Taj Mahal was built on this man's land, the owner's name was..., he was Shah Jahan's...
Taj Mahal: The Taj Mahal is one of the most stunning monuments in the world and also among the Seven Wonders of the World. The monument is also very famous because it is a symbol of eternal love. Millions of visitors flock to Agra to visit the Taj's beautiful architecture and rich history. The Taj Mahal was built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century in loving memory of his beloved wife Mumtaz Mahal. UNESCO also declared the monument as a World Heritage Site.
The Taj Mahal has several mysteries, and one of it is the tale of the land on which the monument was built. Lets know the story.
As per historical records, the land w\here the Taj Mahal was built did not originally belong to Mughal ruler Shah Jahan. The land wasn't seized by the Mughal ruler but exchanged willingly. Land Belonged To Jaipur King
Shah Jahan's wife Mumtaz Mahal died in 1631 in Burhanpur. Her body was buried in Burhanpur but after six months the body of the queen was moved Agra. As per historical records, the land selected to build the Taj Mahal was owned by a Rajput king and ally of Shah Jahan Mirza Raja Jai Singh of Amer.
According to a Mughal record Padshahnama, the land belonged to Raja Man Singh, grandfather of Jai Singh. He donated the land to Shah Jahan. Historical documents indicate that the land now occupied by the Taj Mahal was previously owned by the Kachhwaha Rajputs, and the site featured a large, domed structure.
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) also suggests that the land was owned by Raja Jai Singh was a Rajput king and one of Shah Jahan's trusted allies. The Mughal king negotiated with Singh and acquired the land in exchange for four havelis in Agra. Part Of A Common Practice
Notably, the exchange of properties was a common practice and part of cooperation between the Mughal rulers and regional Rajput kings. Raja Jai Singh was a highly regarded and loyal military leader within the Mughal court, known for his strong alliance with the emperor.
BJP MP Diya Kumari, who belongs to the Jaipur royal family, claimed that the land originally belonged to her ancestors.
'Records available with the Jaipur family show that the land belonged to us. Compensation was given in return for the land,' Kumari told media. History Of The Land
Contrary to claims of seizure, the land transfer between allied dynasties was a mutually agreeable exchange, highlighting the monument's importance as a symbol not only of affection but also of cooperation and peaceful coexistence between powerful contemporary rulers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
14 hours ago
- New Indian Express
1,800-year-old inscription unearthed in Telangana's Yadadri
HYDERABAD: A fragmentary Brahmi inscription dating back to the second century CE was discovered at Chada in Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district during recent excavations by the Telangana Department of heritage. The inscription, engraved on a stone slab, is written in Prakrit language and Brahmi script, typical of the Satavahana period. Though partially damaged, the inscription includes the phrase 'sacha(va)lo[ka] hita sukhaya', which translates to 'for the well-being and happiness of all worlds'. Archaeological Survey of India Director (Epigraphy) K Muniratnam Reddy believes that the inscription records the donation of a slab (pato) to a vihara (Buddhist monastery), indicating the site's importance as a Buddhist centre during the Satavahana era. 'The Telangana government continues to support archaeological research through its Department of Heritage and is actively developing Buddhist tourism circuits across the State,' he added.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
12 ancient Maratha forts just became UNESCO World Heritage Sites: Here's what it means for culture, tourism and you
12 ancient Maratha forts just became UNESCO World Heritage Sites UNESCO has officially granted World Heritage status to a unique set of 12 historic Maratha forts spread across Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. These sites, together called the Maratha Military Landscapes of India, were recognised not just for their age or architecture, but for the military ingenuity they represent. Built or fortified between the 17th and 19th centuries, each fort reflects a different strategy — some rise from hills, others cling to cliffs, while a few sit isolated in the sea. This inscription was approved at UNESCO's 47th World Heritage Committee session in July 2025. With it, India now holds 44 World Heritage Sites, making it the sixth most-represented country in the world. Here's what makes these forts stand out — and why this listing matters beyond just heritage circles. 12 Maratha forts now UNESCO Heritage Sites These 12 forts weren't picked at random. They represent a strategic military network designed to defend the Maratha Empire against the Mughals, the British, and other regional powers. The geography varies — from hills and coastlines to forests and islands — but the intention was the same: control terrain, monitor movement, and stay one step ahead. Here are the newly listed World Heritage forts: Hill Forts: Shivneri, Salher, Lohagad, Raigad , Rajgad, Gingee Hill-Forest Fort: Pratapgad Hill-Plateau Fort: Panhala Coastal Fort: Vijaydurg Island Forts: Khanderi , Suvarnadurg, Sindhudurg Each played a specific role in warfare. