing Trump's massive tax and immigration bill.
New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: Senate to Begin Voting on Policy Bill, as G.O.P. Grasps for Support
Provisions added to the president's domestic policy bill to help win the support of Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, center, violated Senate rules and may need to be dropped. The Senate opened debate on Sunday on the embattled Republican tax cuts and domestic policy bill, as G.O.P. leaders toiled to build enough support in their own ranks to push it through before a Fourth of July deadline set by President Trump. The bitter floor fight began in earnest after Senate clerks devoted almost 16 consecutive hours to reading aloud the 940-page bill. Democrats insisted on the reading as a protest and to delay the final showdown, stalling a vote on passage to Monday at the earliest. Late Sunday night, Republicans, still laboring to marshal backing for the measure, delayed a marathon series of votes on amendments to it, which had been expected to begin overnight, until Monday morning. Still, Republicans took to the floor to hail the legislation, which extends a broad array of tax cuts enacted in 2017 during the first Trump administration and boosts spending on the military and border security, while making steep cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance to pay for them. 'It's a big, beautiful bill if you believe in cutting people's taxes, securing the border, having a strong military and controlling government spending,' Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and chairman of the Budget Committee, said, using the name bestowed upon the legislation by Mr. Trump. Democrats assailed the bill, which also would increase the federal debt limit by $5 trillion, noting that it was projected to significantly increase the deficit and deny essential safety net programs to millions of Americans in order to provide tax benefits mainly to the wealthiest. 'This is a recipe for disaster,' said Senator Gary Peters, Democrat of Michigan, calling the legislation reckless and unconscionable. In a stark display of the political peril for Republicans around the bill, Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, one of the party's most vulnerable incumbents, suddenly announced Sunday that he would not run for re-election next year after voting against bringing the bill to the floor. His opposition had drawn a harsh rebuke from Mr. Trump, who threatened to recruit a primary opponent to challenge him. Later, in a scathing speech on the Senate floor, Mr. Tillis assailed the bill and Mr. Trump, saying the measure was a betrayal of the president's promise to protect Medicaid and warning that his party was 'about to make a mistake.' But Republicans were determined to plunge ahead. As the debate began, they used an accounting gimmick to upend longstanding budget rules and unilaterally declare that extending the tax cuts, estimated to cost roughly $3.8 trillion over a decade, would add nothing to the federal deficit. The move amounted to a substantial blow to the filibuster: It effectively lets Republicans ignore budgeting rules that are meant to prevent adding to the deficit, while still availing themselves of a special process that allows them to pass their bill with a simple majority vote, rather than the 60 votes required to overcome a filibuster. Democrats called the maneuver a trick that would pave the way for disastrous policies. 'Rather than be honest with the American people about the true costs of their billionaire giveaways, Republicans are doing something the Senate has never, never done before, deploying fake math and accounting gimmicks to hide the true cost of their bill,' said Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader. But Republicans said they were within their rights and were prepared to roll over the Democratic objections. Even as the endgame drew nearer for the legislation, it continued to change as several Republicans remained unsatisfied with it. The Senate official who enforces the chamber's rules determined that two last-minute provisions — added on Saturday to benefit Alaska and Hawaii and help secure the vote of Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska — violated Senate rules and would likely need to be dropped from the bill, according to an aide. Those provisions had been seen as crucial to winning the support of Ms. Murkowski on the initial procedural vote that narrowly passed late Saturday night 51 to 49, with two Republicans and all Democrats opposed. It was uncertain whether she would still back the legislation if those sweeteners were dropped. The ruling by the chamber official, the Senate parliamentarian, involved a special boost to the two states' Medicaid payment rates and one to the prices Medicare pays hospitals in those states for some medical services. Adding to the uncertainty around the measure were new estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which showed that it would pile at least $3.3 trillion on the already-bulging national debt over a decade, nearly $1 trillion more than the version passed by the House. That could pose big problems for the measure in the House, which must give it final approval. Fiscal hawks there have warned that the price tag of the measure must not rise. The C.B.O. also reported that the Senate version of the measure would result in deeper cuts in federal support for health insurance and in more Americans losing coverage than the House version, underscoring the political risks for Republicans. The analysis found that the legislation would leave 11.8 million more Americans uninsured by 2034. Federal spending on Medicaid, Medicare and Obamacare would be reduced by more than $1.1 trillion over that period, with more than $1 trillion of those cuts coming from Medicaid alone. Image Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, wants to offer an amendment to revert the tax rate for the most affluent Americans to the level before the 2017 tax cuts were enacted. Credit... Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times Once the clerks finished their reading, the clock started on 20 hours of debate on the legislation, evenly split between the two parties, though Republicans were not expected to use all their time. At the end of the debate, members of both parties would have the opportunity to offer more changes and force floor votes on those amendments in an hourslong process known as a vote-a-rama. The resolution of those amendments could be crucial to determining the fate of the bill when senators cast their final votes. For instance, Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, wants to offer an amendment to revert the tax rate for the most affluent Americans to the level before the 2017 tax cuts were enacted, generating new revenue. Ms. Collins voted to open the debate on Saturday but told Republican leaders that her vote did not represent a commitment to support the final bill. A group of hard-right conservatives who held out for four hours on Saturday night before agreeing to begin debate also want changes to produce greater savings in Medicaid, a proposal that could weaken support from other senators worried about health care cuts in their states. Democrats are dug in against the proposal. On CNN's 'State of the Union,' Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, warned on Sunday that 16 million Americans could lose their health care coverage under the bill. The cuts could make health care more expensive and have a 'ripple effect to all of us who have traditional health care as well,' he added, setting the total number of uninsured back to 'where we were before Obamacare.' But Senator Katie Britt, Republican of Alabama, appearing on the same program, dismissed recent polls showing a lack of support for the bill. She maintained that Americans would greatly benefit and said she was excited about the bill's potential. 'I think when the American people actually get to see this in fruition, they absolutely are going to be, too,' Ms. Britt said. Andrew Duehren , Margot Sanger-Katz and Annie Karni contributed reporting.
Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Monday briefing: Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill; ambush of Idaho firefighters; AI's impact on brains; lab-grown salmon; and more
An intercepted call captured Iranian officials downplaying the damage of U.S. strikes. Senate Republicans are racing to pass Trump's massive tax bill this week. Trump said he will move aggressively to undo nationwide blocks on his agenda. Firefighters were ambushed while responding to a fire in Idaho. A school shut down after Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan pulled funding. Artificial intelligence might be changing our brains, but it's not clear how. Lab-grown salmon is on sale for the first time in the U.S. And now … are you taking too many prescription drugs? Here are the risks. Want to catch up quickly with 'The 7' every morning? Download The Post's app and turn on alert notifications for The 7 or sign up for the newsletter.
