Tributes to Brian Wilson flood in from across the music world
Wilson's family posted news of his death on his website and social media accounts today. Further details weren't immediately available.
The influence of Wilson's music was felt far and wide, which has been reflected in the tributes made by other musicians and entertainers.
'Brian Wilson was my friend and my brother in songwriting. We shared a similar sensibility, as evidenced by his 4 over 5 chord under Aaaah! in Good Vibrations and mine under I'm Into Something Good. We once discussed who used it first, and in the end we decided it didn't matter. The world will miss Brian, but we are so lucky to have his music," singer-songwriter Carole King said on Facebook.
'I know Orbison is the king of emo, but man if there was a human being who made art out of inexpressible sadness….damn it was Brian Wilson," drummer and producer Questlove said on Instagram.
ADVERTISEMENT
John Cusack, who played Wilson in the 2014 biopic Love & Mercy, said: 'The maestro has passed — the man was a open heart with two legs — with an ear that heard the angels. Quite literally. Love and Mercy for you and yours tonight. RIP Brian.'
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including passengers stuck on ferry overnight, new flights to Sydney coming, and the weirdest things we leave in Ubers. (Source: 1News)
Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards posted to Instagram. 'Rest in Peace,' he wrote.
'Oh no Brian Wilson and Sly Stone in one week - my world is in mourning. So sad," said Richards' bandmate Ronnie Wood on X.
'Anyone with a musical bone in their body must be grateful for Brian Wilson's genius magical touch !! And greatly saddened of this major worldly loss!! My thoughts go out to his family and friends," Fleetwood Mac drummer Mick Fleetwood said on X.
'First Sly, now Brian … this is really just," Maggie Rogers wrote on her Instagram Story, adding a heartbreak emoji.
'Anyone who really knows me knows how heart broken I am about Brian Wilson passing. Not many people influenced me as much as he did. I feel very lucky that I was able to meet him and spend some time with him. He was always very kind and generous. He was our American Mozart. A one of a kind genius from another world," Sean Ono Lennon said on X.
ADVERTISEMENT
'SO very sad to hear that our dear friend, inspiration and mentor for decades has passed away. Rest In Peace BRIAN WILSON...with love, Dewey & Gerry," Dewey Bunnell and Gerry Beckley, the only remaining founding members of the band America, wrote on Instagram.
Nancy Sinatra posted to Instagram, saying: 'His cherished music will live forever as he travels through the Universe and beyond. God bless you, sweet Brian. One of the biggest thrills of my life was singing California Girls with Brian.'
'To me, Brian Wilson was not merely about surf music, rather a true musical genius toiling away at melding POP into startling sophistication. He will be missed mightily," John Cale, Velvet Underground musician and producer, wrote on X.
'Brian Wilson was a musical and spiritual giant. His melodies shaped generations, & his soul resonated in every note. I was fortunate to know him; we all were blessed by his genius. Rest peacefully, Brian," Micky Dolenz of The Monkees said on X.
Randy Bachman, co-founder of Bachman-Turner Overdrive, said: 'We lost one of the greatest composers and messengers who took jazz harmony, put it to a Chuck Berry beat and made a new genre of music. Some of the best singles in the world. Dennis, Carl and Brian are all together now. Other worlds to sing in.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Julian McMahon's last Instagram exchange with daughter revealed after death
Julian McMahon's last public exchange with his lookalike daughter has come to light after his death from cancer, aged 56. In sweet messages documented on Instagram, the Aussie actor showed his support for his only child, Madison Elizabeth, who he shares with ex-wife and former Baywatch star Brooke Burns. 'Taught
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
Imagining a new web aesthetic where every platform doesn't look exactly the same
First platforms forced us all into their stylised boxes. Now they've made all the boxes look and feel the same. How do we get the best of the old internet back? Lately I've been thinking about what being online looks like. The actual look of it. The aesthetic. As I continue to think and write and talk about escaping walled gardens, I've begun to notice more and more the bricks in those walls. Or the kind of concrete, the colours of the barbed wire, whatever metaphor works in your head. Take a look at this photo quickly and tell me what app this: Is this Snapchat? Maybe the border colours in the screenshot tipped you off – but this is how Instagram shows you its app on its own website. Look like the fave photo sharing site you remember? Let's go again. Which app is this: Is this TikTok? This is Spotify. Try finding the music you love amid its current front page onslaught of video, podcasts, video podcasts, and audiobooks – I dare you. Then talk to a parent of young kids who has carefully controlled their access to YouTube, only to find that the innocent 'music app' is now feeding them the exact same dross. One more: Is this X, the everything app? This is the one that set me off, actually. This is Substack's app, jam-packed with every dark pattern I've come to hate about the current era. If you haven't done this lately, let me show you what trying to sign up to receive a free email newsletter is like now: Ugh, I just needed to get that off my chest, sorry. Back to the look of it all, though. The independent web never had a single coherent aesthetic, obviously, because