SC seeks fresh report from Manipur on probe into alleged audio clips of ex-CM Biren Singh
Central Forensic Science Laboratory
(CFSL) submitted by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and asked the law officer to seek instruction from the state officers with regard to investigation in the matter.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Inside Operation Tupac: Pakistan's secret project to burn Kashmir
Who is Asim Munir, the Zia-style general shaping Pakistan's faith-driven military revival
'Looking for partners, not preachers': India's strong message for EU amid LoC tensions
"The FSL report has been filed. We need a month to probe it," the law officer said, adding the matter can be taken up by the Manipur High Court now as "peace is prevailing now and the probe can go on".
"Let us keep the petitioners aside and if something wrong has been done then let us look into it rather than protecting anyone," the CJI said.
GIF89a����!�,D;
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
After perusing the report, the CJI asked the law officer that he will have to speak to the officers about it.
"The solicitor general to take fresh instructions on filing a fresh report after re-examination. Let it be relisted in the week commencing July 21, 2025," the bench ordered.
Live Events
When lawyer Prashant Bhushan, appearing for petitioner
Kuki Organisation for Human Rights Trust
(KOHUR), said the probe pertains to the former chief minister and it should be fair, the CJI said, "Now we have the President Rule there... it should not be a problem".
He then adjourned the hearing on the plea of KOHUR.
Earlier, the state government had informed the bench that a forensic report on the authenticity of leaked audio clips alleging the role of Singh in the ethnic violence was ready and will be filed.
Singh resigned as the chief minister of Manipur on February 9, amid rumblings within the state BJP and growing demands for a change of leadership.
Earlier, the top court sought a sealed-cover forensic report from the CFSL on the authenticity of the leaked audio clips alleging Singh's role in the ethnic violence that began in May 2023.
KOHUR had sought a court-monitored SIT probe into Singh's alleged role.
Bhushan termed the contents of the audio leaks a "very serious matter" and said Singh was purportedly heard saying that Meitei groups were allowed to loot arms and ammunition of the state government.
"I have annexed transcripts of tape recordings," he added.
The solicitor general said the petitioner had "ideological inclinations" and there was a report by a committee of three high court judges which stated that there were efforts to keep the "pot boiling".
"A truth lab confirmed that 93 percent it is the voice of the chief minister," Bhushan said, adding "truth labs are far more reliable than the FSL reports."
The law officer, however, questioned the veracity of the truth lab report.
On November 8 last year, a bench headed by former CJI D Y Chandrachud directed KOHUR to produce material to indicate the authenticity of some of the leaked audio clips.
Bhushan had said he would also file a copy of the tape in a CD format.
Mehta, however, said the plea could be filed in the high court under Article 226 of the Constitution.
More than 260 people have been killed and thousands displaced since the ethnic violence broke out between the Imphal valley-based Meitei and neighbouring hills-based Kuki communities in May 2023.
The clashes began after a 'Tribal Solidarity March' was organised in the hill districts to protest against an order of the Manipur High Court on the Meitei community's demand for Scheduled Tribe status.
Bhushan alleged that the recorded conversation prima facie showed the complicity and involvement of the state machinery in the violence against the Kuki Zo community.
He said the clips had "disturbing conversations" and Singh could be heard instigating the violence and protecting the attackers.
KOHUR's plea alleged that Singh was instrumental in "inciting, organising and thereafter centrally orchestrating the large-scale murder, destruction and other forms of violence against the Kuki-dominated areas in Manipur".
