Republican Senate tax bill would add $3.3 trillion to the US debt load, CBO says
The changes made to President Donald Trump's big tax bill in the Senate would pile trillions onto the nation's debt load while resulting in even steeper losses in health care coverage, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a new analysis, adding to the challenges for Republicans as they try to muscle the bill to passage.
The CBO estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034–a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill, which CBO has projected would add $2.4 trillion to the debt over a decade. The analysis also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, an increase over the scoring for the House-passed version of the bill, which predicts 10.9 million more people would be without health coverage.
The stark numbers are yet another obstacle for Republican leaders as they labor to pass Trump's bill by his self-imposed July 4th deadline. Even before the CBO's estimate, Republicans were at odds over the contours of the legislation, with some resisting the cost-saving proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid and food aid programs even as other Republicans say those proposals don't go far enough. Republicans are slashing the programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks put in place during his first term.
The push-pull was on vivid display Saturday night as a routine procedural vote to take up the legislation in the Senate was held open for hours as Vice President JD Vance and Republican leaders met with several holdouts. The bill ultimately advanced in a 51–49 vote, but the path ahead is fraught with voting on amendments still to come.
Still, many Republicans are disputing the CBO estimates and the reliability of the office's work. To hoist the bill to passage, they are using a different budget baseline that assumes the Trump tax cuts expiring in December have already been extended, essentially making them cost-free in the budget. The CBO on Saturday released a separate analysis of the GOP's preferred approach that found the Senate bill would reduce deficits by about $500 billion.
Democrats and economists decry the GOP's approach as 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. In addition, Democrats note that under the traditional scoring system the Republican bill would violate the Senate's Byrd Rule that forbids the legislation from increasing deficits after 10 years.
In a Sunday letter to Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, CBO Director Phillip Swagel said the office estimates that the Finance Committee's portion of the bill, also known as Title VII, increases the deficits in years after 2034 under traditional scoring.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
26 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Kremlin, asked about US sanctions bill, suggests it would impact Ukraine peace efforts
The Kremlin said on Monday that it had taken note of comments made by US Senator Lindsey Graham who is sponsoring a tough new sanctions bill on Russia and that its backers should consider its impact on efforts to reach a peace deal on Ukraine. Graham said in an interview with ABC News on Sunday that President Donald Trump had told him that the sanctions bill - which would impose 500 percent tariffs on countries like China and India that buy Russian oil - should be brought forward for a vote. Graham called Trump's decision 'a big breakthrough' which he said was part of efforts to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table on Ukraine and give Trump 'a tool' to bring that about. He stressed however that Trump had a waiver and could decide whether or not to sign it into law if and when it passes Congress. Asked about Graham's comments, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday that Russia was aware of the US senator's stance and had taken note of his statement. 'The senator's views are well known to us, they are well known to the whole world. He belongs to a group of inveterate Russophobes. If it were up to him, these sanctions would have been imposed long ago,' said Peskov. 'Would that have helped the (Ukraine) settlement (process)? That is a question that those who initiate such events should ask themselves.'