everyone made it look like whatever they wanted it to. It was constrained only by what the html/css could do. And so it was individual, chaotic, often weird and it was always personal. It was the sewing and embroidery site that didn't close its tags and the Time Cube guy. If you're too young to have experienced this first hand, hit 'surprise me' on this page and get shown web1.0 sites that are still around (Wiby is a search engine of the early web). Now we think about this era as a pixelly time of flashing 'under construction' gifs and hit counters and tiled backgrounds. But the core components were more 'here is what I care about' and 'here are some other things you might be interested in'. The early platforms started to consolidate us together, but they were still deeply personalisable. MySpace and Geocities pages were as eclectic as the self-built ones. Early Tumblr was all about your template, and let you muck around in the css yourself to make it look exactly the way you wanted. Early subreddits were styled to the hilt, and browser extensions like RES let you further make your experience exactly your own. Then sometime around the mid 2010s it started to change, and platforms started to coalesce around clean, uniform interfaces. We saw more template-driven content structures (profile grids, feeds, carousels). Everything had to conform to brand guidelines and UI patterns, and as a consequence it was suddenly homogenised – even wildly different creators' pages looked the same. You can point to various reasons for this – Google acquired Blogspot, Yahoo! acquired Tumblr, Pinterest moved into its shopping-first era, everything became an app. To begin with these platforms forced us all into their stylised boxes, and now, as you can see above, they've made all the boxes look and feel the same. So if web aesthetic = the messy, expressive look of the open internet, and platform aesthetic = the polished, standardised design of closed ecosystems, both aesthetics say a lot about power, creativity, and who controls the experience. That's probably uncontroversial. What I want to think about now, though, is what the new web aesthetic is. As we start to focus on building the good internet, it's cute and fun to nod to the retro stylings of the web1.0 era – reinventing webrings and blogrolls and giving everything an anti-Squarespace feel. But whatever is next shouldn't be retro. It should be its own thing. Over the last few months in my newsletter I've been talking about exploration, and gardens, and archiving – how to bring discovery back when search has been killed by AI slop and Google tells you to eat rocks. I'm not a designer, so I'm not about to tell you anything about layouts or typefaces or colour palettes. But here's what I think can be the core of the next era of the web. I think the new web aesthetic is about getting active again. Platforms encourage passivity. They want us to stay still and scrolling, looking at what the algo wants to show us. Like, swipe, repeat. But the new web aesthetic is non-linear. It encourages you to move from one site to another, to dive down rabbit holes, and crucially, to continue sharing what you find. Sites that reflect a person's process, not just their conclusions. It's working with the garage door up. Recently I was ranting to a friend about a thinkfluencer who annoys me, because he tends to gather together the ideas of others and publish what he sees as the definitive essay on a topic without crediting any of the other thinking that's fed into it. By contrast, the new web aesthetic is link-heavy. It constantly references out to other spaces, to past work and to related ideas. It sees the web as an ongoing conversation, not a feed. You're encouraged to leave the page. Platform aesthetic is ephemeral. We all know the experience of going to show someone a post, only to find the feed has refreshed and the meme has vanished, and you're never going to find it again. Older content disappears from view by design. The new web aesthetic is persistent and browsable archives (that don't rot!). Content is meant to be discovered over time, not posted once and done. The new web aesthetic returns agency to the explorer. You decide what's interesting. You wander, and as a consequence you stay with things longer. Anne-Helen Peterson wrote last week about the demise of Pocket (ironically on Substack): 'Welp, I read the internet,' he'd sometimes tell me around 10 am. 'Got anything else for me?' I always did, because I also read the internet in that way. I used a combination of Google Reader, favourite websites I'd refresh multiple times daily (The Hairpin, The Toast, Grantland, Jezebel, Go Fug Yourself), and followed links from those sites to other stuff the editors thought worth my time… I've come to think of these years as the halcyon days of the post-recession internet, a sort of second golden digital age. It was before so many publications' fate became inextricable from social media, so even though everyone over at Gawker Media was still being badgered by the traffic leaderboard in their offices, the idea of the homepage still held power. People navigated to your site because they liked your site and knew they found good stuff on your site; then they read stuff there. Not just scrolled, but read. The new web aesthetic wants to make us readers again. And not whatever this is. My own site design doesn't embody all of this yet, but it does reflect the colourful, chaotic, joy-filled nature of the fandom spaces I love. You can find everything I've written or talked about there. You can find my weird little side projects. And through this newsletter you can follow my thought processes and dive down the rabbitholes with me. The next iteration, for me, is surfacing more of this. Making it more discoverable. The map may not be the territory, but it's a good place to start.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Chinese consulate asks NZ film festival to can Philippine doco
