Sen. Baker, Rep. Pugh respond to uncertainty surrounding Penn State-WB, others
In light of reports that Penn State University is considering the closure of several of its campuses, including Penn State Wilkes-Barre, Sen. Baker, R-Lehman Township, and Rep. Pugh, R-Dallas Township, are continuing to monitor the situation.
"This is an unfortunate juncture for our communities and for the future of higher education in the region," said Sen. Baker and Rep. Pugh. "Penn State has disserved us by using a process that was secretive, arbitrary, and lacking in analysis of community viewpoints and needs."
While Penn State has said no final decision has been made, the two legislators said the Pennsylvania Department of Education has confirmed that the university has not formally initiated the required process to close any campus.
The legislators said under state law, such a closure must be submitted for review and approved by the Secretary of Education following detailed evaluation. That process has not yet begun.
In the meantime, the legislators said they are introducing a bill requiring public hearings prior to shuttering any state-related universities.
They are also exploring the creation of a special initiative — like the State Facility Closure Transition Program — to ensure adequate community support in directly impacted and contiguous areas.
"Our Commonwealth Campuses play an essential role in expanding educational opportunity in rural and under-served areas," said Rep. Pugh and Sen. Baker. "The Wilkes-Barre campus is a cornerstone for our region — economically, academically and civically. Before any decision is made, there must be a full, transparent process, guided not only by regulations but by a genuine commitment to the students and communities who depend on these campuses."
Both Sen. Baker and Rep. Pugh emphasized that they would continue to monitor the situation closely and press for meaningful dialogue and public input as developments unfold.
Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
US man gets life for beheading father as political statement and posting video
A Pennsylvania man has been ordered to spend the rest of his life in prison after being convicted of fatally shooting his federal government employee father, decapitating him and brandishing the severed head in an online video that called for the execution of other civil servants. Justin Mohn, 33, was sentenced on Friday after a five-day trial by a judge that found him guilty of murder and terrorism charges, Pennsylvania state prosecutors said. Mohn's conviction is the first time anyone in Pennsylvania has been found guilty under the state's terrorism statute. The local district attorney, Jennifer Schorn, said 'the chilling use of [Mohn's] father's death as a political statement' helped 'underscore the extreme danger he poses'. Among the most damning pieces of evidence in the case was a 15-minute video published on YouTube after the slaying of Michael Mohn, 68, who had long worked for the US army corps of engineers. In it, Justin Mohn, his son, spouted rightwing conspiracy theories, lobbied for militias to torture and execute his father's fellow federal government colleagues, and denounced immigration, LGBTQ+ people, the Black Lives Matter movement and antifascist activists. YouTube removed the video after it had accumulated about 5,000 views in a few hours, the Washington Post noted. Denice Mohn, Justin's mother, came home from work on 30 January 2024 to find her husband dead and beheaded in the bathroom, with a machete and a large knife nearby, said Schorn's office. An autopsy determined her husband had been shot in the head before his decapitation. Denice said at trial that she believed Justin had a normal relationship with his father, but he had struggled to retain employment after graduating from Penn State, which he blamed on the federal government and the educational system. After killing his father, Justin Mohn drove to a national guard training center, where he evidently hoped to convince troops to turn on the federal government, prosecutors alleged. He acknowledged midway through his trial that he had killed his father. But he maintained that the killing resulted from an attempted citizen's arrest that he botched when his father resisted. Prosecutor Edward Louka dismissed Justin Mohn's explanation as 'complete and utter nonsense'. 'He ambushed his dad when he was most vulnerable,' Louka said in court. 'His plan was to murder a longtime federal employee, his father, and order the murder of other federal employees for his warped belief that the government adopt his policies above all else.' After Pennsylvania state court judge Stephen A Corr returned the guilty verdict, Mohn's sister read a statement in court describing how her family felt 'violated by the defendant's extremely calculated and premeditated betrayal and from the posting of the horrifying video that he published online for thousands to see'. 'The awareness that my own brother is capable of such atrocities is terrifying,' Stephanie Mohn said in court, according to prosecutors' statement. 'That person we grew up with is long gone.' In their statement, prosecutors made it a point to allude to Michael Mohn's reputation of being 'a loving husband' as well as a 'father who was always there for his children'. 'Notably, he continued to provide significant emotional and financial support to … Justin, even into his 30s, as Justin struggled with unemployment and finding his path,' Schorn's office said of Michael. 'This tireless support underscored Michael's deep, unconditional love.'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
History from News Journal July 13-19: ice rink debate, lottery problems, hero rescues two
