logo
11 vehicles involved in 2 pileups within 3 hours on Singapore highways, four sent to hospital

11 vehicles involved in 2 pileups within 3 hours on Singapore highways, four sent to hospital

Photo: SGRV FB
SINGAPORE: A series of traffic accidents involving a total of ten cars and a motorcycle unfolded across two major expressways on Saturday (28 June), leaving four people injured.
The first accident occurred along the Tampines Expressway (TPE) towards the Pan Island Expressway (PIE). Police said they were alerted at around 3:30pm to a collision involving six cars.
Video clips shared on the SGRV Facebook page showed the aftermath of the pileup, with damaged vehicles blocking the second lane and several individuals, believed to be drivers, standing near their cars.
The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said two female passengers, aged 33 and 59, were assessed at the scene and conveyed to separate hospitals in a conscious condition. One woman was taken to Changi General Hospital while the other was taken to Sengkang General Hospital.
Later that same evening, a second pileup was reported along the PIE towards Changi Airport. The accident, which happened at around 6pm, involved four cars and a motorcycle. See also Caught on camera: Wild boar hits passing cyclist in Punggol
According to the police, a 25-year-old woman and a 25-year-old male motorcyclist were also injured in the incident and conveyed to hospital conscious.
Investigations into the causes of both accidents are ongoing, the police said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Driver who caused death of pillion rider not NUS student, says university
Driver who caused death of pillion rider not NUS student, says university

CNA

time44 minutes ago

  • CNA

Driver who caused death of pillion rider not NUS student, says university

SINGAPORE: A driver who caused the death of a teenager riding pillion on a motorcycle has never been a student at the National University of Singapore (NUS), the university said in a statement on Tuesday (Jul 1). Jarrett Tee Lee Kiat had been identified as an NUS student at the time of the incident, in reports on court proceedings based on official court documents. However, after Tee's sentencing, NUS posted a statement on Facebook saying that Tee "has no affiliation with this university". "There are no records that this individual has ever been or is currently a student of NUS," said the university on its Facebook page. The 30-year-old Singaporean was sentenced to jail for five years and eight months on Jun 27 for dangerous driving causing the death of Ms Leann Lim Jia Le, 18. He had been driving along the East Coast Parkway expressway at speeds of up to 160kmh when he sped up and overtook the motorcycle Ms Lim was riding pillion on. He then began to play "blocking and braking games" with the motorcycle. After asking his passengers "Do you want to see motorcycle fly?", Tee side-swiped the motorcycle, flinging its rider and pillion five to eight metres away. Ms Lim died of multiple injuries from the collision, and Tee said "she deserved it as she come and push my limit", according to court papers. Court documents that media outlets based their reports on stated: "At the time of the incident, the accused was a full-time student at the National University of Singapore and was also working part-time as a chef as well as a social media influencer".

1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore
1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore