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo Shivneri was Shivaji's birthplace. Raigad was his capital. Pratapgad saw a defining battle in 1659. Suvarnadurg helped build one of India's first naval defences. It's not just stone and mortar. Its strategy is etched into geography. Why UNESCO selected these forts UNESCO doesn't just list sites because they're old or beautiful. There are clear criteria. In this case, the Maratha forts earned recognition for their innovative adaptation to terrain and integrated military planning. Shivaji and later Maratha commanders didn't build massive walled cities. Instead, they developed flexible, rugged defences that used nature to their advantage. Hill forts like Rajgad made invasions slow and painful. Sea forts like Sindhudurg could only be approached at low tide. Some forts had multiple layers of walls, others had escape tunnels or rainwater storage. In short, these weren't castles — they were machines for war. And UNESCO acknowledged that this scattered system, when viewed as one network, was a rare example of military landscape design. India's place in the world: 44 World Heritage Sites and counting With this addition, India now has 44 UNESCO World Heritage Sites — including cultural, natural, and mixed categories. This puts India in sixth place globally, behind countries like Italy and China, and second in the Asia-Pacific region. The recognition came after years of work by India's Archaeological Survey (ASI), the Ministry of Culture, and state governments. The nomination began in 2021, was accepted into UNESCO's Tentative List, and finally approved in July 2025 in Paris. Gingee Fort in Tamil Nadu, the only fort outside Maharashtra in this list, reinforces the pan-Indian reach of Maratha influence. It's a reminder that Maratha history wasn't confined to just one region — it spanned hills, coasts, and cultures. Local impact: What the UNESCO tag changes on the ground A World Heritage tag doesn't just make a good headline. It usually means real change on the ground — both good and challenging. Tourism : Visitor numbers are expected to spike, especially at lesser-known forts like Salher or Suvarnadurg. That brings income, but also wear and tear. Preservation : The ASI and local bodies now have access to more resources — funds, expertise, and even international support — for restoration, signage, and site management. Community pride : Locals, especially in Maharashtra, have reacted with pride. These aren't just tourist sites. They're symbols of resistance, leadership, and homegrown ingenuity. That said, protecting these sites will require real effort. Some are remote. Others are fragile. And none were originally built with modern tourism in mind. Maratha forts beyond history: A legacy of resistance and imagination You can stand at Raigad and see the valley spread out like a map. Or walk the steep steps of Pratapgad and feel the echo of hooves and swords. These aren't empty ruins. They're places that witnessed rebellion, statecraft, and sometimes loss. Many school kids in Maharashtra grow up learning about the idea of Hindavi Swarajya — a people's self-rule — tied deeply to Shivaji's legacy. These forts weren't just defence structures. They were statements. Proof that a smaller power, if clever enough, could survive and thrive among empires. UNESCO's recognition doesn't add that meaning — it just finally acknowledges it. FAQs about the UNESCO listing of Maratha forts 1. What exactly is the Maratha Military Landscapes serial nomination? It's a group listing of 12 forts recognised for their shared military design and strategy, viewed together as a single cultural landscape by UNESCO. 2. Why is Gingee Fort in Tamil Nadu included? Gingee was under Maratha control during Shivaji's southern campaigns. It fits the nomination because of its strategic design and historical relevance. 3. Are all these forts open to the public? Most are, though some may have limited access or seasonal restrictions. Coastal forts like Khanderi and Suvarnadurg often depend on boat access and weather conditions. 4. Will this heritage status bring funding for repairs? Yes. UNESCO sites usually receive more national and sometimes international conservation support, especially through India's ASI and cultural programs. 5. How does this affect local communities near the forts? Positively, in many cases. Increased tourism brings business opportunities, from guides to homestays. However, locals must also help manage environmental impact. 6. What other Indian sites are on the UNESCO World Heritage list? Some of the best-known include the Taj Mahal, Hampi, Kaziranga National Park, and the Ajanta and Ellora caves. The Maratha forts now join that league. Also read | Airport alert: These everyday snacks are banned from carry-on bags on flights by TSA
The Print
2 days ago
- The Print
Maratha Military Landscapes' UNESCO tag is a win. Conservation must catch up
But this recognition carries far more weight. It is a profound acknowledgment of indigenous military traditions and innovation that tuned the terrain into a tactical ally. This would be the first time when an inscription shines light on subaltern military heritage, celebrating the terrain-driven and decentralised warfare crafted by the Maratha generals—an extraordinary chapter of India's history that rarely finds mention on the global stage. With this latest addition, India now ranks sixth globally in terms of the total number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites. The journey to get this inscription was long and full of challenges. After two years of back and forth, the revised nomination was finally accepted last year and has since been hailed as a model for integrated military and ecological heritage. In the late hours of 11th July 2025, far away from the Sahyadri mountains, the World Heritage Committee, during its ongoing 47th session in Paris, added 12 formidable military forts of the great Maratha Empire onto the UNESCO World Heritage site list. Spread across diverse geographical and physiographical terrains of Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, these military establishments—collectively termed as the Maratha Military Landscapes—have become India's 44th World Heritage Site. However, the responsibility does not end with the inscription. This will demand a stronger, strategic, and collaborative management plan for all the world heritage sites and for those in the tentative list. Conservation is a challenge for a developing country like India, where it's becoming increasingly difficult to manage the growing cityscape and historical and archaeological heritage. Outstanding universal value For every site UNESCO recognises as a World Heritage Site, its Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) is evaluated. It is central to the World Heritage convention as it highlights the global significance the site holds, not only in the present time but also in the future. It notes the uniqueness of each site while evaluating the state of preservation and capabilities of the stakeholders to uphold the inscription. However, the responsibility does not lie with the country where it is located. It becomes a global responsibility to ensure that the site's value is not lost. In the case of the 12 forts