Israel's allies see evidence of war crimes in Gaza mounting up
LONDON — Two years ago, Hamas was putting the finishing touches to its plan to attack Israel. In Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu believed that the Palestinians were a problem to be managed. The real threat, he insisted, was Iran.
Netanyahu's rhetoric opposing Hamas was undimmed, but he had also given permission for Qatar to funnel money into Gaza. It gave him space for his real priorities in foreign policy — confronting Iran and finding a way to normalize relations with Saudi Arabia.
In Washington, then-President Joe Biden and his administration believed they were close to hatching a deal between the Saudis and Israelis.
It was all a series of illusions.
Netanyahu has refused to establish an inquiry to look into the mistakes he made alongside his army and security chiefs that gave Hamas its opportunity to attack with such deadly effect on 7 October 2023.
The century-long conflict between Zionists and Arabs for control of the land between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean was unresolved, festering, and about to explode into a war that looks to be as consequential as its other landmarks, in 1948 and 1967.
The Middle East has been transformed since 7 October, and almost two years into the war, the conflict in Gaza is at another inflection point.
They were taken by surprise on 7 October when Hamas attacked, and since then Israel has banned international journalists from Gaza to report freely. Palestinian journalists inside the Strip have done valiant work, and nearly 200 have been killed doing their jobs.
But key facts are clear. Hamas committed a series of war crimes in the attacks it launched on 7 October, killing 1,200 people, mainly Israeli civilians. Hamas took 251 hostages, of which perhaps 20 who are still being held inside Gaza are believed to be alive.
And there is clear evidence that Israel has committed a series of war crimes since then.
Israel's list includes the starvation of Gaza's civilians, the failure to protect them during military operations in which Israeli forces killed tens of thousands of innocents, and the wanton destruction of entire towns in a manner that is not proportionate to the military risk Israel faces.
Netanyahu and his former defence minister are the subject of arrest warrants for war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court. They insist on their innocence.
Israel has also condemned a legal process at the International Court of Justice which alleges that it is committing genocide against Palestinians. Israel denies the accusations, and claims they are antisemitic "blood libels".
Israel is running out of friends. Allies who rallied around after the 7 October Hamas attacks have lost patience with Israel's conduct in Gaza.
Even Israel's most important ally, Donald Trump, is reported to be losing patience with Netanyahu after being taken by surprise when the Israeli leader ordered the bombing of Damascus – attacking Syria's new regime, which Trump has recognised and encouraged.
Other western allies of Israel ran out of patience months ago.
Another joint statement, condemning Israel's actions, was signed on 21 July by foreign ministers from the UK, much of the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan. They used strong words to describe civilian suffering in Gaza, and the failing and deadly aid distribution system run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) that Israel introduced to replace tried and trusted methods used by the UN and leading global relief groups.
"The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths," the statement said.
"The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity. We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food. It is horrifying that over 800 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid.
"The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable. Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law."
David Lammy, Britain's foreign secretary, followed the joint statement with one of his own, using similar language, in the House of Commons in Westminster.
It was not enough for Labour MPs, who want strong words to be backed by strong actions. One told me there was "fury" at the government's reluctance to act more decisively. Top of their agenda is recognition of a Palestinian state, which has already been done by a majority of members of the United Nations. The UK and France have discussed doing so jointly, but so far seem to believe the time is not right.
Israel's parliament, known as the Knesset, is only days away from its summer recess, which will last until October. That means Benjamin Netanyahu will have a break from the threat of a vote of no confidence from the extremist nationalists in his coalition who oppose a ceasefire in Gaza. His reluctance to negotiate a truce is a result of their threats to quit his government. If Netanyahu lost power in an election, his day of reckoning for his 7 October mistakes - as well as the end of his long running corruption trial - would race towards him.
A ceasefire is looking more possible, a chance of survival for Gaza's civilians and for the Israeli hostages who have been prisoners of Hamas for so long.
None of that means the conflict will end. The war has taken it to new depths. But if there is a ceasefire there will be another chance to switch from killing to diplomacy. — BBC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
29 minutes ago
- Arab News
Israel, Palestinian envoys trade barbs at UN over Gaza
NEW YORK: Palestinian and Israeli envoys traded angry accusations Wednesday at the United Nations over the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, as aid and human rights groups warned of 'mass starvation' in the war-torn territory. Israel is facing growing international pressure over chronic food shortages in Gaza, where more than two million people lack food and other essentials after 21 months of conflict. Even after Israel began easing a more than two-month aid blockade in late May, Gaza's population is still suffering extreme scarcities. 'Every day now we receive heart-wrenching messages from Gaza...'I am hungry,'' Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour told the Security Council. 'This is what our children are saying and every individual in Gaza is saying: 'I am hungry. There is no food for my family. We are dying. Help us,'' he said. 'What should we tell them? What should the Security Council tell them? That the whole world is against this starvation policy and yet it is worsening?' But Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon accused Hamas, which rules Gaza, of using the misery to 'feed it into their propaganda machine.' 'For Hamas, the suffering of its own people is their greatest weapon,' he said. Claiming Israel was making the Middle East safer, Danon accused the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs of 'bias' against his country. OCHA is a 'propaganda machine' against Israel, he said, which purposely undercounts aid trucks heading into Gaza. 'We will not work with organizations that have chosen politics over principles,' Danon said, with Israel in future granting just one-month visas to the agency's international staff. More than 100 aid and human rights groups said Wednesday that 'mass starvation' was spreading in the Gaza Strip, and France warned of a growing 'risk of famine' caused by 'the blockade imposed by Israel.' 'I don't know what you would call it other than mass starvation — and it's man-made,' World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters. The lack of food and water was affecting the ability of journalists to carry out their work documenting the conflict. AFP's journalists in Gaza said this week that desperate hunger and lack of clean water is making them ill and exhausted. Some have even had to cut back on their coverage of the war, now in its 22nd month, with one journalist saying 'we have no energy left due to hunger.'