Singapore Law Watch

timean hour ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore

1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore Source: Straits Times Article Date: 02 Jul 2025 Author: Grace Leong StanChart said it has not yet received the legal claim documents, and emphatically rejects any claims made by these companies. More than US$2.7 billion (S$3.4 billion) in alleged misappropriated funds is being sought from Standard Chartered Singapore (StanChart) in a High Court lawsuit filed by liquidators in the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) saga. The suit, which represents the latest wide-ranging effort to recover funds siphoned from Malaysia's sovereign wealth fund 1MDB – from which US investigators claim about US$4.5 billion was stolen between 2009 and 2014 – was brought by court-appointed liquidators Angela Barkhouse and Toni Shukla from financial services firm Kroll. When asked by The Straits Times why the lawsuit was being brought at this juncture, a Singapore-based lawyer for the liquidators declined to comment. The suit, which was filed on June 30, seeks to hold StanChart accountable for its role in allegedly enabling fraud to be committed against 1MDB and the systematic theft of funds. Three companies in liquidation linked to 1MDB – Alsen Chance Holdings, Blackstone Asia Real Estate Partners and Brightstone Jewellery – alleged that between 2009 and 2013, StanChart permitted over 100 intra-bank transfers that helped conceal the flow of stolen funds and chose to overlook obvious red flags regarding these transfers. The suit claims that in doing so, the bank failed to comply with Singapore's anti-money laundering (AML) regulations and client due diligence rules. StanChart, in a statement on July 1, said: 'Any claims by these companies are without merit and Standard Chartered will vigorously defend any lawsuit commenced by the liquidators.' The suit claims that the three companies lost over US$2.7 billion and $20 million in public funds. StanChart, in response to ST's queries, said it has 'not yet received the legal claim documents, and emphatically rejects any claims made by these companies'. The liquidators who are making these claims have publicly stated that these companies were shell companies with no legitimate business and were linked to fugitives Low Taek Jho and his associate Eric Tan Kim Loong, StanChart said. They operated under false pretences, and acted as a conduit for funds misappropriated from 1MDB to launder monies, the bank said. According to the lawsuit, the transfers demonstrate serious breaches and control failings that ultimately enabled the theft of public funds by people operating at the highest levels of the Malaysian government during that period. The account held by Blackstone Asia Real Estate – a firm owned by Tan – allegedly disbursed US$150 million directly to the personal bank account of Najib Razak, the former prime minister of Malaysia who has since been jailed for corruption and money laundering. Some US$4.7 million was disbursed to jewellery, watch and bag vendors to pay for the luxury goods purchased by Najib's wife Rosmah Mansor. Another US$1 million allegedly went to Red Granite Pictures, a movie production and distribution company controlled by Rosmah's biological son Riza Aziz, to pay for movie development expenses, among other things. An account held by Alsen Chance Holdings disbursed US$53.4 million to jewellery, watch and bag vendors to pay for Rosmah's luxury goods purchases, and another US$38.75 million to Red Granite Capital. The account held by Brightstone Jewellery disbursed US$77.2 million to jewellery, watch and bag vendors to pay for Rosmah's luxury goods purchases. According to the suit, these amounts, along with the nature of the money flows, are evidence of how StanChart had failed to conduct the anti-money laundering safeguards. In 2016, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) imposed financial penalties of $5.2 million on StanChart and required that disciplinary action be taken against its officers who failed to perform their duties, following findings of significant lapses and serious regulatory breaches. A spokesperson for the 1MDB board said on July 1: 'The Malaysian people were the true victims of this global fraud, and all parties are determined to hold every facilitator to account – including financial institutions that failed in their most basic duties of vigilance and responsibility.' StanChart, in its statement, pointed out that the transactions at issue date back to 2010. 'We reported the transaction activities of these companies, both before and at the time we shut their accounts in early 2013, and fully cooperated with the investigating authorities,' it said. 'As set out in the MAS' December 2016 media release on the penalties on StanChart for 1MDB-related AML breaches, MAS concluded their inspection of StanChart in relation to 1MDB-related fund flows. 'While MAS identified regulatory breaches, the inspection did not find pervasive control weaknesses or wilful misconduct at Standard Chartered,' the bank said. 'Standard Chartered takes our responsibility to fight financial crime extremely seriously. We have made significant investments in strengthening our controls and uplifting our AML standards, and will continue to do so,' it added. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print

Two contrasting cases raise questions of Pope Leo's actions on sex abuse
Two contrasting cases raise questions of Pope Leo's actions on sex abuse

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Two contrasting cases raise questions of Pope Leo's actions on sex abuse

