Police officers hit pedestrian with vehicle in Kings Cross
The hit happened about 3.10am on Saturday morning after emergency services were called to reports of a brawl in the city.
The police car was travelling along William St in Darlinghurst with lights and sirens, the police said on Sunday.
'Initial inquiries have led police to believe a pedestrian ran onto William Street at the same time and collided with the police vehicle,' the police said.
A pedestrian was struck by a police vehicle early on Saturday morning in Darlinghurst. Picture: NewsWire / Monique Harmer
'Officers assisted the 35-year-old man at the scene before the arrival of paramedics.'
Paramedics took the main to St Vincent's Hospital where he remains in a stable condition.
'The driver of the police vehicle – a constable attached to Kings Cross Police Area Command – was treated at the scene for shock,' the police said.
'Investigations into the circumstances of the crash are underway.'
Duncan Evans
Reporter
Duncan Evans is a reporter for News Corp's NewsWire service, based in Adelaide. Before NewsWire, he worked as a resources and politics reporter for The Daily Mercury in Mackay, Queensland and as a reporter at CQ Today, an independent newspaper based in Rockhampton. He was raised in Emerald and Brisbane and studied English Literature and American Studies at the University of Sydney. He began his career in journalism working for the Jakarta Post in Indonesia for over two years as an editor, translator and writer. He is fluent in Indonesian.
@Duncanevans01
Duncan Evans
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
35 minutes ago
- ABC News
77 per cent of childcare workers operating below safety requirements, union survey finds
More concerns have been raised about safety at childcare centres, with three-quarters of workers telling a survey their place of work was operating below minimum staffing levels at least weekly. The United Workers Union survey of 2,100 childcare workers also found that 42 per cent of workers said their centre was operating below minimum staffing levels on a daily basis. The findings come after the charging of a Melbourne childcare worker with more than 70 offences, including sexual assault, and a long-running ABC investigation revealed examples of profit being placed above care. "While examining the tragic events revealed in Melbourne last week, we also need to understand the alarm that is being sounded by educators," UWU early education director Carolyn Smith said. "Workers report children are left without emotional support, without adequate supervision to stop them hurting themselves or others, and without appropriate education." The union survey was conducted before the Melbourne childcare worker was charged. "I can't even guarantee the safety of the children and myself. I feel sad, unsafe and stressful every day," a Victorian worker told the survey. Do you have a story to share? Email The for-profit operyators that dominate the childcare sector pay staff less and rely more on casual workers, an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission investigation in 2023 found. "Partly because of understaffing, we see a real churn of staff moving through centres, and that's when we don't have that safe, quality environment we need," Ms Smith said. The issues highlighted in the ABC investigation echo the UWU survey, which revealed the top four concerns of educators. Preeti Soodan, a Melbourne educator at a large for-profit provider, told ABC News childcare workers had too many demands placed on them, including cleaning and administration. "There are many challenges we face during the day. We keep changing the hats; we are educators, we are leaders, we are supervising the children, we have many responsibilities with documentation," Ms Soodan said. "We don't only educate them, we have to wipe the tables, clean them, support them emotionally. Throughout our day, we are always juggling." Ms Soodan is a trained primary school teacher with more than a decade's experience working in Australia and India. She said workers were treated as "glorified babysitters" rather than educators. "The neuroscience tells us that 90 per cent of the brain develops till the age of five, so you can understand how precious this profession is," Ms Soodan said. The UWU survey revealed 83 per cent of workers agreed a common staffing loophole called the "under the roof" ratio was used by centres and compromised the wellbeing of children. Ratios are designed to ensure a minimum of staff are present at all times to supervise children but the numbers of workers required in each room varies according to the age of the children. Some staff count all workers "under the roof" rather than numbers in individual rooms required under the National Quality Framework (NQF) and state-based regulators. "Educators tell us that what was supposed to be a commonsense stopgap for changes that occur at centres through the day, has become an overused staffing loophole, entrenching educators regularly working below minimum staffing requirements in their rooms," Ms Smith said. Even where ratios were being met, staff reported an increase in children with additional needs meant safety was still being compromised. "We always work with the correct ratio, but the increase of children with higher needs is making current ratios completely inappropriate," a New South Wales educator told the union survey. Federal Minister for Early Childhood Education Senator Jess Walsh said the survey results were "very concerning". "Providers must meet minimum staffing levels to provide safe, quality early education and care," she said. "We will work with educators and their union to address the concerns raised in this survey." The minister said the government last year agreed to spend $3.6 billion to give childcare workers a pay rise and job vacancies were falling in the sector. The Australian Childcare Alliance, a lobby group representing for-profit providers, said its members had been working with government to improve attraction and retention of workers. "We are unable to comment on a survey with no oversight of the detail included in the data," a spokesperson said. "The sector is rightfully expected to comply with the regulations and National Quality Framework at all times. This is non-negotiable."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Accidentally unredacted document reveals issues with children at Tasmanian watch houses
