Arunachal celebrates West Bengal statehood day in spirit of Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat
1
2
3
4
Itanagar: In the spirit of Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat, the statehood day of West Bengal was celebrated at the Raj Bhavan here on Friday.
The celebration brought together the Bengali and Gorkha communities of Arunachal Pradesh to showcase the rich heritage of West Bengal.
Taking part in the celebrations, Arunachal Pradesh governor KT Parnaik congratulated the people of West Bengal and thanked them for their contributions to the development and progress of Arunachal Pradesh. He said their dedication and cultural vibrancy have enriched the social fabric of the state.
Parnaik also acknowledged the pioneering efforts of institutions like the Ramakrishna Mission, along with the Vivekananda Kendra Vidyalayas, in strengthening the education system of Arunachal Pradesh, adding that the Ramakrishna Mission embodies the shared values that bind the people of both states.
Highlighting the importance of cultural exchange, the governor said such celebrations provide young students of Arunachal Pradesh a valuable opportunity to learn about the diverse cultures of India.
"When children are exposed to the traditions, music, and values of other states, they grow up with greater empathy, understanding, and respect for our nation's unity in diversity," the governor said.
The event was marked by cultural presentations by students from the Nrityangan Dance & Music Academy, Itanagar, a Gorkhali dance by Lhamu Dolma Tamang and others, and local folk dance by students of PM SHRI Arunodaya School, Itanagar, traditional Bengali duet folk dance by Techi Ajum of VKV, Itanagar, and Tarh Dai of KV, Itanagar.
As a part of the event, the message of West Bengal governor CV Ananda Bose was read out.
Later, the governor hosted high tea for the participants and interacted with the members of the Bengali and Gorkha communities, praising their efforts to preserve and promote their cultural heritage in their adopted home.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Assam Congress writes to PM about alleged irregularities in dairy farming scheme, CM denies claims
The Assam Congress on Saturday wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi alleging 'serious irregularities' in a state government-supported dairy farming scheme. Assam Congress chief Gaurav Gogoi, in the letter to Modi, expressed 'serious concerns' about the Assistance to Entrepreneur for Establishment of Commercial Dairy Farming scheme. Under the scheme, individuals who want to set up commercial dairy farms or expand their existing farms are given assistance in securing bank loans, and are also given direct financial aid from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party government in the state. However, Gogoi alleged that several beneficiaries of the scheme appeared to be family members or associates of state ministers and MLAs. He further claimed that 'long-standing dairy farmers, particularly in districts like Bongaigaon, have reportedly been overlooked despite having applied multiple times and fulfilling the eligibility requirements'. Serious irregularities in Assam's dairy scheme exposed, genuine milk producers left out, while kin of ministers & MLAs make the list. Assam PCC President @GauravGogoiAsm writes to PM seeking a review. — Assam Congress (@INCAssam) June 28, 2025 The Congress leader added that the exclusion of experienced dairy entrepreneurs raised concerns about the fairness and transparency of the selection process. 'Equally alarming is the response from the Chief Minister of Assam [Himanta Biswa Sarma], who chose to justify the inclusion of minister's family members in the list of dairy scheme beneficiaries,' Gogoi said, adding that this 'open endorsement of political favouritism' had fulled public outrage. Claiming that it reflected a 'serious breach of oath', the Congress leader added that the alleged irregularities cast doubt on the state government's adherence to ethical governance and the rule of law. Gogoi, in the letter to the prime minister, also raised concerns about the Gorukhuti agricultural project. The project, launched in 2021, was aimed at promoting agricultural development and self-reliance through modern farming techniques in 77,000 bighas of land in Sipajhar. The project also included the procurement of high-yield Gir cows from Gujarat. Citing official records, Gogoi in his letter to Modi claimed that the cows were allocated to several elected representatives, including a firm owned by the wife of state minister Jayanta Mallabaruah, and sitting legislators Bhupen Pegu, Utpal Borah and Diganta Kalita, along with MP Dilip Saikia. 'The diversion of resources and livestock under a project supported by over Rs 5.5 crore in public funds compromises the very objective of government programmes designed to promote inclusive development,' he said. '…these actions go against the very principles of transparency, accountability, and equitable access.' Gogoi urged the prime minister to direct an inquiry into the matter. In September 2021, over 1,000 families, most of them Bengali-origin Muslims, had also been evicted from Dhalpur in Assam's Darrang district to make way for the Gorukhuti project. The evictions had led to protests from local residents, during which two persons were killed. CM Himanta Biswa Sarma denies claims In response to the allegations, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma dismissed any wrongdoing and claimed that the Gir cows had begun dying due to climate incompatibility, India Today NE reported. BJP MLA Padma Hazarika, who was heading the project, had requested private persons to purchase the cattle due to a lack of buyers and fearing further losses, Sarma claimed. 'We should thank them for buying,' he said. 