France's top court rules arrest warrant for ex-Syrian leader Assad is invalid
French investigating magistrates had issued the warrant in November 2023 following a French investigation into chemical weapons attacks in the Syrian city of Douma and Eastern Ghouta district in August 2013 that killed more than 1,000 people.
Then-President Assad's government denied using chemical weapons during the country's civil war that broke out in 2011. Assad was toppled in December last year by Islamist rebels whose leader is now the interim president.
The Court of Cassation's decision overturns one made by the Paris Court of Appeal, which had ruled last year that the warrant was valid. Prosecutors, who would need to ask police to carry out the warrant, had challenged its validity.
"International custom does not allow any exception to the personal immunity of a foreign head of state during the entire duration of their term in office, even when the alleged acts constitute genocide, war crimes, or crimes against humanity," the Court of Cassation said in a statement.
"The arrest warrant issued at a time when this person was the head of state of Syria is therefore invalid ... However, an arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity can now be issued since this person no longer holds the position of Head of State," it said.
Separately, French officials issued a warrant in January against Assad for suspected complicity in war crimes, notably the launch of a deliberate attack on civilians, as part of a inquiry into the case of Salah Abou Nabour, a Franco-Syrian national, who was killed in 2017 in a bombing strike in Syria.
Assad fled to Russia in December 2024 when insurgent forces swept through the country in a lightening offensive, ending over 50 years of rule by his family.
While arrest warrants against sitting heads of state are rare due to immunity protection, international law has exceptions when that leader is accused of war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide. France allows the filing of crimes against humanity cases in its courts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK to start returning some migrants to France within days under new deal
LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Britain said it will begin implementing a deal to return some migrants who arrive on small boats to France within days, a key part of its plans to cut illegal migration, after a treaty on the arrangement is ratified on Tuesday. Under the new deal, France has agreed to accept the return of undocumented people arriving in Britain by small boats, in exchange for Britain agreeing to accept an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with British family connections. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced the "one in, one out" pilot scheme on migrant returns last month. More than 25,000 people have come to Britain on small boats so far in 2025, and Starmer has pledged to "smash the gangs" of smugglers to try to reduce the number of arrivals. Starmer, whose popularity has fallen since winning an election landslide last year, is facing pressure to stop small boats from Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, which leads national opinion polls. In recent weeks in England, there have been a number of protests around hotels housing the asylum seekers who have arrived on small boats, attended by both anti-immigration and pro-immigration groups. French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said on X that the new agreement between the countries has a "clear objective" to break up the people-smuggling networks, although British interior minister Yvette Cooper would not say how many people would be returned under the scheme. "The numbers will start lower and then build up," she told Sky News on Tuesday, adding that the people returned would be those who had immediately arrived on small boats, rather than people already in Britain. Government sources previously said the agreement would involve about 50 returns a week, or 2,600 a year, a fraction of the more than 35,000 arrivals reported last year. Critics of the scheme have said that the scale will not be sufficient to act as a deterrent, but Cooper said that the agreement with France was just one part of the government's wider plan. The government has also targeted people smugglers with sanctions, clamped down on social media adverts and is working with delivery firms to tackle the illegal work that is often promised to migrants. A treaty on the scheme was signed last week but not previously announced ahead of Tuesday's ratification. Britain said the European Commission and European Union member states had given the green light to the plan.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour has ‘lost control of our borders' & ‘one in, one out' migrant deal ‘won't make any difference'
LABOUR'S "one-in-one-out" migrant deal is a hopeless "gimmick" that will "make no difference whatsoever", the Shadow Home Secretary blasted today. The trial, which starts today, sees up to 50 Channel migrants a week sent back to France while the UK will take in the same number via a legal route. 2 2 Detentions are expected to begin within days and removals could start in weeks. But the plan has already been slammed as "weak" and a "gimmick which won't work". Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: "The government's plan being signed today to return just 50 illegal channel immigrants a week, and probably less, will make no difference whatsoever. "This amounts to only 6 per cent of illegal arrivals. Allowing 94 per cent to stay in the UK will be no deterrent at all. "This is a gimmick which won't work." Mr Philp added: "Only removing all illegal immigrants upon arrival will provide the necessary deterrent to stop the crossings. "This is the Conservative plan, but Labour is too weak to implement it and as a result they have lost control of our borders." Under a wider attempted crackdown at illegal migration, charity visa routes are also being tightened as a Nigerian YouTuber boasted about using them to get into the UK. And ministers plan to stop universities taking foreign students if they do not prevent courses being used to claim asylum. The Home Secretary this morning refused to put a number on the overall amount of illegal arrivals who will be sent packing to France under the scheme. She said: "We are not putting an overall figure on this programme. "Of course, it will start will lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it. We want to be able to increase the number of people returned through this programme." She