EXCLUSIVE 'Why would I get a job? I get your monthly wage in a week!' As Starmer's bid to cut disability benefits is sunk by Labour MPs, social media tutorials show claimants how to milk the system - and you'll be the one left feeling sick
But mastering this red tape – particularly in relation to Britain's bloated benefits system – can apparently also present extraordinarily lucrative business opportunities.
Just ask Charlie Anderson, a YouTube blogger who says her chronic arthritis and fatigue has rendered her unable to work.
Thanks to her lengthy experience with the welfare system, she is extremely proficient at filling out forms used to claim the Personal Independence Payment [PIP] allowance disability benefit.
So adept has she become in applying for this taxpayer-funded help that she has taken to explaining the 'tricks of the trade' to any prospective benefits claimant – for a hefty fee, of course.
For £750, Ms Anderson will provide a three-hour online consultation in which she will discuss the best way to fill out a PIP claim form. If she can work her magic, the pricey up-front outlay will quickly be repaid by the taxpayer.
She also offers a premium service to people whose initial PIP claim was turned down. Her £950 fee includes a four-hour, one-to-one video call during which Ms Anderson will talk them through their 'mandatory reconsideration' – civil service-speak for a free appeal.
All from the comfort of her shed-turned-office at the bottom of her garden in Bucknall, Staffordshire.
Charlie Anderson, a YouTube blogger who says her chronic arthritis and fatigue has rendered her unable to work, charges disability benefit applicants large fees for help explaining the 'tricks of the trade'
Remarkably, Ms Anderson – whose YouTube tutorials and emotional diatribes against the state of Britain's benefits system have attracted almost four million views – claims that she has a '100 per cent success rate at winning PIP' and has 'helped over 150 people receive their PIP claims'.
A video with more than 200,000 views starts with a bouncy, 'Hi, my name is Charlie and I'm really good at PIP'. She then describes the 'trickery' used by the Government's assessors. If asked whether you can go to the shops or hospital unaided, don't say yes, she warns, or you won't be awarded benefits.
Despite the fact that her tutorials have attracted criticism from various quarters, business is apparently booming – with Ms Anderson even seemingly 'employing' two people to assist her in administering her customer base.
The 46-year-old is far from the only online influencer – or 'sickfluencer' – exploiting a lucrative market in helping claimants navigate the welfare system's complexities.
Take Whitney Ainscough, who boasts 750,000 followers across TikTok and Instagram. The Range Rover-driving 31-year-old mother from Rotherham, South Yorkshire, says her lifestyle is funded by benefits, claiming in one video posted in May that she receives £1,151.90 a week.
'Why would I get a job?' she said. 'I get your monthly wage in a week. Why would I go out and get a job? I'm living my f***ing best life.'
In another video from earlier this year she advised her followers to withdraw their PIP money in cash so nobody would be able to track what it was being spent on.
It is this sort of abuse of the system that the Government sought to address with its £5billion cuts to the ballooning welfare budget announced earlier this year.
But ministers were this week forced into a humiliating climbdown following a rebellion by Labour MPs. Now there will be no reform of PIP rules until the Government has had time to consider a review of current procedures.
One anonymous Labour MP said the series of U-turns on the bill had turned it into 'a total clusterf**k of Godzilla proportions'.
Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said: 'This farcical climbdown is the most humiliating moment of Labour's first year in office.'
But it's not hard to see why the Government targeted disability benefits for cuts. Around one in ten working-age adults – some four million people – are claiming either disability or incapacity benefit, up from less than three million six years ago. This means taxpayers are footing a bill of £70billion a year for such claimants – up £20billion since the pandemic.
One of the key factors behind this surge is the number of people reporting mental health conditions such as anxiety or depression as what makes them eligible for PIP.
Earlier this year, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said there was an 'overdiagnosis' of mental health conditions, contributing to 1,000 new PIP claimants every day. Even those suffering from conditions such as acne, alcoholism and Tourette syndrome (a neurological condition that causes involuntary, repetitive movements and sounds) are receiving welfare payments.
The Mail can reveal that last year alone, more than £2billion was paid out in benefits to claimants suffering from mixed anxiety and depressive disorders – an average of around £6,600 per claimant.
The figures compiled by the Taxpayers' Alliance also reveal £291million was spent on almost 47,000 claimants who cited anxiety disorders as their main condition and more than £26million was paid out to help people with obesity.