"Pages of history" features excerpts from The News Journal archives including The Morning News and The Evening Journal. See the archives at July 13, 2000, The News Journal Four of five Wilmington City Council members at a stormy committee meeting Wednesday opposed Mayor James H. Sills Jr.'s proposed portable ice-skating rink in Rodney Square. The 13-member council is scheduled to vote next week on spending $1.3 million for the rink. Seven votes are needed to approve the expense. Council President James M. Baker said he prefers a permanent rink at a yet-to-be-built park near the Amtrak station on the Christina riverfront. That prompted Greg Williams, director of the city's parks and recreation department, to say the project has become politicized at the expense of Wilmington's children. He favors the Rodney Square site. Baker, who is running against Sills in the Sept. 9 Democratic mayoral primary, said the Sills administration has advocated the concept of a rink somewhere in the city for three years. The council's requests to explore several locations were not successful, Baker said. 'This is not a political football,' Baker told Williams in a raised voice. 'You guys failed us; we didn't fail you.' Councilman Gerald Brady, who presided over the park and recreation committee meeting, declared the meeting out of order. 'Bring it back to order then,' Baker said. He then left and did not return. Brady and Councilmen Paul Bartkowski and Kevin Kelley said the money should not be spent on the rink because there are more pressing concerns in the city, such as aging infrastructure and neighborhood projects. 'I've got sewers and sidewalks that need to be fixed,' Brady said. Councilwoman Stephanie Bolden said the mayoral race has impeded progress on the rink, which she thinks should be in Rodney Square…. If council approves the project, the rink would open this year or in 2001. The 157-by-75-foot rink would cost $275,000 a year to operate. Two corporations have pledged to pay operating costs for the first five years. City officials would not identify the corporations, saying they want to remain anonymous until the city decides whether to pay for the rink. Recent Wilmington-area news: Approved SEPTA budget would kill Delaware rail service in 2026 without more funding July 16, 1975, The Morning News The Delaware Lottery may not be well, but it is alive. Gov. Sherman W. Tribbitt has yet to appoint a new lottery director, and until he does the game can't start again. In the meantime, a loaned staffer and a volunteer have been kept busy for the past month paying the debts and settling the accounts of the defunct Loto-Superfecta, which ended in April after five money-losing weeks. Tribbitt said he has five or six candidates in mind for the lottery director's job, but has not been able to settle on one. He said one person, who was not named, accepted the post but refused it later for health reasons. ... Because bills need to be paid and accounts reconciled, Tribbitt asked the state planning office to temporarily assign Lou Jordan, a planning administrator, to the lottery. ... Jordan said since he started on June 16 he has paid about $90,000 to cover the rent through June, equipment rentals, payments, advertising and tickets. ... Jordan said he has sent out checks for five $100 tickets since June and another $70 to $80 for smaller prizes…. It is generally assumed that Delaware's second venture into public gaming will more closely follow the typical state lotteries rather than something new again. The Loto-Superfecta let people choose their own numbers and used a horse race to determine the winning number. However, there were no first place winners, and the public steadily lost interest. The General Assembly has put aside $130,000 for the revised lottery, bringing the total state investment to date to more than $600,000. ... The state auditor has charged that lottery officials illegally spent $186,000 more than they had in their $400,000 budget. ... Recent lottery news: Wilmington man hits Delaware Lottery twice in a week. Here's where he bought his tickets July 18, 1925, Wilmington Morning News A double rescue was made in Rehoboth yesterday afternoon when C.C. Thompson, of Seaford, fought a strong undercurrent to drag Miss Marcella Fairchild, 19, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and William Bounds, 12, of Salisbury, Md., from the water. Thompson, an all-round athlete who rescued a woman from drowning last summer, was walking along the beach with a lifeguard when they were attracted by the screams of a woman a short distance from the shore who had been caught in a heavy undertow. Both men jumped into the water and were also caught in the undertow, but Thompson managed to reach the young woman before she had been carried out very far. Keeping the girl's head above water, he waited until the lifeguard joined them, and the two of them managed to get her ashore. Just as they reached the shore, another cry from the water attracted Thompson's attention. Turning, he discovered a small boy who had gotten out in water beyond his depth and had also been caught in the undertow. Leaving the young woman in the care of the lifeguard and the large crowd that had congregated, Thompson swam out to the boy and caught him just as the boy was going down for the third time. After he succeeded in getting the boy ashore, it was discovered he was unconscious, and Thompson, although weakened from his double fight with the undertow, assisted in reviving him by using a stomach pump. Reach reporter Ben Mace at rmace@ This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: History from News Journal: ice rink debate, lottery problems, rescue
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
What the scrap over Mass. Gov. Healey's Sunday show quips explain about our politics