'Otherwise, there were no takers for these sick cattle.' The chief minister also accused the media of sensationalising the issue and comparing the situation to a 'cattle auction', India Today NE reported. He claimed that media houses were ignoring more serious issues, including illegal cow smuggling and security threats. Press bodies condemn state minister's remarks Meanwhile, the Press Club of India, the Gauhati Press Club and the Media Association of Assam has demanded an apology from Mallabaruah for his 'insulting' remarks about a journalist during a press conference on Friday. While responding to a question about the Gir cows asked by a journalist from the Sadin-Pratidin media group, the state minister reportedly referred to him as ' inferior,' Newslaundry reported. 'I will not speak to inferior people like you,' Newslaundry quoted Mallabaruah as saying. 'I will answer when your owner asks me a question.' Targeting journalists for merely asking uncomfortable questions has become a routine phenomenon for politicians and others who are in power and accountable to the people. Such behaviour is against the spirit of a democratic nation. We endorse the Gauhati Press Club statement and… — Press Club of India (@PCITweets) June 28, 2025 The Media Association of Assam demanded an apology from the state minister for his remarks, Northeast News reported. Media Association of Assam's President Hiren Chandra Kalita and Secretary-General Chandra Kumar Shaikia condemned the remarks and called on all journalists to boycott Mallabaruah until he apologises. The Gauhati Press Club also condemned the recurring incidents of journalists facing backlash from political leaders when faced with uncomfortable questions. 'From MPs, MLAs to ministers and other office bearers of different parties, we have seen an alarming trend of targeting the journalist who poses a question that puts them in a difficult position,' Susmita Goswami, Gauhati Press Club chief, said on Friday. On Saturday, the Press Club of India said that it endorsed the Gauhati Press Club statement and urged political leaders to refrain from such undignified behaviour. 'Targeting journalists for merely asking uncomfortable questions has become a routine phenomenon for politicians and others who are in power and accountable to the people,' it said in a statement. On Sunday, Mallabaruah apologised for his remarks about the journalist amid the mounting backlash, The Assam Tribune reported. '...I have not intentionally insulted any journalist," he claimed. "Yet, if my words have hurt someone's sentiments, I truly regret it." Saying that he did not intend to belittle journalists as a whole, the minister acknowledged that his choice of words was inappropriate and hurtful. However, he claimed that his remarks were directed at a particular journalist from a specific news channel whom he accused of asking repetitive questions with an agenda driven by the owner of the channel.
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
What are the issues around deportation?
The story so far:At least seven West Bengal residents who were pushed to Bangladesh by the Border Security Force (BSF) on suspicion of being Bangladeshis were brought back to India after the intervention of the State government. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said on June 25 that residents speaking in their native Bengali language are being branded as Bangladeshis in some Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled States. Several people who were pushed from Assam to Bangladesh also returned as they were found to be Indians or that their citizenship cases were sub-judice. Why have matters escalated? After the regime change in Bangladesh in August 2024, the police across the country were asked by the Union Home Ministry to detect Bangladeshis who had illegally entered the country and were living here on forged documents. The drive assumed momentum after the Pahalgam terror attack in April and the subsequent 'Operation Sindoor'. The Ministry has issued instructions to States to deport undocumented migrants but in most cases pushbacks are happening. Around 2,500 suspected Bangladeshis have been pushed back so far. On May 10, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said that the government has decided to implement the 'pushback' mechanism to check infiltration instead of going through the legal route which is a long-drawn process. Home Minister Amit Shah has asked top intelligence officials to make an example of 'infiltrators' by detecting, detaining, and deporting them. In 2022, at an Intelligence Bureau meeting, Mr. Shah had asked officials to identify around 100 illegal migrants in each State, check documents and arrest and deport them. He asked them to continue with the crackdown even if neighbouring countries do not accept the undocumented migrants. What is the difference between deportation and pushback? Deportation is a legal process which involves detaining and arresting a foreigner suspected to be living in India without documents or who has entered the country illegally. The case is presented before a court and after exhaustion of all legal avenues, which includes conviction by the court, the country which the foreigner belongs to is contacted and the deportation takes places once the identity is confirmed. Pushbacks are not a legal procedure and there are no stated rules. They happen when a foreigner has been caught by the border security force on the international border and, depending on the intensity of the case or the discretion of the border personnel, they are either arrested, made to face the law here or pushed back. Since citizenship and foreigners are Union List subjects, it is the Home Ministry which delegates powers to deport foreigners to State governments. In 2024, the Ministry told the Jharkhand High Court that since the 'Central Government does not maintain a separate federal police force exclusively dedicated to the task of detection and deportation of illegally staying foreigners, action in this regard has been entrusted to the State police.' What is the Immigrants (Expulsion from Assam) Act, 1950? On June 9, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said the State government was likely to enforce a 1950 law to identify and evict illegal foreigners, adding that under the law, district