Plans for Glasgow O2 ABC recommended despite 'negative impact'
This is despite the planning document admitting that the plans have a 'significant issue of the negative impact on the Conservation Area'.
The document also states that 'the scale of the proposed development would overall not be considered to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of Listed Buildings and the Conservation Area'.
But, the recommendation concludes that 'this negative impact is considered to be outweighed by the significantly positive impact of developing this site'.
The document details plans for a mixed-use student accommodation and hospitality site.
Over eight floors - including a basement - House of Social would include student accommodation, as well as a food hall, a public courtyard, a bar, a gym and more.
New images illustrating proposals for the site of the former ABC music venue building on Sauchiehall Street were unveiled today:
New O2 ABC plan concepts revealed today (Image: Vita Group) (Image: Vita Group) READ MORE: Pictures show how new plan for Glasgow's O2 ABC will look
If successful, the proposed Vita development, featuring their House of Social brand, will bring around £70million investment to Sauchiehall Street.
The ground-floor food hall would provide space for five emerging food brands, with over 400 covers and a large bar.
Moving from day into night, the food hall would become an events space featuring music, entertainment, and a community hub.
The student accommodation would feature 356 bed spaces, comprising 306 four, five, and six-bedroom 'houses' with a shared kitchen and lounge and 50 studio spaces. It would also feature a fitness centre, social and study spaces, café-style lounges, and cycle storage.
(Image: Vita Group) (Image: Vita Group) READ MORE: Historic Glasgow venue is an 'eyesore' say furious locals
James Rooke, Planning Director for Vita Group, who has successfully created other new sites in Glasgow, said: 'We believe our proposals offer a unique approach to student living and the benefits the development will bring extend far beyond the student community.
"It will generate significant economic benefits, will help to reenergise Sauchiehall Street and contribute to the city's Golden Z ambitions.
'This is an incredibly challenging site to redevelop, and we've worked hard to create proposals that are deliverable and appropriate.'
Plans for Glasgow O2 ABC recommended despite 'negative impact' (Image: Supplied)
The proposals have the support of a wide range of stakeholders, including local businesses and the Chamber of Commerce.
Stuart Patrick, Chief Executive of the Chamber has welcomed the plans and said, 'It is critical that this key site is brought forward for development as soon as possible.
"There's no doubt it's been a blight on Sauchiehall Street, and we need to secure this much-needed investment, which would be transformational.'
The Glasgow Times previously reported that locals branded the historic Glasgow music venue an 'eyesore'.
The half-demolished O2 ABC site has been dormant for months after initial demolition works were completed at the end of last year.
READ MORE: No answer for Glasgow residents over rats at the O2 ABC
O2 ABC site branded an 'eyesore' (Image: Newsquest/Colin Mearns) The former cinema turned nightclub had lain derelict since the second Glasgow School of Art fire spilt over onto its roof in July 2018.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
7 hours ago
- NBC News
Some community college students could lose their financial lifeline under the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Hundreds of thousands of community college students are at risk of losing financial assistance under the proposed ' Big Beautiful Bill,' which would tighten eligibility requirements for Pell Grants. Students would be required to enroll full time to maintain eligibility for the federally subsidized grants that serve as a financial lifeline for many low- to middle-income students. The bill would increase the number of credit hours students must take each semester from 12 to 15 and could strain those who work, parent, suffer financial distress or otherwise find it difficult to increase their course loads, according to the American Association of Community Colleges. More than 10 million people are enrolled in community colleges across the United States. Students who attend four-year colleges can also apply for Pell Grants, but community colleges are often a gateway into the higher education pipeline for low- to middle-income students. 'I don't have any other options,' said Lakina Mabins, 41, a mother of five who worked two jobs before becoming valedictorian last month at Kennedy King College in Chicago. 'I couldn't take out a loan if I wanted to because you have to have good credit.' Students can receive between $740 and $7,395 a year from the Pell Grant program, according to the the American Association of Community Colleges. It costs $4,050 a year on average to attend a community college, while the average four-year, in-state tuition at a public university is $11,610 a year, the association said. Tighter restrictions for Pell Grant eligibility are part of a sweeping congressional budget bill advanced by Republicans and aimed at cutting taxes and government spending. House Republicans approved their version of the bill in May, and it's now being considered by the Senate. Student Maria Baez, who attends the Community College of Philadelphia, said she would likely have to drop out of school if the bill becomes law because she would not be able to afford it. She said she received about $3,600 through the Pell Grant program last semester. 