If you're the sort of person who watches the Sunday political chat shows, then you might have caught Gov. Maura Healey engaging in a time-honored rite of campaign season last weekend: Burnishing her record as she seeks a second term. And if you're not the sort of person who watches Sunday political chat shows because, say, you were at church or busy packing the car for the beach, then here's a quick object lesson on the perils and pitfalls of being an incumbent with a record. It starts with an extended consideration of what Healey said when WBZ-TV's Jon Keller teed her up with a question last Sunday about the administration of former Republican Gov. Charlie Baker. Important context: Healey has been generally deferential to her predecessor. But Mike Kenneally and Brian Shortsleeve, who are now vying for the 2026 Republican gubernatorial nomination, are former Baker aides. Healey did what most practiced pols do when they're confronted with that kind of question: She flipped the script and turned it into an opportunity to talk about herself. The premise is that the last thing you want to do is give the competition free airtime. Here's the full quote: 'I think what is important to the voters, for reelection, is what I've done,' she said. '[We] cut taxes — hadn't been done in 20 years. We're building more homes that should have been built before. We're building them out now at a scale because we've got a lower cost. [We're] fixing transportation for the first time, not even in recent memory.' She continued: 'The T is running on time. No slow zones. We're going to continue to make investments. And we've made sure that Massachusetts is No. 1 in education. We're back atop the ratings this year, and I'm really pleased about that. There are challenges, driving down costs, particularly around housing and energy, [those are] top on my list. But I'm running for reelection, Jon, because I love Massachusetts.' And now, why it matters: You had to be paying attention, but Healey's comments were a barely veiled swipe at her two Republican rivals. Keneally served as Baker's housing and economic development secretary, which means he was the guy who was supposed to fix the state's housing affordability and supply problem. Shortsleeve was tasked with running the MBTA, and somehow wrestling an aging system, whose repair costs ran to the hundreds of millions of dollars, back into shape. While progress has been made on the latter, it's pretty safe to say we're a long way from done on the former. So it will not shock you to learn that Healey's remarks landed with a thud among Republicans. By Monday afternoon, the state Republican Party had blasted out a lengthy fact-check — and a condemnation — of Healey's comments. 'Misrepresenting a broken record comes naturally to the Healey administration, that has nothing to run on heading into a reelection year,' state GOP Chairperson Amy Carnevale said. 'Voters are living in an opposite reality from the one Governor Healey spoke about Sunday, and they are too smart to believe that she's done anything to make their lives materially better since taking office,' Carnevale continued. Republicans took specific issue with the Democratic governor's assertion that she was the 'first to come in and reform' the state's hugely expensive emergency shelter system. 'We've driven the numbers in shelter way down, we're driving the cost way down,' Healey told Keller. 'I'm actually the first to come in and reform that system, which needed reform.' Healey has made some progress when it comes to reducing the number of people in state-run shelters. And most hotel shelters closed last month because there were fewer people in the system. But the state still had spent nearly $830 million on the system through the end of June, with costs set to exceed $1 billion by the end of the 2024-25 budget year (which closed on June 30), MassLive previously reported. Republicans pointed to similar progress that Baker had made in reducing the number of people in hotel shelters in 2017 and his efforts to keep people in their homes. That was before the state was rocked by a flood of migrant new arrivals, which filled the system to overflowing in 2023. Similarly, Kennealy and Shortsleeve each will have to explain their role in helping to fix — or not — two of the state's biggest public policy challenges: housing and mass transportation. That conversation will shape the campaign to come. And in separate interviews, both have tipped their hands on how they intend to address it. Kennealy, through a spokesperson, defended his record on housing this week, arguing that new housing starts had increased on his watch and declined under Healey. Speaking to MassLive in May, Kennealy offered further details. 'We got passed the single most important zoning reform in 50 years in Massachusetts. And that's called housing choice. And it took us three years to get it done,' he said. 'And we looked at local zoning as an impediment to housing production, and it was our view that we're in a housing crisis in Massachusetts,' he continued. 'We have to produce a lot more housing. But you've got to do it in partnership with cities and towns. You cannot mandate to them what to do. You've got to work with them.' Shortsleeve similarly defended his stewardship of the MBTA, telling State House News Service in a June interview that 'we took out waste and abuse.' 'We streamlined parts of the organization, we rebid contracts, and when we were done, we had the lowest operating expenses in the history of the T,' he continued. 'That shows you what's possible in terms of reforming government when you bring a businessman sort of mindset, an outsider perspective, and a Marine's determination to the job.' He went further, arguing that Healey 'has never delivered a balanced budget for the T. Today, the T takes a billion dollars more to run than it did six years ago, and the T's costs in almost every area have grown rapidly. What I've seen in the fast past few years is unrestrained cost growth.' The $60.9 billion budget that Healey signed into law last week provides $470 million in direct support for the MBTA, as well as funding for reduced-price fares for those who qualify for them. That is some not-insignificant cash. Still, it's important to pause here to note that there are still some 18 months to go before Election Day 2026. In our hyper-accelerated timeline, that's several political lifetimes away. But if campaigns and elections are about anything, they're about candidates taking control of their narratives and defining themselves before their opponents have a chance to do it for them. Don't believe it? Consider that all it takes is one misguided photo of a guy in a tank to help crater a White House campaign. Narratives and records matter. And voters, who might need some occasional prodding, do remember it. These are the Big 3 issues to watch in Boston's mayoral race — and one sleeper Mass. Senate set to make its first move against Trump in 2025 | Bay State Briefing How Beacon Hill bosses quietly buried reform bills that threatened their power Read the original article on MassLive.
