
Bangladesh orders solar panels installation on public buildings to tackle energy woes
Bangladesh is currently governed by an interim administration, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, which took charge after Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina quit and fled the country in August amid widespread protests.
The interim government has struggled to stabilise the power sector due to growing demand and financial constraints.
Yunus' directive came during a meeting of the 'National Rooftop Solar Program', held against the backdrop of a worsening energy crisis driven by volatile global fuel prices.
Officials at the meeting cited a 2024 report by the International Renewable Energy Agency, which showed Bangladesh lagging far behind its regional peers in solar energy adoption.
While solar power accounts for 24% of electricity in India, 17.16% in Pakistan, and 39.7% in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh generates only 5.6% of its electricity from solar sources, according to the report.
To bridge this gap, the government has already floated tenders for 55 land-based solar power plants with a combined capacity of 5,238 MW. However, those projects are not expected to come online before 2028.
Yunus instructed agencies to adopt rooftop solar systems that can be implemented quickly and encouraged a private investment model under which companies would install and maintain solar panels on public buildings, using rooftop space provided by the government.
"The institutions won't have to pay electricity bills and can earn rent from their rooftops," Yunus said.
The International Monetary Fund approved a $1.3 billion disbursement to Bangladesh this week from a $4.7 billion bailout package the country sought in 2023 amid dwindling foreign exchange reserves and rising import costs following a surge in commodity prices triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
15 hours ago
- Telegraph
Miliband forced to pay solar farms to switch off
British solar farms have been paid to switch off for the first time as sunny days prompt a surge of clean power that could overwhelm the grid. The National Energy System Operator (Neso), which manages the UK's power grids and is overseen by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, has issued switch-off orders to solar facilities this year, new research reveals. Operators are paid to switch off when these orders are issued, with the extra cost added to consumer and business energy bills. The solar operators claiming compensation are understood to include some of the UK's biggest energy suppliers, such as EDF Renewables and Octopus Energy. These payments are common for wind farms, which generate more power than cables can cope with on particularly windy days. Solar farms have always had a much smaller output and were mostly built in the South, where grid connections are good. However, the rapid recent growth of solar farms means they too are now being asked to switch off. Neso has said such action was essential to maintaining the stability of the UK's power grids. Critics said it was the latest example of consumers facing extra costs to meet Mr Miliband's net zero targets. Such 'constraint payments' are already common with wind farms because so many have been built in areas such as northern Scotland or offshore, areas without grid capacity to carry the power they generate. So far this year, constraint payments have cost consumers £650m, according to the Wasted Wind website. The cost is added to energy bills. Overall 'balancing payments' could hit £8bn a year by 2030 without massive grid upgrades, according to Neso estimates. Such upgrades would also be extremely costly, with consumers liable. The revelation that solar farm owners are now also claiming constraint payments came from research by the Renewable Energy Foundation (REF), a charity that specialises in energy data. It found that five solar farms had been paid a total of £102,500 to reduce output by 3.6 gigawatt hours between February and June this year. John Constable, the charity's director, said the initial amounts were small but were very likely to rapidly grow, as happened with constraint payments to wind. He said: 'Britain's energy bills are surging and everyone wants to know why. Our work shows that subsidies are a key cause and constraint payments are a critical and growing factor. 'The UK has been subsidising renewables since 2002 and has spent over £200bn of bill payers' cash – equivalent to nearly £8,000 per household.