Another £60million went to 9,000 people claiming to have Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). This absurd liberalisation of the system has not gone unnoticed by bloggers such as Chantelle Knight.
The Southampton-based 43-year-old has told her TikTok followers that sufferers of conditions such as ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder) don't need an official medical diagnosis to get benefits but just to show how the condition affects their everyday life – advice echoed by Charlie Anderson. In another TikTok video, Ms Knight said: 'I have a client with ADHD who is undiagnosed. And I've just secured him an award of high rate daily living allowance and low rate mobility [payments made on the basis of how serious the client's perceived disability is].
'He doesn't have a diagnosis. And it just goes to show you can have an abundance of diagnoses and no evidence and not get an award. Equally you can have an abundance of evidence and no diagnosis and get the award.'
Last month, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled that Ms Knight had breached advertising rules for 'potentially harmful' promotions of a saffron-based food supplement via her website neurodiverselife.co.uk and 'irresponsibly discouraged' people from taking medically-prescribed treatments for ADHD. Last night, her website appeared to have been closed.
It would seem that one of the main contributory factors to this trend is the fact that many PIP claimants are no longer obliged to attend a face-to-face assessment.
The switch to assessments carried out over the phone started in the pandemic when lockdowns made in-person ones impossible. Outsourcing firm Maximus, which conducts PIP assessments on behalf of the Government in the north of England and Scotland, says on its website that some assessments can even be completed solely based on the information provided in the initial form.
It then says that 'if there is not enough information to complete the assessment, you will be invited to attend a consultation'.
'Most consultations are carried out by telephone,' it adds, 'but we may invite you to a video or face-to-face consultation if needed.'
Critics say the use of telephone assessments makes it easier for claimants to exaggerate their symptoms because the assessor is not in a position to scrutinise their condition properly.
In December, former assessor Michael Houston told a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary that 'people were encouraged to do six cases a day' and that they received cash incentives to process more.
'If you did any more than that, you would get £80 per case,' he added. 'If the claimant met the highest category [of sickness benefit] then the assessment could be curtailed early. This would allow them to fit in more cases per day.'
As the phone interviews are not recorded, leaving no way of checking if guidelines are being applied properly, the system is vulnerable to abuse. Former Spectator editor Fraser Nelson, who made the Dispatches documentary, recently argued that returning to face-to-face interviews is vital if the welfare budget is to be brought under control. He said: 'Record and spot-check all claims, not just rejected ones. Publish all sickness benefit data, daily. How many applied and were approved? How many bonuses were paid? Such transparency could be transformative. A Covid-style live data dashboard would focus minds more than any ministerial edict.'
But to understand why the welfare reforms provoked such outrage, it's worth looking at what the Government initially wanted to do.
PIP is not means-tested and does not affect other benefits or the benefits cap. It can even be claimed if you are working. It includes a daily living component and a mobility component. To be entitled to the daily living part, claimants need to explain how much difficulty they have performing everyday activities, including tasks such as cooking, washing and getting dressed or undressed.
A points system is used where, for example, requiring supervision or assistance to prepare or cook a simple meal would be awarded four points. Being completely unable to prepare and cook food would warrant eight points. Under the Government's initial proposals, claimants would have needed to score a minimum of four points on at least one activity to be eligible for that component – rather than a range of different ones. But scrapping the change was one of the Government's concessions to the rebels on Tuesday.
People claiming daily living payments can receive the standard weekly rate of £73.90 or an enhanced one of £110.40, depending on their level of difficulty performing the relevant tasks.
The mobility part comprises a standard rate of £29.20 per week or an enhanced rate of £77.05 per week. Those who qualify for the higher rate can also choose to exchange this for a car under the Motability scheme.
This arrangement came under fire after it emerged it accounts for one in five new cars sold in Britain and, in March, the Mail revealed that the company behind the scheme is sitting on a £4billion stockpile of reserves – including £1.3billion in cash in the bank.
So many people are now entitled to disability benefits that, in some parts of the country, an astonishing one in five people are in receipt of handouts.
In the Welsh county of Blaenau Gwent, 211 out of every 1,000 people are claiming PIP – the highest proportion in the country.