Al Arabiya
41 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
EPA Employees Put Names to 'Declaration of Dissent' Over Agency Moves Under Trump
A group of Environmental Protection Agency employees on Monday published a declaration of dissent from the agency's policies under the Trump administration, saying they undermine the EPA's mission of protecting human health and the environment. More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. The latter figure includes over 70 Nobel laureates. The letter represents rare public criticism from agency employees who could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental, and health science. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move earlier in June. 'Since the agency's founding in 1970, EPA has accomplished (its) mission by leveraging science, funding, and expert staff in service to the American people. Today we stand together in dissent against the current administration's focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise,' the letter read. Agency spokespeople did not immediately respond Monday to messages seeking comment. Employees want the EPA to get back to its mission. 'I'm really sad. This agency that was a superhero for me in my youth – we're not living up to our ideals under this administration. And I really want us to,' said Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who has been on administrative leave since February from the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights while the administration works to close down her department. Hertzberg's work focused on the most vulnerable groups impacted by pollution: pregnant and nursing people, young children and babies, the elderly, people with preexisting and chronic health conditions, and people living in communities exposed to higher levels of pollution. 'That wasn't supposed to be controversial, but it's become so in this political climate,' she said. 'Americans should be able to drink their water and breathe their air without being poisoned. And if they aren't, then our government is failing,' she said. Berg, who also directed the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH from 2003–2011, said the dissent isn't motivated by partisan criticism. He said the employees hope it will help the EPA get back to the mission for which it was established – which only matters if you breathe air and drink water. The letter outlines what the EPA employees see as five main concerns: undermining public trust, ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters, reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities, dismantling the Office of Research and Development, and promoting a culture of fear, forcing staff to choose between their livelihood and well-being. EPA has cut funding and rolled back federal regulations. Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos, and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash their budget and gut their study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an Associated Press examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. 'People are going to die,' said Carol Greider, a Nobel laureate and professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who also signed the letter. She described last week's East Coast heat wave as evidence of the ways people are feeling the effects of climate change. 'And if we don't have scientists at the EPA to understand how what we do that goes into the air affects our health, more people are going to die,' she added. Berg said the declarations of dissent from both the NIH and EPA employees are noteworthy because they represent scientists speaking out as their careers are on the line. Even non-agency employees have to consider whether the government will withdraw research funding. Greider, asked about fears of repercussions or retaliation, said she's living the repercussions of everything. She regularly meets with graduate students who are worried about pursuing scientific careers as labs lose funding. 'It's a long-term problem if we aren't supporting the next generation of scientists,' she said. 'That's decades worth of loss.'
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
The Latest: July Deadline for Trump's Tax and Spending Bill Approaches
Monday could be a pivotal day for Senate Republicans who are racing to meet President Donald Trump's Fourth of July deadline to pass legislation that contains big tax breaks and spending cuts. The House is being called back to session for votes as soon as Wednesday if the Senate can pass the bill. Meanwhile, Trump says he is not planning to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set would expire. Here's the latest: Senate Republicans sprint on Trump's big bill after a weekend of setbacks. The Senate will try to sprint ahead on President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts after a weekend of setbacks. An all-night session to consider an endless stream of proposed amendments–called a vote-a-rama–was abruptly postponed. It's now scheduled to launch when the Senate gavels open Monday. With Democrats united against the Republican president's legislation, the voting could take all day. The day ahead could be pivotal for Republicans who are racing to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline to pass the bill. The House is being called back to session for votes as soon as Wednesday if the Senate can pass the bill. Trump suggests no extension on tariff pause. Speaking to Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business, Trump reiterated his desire to send a 'very fair' letter to each country letting them know what their tariff rates will be. The president said, 'I don't think I'll need to extend the pause on higher tariffs,' which are supposed to take effect on July 9. He mused about what one of his letters could say. 'Dear Mr. Japan, here's the story: you're going to pay a twenty-five percent tariff on your cars,' he said. Congo's top diplomat tells AP she trusts US to uphold its part of peace deal. Congo's foreign minister dismisses skepticism about the Trump administration's mediation role in a peace deal for her mineral-rich country, telling the Associated Press she is confident the US will uphold its part of the deal. Therese Kayikwamba Wagner spoke to the AP after signing a deal with her Rwanda counterpart to end decades of bloody fighting in eastern Congo. The Trump administration agreed to use its influence to honor the press–both countries to honor the deal. In return, the US hopes for improved American access to east Congo's critical minerals. Some Congolese are skeptical. They fear the US will take the minerals without helping calm a conflict that has killed 6 million. 'The United States has been a reliable partner on many other issues that we have dealt with,' Wagner told the AP. 'So there is no doubt in this moment … when it comes to the credibility of the US as a partner, be it for a peace process where we have signed a very important agreement today or for investment from the US,' she said.
