
Disturbing update on Scott Wolf's estranged wife Kelley's 'arrest' revealed as shock video surfaces
The hair-raising incident was inadvertently captured on Instagram Live, although the screen was black through most of the footage until Kelley's face was briefly seen at the end along with those of two sheriff's deputies.
Her voice was clear as she insisted that she would 'go on my own,' before one of the officers was heard asking: 'You got that arm?' followed by what seemed to be the sound of handcuffs clicking shut.
A cop assured her she was 'not going to jail,' while adding that she 'made some comments to your dad, and comments to people that concern - are concerning.'
Kelley claimed: 'I think this is shameful and Scott Wolf has been abusing me and now you're abusing me more.' There is no indication that these allegations are true. It is unclear what Kelley meant by 'abuse.'
Now, the authorities have given their side of the story behind the disturbing footage - and revealed where they took her after she was detained.
The detention took place Friday at the Sundance Resort in Sundance, Utah, where Kelley had been staying since Wednesday, according to People.
A statement by local law enforcement said: 'Deputies responded to the Sundance Resort for a report of a female that needed some help. Upon speaking with the female, our Deputies learned that she had made concerning comments to a family member, and she also made similar comments to our Deputies. For that reason, our Deputies transported the female to a local hospital.'
A spokesperson for the Utah County Sheriff's Office explained further: 'Typically, when we transport somebody in any of our patrol vehicles, they are placed in properly-fitted hand restraints, just for their protection and our protection as law enforcement as well.'
The spokesperson continued: 'So that's what happened today: she was placed in hand restraints, placed into a vehicle, and transported by our deputies to a hospital.'
DailyMail.com contacted Scott's representatives for comment.
Early in the footage, Kelley could be heard saying: 'Oh my God, this is not happening! Fine, I'll go. I'll go on my own. Please, I'll go on my own!'
'You got that arm?' said one of the deputies, and a noise that sounded like handcuffs being applied was then distinctly audible, as Kelley said: 'Wow. Wow.'
She lambasted the officers: 'This is shameful, gentlemen. Look at this. Look at this woman. This is shameful. Be ashamed of yourselves, gentlemen.'
One of the deputies said: 'You're not going to jail,' followed by another sentence that was drowned out as Kelley, a life coach, snapped: 'I know what I'm doing. I've done this. This is my job. Shame on all of you.'
'You've made some comments to your dad, and comments to people that concern - are concerning,' explained one of the officers.
Kelley then directed their attention to the fact the exchange was being recorded on her phone, saying: 'You might wanna turn this off. It's on. Would you like to turn it off? You want me to turn it off?'
She clarified for the officers that she 'didn't mean to' stream the incident, and one of the policemen offered: 'I can turn it off if you'd like me to,' to which she said: 'Please turn it off. Please.'
By the end of the video, Kelley was finally visible, asking the deputies to hand her the phone so that she could switch it off on her own.
Kelley later posted an Insta Stories photo of her personal effects laid out in front of her, including a handbag, a Gatorade bottle and a baseball cap.
'This is horrible. I have been taken against my will. Please check in on my kids. Also... I am happy!! Happier than I have ever been,' she wrote. 'I have NO idea why or how this is happening in AMERICA.'
Kelley added: 'I am compliant, calm and respectful, and hopefully this is all sorted very quickly. In the meantime, be kind to each other. This is one of the darkest things I've ever experienced.'
The astonishing episode comes following Scott's statement on the divorce, which he issued after Kelley announced their split in a cryptic Instagram post.
On Tuesday, Kelley, 48, shared the emotional update with her followers, writing, 'It is with a heavy heart that Scott and I are moving forward with the dissolution of our marriage.'
She continued, 'This has been a long, quiet journey for me—rooted in hope, patience, and care for our children.'
The couple—who met in 2002 and married two years later—share three children: Jackson, Miller, and Lucy.
Just hours after Kelley's post, the Party of Five star, 57, confirmed the news in a statement to People, revealing that he had initiated the split.
'After 21 years of marriage, I have made the most difficult decision of my life, and filed for divorce from my wife Kelley,' he said.
'Our children have always been, and continue to be, the loves of our lives and our every priority, so I kindly ask for privacy at this time as we help guide them through this new chapter.'
Both Scott and Kelley have publicly indicated that their focus remains on protecting their family as they move through this new chapter.