"Petitioner is praying for a court-monitored investigation by special investigation team into the leaked audio tape clips as there is clear and strong prima facie evidence showing involvement of the highest functionary, i.e., chief minister of a state. The investigation would need to unearth the conspiracy which appears to involve the highest functionary of state," it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre declines nod to Punjab power minister Harbhajan for US visit
The Union government has denied political clearance to Punjab power minister Harbhajan Singh for his planned visit to the US, sources said on Thursday. Punjab power minister Harbhajan Singh Singh was to participate in the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) Legislative Summit 2025, scheduled to be held in Boston, Massachusetts, from August 4 to 6. Political leaders require clearance from the ministry of external affairs for travelling abroad. Singh has not been given political clearance by the Union government for visiting the US, the sources said. Last year, the Centre denied political clearance to chief minister Bhagwant Mann for his visit to Paris to support the Indian hockey team at the Olympic Games. Punjab assembly speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan was also denied political clearance for going to participate in a legislature conference in the US in August last year. In 2022, minister Aman Arora was also denied political clearance for a knowledge sharing study tour to Europe. The invitation to Singh was extended jointly by the NCSL and National Legislators' Conference Bharat (NLC Bharat). The NCSL Legislative Summit 2025 is one of the largest gatherings of legislative leaders, staff experts and policymakers worldwide, creating an environment filled with unparalleled learning, networking and inspiration opportunities. The summit would feature open sessions covering various aspects of governance, professional development workshops and networking events designed to facilitate knowledge exchange among legislative colleagues from different countries and jurisdictions, according to an official release issued on July 28.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
SC to T speaker: Decide pleas on BRS turncoat MLAs in 3 months
New Delhi: In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Thursday said to protect foundations of democracy, Parliament must take a call on the effectiveness of the anti-defection law mechanism, which has been virtually blunted due to the widely perceived partisanship of speakers, leading to delays in deciding disqualification petitions against political turncoats. Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice A G Masih gave this ruling while directing the Telangana assembly speaker to decide within three months the disqualification petitions filed against 10 BRS MLAs who defected to Congress after it formed govt in the state following the Nov 2023 elections. The verdict marks a departure from the restraint that courts have shown in setting deadlines for speakers and could well be a precedent in settling defection-related cases in the future. The CJI-led bench also directed the speaker not to allow the 10 MLAs, facing disqualification proceedings, to protract proceedings. "In the event, any of such MLAs attempt to protract the proceedings, the speaker would draw an adverse inference against him," the bench said. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Constitutional courts have generally refrained from fastening speakers with a timeline to decide pending disqualification petitions. However, SC said since the Telangana speaker has delayed adjudication of the disqualification petitions by more than a year, it warranted issuance of directions to him. The bench was critical of the way the speaker issued notice on the disqualification petitions seven months after they were filed, and said such a delay breached the trust Parliament reposed in presiding officers to adjudicate defection cases fearlessly and expeditiously. In the 2023 elections to the 119-member assembly, Congress had won 64 seats, BRS 39, BJP eight, AIMM seven and CPI one. However, Congress's numbers rose after the defection of the10 BRS MLAs. Writing the 74-page judgment recording numerous instances of speakers' deliberate inaction in speedy adjudication of disqualification petitions against MLAs, CJI Gavai said, "It is for Parliament to consider whether the mechanism of entrusting speakers the important task of deciding the issue of disqualification on the ground of defection is serving the purpose of effectively combating political defections or not?" "If the very foundation of our democracy and the principles that sustain it are to be safeguarded, it will have to be examined whether the present mechanism is sufficient or is for Parliament to take a call on that," the CJI said. SC reiterated the settled law that speakers/chairman of assemblies, Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha function as tribunals while deciding disqualification petitions under the anti-defection law, and that their decisions can be scrutinised by the HCs and the apex court. CJI Gavai examined the purpose behind enactment of the anti-defection law in 1985 through a constitutional amendment and said the only purpose of entrusting the work of adjudicating the disqualification petitions to the speaker/chairman was to avoid dilly-dallying and resultant delay in the courts of law or the Election Commission's office. He said, "Parliament decided to entrust the important question of adjudication of disqualification petitions, on account of defection, to the speaker/chairman expecting him to decide them fearlessly and expeditiously." CJI Gavai and Justice Masih said, "With the experience of over 30 years of working of the 10th Schedule to the Constitution, the question that we will have to ask ourselves is as to whether the trust which the Parliament entrusted in the high office of the speaker or the chairman of avoiding delays in deciding the issue with regard to disqualification has been adhered to by the incumbents in the high office of speaker and the chairman or not?" Referring to a chain of cases under the anti-defection law marred by inordinate delay in adjudication by speakers across states, already frowned upon by SC in as many cases, the bench said, "We need not answer this question, since the facts of the various cases themselves provide the answer."
