logo
Priceline customer accuses pharmacy of despicable act as staff hit back... before bosses offer a grovelling apology

Priceline customer accuses pharmacy of despicable act as staff hit back... before bosses offer a grovelling apology

Daily Mail​a day ago

A woman has accused Priceline of racial profiling with bosses offering a grovelling apology in a massive backflip after the store bluntly denied the claims.
Joyce Lebechi claimed workers routinely requested security footage to be checked whenever she visited the store in Victoria.
Ms Lebechi filmed herself confronting a staff member on the weekend, saying she was fed-up with being 'targeted'.
The pharmacy initially took to Instagram to deny the accusations and defend its staff, before removing the post.
'We treat every person equally, and any suggestion otherwise is not only hurtful, it is categorically untrue,' it read.
The pharmacy has since backtracked with a Priceline spokesman telling Daily Mail Australia on Monday they were deeply sorry for the incident.
'The situation that occurred at the Priceline Pharmacy franchise is highly regrettable and we wholeheartedly apologise to Ms Lebechi,' she explained.
'The security camera checks in question are not endorsed by Priceline Pharmacy, and the store has been asked to stop performing these.'
Ms Lebechi said in her TikTok video that 'every time I come in here, they always ask for the cameras to get checked'.
'And today I've had it up to here,' she said.
She approached a staff member and asked why the security checks seemed to coincide with her visits.
'Every time I come in the store, the cameras are asked to be checked. Why is that?' she asked.
The employee responded that checks are conducted 'every ten minutes'.
Ms Lebechi recalled a previous conversation where she was told the checks happened 'every five minutes'.
'Now it's ten minutes,' she said.
The customer insisted the situation had happened too often to be a coincidence when speaking to another staff member.
'It just feels very racially motivated,' Ms Lebechi said.
But the staff member said the checks were 'random', and she had had similar conversations in the past with other shoppers.
'You're not the only one that has that conversation with us,' she explained.
'It happens all the time, and everyone that's shopping at that time has the same comment, but we've got to do it, we can't stop.'
Ms Lebechi she said it still felt racially motivated.
'You can't say that to us when we have multiple races working in here,' the staff member said.
'First of all, I don't really see that,' the shopper replied.
'I think it's something that you guys need to be conscious of, in my opinion.'
But the staff member disagreed saying: 'No, because then we are targeting.'
Ms Lebechi said there were too many occasions the announcement had occurred, blaming front-of-store staff for targeting customers of colour.
The staff member apologised that the shopper 'felt like that' as Ms Lebechi left the store.
The store posted a now-deleted statement to their social media account, taking aim at the claims.
'We are deeply disappointed by these claims, as they do not reflect the reality of our store, our staff, or our values,' it read.
'Our team proudly represents a wide range of cultural backgrounds, and we serve a diverse community of customers every day with professionalism, care, and respect.
'As part of our standard loss prevention policy, common across major retailers, we conduct random security measures, including bag checks and camera monitoring, throughout the day.
'These checks are never based on race, ethnicity, or appearance. They are carried out strictly as a routine part of ensuring the safety and wellbeing of both our customers and staff.'
The store said they are considering the accusations extremely seriously and strongly considering legal action.
'We have many long-standing regular customers from all walks of life who know and trust our team,' the statement read.
'We treat every person equally, and any suggestion otherwise is not only hurtful, it is categorically untrue.'
A Priceline spokesman has since apologised 'for the understandable distress and concern caused by the events that took place'.
'This experience does not reflect our values of inclusivity and respect, for all customers,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BREAKING NEWS Channel Nine confirms veteran will make a sensational return to TV after quitting radio gig
BREAKING NEWS Channel Nine confirms veteran will make a sensational return to TV after quitting radio gig

Daily Mail​

time27 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Channel Nine confirms veteran will make a sensational return to TV after quitting radio gig

Channel Nine has confirmed Deborah Knight will be stepping away from her role on 2GB's Money News and returning to a full-time television role at the network. The seasoned journalist is set to take on the role of presenter for the national 9News Morning bulletin at 11:30am each weekday from July 21. The 52-year-old will also present 9News Afternoon each weekday in Sydney and will continue to host A Current Affair on Saturday night. 'I'm incredibly excited to be stepping back into a full-time television role with 9News and Current Affairs,' Deb said. 'It's a fantastic opportunity to be part of the daily news cycle and connect with viewers during these important bulletins. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. 'I've thoroughly enjoyed my time in radio, particularly hosting Money News, and I'm grateful for the wonderful listeners who tuned in. I'm also very pleased to continue hosting A Current Affair on Saturday nights.' Deb's final show on 2GB will be on Thursday, with a new host set to be announced in the coming weeks. National Content Manager of Nine Radio Greg Byrnes acknowledged her contribution to radio. 'Deb has been an integral part of the 2GB on-air team since 2020, but her ties to talk radio stretch back much further,' he said. 'Nationally, the Money News program with Deb as host, has recorded some of its best ratings on record and she finishes up as No. 1 overall in Sydney. We'll miss Deb on and off the air but as she's remaining in the Nine family she'll never be too far away.' Deb's exit from 2GB will leave the Sydney station without any female presenters during the weekday daytime lineup. She first joined 2GB's afternoon program in 2020, reportedly on a $600,000 salary, before being moved off the role in late 2023 due to disappointing ratings. At the time, the broadcaster was said to be 'shattered' by the decision. Despite the shake-up, Knight quickly bounced back, taking over Money News in November 2023 in a revamped 7pm-8pm slot. And it didn't take long for her to prove the doubters wrong. Knight helped drive Money News to a 13.3 per cent share in the latest ratings survey -ranking her number one in the country for the timeslot, and more than doubling the show's audience in Queensland, where it's also broadcast on Brisbane's 4BC. The program also recorded a 0.6 point increase in the latest survey, contributing to 2GB's strongest ratings result of the year.