In her initial Instagram post, Kelley opened up about her emotional state, speaking of 'healing' and embracing 'freedom' as she steps into the future.
She also offered a heartfelt tribute to her estranged husband, writing, 'Scott Wolf is one of the best fathers I've ever known and one of the best partners a woman could have the privilege of sharing life with.
'He is kind, thoughtful, funny, and beautiful in spirit.'
Though she made clear she wouldn't be discussing the reasons behind the split publicly, Kelley expressed peace with how she's handled the situation.
'While I will not speak publicly about the details, I feel peace knowing that I've done everything I can to walk this path with integrity and compassion,' she wrote.
She added that she and Scott remain committed to raising their children with love and stability.
'We both look forward to an extraordinary life centered around the most extraordinary children. My priority has always been their wellbeing—and my own healing. That will never change.'
Kelley ended the emotional message with a request for privacy and a message of quiet strength: 'I am stepping into a chapter of peace, freedom, and protection—with grace. Thank you to the many friends, family, and professionals who have held space for me with love.
'Please respect our privacy during this time. May we all remember: healing isn't loud. It's sacred.'
Accompanying her words was an image of a lioness with three eagles flying above.
The announcement of the split followed weeks after Kelley shared a cryptic message hinting at feeling 'misunderstood' and a desire to 'tell the truth.'
In a poem posted to her followers, she spoke about breaking free from old patterns and expectations to find true freedom.
'I know that may sound bold, but when I read it back, I sat in stillness and wept,' she wrote. 'Because somehow, these words came straight from the center of my heart — clear, fierce, and free.'
She encouraged her followers to listen to their inner voice when it's time to change and to hold onto 'love and hope and optimism and beauty,' reminding them, 'It's WORTH IT! YOU ARE WORTH IT!'
Kelley acknowledged the challenges she's faced recently but vowed not to be dragged down by negativity.
'I came here to tell the truth. To write with integrity. To live with my whole heart— even when it's misunderstood,' she said.
She added that she's never felt more clear, light, or happy, closing with a hopeful note: 'I cannot wait to love and live in a way I didn't even know was possible.'
Just one week prior to Tuesday's divorce announcement, Scott and Kelley celebrated their 21st wedding anniversary.
The couple did not publicly honor the milestone on their respective social media pages.
The year prior, Kelley made a concerning revelation while paying tribute to Scott on their 20th wedding anniversary.
The reality TV star revealed that she 'almost walked out' the relationship early in their engagement when she noticed Scott starting to 'poke at me, challenge me.'
'The first few times, I wrote it off as stress or the beginnings of getting to know somebody's idiosyncrasies,' Kelley wrote. 'But then, I had this feeling come back to me that I had in the past. It was a feeling that I didn't like, and a feeling, I had worked very hard to process, heal, and make sure I noticed when/if it ever came again.
'It was the feeling of self betrayal. It was the feeling of bending myself in order to accommodate another person even when I knew that I had done nothing wrong.'
She said that she previously experienced 'this feeling' in a past 'toxic relationship.'
'My old pattern had returned. I was scrambling to make myself more accommodating, less aggravating, whatever it was that seem to be pushing him away. And then I woke up one morning and said 'wait a minute' I've done this game before and I'm not doing this again,' she wrote.
Kelley recalled taking off her engagement ring and handing it to Scott before telling him that she 'will not stick around while somebody tries to excavate fault in me.'
'I turned around and walked towards the door. And like I had done before in my life, I was ready to walk out the door with the girl that I promised to save.'
When left with the possibility of losing her forever, Kelley said that Scott stepped up and fought for their relationship.
'But, this love story wasn't over. Scott looked at me, and some thing happened…
'He said, "You are really going to leave. I believe you. I can see it. I can feel it. And there is no chance in hell I am going to let that happen, so let's do this,"' Kelley recalled.
'"Let's do this hard part, the uncomfortable part. The part where I have to look in the mirror and see my old pattern where I have tried to find fault in somebody in the hopes that I would prove that nobody can really do the hard stuff and stick around."'
'We all know that our patterns come from the things that have happened to us in life. Scott had never been shown what it looked like when LOVE really showed up.'
Kelley said that after that moment she and Scott were 'more bonded, more connected, and more clear about the promise we were about to make to each other.'
She said their wedding day was full of 'magic' and 'hope' and that her almost walking out the door 'set the stage for so many things' in their 20-year romance.