The Print
6 hours ago
- The Print
Once vocal on ‘saffron terror', Congress big guns evasive after 2008 Malegaon blast verdict
'Please don't digress. This government has destroyed the country's economic, foreign and defence policies. You people don't say it and want to talk about other issues, but they are running this country to the ground,' he said. Speaking to reporters in the Parliament complex, Lok Sabha Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi parried when asked for a response on the acquittals. New Delhi: The acquittal Thursday of the seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case elicited a guarded response from the Congress, which has over the years drawn the BJP's censure for fanning the 'bogey' of 'Hindu terror' while in power from 2004 to 2014. Congress Rajya Sabha MP Digvijaya Singh, who triggered controversy in 2010 after attending the launch of a book, '26/11: RSS ki Sazish', was also measured in his words, saying that terrorism, a 'byproduct of hatred', had no religion. 'I even told the home minister in the Rajya Sabha that I never accused the RSS of the Mumbai attack. I will repeat that the RSS had no role in the Mumbai terror attack. The allegations made against me are false,' Singh had told reporters ahead of the Malegaon case verdict. Following the verdict, when reporters approached him for a response, Singh said, 'There are no Hindu terrorists. Hatred gives birth to terrorism, not Hinduism, Islam or any other religion. It is not right to link religion with terrorism. Every religion represents love, harmony, truth, and non-violence.' Digvijaya Singh contested and lost the 2019 Lok Sabha elections from the Bhopal seat against BJP's Pragya Thakur, one of those acquitted Thursday in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. Former Madhya Pradesh chief minister Kamal Nath, meanwhile, told reporters that those affected by the acquittal have the option of filing an appeal. Digvijaya Singh's presence at a launch event, involving a book authored by Aziz Burney, in 2010 came when many voices within the Congress had started flagging the possible radicalisation among a section of Hindus, and the BJP-RSS role behind it. For instance, addressing a conference of top police officers in August 2010, P. Chidambaram, then serving as the home minister, said, 'There is no let-up in the attempts to radicalise young men and women in India. Besides, there is the recently uncovered phenomenon of saffron terrorism that has been implicated in many bomb blasts of the past. My advice to you is that we must remain ever vigilant and continue to build, at the central and state levels, our capacity in counter-terrorism.' His remarks, at the time, sparked a controversy, prompting the Congress to issue a clarification that 'terrorism has only one colour, and it is black'. Speaking Thursday, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Imran Pratapgarhi reiterated that position, claiming UPA-era Home Secretary R.K. Singh, who would subsequently join the BJP and serve as a minister in the Modi dispensation, coined the term 'saffron terror'. 'The Congress party has been saying from the first day that religion is not associated with terrorism. This term was coined by the then-Home Secretary, R.K. Singh. The BJP kept him as a minister and MP for 10 years, sitting alongside them,' Pratapgarhi said, adding that the National Investigation Agency (NIA) special court delivered 'a verdict, not justice'. 'Former Maharashtra anti-terrorism squad chief Hemant Karkare, who had caught them (the Malegaon blast accused) was martyred while protecting this nation in the 2008 Mumbai attack. The BJP is essentially questioning his martyrdom now,' he said. Former Home Minister and Congress leader Sushilkumar Shinde has written in his 2024 autobiography that R.K. Singh spoke about 'saffron terror' in 2013 after Shinde brought it up at a party convention in Jaipur in January 2013. In an address at the convention, Shinde noted he spoke about 'saffron terror' in his memoir 'Five Decades in Politics', and the home ministry investigations revealed that some saffron organisations had been conducting training camps to spread terrorism. 'Reports have come during the investigation that the BJP and the RSS conduct terror training camps to spread terrorism … Bombs were planted in the Samjhauta Express, Mecca Masjid, and a blast was carried out in Malegaon. We will have to think about it seriously and will have to remain alert,' I had told the AICC delegates. 'We have to take these facts seriously and remain alert',' Shinde wrote. He added, 'I had come across the term 'saffron terror' in one of the confidential papers prepared by the Union home ministry. But it was an issue that had the potential to snowball into a huge controversy since the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and its ideological fulcrum, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), were apparently involved.' 'I was, therefore, careful to first check the veracity of the allegation before going public with it…Subsequently, R.K. Singh also spoke, which was a pleasant surprise because it is rare to see an Indian Administrative Service officer dwell on politicised issues.' (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: 'Grave suspicion but not enough proof'—what NIA court said as it acquitted Malegaon blast accused