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary reveals why he'll soon own TikTok
Amid the race to find a buyer for TikTok before the embattled app is forced to go dark by the US government, a savior for the widely popular social media platform has emerged. Now, Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary tells the Daily Mail in an exclusive interview that he's more confident than ever that he'll be involved in the deal to acquire the app. On Sunday, President Donald Trump said, 'We have a buyer for TikTok ... I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it... It's a group of very wealthy people.' Sources reportedly familiar with the deal told Bloomberg this week that the president was referring to a consortium that includes tech giant Oracle Corp, investment firm Blackstone and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. The rush to find a buyer for TikTok has finally come to a head more than a year after President Joe Biden signed The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act in April 2024. The law bans social networking services that are defined as 'foreign adversary-controlled' and gave them 270 days to come into compliance with the law. The South Asian country banned the app over national security concerns in 2020, an outcome that is entirely possible in the US. In January, TikTok voluntarily shut down in the US for 14 hours after the US Supreme Court upheld the Protecting Americans law. Indeed, Republican lawmakers are growing frustrated with repeated delays in enforcement. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away,' Republican Congressman Darin LaHood, who is a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said last month. 'I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways.' At the heart of US national security concerns is TikTok's algorithm, which experts allege may compromise the private data of Americans and manipulate content that US citizens see in their feeds. TikTok has denied that it poses any risk to American users. Regardless, the social media platform faces the threat of a total shutdown inside the United States. September 17 is the current deadline for TikTok to find a buyer. O'Leary, a Daily Mail columnist, maintains that he is 'quite confident' that his group – led by billionaire businessman Frank McCourt and including O'Leary, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian and others – will be part of the TikTok solution. If anything, O'Leary said, various groups in the running for the acquisition may work together. 'Both sides are missing a piece of the puzzle,' he explained. 'Our group doesn't have any existing shareholders of ByteDance, but [Oracle's consortium] doesn't have any code that's going to be compliant with the order from Congress.' The proposal from Oracle's camp would not be a viable one, according to O'Leary, because their bid, he says, involves licensing the algorithm from ByteDance. O'Leary predicts that the US government will require the new owner of TikTok to create a unique algorithm. That's where his syndicate comes in. 'There is not going to be a purchase of TikTok with the Chinese algorithm,' he said. 'We've spent millions of dollars on new technology that'll be the engine that is not owned by the Chinese.' McCourt, who's leading the group called 'The People's Bid for TikTok,' previously told Forbes that users should have more control over their own data. 'Imagine a TikTok where you choose exactly how you experience content, instead of an algorithm secretly deciding for you,' McCourt said. Finally, O'Leary claims that one major hurdle remains – the opposition of the Chinese government. 'We still don't know if [Chinese President] Xi wants to sell TikTok USA to an American-owned entity,' O'Leary explained. 'It's a little unusual to announce the buying group if there's no seller.'


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
County Durham solar farm proposal turned down after objections
Plans for a large-scale solar farm in the countryside have been refused over concerns about noise and the impact on the landscape. Hare Hill Solar's proposal for the site in Haswell Plough was voted down by Durham County Council's planning committee after a developer hoped to operate the 154-acre (62.7 hectare) site at Harehill Farm alongside a battery storage system, but faced opposition from County Council's planning department had originally backed the development to provide clean energy to 17,600 homes, but the committee voted to knock back the plans. Resident Janice Ferguson said her family would become "prisoners in our own home" if the solar farm went ahead."In every direction we will be surrounded by wire fencing, security lighting and CCTV cameras," she told the Local Democracy Reporting Service."We will have to endure at least a year of dust and drilling while 90,000 panels are piledriven into the ground all around us." Residents' concerns Ms Ferguson was joined by 24 other objectors, including local MP Grahame Morris who opposed the proposal due to noise issues and the impact on the said: "The thought of residents being surrounded by rows of solar panels is understandably distressing."Kenneth Morton, speaking on behalf of the applicant, said the application had been altered following local feedback and told a council meeting: "This scheme has planning officers' recommendation for approval, it seeks to minimise local impacts, enables the survival of two local businesses, supports jobs and supports biodiversity."Also supporting the plan, Councillor Mark Wilkes said there would be "no impact on farmland, which in any shape or form can be considered to be negative".However, a majority of committee members sided with the campaigners' Alan Bell said: "It's immense, it's enormous."The landscape harm is not going to be overcome." Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.