Staff at two Tasmanian prisons have "urgently" requested body-worn cameras and reported "high levels of anxiety" when managing children in watch houses, a mistakenly unredacted document shows. Using the Right to Information (RTI) process, the ABC requested information about complaints or concerns regarding Tasmanian children being held in adult custodial facilities — where they await court, bail or police interview. RTI — sometimes called Freedom of Information — is a system that helps people access documents and other public-interest information held by public authorities. When journalists or members of the public receive documents through RTI, they are usually partly blacked out as to not disclose information. The ABC made an RTI request to the Department of Justice, the public authority for the Tasmanian Prison Service. Two months later, a 14-page document was received. See more details of the ABC's request, the information provided and relevant parts of the Right to Information Act, here. By mistake, the document received was completely free from redaction, revealing in full an "issues register" from 2024, where prison staff listed concerns around the detention of children in watch houses and the Department of Justice responded with suggestions or actions to address them. Within minutes the department sent another email saying they "would like to recall" the document. It then sent a second, corrected version of the document, which was completely redacted aside from several paragraphs and a one-page introduction. Watch houses are designed for temporary detention and lack the facilities of long-term prisons or detention centres. The department told the ABC that redactions were made where the document contained personally identifying information, deliberative information, and information "out-of-scope" of the request. The unredacted version contained no names or personally identifying details. The ABC has decided to publish this story, after reviewing the information. The ABC can reveal the hidden information was indicative of staff concerns that: The Department of Justice has since told the ABC: The department said it was in the final stages of acquiring body-worn cameras in reception prisons — where watch houses are located — "with implementation expected before the end of the year". In the issues register, the department responded to staff concerns about health and hygiene risks for children, saying it would "upgrade infrastructure to allow young people to tend to basic hygiene and self-care". "Reducing the risk of trauma to young people in reception prisons remains a key priority. The department is committed to ongoing improvements." Tasmanian prison staff, who manage youth in watch houses on behalf of Tasmania Police, said police officers "regularly" told detainees they "will be at the WH [watch house] for a little while" — which can negatively impact their mental and physiological state. Dysregulation refers to an inability to control or regulate emotional responses. Staff also said police provided insufficient information when transferring people to watch houses, resulting in "significant operational risks and impacts the safety of detainees". But police say an admission form for each detainee outlining personal details, behavioural risks, medical information and child safety concerns is provided to prison staff. "Tasmania Police aims to provide timely and accurate information to prison staff regarding a youth in custody at the time the youth is detained," a police spokesperson said. The department said over the next five years it intended to "advocate for Youth Justice Blueprint to incorporate watch house facility for young people". Johan Lidberg, an associate professor at Monash University, believed because the document was "in the highest public interest" and did not identify people, it was not reasonable to keep it hidden — and considered the "personal information" exemption did not apply. The department was asked for more details on the decision to not disclose the information. It replied: "As outlined in the right to information decision, if you are dissatisfied with the decision you may seek an internal review under section 43 of the Right to Information Act 2009 (the Act)." The ABC requested details of: "Complaints, concerns or similar regarding children and young people being held in an adult remand facility and related correspondence from 2022 to 2025." One 14-page document was given to the ABC titled "Engaging with Young People Training — Issues and Responses". It included a one-page introduction and then a table with two columns — one outlining staff-raised issues with dealing with young people in watch houses and the other with the department's written response to the issue. It was initially completely unredacted but with red outline boxes left around some sections, and then, minutes later a version with those boxes redacted was sent through in which almost all the document was redacted. The initial introduction as well as some sections on pages 2 and 3 were left unredacted. No staff or detainees were named in the document. The department said redactions were made according to the following parts of Tasmania's Right to Information Act: Exemptions subject to public interest test Section 35 — 'Internal deliberative information' I consider that disclosing the above listed items, which contain material compiled by departmental officers may contain information which is wrong or inaccurate — see clause (u) of Schedule 1. The material contains records of ongoing consultations between officers, including material which is deliberative in nature. It is also important to note that the material relates to exchanges by relatively junior Departmental employees and there is no information to indicate their views would be adopted as a formal policy. I also consider that the nature of the comments of Departmental officers are deliberate in nature and should not be disclosed. Officers must feel free to provide their opinions, advice and recommendations, and to participate openly in consultative and deliberative processes, in order for decision and action resulting from those processes to be robust. The overriding public interest consideration is the need to ensure that there is a frank exchange of views between officers when making decisions. The disclosure of consultations or deliberations would likely prevent such exchanges from occurring, with a consequent detrimental impact on good decision-making. Further, it would also lead to a reluctance to document the reasons for decision, with a consequent loss in transparency in the decision-making process. Section 36 — 'Personal information of a person' I consider that disclosing the personal information of members of the public would be detrimental to the interests of those persons — see clause (m) of Schedule 1. The personal information of people who have been held at a watch-house is not in the public domain and those persons might suffer discrimination by reason of their having been in these facilities if disclosed. As a consequence of the above, I am of the opinion that the factor favouring disclosure are outweighed by those against disclosure and it is not in the public interest to provide the personal information of a members of the public. 'Information out of scope' I consider that part of the material contains information which is out of scope of your request. The relevant material has been redacted and marked accordingly.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson endured freezing cell conditions during her trial — now she's headed to maximum-security jail