Qantas pilots to take strike action after 'lowball' pay offer despite recording mega profits
Qantas pilots to take strike action after 'lowball' pay offer despite recording mega profits

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Qantas pilots to take strike action after 'lowball' pay offer despite recording mega profits

Parcel deliveries won't be impacted when Qantas pilots responsible for transporting mail take industrial action over a wage offer they say will leave them at the bottom of the industry. More than 100 Express Freighters pilots will be eligible to begin low-level action from Friday after over 90 per cent voted in favour of protected action over the company's 'lowball' pay offer. After six months of protracted negotiations, unions said the company has refused to improve the offer, which in some cases, would see pilots' remuneration hovering around the bare legal minimum and would entrench poor work-life balance. The pilots fly a significant amount of Australia Post's parcel freight overnight on 'back of the clock' flights and spend up to 260 hours away from home each month. Three unions, the Transport Workers Union (TWU), Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP) and Australian and International Pilots Association, have filed protected action ballots for the first time. Pilots undertaking the low-level action will stop work on days off and not complete work before a scheduled shift, as the unions set the runway for escalating action if Qantas doesn't come back with a better offer. The TWU and AFAP are calling for a pay increase to match industry standards, as well as improvements to roster protections and additional days off to improve work-life balance. Qantas have put contingency plans in place, with the majority of freight moved in the belly of its passenger planes not affected by this action, and they don't expect any impact on operations. 'We're bargaining in good faith for a new agreement and have put forward a proposal that includes significant pay increases and lifestyle improvements for our freighter pilots,' a spokeswoman said. 'It's disappointing that the unions have taken this step instead of continuing discussions.' Workers are struggling with poor rostering, declining conditions, and contracts going to the cheapest bidder across the Qantas supply chain, TWU National Secretary Michael Kaine said. 'Industrial action is always a last resort, but once again we've seen Qantas come to the bargaining table seeking to lowball its workers instead of give them a fair offer,' he said. 'We need to stop seeing workers treated as a cost to be lowered rather than an investment.' AFAP's executive director Simon Lutton said the pilots had no other choice than to take action. 'When compared to equivalent pilots, the offer made by Qantas to its Express Freighters pilots represents the lowest terms and conditions on virtually every metric,' Mr Lutton said. In February, Qantas posted $1.39 billion in profits before tax in its half-yearly results.

Federal court orders Sydney Muslim cleric to remove ‘racist and antisemitic' lectures from social media
Federal court orders Sydney Muslim cleric to remove ‘racist and antisemitic' lectures from social media

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Federal court orders Sydney Muslim cleric to remove ‘racist and antisemitic' lectures from social media

A Sydney Muslim cleric has been ordered by the federal court to take down a series of 'fundamentally racist and antisemitic' speeches posted online, and instructed by a judge not to make similar addresses again. Wissam Haddad – whose legal first name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd – has been successfully sued by two senior members of Australia's peak Jewish body, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), over a series of lectures he gave at the Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown in November 2023 – subsequently broadcast online – in which, the court found, he maligned Jewish people. On Tuesday, Justice Stewart found Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'The court has found that the series of lectures, titled 'The Jews of Al Madina', conveys disparaging imputations against Jewish people that, in all the circumstances, were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jews in Australia. 'The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and antisemitic; they make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group.' In his speeches, Haddad quoted and offered interpretation of ayat from the Qur'an and hadith, and described Jewish people as 'mischievous', 'treacherous' and 'vile'. His defence told the court the speeches concerned historical writings about Jewish people in Medina in the 7th century CE, at the time of the prophet Muhammad. His defence also argued the lectures were given for an educational purpose, and that they could not be found to have breached section 18C because they were not public, but rather addressed to a private Muslim audience. But the complainants told court Haddad used 'overtly dehumanising' language about Jewish people and that he revelled in being 'deliberately provocative and inflammatory'. The court heard the speeches were made in the knowledge they would be broadcast online, with microphones and cameras set up to record them. Peter Wertheim, one of the claimants in the case and ECAJ co-chief executive, gave evidence that Haddad's speeches 'making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards … are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising'. Justice Stewart said Jewish people in Australia would have found Haddad's lecture 'harassing and intimidating' and said the context of the speeches' delivery – as conflict raged in Gaza – had exacerbated their impact. 'The lectures were delivered at a time of heightened vulnerability and fragility experienced by Jews in Australia following the attack by Hamas on 7 October 2023, Israel's bombardment and blockade of Gaza in response, and resultant solidarity protests and other actions in Australia.' In his judgment, Justice Stewart pointedly stated that criticism of Israel, or of the actions of the Israel Defense Forces, was not inherently antisemitic. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature, criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity. 'The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other.' The court rejected two constitutional arguments made by Haddad: that part 2A of the Racial Discrimination Act (including section 18C) was beyond the power of the parliament to legislate because it conflicted with the implied freedom of political communication; or that it contravened section 116 of the constitution as a law 'prohibiting the free exercise of any religion'. The court ordered Haddad to remove the speeches from the internet, and not to make similar public addresses in future. Lawyers for both sides will address the court on the manner and wording of any 'corrective notice' required to be published. Wertheim, and co-claimant Robert Goot, did not seek damages. The court has ordered Haddad to pay the claimants' costs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store