'Marriage, friendships, relationships of all kinds are a dance. Never to be a straight line. Never without plot, twists, and highs and lows,' she wrote.
'There is one thing we both learned that day, you have to be willing to love yourself the most to truly love somebody else, the most.
And yes, like all amazing love stories, we continue to choose the power of love, over and over,' Kelley concluded.
Scott also posted in honor of their 20th wedding anniversary, where he admitted that their marriage had been 'tested these last few years.'
'As blessed as we have been and are, we have surely been tested these last few years. You continue to be the force of light and love and life that makes it all make sense,' he wrote.
'You are the rock of our family, and even when pushed beyond what sometimes even feels possible, you have always found a way to hold on to who you truly are, and who and what you love the most.'
He also gushed about their 'three beautiful children, several generations of fur babies, and what feels like a lifetime of adventures and experiences together.'
Scott concluded his heartfelt tribute by expressing hope that his and Kelley's 'lights continue to shine together forever.'
Kelley last posted Scott on her Instagram in July 2024 during a couples trip to Las Vegas, Nevada.
Meanwhile, Kelley last appeared on Scott's Instagram in February as he called her and their daughter Lucy his 'forever Valentines.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tesla, Elon Musk sued by shareholders over Robotaxi claims
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Elon Musk and Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab were sued by shareholders who accused them of securities fraud for concealing the significant risk that the company's self-driving vehicles, including the Robotaxi, were dangerous. The proposed class action was filed on Monday night, following Tesla's first public test of its robotaxis in late June in the company's Austin, Texas, hometown. That test showed the vehicles speeding, braking suddenly, driving over a curb, entering the wrong lane, and dropping off passengers in the middle of multilane roads. Tesla's share price fell 6.1% over two trading days after the test began, wiping out about $68 billion of market value. Musk and his electric vehicle maker were accused of repeatedly overstating the effectiveness of and prospects for their autonomous driving technology, inflating Tesla's financial prospects and stock price. Shareholders said this included Musk's assurance on an April 22 conference call that Tesla was "laser-focused on bringing robotaxi to Austin in June," and Tesla's claim the same day that its approach to autonomous driving would deliver "scalable and safe deployment across diverse geographies and use cases." Tesla did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. Chief Financial Officer Viabhav Taneja and his predecessor Zachary Kirkhorn are also defendants. Expanding robotaxis is crucial for Tesla as the company faces falling demand for its aging electric vehicles and a backlash over Musk's politics. Musk, the world's richest person, wants to offer the service to half the U.S. population by year end, but must convince regulators and assure the public his technology is safe. Monday's lawsuit in Austin federal court is led by Tesla shareholder Denise Morand, and seeks damages for shareholders between April 19, 2023 and June 22, 2025. A Florida jury on August 1 found Tesla 33% responsible for a 2019 crash involving its self-driving software, which killed a 22-year-old woman and injured her boyfriend, and ordered it to pay about $243 million in damages to victims. Tesla blamed the driver and plans to appeal. The case is Morand v Tesla Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 25-01213.


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
NWSL says it has ‘no duty of care' for women suing San Diego Wave over assault claims
In a filing last month, the National Women's Soccer League denied all allegations contained in a lawsuit brought by former San Diego Wave employees and called for the suit to be 'dismissed in its entirety,' claiming that the league has 'no duty of care' to the six women suing the club and the league. The 2024 suit contains allegations of sexual assault of an employee by a co-worker while both employed at the club, along with claims of sexual harassment, racial discrimination, disability discrimination, failure to investigate and prevent harassment and discrimination. In the answer to the allegations filed on 8 July to the Superior Court of California in San Diego, the NWSL's legal representatives, Los Angeles firm Arentfox Schiff, deny that the six former Wave employees were 'damaged or harmed' because of any act of the league. The NWSL's lawyers claim 'the doctrine of consent,' inferring that the sexual assault and harassment claims were based on consensual encounters, and also that certain allegations are beyond California's statute of limitations. The NWSL's defense also claims it had no duty of care to San Diego Wave employees as any incidents that occurred were between the individuals and the club – not the league. According to legal experts interviewed by the Guardian, the NWSL's response to the lawsuit is a catch-all answer that aims to cover all possible angles of defense. 'The defendant has simply listed every affirmative defense that could apply to any of the claims,' said Professor David Oppenheimer, clinical professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. 