commissioners are empowered to declare individuals as illegal immigrants and initiate eviction proceedings. The 1950 Act was passed by Parliament amid communal disturbance and violence following the Partition of India in 1947 and creation of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) bordering West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. The Act says that 'it extends to the whole of India', but has Assam-specific provisions. Section 2 of the Act says that if the Union government is of the opinion that any person or class of persons, having been ordinarily resident in any place outside India are detrimental to the interests of the general public of India or any Scheduled Tribe in Assam, the Union government may by order, 'direct such person or class of persons to remove himself or themselves from India or Assam within such time and by such route as may be specified in the order'; and 'give such further directions in regard to his or their removal from India or Assam as it may consider necessary or expedient'. What are the laws for foreigners? Till April this year, matters relating to foreigners and immigration were administered through 'pre-Constitution period' laws enacted during the First and Second World Wars, which were the Foreigners Act, 1946, Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920, the Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939 and the Immigration (Carriers' Liability) Act, 2000. In April, Parliament enacted the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 repealing the old laws. Unlike Pakistan and Bangladesh borders, the rules for movement of people along Nepal and Myanmar are different. Nepal has a free-border agreement with India, and a Free Movement regime (FMR), allowing movement of people residing within 10-km on either side, exists along the India-Myanmar border. Following the May 2023 ethnic violence in Manipur, the Ministry in 2024 decided to fence the entire 1,643-km Myanmar border in the next 10 years. Post the military coup in Myanmar in February 2021, over 40,000 refugees from Myanmar belonging to the Chin ethnic group who are closely related to the Mizo community crossed over to Mizoram. On March 10, 2021, the MHA sent a letter to the State governments of Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Mizoram that the refugees should be identified and deported and that the State Governments have no powers to grant 'refugee' status to any foreigner as India is not a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 and its 1967 Protocol. The refugees continue to live here. What is behind this recent drive? Since the April 22 terror attack at Pahalgam, the police has intensified the drive to detect undocumented migrants. Initially, they were taken by trains to border districts and then pushed to Bangladesh by the BSF. In some instances, migrants after being up picked from Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra, were flown by planes to Agartala in Tripura and transported to the Bangladesh border by BSF personnel. The police and the BSF record biometrics and photographs of the undocumented migrants. It is to be noted that the BSF has never acknowledged any of the pushbacks. The Ministry has asked the States to verify the claims of undocumented migrants who claim Indian nationality after which District Magistrates are to send a report within 30 days, failing which the Foreigners Regional Registration Officer would deport them. In 2022, the Unique Identification Authority of India was asked to maintain a 'negative list' to stop undocumented migrants from procuring identity documents in the future.
The Hindu
20 hours ago
- The Hindu
Assam Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi draws PM Modi's attention to irregularities in dairy project
GUWAHATI Assam MP Gaurav Gogoi has drawn the attention of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to allegations of political favouritism and irregularities in two government-backed dairy projects, including one that entailed the eviction of migrant Muslims. In a letter to the Prime Minister on Saturday (June 28, 2025), Mr. Gogoi, also the State Congress president, called for an immediate review of the Assistance to Entrepreneur for Establishment of Commercial Dairy Farming (2022–23) scheme, meant to help genuine entrepreneurs, but allegedly being misused. 'The scheme, which provides subsidies up to ₹50 lakh per unit, was designed to support dairy entrepreneurs and strengthen regional milk production. However, several beneficiaries reportedly include relatives and associates of ruling party ministers and MLAs,' Mr. Gogoi stated. Some eligible and long-standing dairy farmers were overlooked, despite multiple applications, suggesting a lack of fairness and transparency in the beneficiary selection process, Mr. Gogoi said. The Congress leader criticised Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma for publicly defending the inclusion of family members of Ministers, MLAs, and MPs as beneficiaries under the scheme. 'This not only erodes public trust but reflects a troubling endorsement of political bias,' Mr. Gogoi said. He also cited alleged irregularities in the ₹5.5 crore Gorukhuti agricultural project in the Darrang district, for which some 800 families of Bengali-speaking Muslims were evicted in September 2021. Two eople, including a minor, were killed in police firing during the eviction drive. Gir cows procured under the Gorukhuti project were allotted to firms linked to an MP and at least four Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLAs, including a Minister, Mr. Gogoi said. Terming the alleged resource diversion 'a serious betrayal of public interest', the Congress legislator urged the the PM to initiate an official enquiry into the matter to uphold transparency, accountability, and equitable access to public welfare programmes. 'If politically-connected individuals continue to siphon off schemes meant for the underprivileged, we risk alienating the very communities these policies are designed to empower,' Mr. Gogoi stated.