'I don't even have a backup plan,' said Baez, 41, who wants to own a small marketing business one day. 'But I want so badly to further my education so that I can have a career.' Hundreds of thousands of students could be at risk of losing their grants if the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is approved, said Martha Parham, a spokeswoman for the American Association of Community Colleges. Many students are unable to attend college full time because they have other responsibilities, she said. 'Community colleges are the on-ramp to the middle class,' Parham said, but costs can pose a strong barrier. The first grants were awarded in 1973; the program was later named for the late Sen. Claiborne Pell, D-R.I. The Big Beautiful Bill would also do away with subsidized federal loans, which would force college borrowers to accumulate more debt. 'It's going to be extremely hard for people to get out of debt with these changes,' Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, an organization that helps people fight debt, told CNBC. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which is playing a key role in drafting the Senate's version of the bill, was unavailable for comment this week, his office said. Cassidy has said the entire Big Beautiful Bill would save an estimated $300 billion in government spending and lift the burden on taxpayers who subsidize college graduates' loan payments. But student Michael Weaver, 34, who attends Stanly Community College in Albemarle, North Carolina, on a Pell Grant, said part of the appeal of attending a two-year college is to take courses at your own pace. 'It's a bit of a stretch for most students, and to be honest, the majority of students receiving the grant are working people who only have the option of attending school part time,' Weaver said. Mabins, who plans to attend National Louis University in downtown Chicago this fall, considers herself a low-income student because she lives in public housing and is enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps. 'The government wants me off assistance, but they are creating more debt and making it harder for me to better myself,' she said. 'I have goals, and in the next five years, I see myself with a master's degree and working in my career field.'
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump hedges on deadline for mega tax bill to pass Congress
Trump has pressed Senate Republicans to stay on his ambitious timeline to complete their work by July 4 and get the measure to his desk for signature into law. But the president also acknowledged his ambitions might not become reality amid deep internal GOP policy disputes and complex Senate rules that have sent the mega bill through the legislative shredder. More: GOP senators negotiate Trump budget bill in hopes of improving its polling Among the many concerns Republicans are still trying to work through are their own proposed cuts for Medicaid eligibility, which Democrats already see as a winning political message for them in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections where they're looking to retake majorities in both the House and Senate. Trump has said previously he wants Congress to pass the sweeping bill and get it to his desk by Independence Day. But for that to happen the Senate still needs to finalize and pass its version, before then sending it back to the GOP-led House to reconcile any differences with their efforts that previously won approval with the slimmest of majorities in May. As the Senate continues to grapple with concerns including the legislation's high cost and the Medicaid language, Trump is hedging his own deadline. "It's important," but, "it's not the end-all," Trump told reporters on June 27. "We'd like to get it done by that time, if possible," Trump said. Further complications have come in the form of Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough's ruling on what is and is not within the scope of a spending bill. MacDonough, a nonpartisan official, found several Senate Republicans' provisions in violation, including attempts to repeal federal food aid for noncitizens, multiple measures softening environmental regulations and deregulation for gun silencers. "The parliamentarian's been a little difficult," Trump said. "I would say that I disagree with the parliamentarian on some things, and on other ways, she's been fine." Trump did not go so far as to call for her termination, though, unlike some Republicans on Capitol Hill. The president is instead laying the groundwork to pin the blame on his congressional opponents. "The Democrats won't approve it only because politically it's so good for the Republicans," Trump said. "If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long," he added. Polling has shown Trump's bill is not scoring well with in public opinion. Fewer than 30% of voters support the bill in three recent surveys by Pew, Quinnipiac and the Washington Post-Ipsos. The bill is doubtful to get support from any Senate Democrat, but under special Senate rules, only 51 Republicans are needed to sign-off and avoid a filibuster.