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Our Lady of Reconciliation, a parish once run by Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, in Lima, Peru. CHICLAYO, Peru – The contrasts are glaring. In one case, Pope Leo XIV – then known as Bishop Robert Prevost – sided with victims of sexual abuse, locking horns with powerful Catholic figures in Peru. He sought justice for victims of a cult-like Catholic movement that recruited the children of elite families and used sexual and psychological abuse to subordinate members. In another case, he was accused of failing to sufficiently investigate claims by three women that they had been abused as children by priests. The accused were two priests in cardinal Prevost's diocese in a small Peruvian city, including one who had worked closely with the bishop, according to two people who work for the church. As Pope Leo settles into the papacy, leading the world's 1.4 billion Catholics, his handling of clergy sexual abuse will be closely scrutinised, and the two cases have left him open to starkly diverging judgments: praise for helping victims in one, claims that he let them down in the other. In the first, victims have hailed as heroic his work taking on the ultraconservative group, Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, which had grown more influential after Pope John Paul II gave it his pontifical stamp of approval. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US Senate approves divisive Trump spending Bill World Trump escalates feud with Musk, threatens Tesla, SpaceX support Singapore A second chance to excel: 3,800 private candidates taking O- and A-level exams in 2025 Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train Opinion US strikes on Iran: The impact ripples on, from Baghdad to Beijing Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26 Business Binance to keep hundreds of staff in Singapore despite crackdown, sources say Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance Breaking with other powerful Catholic figures in Peru, cardinal Prevost arranged talks between victims and church leaders and helped those who suffered abuse to get psychological help and monetary settlements. As he rose through the Vatican's ranks, cardinal Prevost kept increasing the pressure on Sodalitium, which was ordered to disband only weeks before he became the first American to lead the Catholic Church. In the second case, in the northern Peruvian city of Chiclayo, the three women and victims' advocates say, cardinal Prevost conducted a superficial investigation that led the Vatican to close the case relatively quickly. They also say that despite a church order prohibiting one of the accused priests, the Reverend Eleuterio Vásquez, from practicing amid the inquiry, he continued leading public Masses. Photographs and video posted on Facebook and verified by The New York Times showed Reverend Vásquez leading church ceremonies during the investigation, raising questions among some critics about what oversight, if any, Cardinal Prevost put in place to ensure that victims were protected from a potential abuser. Vatican guidelines discourage 'simply transferring' an accused priest to another parish while an investigation is ongoing. Cardinal Prevost also appointed a priest, the Reverend Julio Ramírez, to counsel the women. Reverend Ramírez warned them that they should not expect much accountability from Rome because their abuse had not involved 'penetration'. 'I don't want it to sound bad,' Reverend Ramírez told one of the women in a recorded telephone conversation, a copy of which was obtained by the Times. 'Nor are we defending him. But since it hasn't reached a situation – I know what you've experienced is traumatic – but it hasn't reached a situation of rape, it seems that they've given priority to other cases.' The Vatican says Cardinal Prevost followed church protocol after the women went to him with their abuse claims, conducting an initial investigation and sending his findings to Rome, where a final decision would be made. Mr Ulices Damián, a lawyer for the Chiclayo diocese, said it was 'false' that the bishop did nothing to help the women. 'He acted in accordance with the procedures,' he said. The Times also identified a second case of a priest accused of abusing a minor who was able to continue his clerical duties for years while Cardinal Prevost led the diocese in Chiclayo – even after the church ordered the priest to cease work in his parish while an investigation was conducted. The Vatican has struggled to rebuild trust after years of clergy misconduct and what advocates for abuse victims say has been a woeful response by church leaders. The Vatican's existing rules to protect children, even if the pope followed them when he was in Chiclayo, are one of the fundamental problems, advocates say, failing to provide full accountability or justice. Activists have asked for changes that include a universal zero-tolerance law, which would permanently remove from ministry clergy who are found guilty by a church tribunal of abuse or covering up wrongdoing. Currently, only Catholic authorities in the United States have imposed such standards. The law would also mandate independent oversight of bishops handling abuse cases. In Pope Leo's past, some see a man who will take strong steps against abuse. Some of Sodalitium's victims say the criticism of his actions in Chiclayo has been exaggerated and amplified by forces favorably disposed to Sodalitium, as an act of retaliation. 'He was never at all an indifferent, indolent or cowardly bishop,' said Mr Pedro Salinas, a journalist and Sodalitium abuse victim. But others look at the pope's time in Chiclayo and see a man who will push few boundaries when it comes to rooting out abuse. 'Survivors don't trust him,' said Mr Peter Isely, a founding member of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests. 'He's going to have to prove his trust and he's going to have to bend over backwards to prove it.' 