'The common term for such an answer is 'boilerplate.' The purpose is to preserve any conceivable defense.' An NWSL spokesperson said the league could not comment on pending litigation. Arentfox Schiff did not respond to requests for comment and clarification. The six women who filed the lawsuit include one who claims she was sexually assaulted by a San Diego Wave co-worker, another who claims she was sexually harassed by the same co-worker, and Brittany Alvarado, a former videographer for the Wave, claiming workplace-related violations. Three other women are named in the suit for similar alleged violations. Alvarado brought attention to the workplace environment at San Diego Wave after she posted on social media in 2024 that the 'NWSL must take immediate action to remove Jill Ellis from both the San Diego Wave and the league entirely.' Ellis, the former USWNT head coach, was Wave president at the time of the events alleged in the lawsuit and had a hands-on role in managing the club. Ellis has since departed San Diego to take a senior role at Fifa as its chief football officer. Ellis is not a defendant in the lawsuit but is named within it, described as having 'set an abusive and toxic workplace culture' and 'once asking random men in Kansas City about their penises'. (Ellis has filed a separate defamation suit against Alvarado based on her social media post.) The Guardian previously revealed that a 2024 investigation by the NWSL into San Diego Wave management found that the club's front office 'could have done more' to address a sexual assault allegation but found no specific issue with how the claim was handled because the alleged victim did not use the term 'sexual' when describing her experience. The San Diego Wave is a co-defendant in the case with the NWSL. As reported by the Guardian, Jane Doe 1 alleges that a night out in San Diego with a co-worker led to 'inappropriate activities including a game of 'Sexy Jenga' that led to him pressuring her into non-consensual sexual acts'. Jane Doe 1 alleges that later at her apartment, while she was drunk, she was pressured into 'sexual activity that she explicitly stated she did not consent to'. The NWSL's defense argues that consent was given. Under California law, consent requires an individual to freely give agreement to engage in sexual activity 'and voluntarily and have knowledge of the nature of the act or transaction involved.' Sign up to Moving the Goalposts No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women's football after newsletter promotion Another woman, 'Jane Doe 2', alleged in the lawsuit she was sexually harassed by the same San Diego Wave employee who this time sent her non-work related messages and images via Snapchat that became increasingly sexual in nature. Jane Doe 2 claims she was terminated by the club after she did not work the minimum number of shifts in her non-full-time role – shifts that were assigned by the alleged harasser. 'In a negligence case, consent is a potential defense when the plaintiff has agreed to participate in an activity knowing that there are significant risks of harm, and willing to subject themselves to them,' Oppenheimer said. 'The best examples come from sports, but for the athletes … In this case, for the statutory claims under the civil rights laws, there is no defense of consent.' Oppenheimer offered a hypothetical scenario for the NWSL to launch a successful defense: '[The] defendant proves that as each employee was hired they were warned, 'You need to know that this is a toxic workplace. We permit emotional and sexual harassment, we retaliate against people who complain, and we fire people in bad faith. If you don't want to subject yourself to this, don't work here.' That might be enough to defend themselves on the negligent hiring and management claim, but it would subject them to liability on the statutory discrimination claims.' The defense also claims the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs delayed bringing the lawsuit and that a two-year statute of limitations under California law should be enforced. The earliest claims made in the case took place in mid-2022. The suit was filed in October of 2024. The NWSL's lawyers cite a section of California code of civil procedure stipulating that there is a two-year statute of limitations to sue for 'An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.' California law stipulates elsewhere that there is a 10-year statute of limitations for criminal sexual assault claims (the NWSL case in question is civil). The NWSL claims it cannot be held accountable for events described in the lawsuit because they fall outside the relationship between the league and the Wave. The league claims it did not know the incidents occurred nor should it have known. The former San Diego Wave employees have requested a trial by jury.


BBC News
44 minutes ago
- BBC News
Clintons subpoened in House Epstein probe
Former US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary are among a range of high-profile names to receive subpoenas from a congressional committee to testify about deceased sex offender Jeffrey James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, issued the subpoenas on Tuesday to the Clintons, as well as eight other individuals. The committee is looking for more information about Epstein's history, after President Donald Trump's administration decided against releasing more federal files on the late decision sparked outrage among Trump's supporters and some liberals, as many believe the files include a "client list" of famous men affiliated with Epstein. Former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller and six former US attorney generals will also be compelled to testify before the committee - the US Department of Justice has also been subpoenaed for records related to Epstein.