NBC News
21 hours ago
- NBC News
Senate Republicans eye weekend votes on Trump's massive bill as tensions run high
WASHINGTON — Senate Republican leaders are hoping to start voting on their massive domestic policy bill on Saturday, even as major pieces of it have yet to be finalized. GOP senators held a lengthy lunch meeting Friday with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, as the process grows messy and acrimonious with a host of conflicting demands persisting within the party. Still, Republican leaders put members on notice that Senate votes were imminent. 'My expectation is: At some point tomorrow we'll be ready to go,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said after the Friday meeting, although he wouldn't say whether he has the 51 votes needed to begin debate. 'We'll find out tomorrow,' Thune said, as Republicans race toward a self-imposed July 4 deadline to send the bill to President Donald Trump's desk. While senators have been told to be prepared for the first vote on Saturday at noon, Thune conceded that timing is "aspirational.' Some senators complained that they hadn't seen the text of the bill they're being asked to vote on, with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., predicting that it may not come out until "right before" the vote. Others have vented about a host of provisions invalidated by the Senate parliamentarian as failing to comply with the chamber's budget rules for bypassing the 60-vote threshold — including spending cuts to Medicaid and Obamacare and immigration-related provisions. If the motion to proceed passes, that would trigger up to 20 hours of debate on the bill before a process where senators can offer unlimited amendments, known as a "vote-a-rama," before a final vote. Bessent told reporters Friday that Republicans are "very, very close" to agreement on how to resolve one of the big sticking points of the package: the state and local tax deduction cap. The emerging plan is to impose a $40,000 "SALT" cap for just five years, instead of the 10 years in the House-passed legislation, according to Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D. That would lower the sticker price of the legislation as Republicans scramble to find ways to limit red ink. "We're getting really close to landing the plane," said Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., who has been helping to negotiate a SALT deal between the White House, senators and House Republicans from high-tax blue states. There also will be a fund to mitigate the pain of the bill's Medicaid cuts for rural hospitals, senators said, though the size of it remained unclear. It's expected to be larger than a proposed $15 billion. Mullin said it was helpful to have Republican senators, Johnson and Bessent all in one room as they tried to hammer out unresolved issues. "Having the speaker, having the secretary here, and having Thune in the room really put the leaders there to make the decisions and clarify a lot of things for us," said Mullin, who also spent time with Trump at the White House Thursday night. "The president has been extremely accessible," he added. "Anybody that needed to call him could get ahold of him. He's been fully engaged." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., slammed Republicans' plans to 'jam it through' as early as this weekend, while citing recent polling data that shows the emerging bill is unpopular. 'Americans hate this bill,' Schumer told reporters on Friday afternoon. "It steals their Medicaid. It jacks up their premiums. It takes away their jobs and gives trillions away to billionaires and special interests. So, of course Republicans are scrambling and rushing. They know their bill is terrible.' Dubbed by Trump as the 'one big, beautiful bill,' the sweeping package would extend the president's expiring tax cuts passed in 2017, and it includes an infusion of money to expand the military, beef up border security and carry out his mass deportation plans. It would also fulfill two of Trump's campaign promises: eliminating taxes on tips and overtime work. The version of the bill the House passed in May is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. If the Senate passes the bill, it will need to go back through the House before Trump can sign it into law. Trump contradicted himself on Friday about the July 4 deadline for passage. During a press conference, he said that Independence Day was "not the end all" for the bill. But just hours later, Trump took to Truth Social and clarified he wanted it done by next week. "The Great Republicans in the U.S. Senate are working all weekend to finish our 'ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,'" Trump wrote. "The House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th — We can get it done." Leaving the Senate lunch, Johnson said Republicans were getting "very close to a final product." Asked if the July 4 deadline was still doable, Johnson replied: "I believe so." Some senators were more certain of meeting Trump's deadline. 'We're going to move forward. We're going to pass this bill before July the 4th. We're going to get it to President Trump's desk," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who is close to Trump. "I've never been more confident of the bill passing than right now.'
