
AI video becomes more convincing, rattling creative industry
To measure the progress of AI video, you need only look at Will Smith eating spaghetti.
Since 2023, this unlikely sequence – entirely fabricated – has become a technological benchmark for the industry.
Two years ago, the actor appeared blurry, his eyes too far apart, his forehead exaggeratedly protruding, his movements jerky, and the spaghetti didn't even reach his mouth.
The version published a few weeks ago by a user of Google's Veo 3 platform showed no apparent flaws whatsoever.
'Every week, sometimes every day, a different one comes out that's even more stunning than the next,' said Elizabeth Strickler, a professor at Georgia State University.
Between Luma Labs' Dream Machine launched in June 2024, OpenAI's Sora in December, Runway AI's Gen-4 in March 2025, and Veo 3 in May, the sector has crossed several milestones in just a few months.
Runway has signed deals with Lionsgate studio and AMC Networks television group.
Lionsgate vice president Michael Burns told New York Magazine about the possibility of using artificial intelligence to generate animated, family-friendly versions from films like the 'John Wick' or 'Hunger Games' franchises, rather than creating entirely new projects.
'Some use it for storyboarding or previsualization' – steps that come before filming – 'others for visual effects or inserts,' said Jamie Umpherson, Runway's creative director.
Burns gave the example of a script for which Lionsgate has to decide whether to shoot a scene or not.
To help make that decision, they can now create a 10-second clip 'with 10,000 soldiers in a snowstorm.'
That kind of pre-visualization would have cost millions before.
In October, the first AI feature film was released – 'Where the Robots Grow' – an animated film without anything resembling live action footage.
For Alejandro Matamala Ortiz, Runway's co-founder, an AI-generated feature film is not the end goal, but a way of demonstrating to a production team that 'this is possible.'
'Resistance everywhere'
Still, some see an opportunity.
In March, startup Staircase Studio made waves by announcing plans to produce seven to eight films per year using AI for less than $500,000 each, while ensuring it would rely on unionized professionals wherever possible.
'The market is there,' said Andrew White, co-founder of small production house Indie Studios.
People 'don't want to talk about how it's made,' White pointed out. 'That's inside baseball. People want to enjoy the movie because of the movie.'
But White himself refuses to adopt the technology, considering that using AI would compromise his creative process.
Jamie Umpherson argues that AI allows creators to stick closer to their artistic vision than ever before, since it enables unlimited revisions, unlike the traditional system constrained by costs.
'I see resistance everywhere' to this movement, observed Georgia State's Strickler.
This is particularly true among her students, who are concerned about AI's massive energy and water consumption as well as the use of original works to train models, not to mention the social impact.
But refusing to accept the shift is 'kind of like having a business without having the internet,' she said. 'You can try for a little while.'
In 2023, the American actors' union SAG-AFTRA secured concessions on the use of their image through AI.
Strickler sees AI diminishing Hollywood's role as the arbiter of creation and taste, instead allowing more artists and creators to reach a significant audience.
Runway's founders, who are as much trained artists as they are computer scientists, have gained an edge over their AI video rivals in film, television, and advertising.
But they're already looking further ahead, considering expansion into augmented reality and virtual reality – for example creating a metaverse where films could be shot.
'The most exciting applications aren't necessarily the ones that we have in mind,' said Umpherson. 'The ultimate goal is to see what artists do with technology.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US stocks mixed as markets eye earnings, trade talks
NEW YORK: The Dow fell while the Nasdaq edged higher early Thursday as markets digested mixed corporate earnings and anticipated additional trade deal announcements from President Donald Trump. Google parent Alphabet was among the early gainers, rising about three percent after reporting a whopping $28.2 billion in second-quarter profits as it touted its artificial intelligence offerings. But Tesla dove around eight percent as CEO Elon Musk warned of a rough patch for earnings, while both Chipotle Mexican Grill and Dow Chemical suffered double-digit declines. About 20 minutes into trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 0.5 percent at 44,779.70. Wall St extends gains after report of US-EU nearing trade deal The broad-based S&P 500 gained 0.2 percent to 6,371.86, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index climbed 0.3 percent to 21,081.49. analyst Patrick O'Hare said Trump's trade announcement with Japan had raised hopes about further deals. 'There is underlying enthusiasm for more trade deals being struck before the August 1 deadline,' O'Hare said. The European Central Bank, meanwhile, held interest rates steady as policymakers waited to see whether the eurozone would strike a deal with Trump.