Chinese officials have asked that a Filipino documentary be removed from future screenings at the New Zealand Doc Edge Festival, saying doing so would be in the interest of Chinese-New Zealand relations. The documentary, Food Delivery: Fresh from the West Philippine Sea, had its world premiere on June 30 at The Capitol Cinema in Auckland — after being withdrawn from screenings in its home country. The film was scheduled to premiere at the Puregold CinePalo Film Festival in Manila was pulled from the line-up days before it aired over what the film creators described as "external factors" earlier this year. It was then selected by New Zealand's Doc Edge Festival — the first to be able to do so. But, this week, festival organisers were asked to do as the Filipino counterparts had and cut the doco from its schedule. In correspondence seen by 1News, the Chinese Consulate requested the festival refrain from all future screenings — if it wanted to act in the "interest of public and China-New Zealand relations". The correspondence pointed out that New Zealand Prime Minister's Christopher Luxon's recent visit to China had been "fruitful". ADVERTISEMENT Festival organisers said the written request followed several calls to ticketing staff and board members, requesting that the screenings be pulled. "The documentary... is rife with disinformation and false propaganda, serving as a political tool for Philippines to pursue illegitimate claims in the South China Sea. Its screening would severely mislead the public and send the wrong message internationally," the email from the Chinese Consulate read. "This documentary disregarded history and facts, and is designed to amplify the Philippines' wrong position on the issue concerning the South China Sea and deliberately distort and hype up the maritime situation." Doc Edge general manager Rachael Penman said they've refused the request and willingly stand by all their filmmakers. "We are a voice for independent filmmakers," she said. "We programmed a film that we felt was really important to be seen and brings up a conversation with so many people. I hope that everyone does go and see this now, and has their own opportunity to make their own decisions about this film." 1News has reached out to both the Chinese Embassy and the Chinese Consulate via email and phone with questions around its specific concerns with the film and why it was appropriate to exert political pressure in such a way. While it didn't address those specific questions, the Chinese Embassy said as a "matter of principle we hope that publicly promoted content would reflect realities rather than spreading mis or dis-information". ADVERTISEMENT It also called for disputes to be peacefully resolved and expressed its desire for "countries outside the region to play a constructive role in this regard instead of doing the opposite". The Philippine Embassy declined to comment other than to say "it is aware" of the situation. Directed by Filipino filmmaker Baby Ruth Villarama, the tells the stories of local fishermen, the national Coast Guard, and the Navy as they work in the South China Sea – with a particular focus on the area around the Scarborough Shoal. Contained within the Philippines' Exclusive Economic Zone, China's had de-facto control of it since 2012 and has refused to accept an international ruling that said its claim over almost the entirety of the South China Sea has no legal basis. University of Otago senior lecturer in politics Nicholas Khoo said there is "absolutely no ambiguity" and the Scarborough Shoal is "Filipino territory". "The challenge is that China doesn't respect the Filipino position, nor does it respect the international legal issue that is at stake here." He said the situation "underlines the importance of New Zealand standing up for the international legal order" and for it to continue to "reassert our interest in freedom of navigation", adding that "there should not be an aggressive use of force to attempt to solve issues". ADVERTISEMENT Khoo said the film clearly contradicts China's narrative and that will be why officials are working to prevent its screening. New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded on behalf of government officials and said it fully supports freedom of expression. In relation to the territorial disputes, it said New Zealand does not take a position on individual claims in the South China Sea, but did want disputes resolved peacefully via diplomacy and in accordance with international law, in particular the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. In China the film has also been heavily criticised. Commentators with its state-run network described it as revealing a "pattern of selective storytelling that serves broader political interests" and a "propaganda piece" that "dodges the gritty geopolitics of the region and the realities of the territorial issues and maritime disputes". Villarama told 1News today she had deliberately chosen to shine the lens on the people rather than the politics. "Because we really want to celebrate us as people, without politicising the issue. We want to diplomatically reach out and share our personal stories, because the more personal we go, the more authentic we can be with others." She said she held no animosity towards China, and invited those opposed to her documentary to go and watch "so they can know the truth about our people". ADVERTISEMENT "We don't have any agenda. There is no 'Western influence'."