In Sunderland, the figure stands at 173 per 1,000 people and, in this PIP hotspot on Thursday afternoon, sisters Maureen and Mary Robey and their friend Olga Koch were enjoying the sunshine in the city centre. All three have been claiming PIP for a number of years.
Maureen, 71, said she was finally granted the £600-a-month benefit following a phone consultation.
'It wasn't as easy as it could have been to claim PIP,' she said. 'I wasn't expecting to have to answer questions over the phone. I had been told that filling out a form would be all I needed to do. But I filled out a long form and my doctor's notes were sent over to back up my claim. I expected the money to be sent to my account quickly after.
'They rang me and asked questions about my COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease], which I didn't think was necessary.
'All three of us have been on it for years and it's helped to make our lives easier, so this uncertainty about it being reformed has caused some concern.'
Mary, 72, said she has anxiety and depression but her PIP claim was initially rejected. 'I turned to Age Concern for help and they filled out my forms for me,' she said. 'It was only after their involvement that I got the help I needed.'
Under PIP terms, new claims cannot be made after reaching state pension age. But if you already get PIP and hit pension age, your payments continue.
Former soldier John Heskett, 73, said he believed there were a number of people in the city fooling the system: 'There are a lot of kidders out there who are claiming PIP when there's not a thing wrong with them.
'I know of people in this town who are claiming and they're fitter than me. I have problems with my legs and I know I would qualify but I don't ask for help when I don't feel I need it.
'Everyone should be tested properly because people are working the system.'
Back online, Charlie Anderson, as part of her £750 online tutorial, says she will analyse answers to ensure 'what we write matches your life AND is communicated in a way that suits the DWP [Department for Work and Pensions] so they can assess you.'
Ms Anderson, with more than 52,000 YouTube subscribers, then says she can send answers back so the claimant can 'copy what we wrote straight on to your form'.
She adds: 'By the end of the meeting, you will feel much better and you will probably have the best nap you have had in years!'
Last night, a spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions hit out at those trying to cash in on the benefits boom.
'We condemn attempts to charge people for support with their PIP applications, and strongly encourage customers to seek additional support through free channels, such as, the gov.uk website, our dedicated helpline, and relevant charities,' he said.
'And we are bringing forward the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation as part of wider plans that will save £9.6billion by 2030 – protecting taxpayers' money and investing in our public services through our Plan for Change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour
It is more than a quarter of a century since Tony Blair complained about the 'scars on my back' from two years of trying to reform the public sector. As the Cabinet Office supremo, Pat McFadden, noted in a speech on the same subject in December, Blockbuster Video and Toys R Us were still in operation at the time of Blair's comments, while Airbnb, WhatsApp and Spotify had yet to be born. Twenty-six years later, creative destruction has reshaped the private sector, in some ways unrecognisably, but the same old arguments swirl about modernising government. The case for public sector reform has become more urgent after the reversals of the past few weeks. A partial U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments, at a cost of almost £1.3 billion, turned out to be a mere appetiser for a near-total capitulation on attempts to cut welfare by nearly £5 billion. Those surrenders, plus a possible downgrade of the independent fiscal watchdog's productivity forecasts and other revisions, could blow a £30 billion hole in the public finances. After £40 billion of tax rises in October's budget — which put the UK on course for a record postwar haul of 37.7 per cent of GDP — the drums are beating to the rhythm of more taxes this autumn. Breaking a manifesto promise not to increase the burden on 'working people' could cost the chancellor her job. Cranking up taxes even further on businesses — which have swallowed £25 billion of extra national insurance contributions — and on capital gains, carried interest and inheritances would place another drag on already sluggish growth. Labour may have been handed an ugly fiscal picture by the Conservatives last year, but it is getting worse. Much valid criticism has been made of Rachel Reeves, Sir Keir Starmer and senior colleagues for their failure to persuade a recalcitrant parliamentary party of the need for realism in spending cuts. Although the winter fuel business was handled badly politically, reducing payments was right in principle, and £5 billion should have been just the start in controlling a benefits bill that is predicted to swell to £378 billion by 2030. The simple fact is that Labour is showing itself incapable of getting the nation's costs down, and higher taxes would stifle the economy. Sharpening public sector productivity is the only plausible third way. Three articles we carry today offer a way forward. Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, argues that the present model of 43 county-based forces has not been fit for purpose 'for at least two decades' and should be replaced by 12 to 15 regional forces. He says this would reduce back-office duplication and allow the enlarged groups to make better use of technology. Rowley also makes the point that creaking social services are frequently forcing police officers to take on the role of social workers, especially in cases of children missing from local authority care. Penny Dash, the new chairwoman of NHS England, says the health service's dysfunctional bureaucracy makes her 'just want to cry'. There are examples of brand-new scanners lying idle, unused buildings on the NHS estate, operating theatre times routinely slipping and appointment letters being sent out to patients after they were due to be seen. Dash wants to open up data on NHS performance, including on individual doctors and teams, saying the institution should go 'really big on transparency'. Today we also report on the scandal of HS2, a rail project that could end up costing more than £100 billion despite suffering repeated delays. We reveal how contracts were struck with the private sector, on behalf of the taxpayer, that contained no element of risk. This meant that there was no incentive for many of the contractors to operate efficiently, as they were safe in the knowledge that if the costs over-ran, the taxpayer would pick up the tab. The new boss of HS2 has pledged to renegotiate the contracts. His approach should be replicated across Whitehall. In truth Labour has so far taken the easy options for improving public sector performance, awarding workers above-inflation pay rises and increasing capital budgets. Sensible cabinet ministers now accept in private that those pay deals should never have been struck without some kind of union commitment to workplace reform. The next steps will now be harder, involving confronting vested interests, including Starmer's own backbenchers. Blair, with his record landslide in 1997, was prepared to sustain scars in pursuit of reform — and even he made limited progress. The big question is whether Starmer and his team are up for and up to the challenge.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Conservatives will look to amend Government welfare Bill
Kemi Badenoch will pledge that the Tories are 'now the only party committed to serious welfare reform' after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer shelved plans to restrict eligibility for Pip in the face of a backbench revolt this week. Ministers have warned there will be costs to their backtracking on the plans, as Downing Street and the Treasury will be looking to cover the spending shortfall left by the decision. The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation – set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday. Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for Pip to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually. As part of the Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for universal credit. Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money. Another of the Conservatives' amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD. The third amendment would block the increase in universal credit and restrict Pip for some people who are not British citizens. In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'. 'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will say. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels. On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging' and did not rule out tax rises in the autumn budget. It came after images of the Chancellor crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, although a spokesman said she was upset by a personal matter. In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said it would be 'irresponsible' to rule out the idea of tax rises and warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Bill. The Sunday Times reported that the two-child benefit cap could be unlikely to be scrapped – as many Labour backbenchers want – as ministers look to balance the finances.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Shona Robison urges Prime Minister to follow Scotland on taxation
Ms Robison said that if Labour had followed the Scottish model, where higher earners pay more tax, Labour would not be in the 'complete fiscal mess that they are in now.' Her comments come after Sir Keir Starmer's Government was forced into a last-minute climbdown in order for welfare legislation to pass its first parliamentary hurdle earlier this week. In a late concession on Tuesday evening, ministers shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), with any changes now only coming after a review of the benefit. These changes are expected to put pressure on other parts of the Government's finances. Ms Robison said: 'People voted for a Labour government last year because they wanted change from the Tories – but after a year of attacks on the incomes of pensioners, the poor and the disabled, they are rightly wondering exactly what, if anything, is different. 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now. 'After a year of mistakes, Labour needs a new direction – and they should look to Scotland. By asking people on higher incomes to pay a bit more in tax, we have ensured a majority of taxpayers pay less than they would elsewhere in the UK, and are able to unlock more spending for services like the NHS, as well as cut poverty by introducing a Scottish Child Payment, and ensure that everybody can benefit from important services like free tuition and free prescriptions.' She added: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's economy, business and fair work spokesperson Daniel Johnson MSP said: 'SNP ministers have a brass neck to think they can lecture anyone after their atrocious financial mismanagement. 'The SNP use higher taxes on Scottish nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth, waste billions on out-of-control prison and ferry projects, and have created multibillion-pound black holes in the public finances. 'Labour is delivering the largest funding settlement in the history of devolution, with £50 billion for Scotland's NHS, schools and public services this year alone. Despite that, the SNP are now gearing up to make cuts to fill their fiscal black hole. 'The SNP government has the money, they have the powers, but they are out of ideas, out of excuses and out of time. 'Next year, we have the chance to kick out this SNP Government that cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.'