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Un's top court says all countries have to act against climate change. here are the key takeaways
The Hague, Netherlands (AP) — The United Nations' top court has issued a landmark advisory opinion on climate change, its 15 black-robed judges weighing in for the first time on what the court's president called an existential problem of planetary proportions that imperils all forms of life and the very health of our planet. The International Court of Justice's unanimous non-binding opinion, which runs to over 500 pages, was immediately hailed by activists as a turning point in international climate law. After years of lobbying by island nations who fear they could disappear under rising sea waters, the UN General Assembly asked the court in 2023 to answer two questions: What are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? And what are the legal consequences for governments when their acts or lack of action have significantly harmed the climate and environment? Here are some of the key points from the opinion delivered Wednesday. A healthy planet is a basic human right. In a simple statement that could have profound legal ramifications, the court said everyone is entitled to a habitable planet. 'The human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment is therefore inherent in the enjoyment of other human rights,' court President Yuji Iwasawa said during a two-hour hearing. A livable planet is a human right and is part of international customary law, meaning every country is obliged to protect it, not just countries that have signed climate treaties and other agreements. Violating international law. A failure to address climate change, the court said, could be a violation of international law. That matters because it applies to all countries and paves the way for legal actions including states returning to the ICJ to hold each other to account, domestic lawsuits, and investment agreements that have to conform to international law. 'With today's authoritative historic ruling, the International Court of Justice has broken with business-as-usual and delivered a historic affirmation: Those suffering the impacts of climate devastation have a right to remedy and full reparation,' said Joie Chowdhury, a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law. Payback time? The court ruled that some countries or individuals suffering from the effects of climate change could be eligible for compensation. 'For climate damage linked to greenhouse gas emissions, restitution may take the form of reconstructing damaged or destroyed infrastructure and restoring ecosystems and biodiversity,' the court said. If that's not possible, financial compensation could be assessed, though the judges conceded it may be difficult to calculate as there is usually a degree of uncertainty with respect to the exact extent of the damage caused. Activists hailed that part of the decision as a historic turning point in their search for justice. 'The ICJ's decision brings us closer to a world where governments can no longer turn a blind eye to their legal responsibilities. It affirms a simple truth of climate justice: Those who did the least to fuel this crisis deserve protection, reparations, and a future,' said Vishal Prasad, director of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change. Climate refugees. While the court's opinion is far-reaching, no one expects it to immediately solve the problems created by climate change. The judges noted that people may be forced to flee their homes to escape the dangers posed by climate change, and countries are obliged to not turn away climate refugees when their lives are endangered. 'If a country disappears under rising ocean levels, that country doesn't cease to exist,' they said. For the Pacific Island nations that pushed for the opinion, the threat is real. Since 1993, sea levels around Vanuatu's shores have risen by about 6 millimeters (.24 inches) per year–significantly faster than the global average–and in some areas tectonic activity has doubled that rate.
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
UK condemns Israeli aid system as ‘inhumane and dangerous' at UN debate on Gaza
NEW YORK: The UK sharply criticized Israel's humanitarian conduct in Gaza during a high-level UN Security Council debate on the Middle East peace process on Wednesday, describing the Israeli aid system as 'inhumane, ineffective, dangerous and fueling instability.' Speaking at the council's open debate, UK Ambassador to the UN Barbara Woodward called for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, saying that the suffering of Palestinian civilians and the continued holding of hostages by Hamas since Oct. 7 'must end now.' She said: 'The IDF is shooting at desperate Palestinian civilians on an almost daily basis. Hamas is exploiting this disorder.' She called on Israel to stop such attacks, hold perpetrators accountable and work with the UN to implement a more effective aid delivery system that complies with international humanitarian law. Woodward reaffirmed the UK's support for the UN's humanitarian coordination office and condemned recent strikes on the World Health Organization in Deir Al-Balah. The ambassador also condemned Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz's proposals to forcibly displace Palestinians to Rafah and criticized the expansion of settlements in the West Bank, calling it a 'flagrant breach of international law' and 'an accelerating campaign to prevent a Palestinian state.' While insisting Hamas must not govern Gaza or threaten Israel's security in the future, Woodward warned that actions by the Israeli government were undermining the only viable alternative — the Palestinian Authority. She pointed to Israel's withholding of $2.6 billion in tax revenues owed to the Palestinian Authority, which she said is crippling essential services and weakening Palestinian institutions. 'This is not conducive to Israel's long-term security,' she added. Woodward reiterated the UK's commitment to a two-state solution and warned that London is prepared to take 'further action' to stop what it sees as the erosion of prospects for peace. She noted that a high-level conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia next week will be a key opportunity to advance international support for a peaceful resolution.