'Half monk, half soldier' The reporting stunned the Catholic establishment. Just as Cardinal Prevost took over as leader of the Chiclayo diocese in 2015, two Peruvian journalists released a book containing shocking details about Sodalitium, which was founded in 1971 by a layman, Luis Fernando Figari. The book, Half Monk, Half Soldier, by Salinas and Paola Ugaz, said the group evolved into a fanatical far-right movement with a culture of sexual abuse. In a subsequent independent inquiry, investigators, including a former FBI official, found that Figari would use a whip with metal points to punish members, make his dog bite them, burn them with a lit candle and make them wear a belt that caused electric shocks. In interviews with the Times, several survivors said few church leaders in Peru were willing to take their claims seriously. Of those who did, 'the most important was Robert Prevost,' said Mr Oscar Osterling, who recalled Figari summoning him as a youth, making him strip naked and filming him. Dozens of victims eventually came forward. Sodalitium members included Archbishop José Antonio Eguren, a powerful church leader in the north-west city of Piura, a three-hour drive from Chiclayo. In 2018, Cardinal Prevost helped organise a meeting in Lima, the capital of Peru, between senior clergy and Sodalitium victims, helping them obtain mental health counseling and financial payments, victims said. For a bishop in the Peruvian church, taking such measures was trailblazing. For years, prominent Catholic clergy opted to look the other way even as victim after victim came forward with harrowing tales of sexual, physical and psychological abuse by Sodalitium's leaders. 'I can't stay quiet' Though he was called a champion for victims of Sodalitium, the three women from a working-class neighborhood in Chiclayo who claimed they had been victims of clerical abuse say they received very different treatment. It started with a visit they made to the future pope in 2022. As children, they told Cardinal Prevost, they had been abused by two priests in the diocese. One, Reverend Vásquez, had taken two of the girls to a mountain retreat on separate occasions, they later told a news outlet, Cuarto Poder, and he had gotten into bed with them. 'He started lifting me up and rubbing me on him,' one of the women told the television program. She was 11 at the time, according to the news report, and said she did not understand what was happening. One of the women, Ms Ana María Quispe, now 29, has since spoken out extensively on TikTok and Facebook and in Peruvian media, and said she had decided to go to Cardinal Prevost because she was haunted by the idea that her silence might have let an abuser continue to do harm. 'This could happen to my daughter,' she said on TikTok. 'I can't stay quiet – no more cowardice.' Ms Quispe said on TikTok that Cardinal Prevost told the women he believed them and even encouraged them to report the abuse to civil authorities, which they did. But then, Ms Quispe said, not much seemed to happen. The diocese claimed in public statements that Reverend Vásquez had been 'prohibited' from celebrating Mass amid an investigation. Social media posts reviewed by the Times, however, showed him continuing to participate publicly in Mass at least three times during the period the Vatican said an inquiry was being conducted. He was even photographed jointly officiating Mass with Cardinal Prevost. In abuse cases, Vatican guidelines instruct church leaders to conduct an initial investigation and send their findings to Rome. The Vatican suggests that leaders assemble testimony and establish basic facts, but gives them broad latitude in deciding what to report to higher-ups. A spokesperson for the Vatican, Mr Matteo Bruni, said Cardinal Prevost's investigation went 'beyond the requisites' and included receiving a written report from the women and searching the archives of the diocese for similar accusations against Reverend Vásquez. Prosecutors in Peru closed their civil investigation in 2022, according to the diocese, the same year the women went to Prevost with their accusations, because the claims went back so many years that they fell outside the statute of limitations. Prosecutors declined to comment. The Vatican closed its own investigation into the women's claims in August 2023, citing the decision by civil authorities and a lack of evidence. In the other case in Chiclayo identified by the Times, the diocese had ordered a priest, the Reverend Alfonso Raúl Obando, accused of sexually abusing a minor, to stop any clerical work in his parish. But more than a dozen Facebook posts identified by the Times, many of them from the period when Cardinal Prevost led the diocese, showed the priest continuing to work as a priest – often with children. In one instance, Reverend Obando used a church Facebook page to ask children to send him their photographs directly on WhatsApp. The Vatican recently stripped Obando of his clerical status, but he has continued working in Chiclayo. Obando did not respond to calls and text messages seeking comment. Disappointment and anger Ms Quispe was outraged over the handling of her case and, starting in November 2023, began speaking out on online, accusing church leaders of failing to deliver justice or accountability and laying part of the blame on Prevost. 'They always protect them,' she said on TikTok of accused priests, giving them 'total freedom to continue doing harm with no repercussions.' An intermediary eventually put the frustrated women in touch with the Reverend Ricardo Coronado, a priest with conservative leanings who had been photographed socialising with Sodalitium members. It was Reverend Coronado who connected the women with the news program Cuarto Poder, he said in an interview, which further amplified the critique of Cardinal Prevost. Reverend Coronado's involvement in the case was brief. After a few months representing the women, he was defrocked amid separate claims of misconduct. In the interview, he maintained that he was defrocked to remove him from the case. He also insisted that he had not acted on behalf of Sodalitium to represent the women. A lawyer for the women declined to comment. The church declined to make Reverend Vásquez available for an interview. A second priest accused by Ms Quispe has a degenerative illness, the diocese said in a statement, and 'is unable to defend himself, so no case can be opened against him'. In late 2023, citing Ms Quispe's decision to speak out, the Chiclayo diocese said it had reopened the investigation into Reverend Vásquez. With the case continuing, Reverend Vásquez recently asked to leave the priesthood, according to a person with direct knowledge of the case. The person asked not to be identified, fearing retaliation from the church. Reverend Vásquez is awaiting a decision from the Vatican. Reverend Coronado, the defrocked canon lawyer, said he believed the new pope had mishandled the women's claims in Chiclayo – not out of malice, but because of inexperience. 'The pope is another human being,' he said. 'He's not God.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store