added: "We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. "But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information." The first small boat migrants set to be booted back to France under the new 'one in, one out' returns deal will be rounded up by the end of the week, the Home Office confirmed. The scheme, which has now been signed off by the European Commission, kicks in today and marks the first major returns agreement with an EU state since Brexit. Border Force officers are on standby to start picking out who'll be sent packing, with dozens of beds already cleared at immigration removal centres across the UK. Under the rules, any adult arriving illegally by small boat could face deportation. For every one sent back, Britain will take in a "genuine asylum seeker" from France — but only if they've got family ties here or come from a country with a high level of successful asylum claims, such as Afghanistan, Iran or Eritrea. The pilot will run for nearly a year. While the Home Office hasn't confirmed exact numbers, insiders say around 50 migrants a week will be deported. The figure equates to just one in 17 arrivals, based on current crossing levels. Top officials say the people smugglers' business model will only collapse if up to 85 per cent of crossings are stopped. The deal is part of Sir Keir Starmer's wider vow to 'smash the gangs'. But channel crossings have hit record highs, with a whopping 25,436 people making the journey this year alone, up nearly 50 per cent on 2024.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I felt sick when a scammer stole £2k from my bank despite writing about fraud for 20 years – the red flags I ignored
DRIVING home from an emergency vet trip for my miniature schnauzer, Luna, and my phone rang. I pulled into answer and my mind was racing. It was two days before we were due to go on a two-week family holiday to France and I was juggling picking up the kids from nursery. 1 'Hello? Is that Ruth Jackson-Kirby…', a calm man said, with a professional voice, 'I'm from Santander's fraud team. There's been a suspicious payment on your card'. My stomach flipped. This is the last thing we need, I thought. He knew everything - my name, my credit card provider, the exact product, the colour of the card, and even the last four digits of a card that I'd cancelled months earlier due to fraud. 'In order to reverse the transaction, I need you to approve it in your app,' he said. He asked me how someone could've got my card details. Had I used it somewhere dodgy? Responded to any texts from HMRC or the police? We spoke for around 20 minutes — he waited until I got home, as I didn't have the card with me. Then he told me the transaction was with a car hire firm in Spain, Discovery Cars. He said he could reverse it — but I'd need to approve it in the app first. I hesitated. But he reassured me that it was just a step in the refund process — and that only a Santander staff member could trigger the app notification. I was flustered and distracted. I tapped approve. Despite my two-decade long career as a financial journalist where I write about scams for a living, I didn't question it. It was only when he started talking about a second transaction that I realised and hung up. But it was too late - £2,059 disappeared from my bank. I had become a victim of an impersonation scam – where criminals pose as your bank, the police or HMRC – are the most common cons around. 'Despite the rise of AI, what we're seeing right now is criminals continuing to use tried and tested methods,' a National Trading Standards spokesperson told The Sun. 'These include impersonation scams that see criminals bombard consumers with texts, emails or calls that appear to be from banks or other trusted organisations like the NHS, HMRC or parcel delivery firms.' While I was on the phone to Santander – having dialled the number on the back of my card – he rang back five times. When I finally got through, the real fraud team confirmed I'd been scammed. A payment to Discovery Cars for £2,059.99 had gone through. I felt sick. I couldn't believe I'd fallen for it. I've written about scams for 20 years. Now I was the victim. Thankfully, Santander refunded the money four days later. But I barely slept in the meantime. I thought I'd lost the money. 'Scammers are ruthless – and impersonation scams are rife,' says Michelle Pilsworth, head of fraud and customer experience at Santander. 'Scammers use personal data that they have taken from interactions with the individual or via the dark web to convince them to trust them, and in turn, part with their money.' Someone at Santander told me that it often starts with a text saying you need to pay a fine or unpaid bill. You click, tap in your details, hear nothing more. Then a year or two later, a scammer uses those details in a call like the one I received. The red flags I ignored LOOKING back there were red flags on the call, I just didn't notice them. The second time he called, my husband overheard and picked up on something I'd missed: the scammer used my maiden name. I haven't been great at updating my name everywhere, but my bank would use my married name. He also mentioned a credit card I'd cancelled — but that card wasn't from Santander. A real Santander employee wouldn't have had access to that. And when I started hesitating, he turned up the pressure. 'We need to act now to reverse the payment,' he said. Creating urgency is a classic scam tactic, and I fell for it In my case, the scammer put the charge on my credit card. Santander refunded it quickly, but if they hadn't, I could've claimed under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act. This law means credit card providers must refund you if the goods or service don't arrive, which they wouldn't have done, and they cost between £100 and £30,000. If I'd paid straight from my current account, it would've been a type of Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud. Since new rules came in last year, banks must refund victims of APP scams — up to £85,000, though they can deduct a £100 excess. But if you ignore your bank's warnings or wait too long to report the fraud, you might not get your money back. The same scammer has called me twice since. Now I know what to do. 'I'll call you back,' I say, and hang up. That's my advice to everyone. If someone calls saying they're from your bank or card provider – don't even listen. Don't argue. Don't let them draw you in. Hang up. Then find the right number and call back yourself. If it's genuine, they'll tell you. And if it's not – you've just saved yourself a lot of money. .