Express Tribune
20 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Google, OpenAI earn gold at high school maths contest
Alphabet's Google and OpenAI said their artificial-intelligence models won gold medals at a global mathematics competition, signaling a breakthrough in maths capabilities in the race to build powerful systems that can rival human intelligence, reported Reuters. The results marked the first time that AI systems crossed the gold-medal scoring threshold at the International Mathematical Olympiad for high-school students. Both companies' models solved five out of six problems, achieving the result using general-purpose "reasoning" models that processed mathematical concepts using natural language, in contrast to the previous approaches used by AI firms. The achievement suggests AI is less than a year away from being used by mathematicians to crack unsolved research problems at the frontier of the field, according to Junehyuk Jung, a math professor at Brown University and visiting researcher in Google's DeepMind AI unit. "I think the moment we can solve hard reasoning problems in natural language will enable the potential for collaboration between AI and mathematicians," Jung told Reuters. The same idea can apply to research quandaries in other fields such as physics, said Jung, who won an IMO gold medal as a student in 2003. Of the 630 students participating in the 66th IMO on the Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Australia, 67 contestants, or about 11 per cent, achieved gold-medal scores. Google's DeepMind AI unit last year achieved a silver medal score using AI systems specialised for maths. This year, Google used a general-purpose model called Gemini Deep Think, a version of which was previously unveiled at its annual developer conference in May. Unlike previous AI attempts that relied on formal languages and lengthy computation, Google's approach this year operated entirely in natural language and solved the problems within the official 4.5-hour time limit, the company said in a blog post. OpenAI, which has its own set of reasoning models, similarly built an experimental version for the competition, according to a post by researcher Alexander Wei on social media platform X. He noted that the company does not plan to release anything with this level of math capability for several months. This year marked the first time the competition coordinated officially with some AI developers, who have for years used prominent math competitions like IMO to test model capabilities. IMO judges certified the results of those companies, including Google, and asked them to publish results on July 28. "We respected the IMO Board's original request that all AI labs share their results only after the official results had been verified by independent experts and the students had rightly received the acclamation they deserved," Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis said on X.


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Humans beat AI gold-level score at top maths contest
SYDNEY: Humans beat generative AI models made by Google and OpenAI at a top international mathematics competition, despite the programmes reaching gold-level scores for the first time. Neither model scored full marks — unlike five young people at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), a prestigious annual competition where participants must be under 20 years old. Google said Monday that an advanced version of its Gemini chatbot had solved five out of the six maths problems set at the IMO, held in Australia's Queensland this month. 'We can confirm that Google DeepMind has reached the much-desired milestone, earning 35 out of a possible 42 points — a gold medal score,' the US tech giant cited IMO president Gregor Dolinar as saying. 'Their solutions were astonishing in many respects. IMO graders found them to be clear, precise and most of them easy to follow.' Around 10 percent of human contestants won gold-level medals, and five received perfect scores of 42 points. US ChatGPT maker OpenAI said that its experimental reasoning model had scored a gold-level 35 points on the test. The result 'achieved a longstanding grand challenge in AI' at 'the world's most prestigious math competition', OpenAI researcher Alexander Wei wrote on social media. 'We evaluated our models on the 2025 IMO problems under the same rules as human contestants,' he said. 'For each problem, three former IMO medalists independently graded the model's submitted proof.' Google achieved a silver-medal score at last year's IMO in the British city of Bath, solving four of the six problems. That took two to three days of computation — far longer than this year, when its Gemini model solved the problems within the 4.5-hour time limit, it said. The IMO said tech companies had 'privately tested closed-source AI models on this year's problems', the same ones faced by 641 competing students from 112 countries.