Since the start of her murder and attempted murder trial, Erin Patterson's daily routine had been the same. On Monday mornings, Patterson would board a van at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre maximum security women's prison in Melbourne's western suburbs and make the two-hour journey — more than 170 kilometres — to the Latrobe Valley in south-eastern Victoria. By the time she reached Morwell, where her case was being heard, a waiting contingent of photographers would emerge from the fog near the town's rose garden like a spectre, jostling for the money shot. Patterson would then be taken to the cells at the local police station, her home for the week, before making the journey in reverse. Before the trial began, she'd already been in custody for more than 600 days since her arrest on November 2, 2023. Patterson, who was on Tuesday convicted of murder and attempted murder, had struck a deal with Corrections Victoria that she would be able to be able to take a doona and pillow into her bare concrete cell. Her defence lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, told the Supreme Court of Victoria none of those things were provided. "At some stage she was given a blanket, but she spent the night cold and awake … and she can't operate like that," Mr Mandy said at the time. "Someone who is in police cells for five weeks, facing a murder trial … requires special treatment so that we can do our job properly, so that she can provide us with proper instructions so that she's not uncomfortable," he said. "It won't be fair to her if that situation continues." Patterson would eventually receive a doona, a pillow and a sheet, but according to sources familiar with the cells at the Morwell police station, it still would not have been a comfortable stay. "They're simply not designed for people to live in," said one criminal lawyer. Until now, the Supreme Court has prevented details of Patterson's time in custody from being published to preserve her right to a fair trial. The only public description of Patterson's cell was made by Justice Christopher Beale, who inspected it before the trial started. "I was shown the cell where she is now being held and the bedding is really just a bit of plastic attached to the floor," the judge told the court. Patterson's accommodation in Morwell was a significant shift from what she was used to at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, a maximum-security facility for women that houses 538 prisoners. The Morwell cells often house people who are drunk or high and, by extension, their associated bodily fluids, which are pressure-hosed out before someone else checks in. Legal sources said the cells, which are made of concrete, were not only extremely cold but quite loud, with sound echoing off every surface. Another criminal lawyer was franker in her assessment. "[They're] just old shitty cells," she said. "It's not clean, that's for sure." The second criminal lawyer said clients were brought into a particular area to speak to their legal team. "They're just like these little boxes like you see in the movies where there's a clear plastic screen separating you," she said. By contrast, some prisoners at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, which also houses Melbourne crime matriarch Judy Moran and convicted paedophile Malka Leifer, have access to more creature comforts to help pass their sentences. In some high-privilege units within the prison, inmates have access to a television and couches. Others are allowed to train support dogs during the day. Some prisoners even have microwaves in their cells. But according to one source who has made frequent visits to the women's prison, even those small comforts are not enough to distract prisoners from reality. "Can you imagine waking up in the morning and you don't see the outside world. You see fences all around — that's what it looks like. It's depressing," they said. The source said visitors were usually allowed on weekends. "There's a visitor centre there. They've got the babies there, the playgrounds and stuff for all the kids — it's like a primary school," they said. "When you go through the entry point you get treated like a criminal. You've got to go through the scanner, you've got to get an eye test to ID you," they said. The prison's stringent visitor policy is something Patterson will have to get used to. The 50-year-old is now facing life in prison over the murders of Heather Wilkinson, Don and Gail Patterson and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson. The beef Wellington used to murder her in-laws has captured global attention, which is no surprise to Brandy Cochrane, a criminologist at Victoria University. "There's a long history of fascination with women who kill," Dr Cochrane told ABC Radio Melbourne. "There are a lot of parallels between the way that the media and the courts treated Lindy Chamberlain and Erin Patterson." She said both Patterson and Chamberlain were criticised for showing no emotion during their verdicts, which was interpreted as "another damning moment for both of them". Kathryn Whitely, a US-based feminist criminologist, has worked with 100 female murderers around the world and conducted an in-depth study of women at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. "In the US, it'd be termed a mass killing. Very, very rare for a female," Dr Whiteley said. "Women, also as we understand, no matter if it's mass or not in this case, their victims are usually someone that is close to them, someone that they know, and often someone that they love," she said. Dr Whiteley, who closely followed the case, said Patterson had struggled with "self-esteem challenges" and would take years to adapt to prison life. "She will find that it will be hard to adjust," she said. "It takes anywhere from five to seven years for a woman to at least assimilate or adjust to the 'prison way' or prison approach to how we survive inside." It comes as the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre, which Patterson will now call home, faces significant issues. In June this year, the ABC revealed the prison has faced unprecedented rolling lockdowns due to a lack of staff. Former prisoners said they were locked away with no interaction, support or even meals for days and nights on end. Since July 2024, confidential government correspondence reveals there have been at least 106 lockdowns. Another lawyer told the ABC its prisoners like Patterson would be facing significant restrictions. "Whatever her life is going to be like in Dame Phyllis, at the moment she's going to be more restricted," he said.