of the Maratha Military Landscapes of India, the task to underline the OUV was undertaken by the Archaeological Survey of India in collaboration with other stakeholders in the dossier. As per the statement, the military landscape developed between the 17th and 19th centuries CE. represented an extraordinary fortification and military system. The military system and the ideology reached their zenith during the time of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj by c.1670 CE and continued till 1818 CE. This extraordinary network of forts, varying in hierarchies, scales, and typological features, is a result of integrating the landscape, terrain, and physiographic characteristics, particularly distinctive to the Sahyadri mountain ranges, the Konkan coast, the Deccan Plateau, and the Eastern Ghats in the Indian peninsula. According to the OUV, they represent the Maratha kingdom's envisioned military network in India. It is also stressed in the dossier that the significance not only lies in the architecture but also in the innovation of connecting them into a unified operational defence system through a strategic network that exploits the unique cultural landscape. They are also the largest concentration of forts integrated within a cultural landscape, globally. Along with the forts, the buffer zones constitute the most authentic, well-preserved, and representative sites of the Maratha Military Landscapes of India. The nomination boundary of the 12 forts includes all the key features that support their recognition as a UNESCO World Heritage site. The area covers the main defensive structures that showcase the Marathas' unique military architecture. The buffer zone around each fort is carefully designed to reflect both the immediate surroundings of the fort and the larger landscape of related forts. This includes two additional layers of the Maratha defence systems built strategically around the main forts. These outer areas include smaller forts and outposts that supported the core structure. The buffer also considers old trade routes and natural features like hills, forests and terrain, which played a major role in the region's defence, culture and economy. These natural elements, along with the man-made check posts known as the Met area, formed part of the larger Maratha Military Landscapes of India. Protection and management In December 2024, Gwenaëlle Bourdin, the then Director of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) Evaluation Unit (responsible for evaluating the OUV of nominated sites), submitted a short interim report on the evaluation carried out by an expert named Hwajong Lee (Republic of Korea). In the report, the panel considered that the 'Maratha Military Landscapes of India' might have the potential to meet the requirements for the Outstanding Universal Value, although this had not yet been demonstrated during the evaluation. From requesting an exhaustive description of each fort and of the nominated component parts, asking the State Party to justify its rationale behind selecting 12 forts out of the initial list of 390 forts, and 14 forts in the Tentative List, ICOMOS highlighted many concerns. However, the most important aspect highlighted by the ICOMOS was not its historicity or the description but the negative impact of interventions and developments taking place at a number of the sites from the list. These included steel towers and solar panels at Khanderi Fort, a ropeway and support structure at Raigad, modern structures, pipelines, and electric poles within several nominated areas. At Pratapgarh, new constructions have appeared in the buffer zones, while Panhala Fort has been impacted by communication towers, water tanks, and even a road cutting through the site. Similarly, National Highway 77, which runs through Gingee Fort, raises questions about its impact on the site's integrity. Thus, ICOMOS asked for the Site Management Plan for each nominated fort. In response, the State Party, provided enough material highlighting its competence in protecting the nominated components. It was noted that eight out of the 12 forts are centrally protected by ASI, and the rest are protected by the Directorate of Archaeology and Museums, government of Maharashtra. For overseeing the management, the State Level Apex Advisory Committee is formed. But is it enough? Also read: Early Harappan burial discovery is changing how we understand Gujarat's past A boon or a threat? Similar to the Maratha Military Landscapes of India, the magnificent Hill forts of Rajasthan, which include Chittorgarh, Kumbhalgarh, Sawai Madhopur, Jhalawar, Jaipur, and Jaisalmer, were inscribed as UNESCO World Heritage Sites in 2013. They were the first serial nominations of India: a group of geographically dispersed but thematically connected sites spanning multiple states or regions. Such sites require a unified conservation framework and an integrated, collaborative management plan. This increases the role of stakeholders in constructing future strategies that emphasise coordinated governance, ecological sensitivity, and active community involvement. Such an integrated effort targets ensuring long-term protection of the sites. However, many forts of Rajasthan, especially Kumbhalgarh, are facing growing conservation concerns due to unchecked tourism, structural degradation, and poor conservation efforts. These forts are vulnerable to urban pressure, increasing footfall, which impacts their integrity. It is evident that with increased visibility on the global front, there will be a sharp rise in the footfall. Are the stakeholders prepared for the preservation challenges not only of the monument but also of the landscape that is integral to their significance? Now that the spotlight is on lesser-known chapters of history, the real challenge is in protecting them without overexposing. Until a management plan is put in place and concerns are taken care of, we must celebrate the recognition that the Maratha forts have awaited for centuries. Let's also remember that heritage is not just about marking national achievements on a global stage—it is meant to be protected, preserved, and passed on to future generations. Disha Ahluwalia is an archaeologist and junior research fellow at the Indian Council Of Historical Research. She tweets @ahluwaliadisha. Views are personal. (Edited by Ratan Priya)
